National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish
Previous comment
Articles 1 (paragraph 1), 2 (paragraph 1), and 25, of the Convention. Trafficking in persons. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to provide information on the measures adopted or envisaged to combat trafficking in persons.
Legislative measures. Enforcement of effective penalties. The Committee noted previously that the Ministry of the Interior and Justice was preparing a Bill on trafficking in persons and it requested the Government to provide information on the progress made in relation to the Bill.
The Committee notes that, according to the Government’s report, the legal framework that is in force is composed of the constitutional provisions of article 54, under the terms of which “no one may be subjected to slavery or servitude. Trafficking in persons, and particularly in women, boys, girls and young persons in all its forms shall be subject to the penalties prescribed by law”. The Penal Code, although it does not refer explicitly to the crime of trafficking in persons, provides in section 4(10) and section 174 that any persons within or outside the country who take part in trafficking in slaves, reduction to slavery or a condition akin to slavery shall be punished with terms of imprisonment of from six to 12 years. The Committee also notes that under sections 15 and 16(11) of the Law against Organized Crime of 2005, trafficking in persons and migrant workers is considered to constitute the offence of organized crime. The prescribed penalty is from four to six years of imprisonment.
The Committee hopes that the Government will provide information on the number of denunciations and cases of trafficking in persons that have been investigated, the number of such cases that result in judicial proceedings under the provisions of the Penal Code and of the Law against Organized Crime, and provide copies of the respective court rulings with an indication of the penalties imposed. In this respect, the Committee reminds the Government of the requirement to ensure that the penalties imposed by law are really adequate and are strictly enforced.
Protection of victims. The protection of the victims of trafficking, and more generally the protection of witnesses, contributes to guaranteeing compliance with the law and the effective punishment of those responsible, as required by Article 25 of the Convention. The Committee notes that, in accordance with the Basic Act on the Office of the Attorney-General, units have been established to assist victims, which discharge the functions of assisting and guiding victims.
The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the operation of such units in relation to the provision of assistance to the victims of trafficking in persons. Considering the specific situation of victims of this crime, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures adopted or envisaged in relation to the possibility that victims who are illegally resident in the national territory may stay in the country and whether specific conditions and guarantees have been envisaged for this purpose.
Trafficking in persons for the exploitation of their labour. The Committee notes sections 53, 56 and 57 of the Act respecting foreign nationality and migration, which establish sentences of between four and eight years for any persons who employ men and women of foreign nationality whose status is illegal with a view to exploiting their labour under conditions which prejudice, suppress or restrict the labour rights that would have applied, and sentences of between eight and ten years in cases of the illegal trafficking in persons involving the use of violence, intimidation or deceit, or the abuse of a situation of need, the gender of the victim or vulnerable groups.
The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the application of the provisions referred to above, with an indication of the number of cases in which they have been applied, the investigations that have been conducted, the cases tried and the penalties imposed on those responsible.
Trafficking in persons
In its previous observations, the Committee noted the comments made by the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU), in which it referred to the “widely reported” trafficking of women and children for prostitution. The Committee noted the Government’s reply, in which it indicated that the ICFTU’s allegations were vague and referred to previous comments made in the context of the Convention. The Committee subsequently noted convergent information from United Nations institutions, namely: the conclusions of the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (document E/C.12/1/Add.56, paragraph 16, of 21 May 2001) in which the latter Committee expressed serious concern at the spread of child prostitution and the incapacity of the State party to resolve these problems; and the concluding observations of the United Nations Committee on Human Rights (document CCPR/CO/71/VEN, paragraph 16, of 26 April 2001), in which that Committee stated that it was deeply concerned “by the information on trafficking in women to Venezuela, especially from neighbouring countries, and by the lack of information […] on the extent of the problem and action to combat it”.
Despite the fact that the Government did not provide any information on this subject, the Committee noted the enactment of various provisions under the terms of which the trafficking in persons could be penalized (including the Basic Act on the Protection of Children and Young Persons of 2 October 1998, article 54 of the Constitution of 30 December 1999 and section 174 of the Penal Code of 20 October 2000) and it requested the Government to provide information on the effect given in practice to these provisions, on the number of prosecutions for trafficking and the penalties imposed.
The Committee expressed the hope that the Government would provide fuller information on the trafficking in humans in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and on the measures adopted to prevent and combat it. Furthermore, noting that the Government had not replied to the general observation of 2000, the Committee invited it to provide the information requested therein.
