National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish
Repetition Article 1(b) of the Convention. Imposition of forced labour as a method of mobilizing and using labour for the purposes of economic development. In its previous comments, the Committee emphasized that national service, as established in Ordinance No. 78-002 of 16 February 1978 setting forth the general principles of national service, is incompatible with Article 1(b) of the Convention. Under the terms of section 2 of the Ordinance, all Malagasies are bound by the duty of national service defined as compulsory participation in national defence and in the economic and social development of the country. This compulsory service, which requires citizens to be engaged in defence or development work, involves citizens of both sexes for a maximum period of two years and may be carried out up to the age of 35. The Committee requested the Government to take the necessary measures to bring its legislation into conformity with the Convention. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that, after the processes of registration and review, young national service conscripts have to carry out their service by choosing between two options: (i) being excused for family reasons, in which case conscription is cancelled or deferred for one year, depending on the circumstances; or (ii) continuing vocational training through Action for Development Military Service (SMAD). The objective of the SMAD is therefore to facilitate the integration into active life of young Malagasies who volunteer for national service. The SMAD is established on a voluntary basis for young persons, and the duration of the training is set at 24 months, following which the volunteers are released from their statutory service obligations. These young persons choose between training for rural or urban trades. The Committee once again recalls that programmes involving the compulsory participation of young persons in the context of military service or, instead of such service, in work for the development of their country, are incompatible with Article 1(b) of the Convention, which prohibits the use of compulsory national service as a method of mobilizing labour for the purposes of economic development. It observes that the Ordinance of 1978 provides that all Malagasies are covered by the duty of national service, defined as compulsory participation in national defence and in the economic and social development of the country. The Committee firmly requests the Government to take the necessary measures to bring Ordinance No. 78-002 of 16 February 1978 into conformity with the Convention by guaranteeing that compulsory national service is not used as a method of mobilizing labour for the purposes of economic development. In the meantime, the Committee requests the Government to specify the relationship between the service obligations envisaged in the framework of compulsory national service, as set out in the Ordinance of 1978, and participation in SMAD. The Committee further requests the Government to indicate the practical modalities for the implementation of the SMAD and whether young persons who have chosen the SMAD can cancel the training on their own initiative. Finally, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the number of cancellations registered and their consequences.
The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in its first report on the application of the Convention.
Article 1(b) of the Convention. Imposition of forced labour as a method of mobilizing and using labour for purposes of economic development. The Committee notes that, under section 2 of Ordinance No. 78-002 of 16 February 1978 setting forth general principles of national service, all Malagasies are bound by the duty of national service defined as compulsory participation in national defence and in the economic and social development of the country. This compulsory service, which puts citizens at the effective service of the defence or of development, concerns both citizens of both sexes for a maximum period of two years and may be carried out up to the age of 35. This obligation is carried out in the armed forces, outside the armed forces, or partly in the armed forces and partly outside the armed forces.
The Committee draws the Government’s attention to the fact that programmes involving the compulsory participation of young persons in the context of military service and, instead of such service, in activities for the development of their country have been considered incompatible with Article 1(b) of the Convention, which does not allow compulsory national service to be used as a method of mobilizing and using labour for purposes of economic development. Moreover, the above provisions of the national legislation are also contrary to Article 2(2)(a) of the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29), which has also been ratified by Madagascar. The Committee notes in this respect that, in the context of the application of Convention No. 29, the Government indicated that Ordinance No. 78-002 could be considered obsolete and that its revision could be envisaged.
The Committee hopes that the Government will take all the necessary measures to bring the national legislation on compulsory national service into conformity with the Convention.
Article 1(c). Imposition of forced labour as a means of labour discipline. The Committee notes that section 168 of the Labour Code (Act No. 2003-044 of 28 July 2004) provides that, through internal rules, “the employer shall establish the general and permanent rules respecting the technical organization of the establishment and general discipline, determining the nature and extent of the penalties which may be imposed … ”. Section 170 specifies that an order made by the minister responsible for labour shall determine the minimum content of internal rules and the applicable sanctions. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide a copy of the ministerial order referred to in section 170 of the Labour Code, so that it could examine the nature of disciplinary measures that may be imposed on employees.