The Committee regrets to note that in its latest report the Government ignores the request for information made by the Committee in its individual observation relating to the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and in the general observation addressed to all governments, and that it repeats that the ICFTU’s comments are vague.
Nevertheless, despite the fact that the Government has not considered it necessary to reply to its request for information, the Committee notes the information contained on the web site of the Ministry of Communication and Information of the Government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela concerning the “important steps” that the Government has taken over the past year in its “extensive measures to combat trafficking in humans”, “to protect the victims, convict the traffickers and provide the police forces and public institutions with the tools to address the problem”.
According to the same government source:
– in September 2005, the National Assembly of Venezuela adopted the Basic Act against organized crime as a “legislative measure providing the police forces and government institutions with additional tools to combat the trafficking in humans and to impose longer prison sentences on convicted traffickers”;
– during the first quarter of 2006 a total of 52 victims of trafficking in humans were identified and assisted, constituting an increase of 98 per cent in relation to the same period the previous year;
– in 2005, a total of 21 individuals were convicted for involvement in the trafficking of humans and another three were under trial during the first quarter of 2006; and
– in 2006, the National Plan of Action to Prevent, Suppress, Penalize and Provide Global Assistance to Victims of the Trafficking in Persons was adopted, which calls for the participation of government ministries and bodies, NGOs and international cooperation organizations.
Legislation
The Committee notes section 16 of the Act against organized crime, under the terms of which the trafficking in persons and migrants is considered to be an offence in relation to organized crime. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the provisions applicable to cases in which the trafficking in persons is not committed by organized crime.
The Committee notes that, according to the information contained on the web site of the Ministry of Communication and Information of the Government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, the Ministry of the Interior and Justice will submit a Bill on the trafficking in persons. The Committee hopes that the Government will provide information on developments relating to the Bill and that it will provide a copy of the Act once it has been adopted.
Penalties
The Committee recalls that, under the terms of Article 25 of the Convention, the illegal exaction of forced or compulsory labour shall be punishable as a penal offence, and it shall be an obligation on any Member ratifying the Convention to ensure that the penalties imposed by law are really adequate and are strictly enforced.
The Committee hopes that the Government will provide information on current legal proceedings, the provisions of the national legislation under which legal proceedings have been initiated against those responsible and that it will indicate the penalties that are applied.
Other measures: Protection of victims
The Committee notes that one of the objectives of the National Plan of Action is the formulation of a Protocol to protect and assist victims. The Committee hopes that the Government will provide a copy of the National Plan of Action and the Protocol.
The Committee notes the series of measures that have been adopted and hopes that in future the Government will provide information on any other measures adopted or envisaged to combat the trafficking in persons and to ensure compliance with the Convention.
The Committee notes the comments of 21 November 2002 by the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) which were sent to the Government on 3 January 2003 so that it might make any comments it deemed fit.
The ICFTU referred in its comments to "widely reported" trafficking of women and children for the purpose of prostitution. The Committee notes that in its response the Government states that the ICFTU’s allegations are vague and refers to previous comments made in the context of the Convention.
The Committee notes the conclusions of the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (E/C.12/Add.56, 21 May 2001, paragraph 16) in which the abovementioned committee expressed serious concern at the spread of child prostitution and the incapacity of the State party to resolve these problems.
The Committee also notes the concluding observations by the United Nations Committee on Human Rights (CCPR/CO/71/VEN, 26 April 2001, paragraph 16) in which the abovementioned committee stated that it was deeply concerned "by the information on trafficking in women to Venezuela, especially from neighbouring countries, and by the lack of information … on the extent of the problem and action to combat it."
The Committee hopes that the Government will provide fuller information on human trafficking, particularly trafficking in children, in Venezuela and on the measures taken to prevent and combat it. Noting that the Government has not responded to the general observation of 2000, the Committee invites it to provide the information requested therein.
The Committee recalls in this connection that according to Article 25 of the Convention, the illegal exaction of forced or compulsory labour shall be punishable as a penal offence, and any Member ratifying the Convention must ensure that the penalties imposed by law are really adequate and strictly enforced. The Committee notes that a number of provisions have recently been promulgated to allow human trafficking to be punished (inter alia the Basic Act on the Protection of Children and Young Persons, 2 October 1998, article 54 of the Constitution, 30 December 1999, and section 174 of the Penal Code, 20 October 2000). The Committee asks the Government to provide information on the effect given in practice to the abovementioned provisions and on the number of prosecutions for trafficking and the penalties imposed.
With reference to its previous comments concerning the provisions of the Act of 1956 relating to vagrants and rogues, which empowered the administrative authorities to order internment in a rehabilitation and labour establishment, an agricultural reformatory colony or a work camp, in order to reform vagrants and rogues or to put them out of harm's way, the Committee notes with satisfaction that in the ruling passed on 14 October 1997, the Supreme Court of Justice declared the Act in question to be null and void since it was unconstitutional.
Article 2, paragraph 2(c), of the Convention. In its previous comments, the Committee referred to sections 17, 21 and 23 of the Act of 1956 relating to vagrants and rogues, which empowers the administrative authorities to order internment in a rehabilitation and labour establishment, an agricultural reformatory colony or a work camp, in order to reform vagrants and rogues or to put them out of harm's way. The Committee pointed out that, in accordance with the Convention, work can be exacted from a person only as a consequence of a conviction in a court of law. It requested information on the number of persons who, during a three-year period, had been the subject of such measures, the duration of the measures and the establishments in which those concerned had been detained.
The Committee also requested the Government to take the necessary measures to introduce a more restrictive definition of vagrancy into sections 1 and 2(a) of the above-mentioned Act, since laws which define vagrancy and similar offences in an unduly extensive manner are liable to become, directly or indirectly, a means of compulsion to work, in violation of the Convention.
The Committee noted in its 1994 observation the information supplied by the Government to the effect that, under the above-mentioned provisions, security measures were applied to 476 persons in 1990, 560 persons in 1991 and 911 persons in 1992 and that they were for a duration of between 30 and 36 months.
Despite the fact that the above figures show a tendency for the application of such measures to increase, the Committee noted with interest from the information supplied by the Government that, although the Act relating to vagrants and rogues, which is intended to cover potentially dangerous situations in which no crime has been committed and which allows the jurisdiction of the courts to be transferred to the administrative authorities, has not yet been repealed, there are currently two petitions for the above Act to be declared unconstitutional, the texts of which were supplied by the Government. The Government adds that a draft Code of Sanctions has been submitted to Congress to determine competence for the imposition of sanctions, which would repeal the Act relating to vagrants and rogues.
The Committee notes that the Government states in its latest report that, to date, no decision has been given on the drafts mentioned and that it has requested information from the Supreme Court concerning the petition for the Act respecting vagrants and rogues to be declared unconstitutional; the information will be supplied as soon as it is available.
The Committee recalls that this matter has been the subject of comments for many years and hopes that, in its next report, the Government will be able to state that the provisions of sections 17, 21 and 23 of the Act of 1956 relating to vagrants and rogues has been repealed, thus ensuring compliance with the Convention in this respect.
The Committee notes the Government's detailed report.
Article 2, paragraph 2(c). In its previous comments, the Committee referred to sections 17, 21 and 23 of the Act of 1956 respecting vagrants and rogues, which empowers the administrative authorities to order internment in a rehabilitation and labour establishment, an agricultural reformatory colony or a work camp, to reform vagrants and rogues or to put them out of harm's way. The Committee pointed out that, in accordance with the Convention, work can only be exacted from a person as a consequence of a conviction in a court of law. It requested information on the number of persons who, during a three-year period, had been the subject of such measures, the duration of the measures and the establishments in which those concerned had been detained.
The Committee also requested the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure a more restrictive definition of vagrancy in sections 1 and 2(a) of the above Act, since laws which define vagrancy and similar offences in an unduly extensive manner are liable to become, directly or indirectly, a means of compulsion to work, in violation of the Convention.
The Committee notes the information supplied by the Government in its report to the effect that, under the above provisions, security measures were applied to 476 persons in 1990, 560 persons in 1991 and 911 persons in 1992 and that they were for a duration of between 30 and 36 months.
Despite the fact that the above figures show a tendency for the application of such measures to increase, the Committee notes with interest from the information supplied by the Government that, although the Act respecting vagrants and rogues (which is intended to cover potentially dangerous situations in which no crime has been committed and which allows the jurisdiction of the courts to be transferred to the administrative authorities) has not yet been repealed, there are currently two petitions for the above Act to be declared unconstitutional, the texts of which were supplied by the Government. The Government adds that a draft Code of Sanctions has been submitted to Congress to determine competence for the imposition of sanctions, which would repeal the Act respecting vagrants and rogues.
The Committee hopes that in its next report the Government will be able to state that the above provisions have been repealed, thereby ensuring observance of the Convention on this point.
The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the following matters raised in its previous direct request:
In its previous direct request, the Committee noted that, under the Act concerning the National Armed Forces, the functions of the armed forces include that of participating in the full development of the country and military service (section 8(d) and (e)). The Committee requested the Government to provide detailed information on the duties carried out in practice by conscripts.
The Committee noted that the information requested was not communicated by the Government. It again expresses the hope that it will be provided in the next report.
The Committee notes that no report has been received from the Government. It must therefore repeat its previous observation on the following matters:
1. Article 2, paragraph 2(c), of the Convention. The Committee has been referring for some years to sections 17, 21 and 23 of the Act of 1956, respecting vagrants and rogues, which empowers the administrative authorities to order internment in an establishment of rehabilitation and labour, an agricultural reformatory colony or a work camp, to reform vagrants and rogues or to put them out of harm's way. The Committee noted the information provided by the Government on various occasions since 1970, to the effect that the Congress of the Republic is studying a draft text to reform the Penal Code, section 113 which provides that security measures may be imposed only by the judicial authorities. The Committee asked for detailed information on the number of persons who had been the subject, during the past three years, of security measures involving the obligation to work, the duration of these measures and the establishments in which those concerned had been detained. The Committee noted that, according to the Government's report for the period ending 30 June 1989, no further progress had been made in the revision of the Penal Code, and that the report did not contain the information requested concerning the application, in practice, of the provisions in question. The Committee had expressed the hope that the Act respecting vagrants and rogues would be amended in the near future to ensure that the administrative authorities may not impose sanctions involving the obligation to work, thereby securing compliance with the Convention on this point. 2. The Committee has observed in previous comments that the Act concerning vagrants and rogues defines as vagrants, liable to be subjected to security measures, those persons, in particular, who habitually and unwarrantedly abstain from carrying on a lawful occupation or trade and are therefore a threat to society (sections 1 and 2(a)). The Committee has indicated that laws defining vagrancy and similar offences in an unduly extensive manner are liable to become, directly or indirectly, a means of compulsion to work, in violation of the Convention. The Committee requested the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure a more restrictive definition of vagrancy in the Act concerning vagrants and rogues, so that penalities for vagrancy can be imposed only on those who, in addition to abstaining habitually from work, disturb the public order by begging, failing to support their dependents, or engaging in any specific illegal action in addition to abstaining from work, and that it will report on progress made in this regard.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.
The Committee notes that the information requested is not contained in the Government's report and hopes that it will be provided in the next report.
The Committee notes the Government's report.
1. Article 2, paragraph 2(c), of the Convention. The Committee has been referring for some years to sections 17, 21 and 23 of the Act of 1956, respecting vagrants and rogues, which empowers the administrative authorities to order internment in an establishment of rehabilitation and labour, an agricultural reformatory colony or a work camp, to reform vagrants and rogues or to put them out of harm's way. The Committee noted the information provided by the Government on various occasions since 1970, to the effect that the Congress of the Republic is studying a draft text to reform the Penal Code, section 113 which provides that security measures may be imposed only by the judicial authorities. The Committee asked for detailed information on the number of persons who had been the subject, during the past three years, of security measures involving the obligation to work, the duration of these measures and the establishments in which those concerned had been detained.
The Committee notes that, according to the Government's report, no further progress has been made in the revision of the Penal Code, and that the report does not contain the information requested concerning the application, in practice, of the provisions in question.
The Committee trusts that the Act respecting vagrants and rogues will be amended in the near future to ensure that the administrative authorities may not impose sanctions involving the obligation to work, thereby securing compliance with the Convention on this point.
2. The Committee has observed in previous comments that the Act concerning vagrants and rogues defines as vagrants, liable to be subjected to security measures, those persons, in particular, who habitually and unwarrantedly abstain from carrying on a lawful occupation or trade and are therefore a threat to society (sections 1 and 2(a)). The Committee has indicated that laws defining vagrancy and similar offences in an unduly extensive manner are liable to become, directly or indirectly, a means of compulsion to work, in violation of the Convention.
The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure a more restrictive definition of vagrancy in the Act concerning vagrants and rogues, so that penalities for vagrancy can be imposed only on those who, in addition to abstaining habitually from work, disturb the public order by begging, failing to support their dependents, or engaging in any specific illegal action in addition to abstaining from work, and that it will report on progress made in this regard.