Seamen's Articles of Agreement Convention, 1926 (No. 22) - Iraq (RATIFICATION: 1966)

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes the Government’s reports on Conventions Nos 22, 23, 92, 146 and 147. In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of these maritime Conventions, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine them in a single comment, as set out below.

The Committee recalls that, in the framework of the Standards Review Mechanism, the ILO Governing Body, as recommended by the Special Tripartite Committee on the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, as amended (MLC, 2006) classified Conventions Nos 22, 23, 92, 146 and 147 as “outdated”. At its 343rd Session (November 2021), the Governing Body placed an item on the agenda of the 118th Session (2030) of the International Labour Conference concerning the abrogation of Conventions Nos 22, 23, 92 and 146 and requested the Office to launch an initiative to promote the ratification on a priority basis of the MLC, 2006 among the countries still bound by Conventions Nos 22, 23, 92, 146 and 147. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that it is in favour of ratifying the MLC, 2006 and that several meetings were held on issues relating to this process with the participation of the General Federation of Workers’ Unions in Iraq and the Iraqi Federation of Industries. The Committee therefore requests the Government to provide information on any progress made towards the ratification of the MLC, 2006 and reminds it of the possibility to avail itself of the technical assistance of the Office.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Committee notes with  deep concern  the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the protection of seafarers’ rights as laid out in the Conventions.  In this regard, the Committee refers to the resolution adopted by the Governing Body in its 340th Session (GB.340/Resolution) concerning maritime labour issues and COVID-19 disease, which calls on Member States to take measures to address the adverse impacts of the pandemic on seafarers’ rights and requests the Government to provide information in its next report on any temporary measures adopted in this regard, their duration and their impact on seafarers’ rights.

Seamen’s Articles of Agreement Convention, 1926 (No. 22)

Articles 3–14 of the Convention. Seafarers’ employment agreements and record of employment. The Committee requested the Government to indicate the measures adopted to give effect to these requirements of the Convention. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is a signed agreement between the State Company for Maritime Transport and the seafarers working on board its ships providing seafarers with decent working and living conditions on board ship and giving full effect to the Convention. While noting this information, the Committee requests the Government to clarify whether the Maritime Civil Service Act of 1975 is still in force, thereby giving to seafarers the status of public employees engaged on a permanent basis. It further requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions that ensure compliance with the different Articles of the Convention for all seafarers working on board its ships.

Repatriation of Seamen Convention, 1926 (No. 23)

Article 5. Repatriation expenses. The Committee requested the Government to specify the laws and regulations implementing Article 5 of the Convention ensuring that the repatriation expenses are paid to all seafarers irrespective of whether they are awaiting repatriation in locations outside Iraq or in Iraq, or whether they are employed in the public or private sector. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that the State Company for Maritime Transport is committed to the right of seafarers to repatriation upon completion of their period of service aboard ship or in the event of sickness, termination of their employment with the contracting company, injury or death during the course of work. P&I Insurance Club covers the expenses of repatriation of seafarers injured as a result of accidents. While noting this information, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the relevant legislative provisions giving effect to Article 5 of the Convention.

Accommodation of Crews Convention (Revised), 1949 (No. 92)

Articles 3 and 6–17. Implementing legislation. Crew accommodation requirements. Noting the absence of legislation giving effect to Articles 3 and 6–17 of the Convention, the Committee requested the Government to adopt the necessary measures in this regard. In the absence of new information, the Committee requests the Government to adopt the necessary measures, without delay, taking into account its previous comment on this matter.

Seafarers’ Annual Leave with Pay Convention, 1976 (No. 146)

Application of the Convention. The Committee requested the Government to take steps to implement the obligations under Articles 3–12 of the Convention. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the State Company for Maritime Transport grants persons working on board its ships paid annual leave under appropriate conditions, in accordance with the annual leave regulations under the international Code, which applies to seafarers working on board its ships, taking into consideration the special needs of seafarers with regard to such leave and that this matter is implemented in full. In the absence of specific reference to new legislative provisions, the Committee once again requests the Government to introduce the necessary amendments to the Civil Marine Service Act in order to give effect to the following provisions of the Convention: Article 4 (proportionate leave if length of service is insufficient for full entitlement), Article 6 (justified absence from work and temporary shore leave not to be counted in the minimum annual leave), Article 8 (annual leave in principle consisting of an uninterrupted period), Article 10 (return to the place of engagement or recruitment at the employer’s cost) and Article 11 (prohibition of agreement to relinquish the right to annual leave) of the Convention. The Committee also requests the Government to consider appropriate action to ensure that seafarers employed on board privately owned vessels enjoy the coverage of Article 3 (30-day annual leave), Article 6 (public holidays and periods of incapacity for work not to be counted as annual leave), Article 8 (division of leave into parts and accumulation of leave) and Article 10 (free transportation to place of engagement or recruitment) of the Convention as the existing Labour Code does not appear to give effect to any of these provisions.

Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1976 (No. 147)

The Committee previously requested the Government to indicate how substantial equivalence with the ILO Conventions enumerated in the Appendix to the Convention is ensured in law and practice. This obligation, in the case of Iraq, relates to the following Conventions: the Sickness Insurance (Sea) Convention, 1936 (No. 56); the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87); the Prevention of Accidents (Seafarers) Convention, 1970 (No. 134) (Articles 4 and 7); and the Food and Catering (Ships’ Crews) Convention, 1946 (No. 68), unless the relevant shipboard living arrangements are covered by collective agreements. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the State Company for Maritime Transport relies on laws and regulations pertaining to global safety standards, including standards of competency and hours of work. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the matters raised in its previous comment with respect to the implementation of Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.

Article 2(a)(i). Standards of manning. Noting that the absence of new information in this respect, the Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which provide for standards of manning to ensure the safety of life on board.

Article 2(f). Inspections. Noting the absence of new information in this respect, the Committee once again requests the Government to provide details of the arrangements which exist to verify compliance with the national laws or regulations, required under Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147, applicable to collective agreements and ratified international labour Conventions.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes with deep concern that the Government’s report has not been received. It expects that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments. The Committee informs the Government that, if it has not supplied replies to the points raised by 1 September 2021, then it may proceed with the examination of the application of the Convention on the basis of the information at its disposal at its next session.

Repetition

The Committee notes that a new Labour Code was adopted on 17 August 2015. It also notes the Government’s indication in its reports that a Tripartite Consultation Committee has recommended the ratification of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006), and that it is currently carrying out a comparative analysis between the provisions of the MLC, 2006 and the national regulations. The Committee notes these efforts and requests the Government to provide information on progress achieved in this regard. The Committee also reminds the Government of the possibility to avail itself of technical assistance from the Office concerning the implementation of Conventions. In the meantime, the Committee will continue to examine the conformity of national legislation with the requirements of the maritime Conventions. In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues to be addressed in relation to the application of these Conventions, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine these matters in a single comment, as follows.

Unemployment Indemnity (Shipwreck) Convention, 1920 (No. 8). Articles 2 and 3. Unemployment indemnity in the event of the loss or foundering of a ship. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to take all appropriate steps – preferably in the context of an overall revision of the maritime legislation – to ensure that: (i) in every case of loss or foundering of any vessel, seafarers employed thereon shall be paid for the days during which they remain unemployed an indemnity at the same rate as the wages payable under their contract although the total indemnity payable to any one seafarer may be limited to two months’ wages; and (ii) seafarers shall have the same remedies for recovering the indemnity against unemployment as they have for recovering arrears of wages earned during their service. The Committee once again requests the Government to take all appropriate steps to ensure that seafarers are paid the indemnification specified in Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.

Seamen’s Articles of Agreement Convention, 1926 (No. 22). Articles 3–14. Seafarers’ employment agreements and record of employment. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Labour Code (Act No. 71 of 1987) give effect to the requirements of the Convention and that seafarers continue to enjoy the status of public employees engaged on a permanent basis. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that a model seafarer’s employment agreement will be incorporated in instructions that will govern the implementation of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that the requirements of Convention No. 22 are consolidated in Regulation 2.1 and the Code of the MLC, 2006. Therefore, the Committee reminds the Government of its obligations to implement the provisions of Convention No. 22. The Government is requested to provide detailed information on any measures taken in this respect.

Repatriation of Seamen Convention, 1926 (No. 23). Article 5. Repatriation expenses. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to report on the concrete measures taken to ensure that the repatriation expenses are paid to all seafarers employed or engaged on board seagoing vessels registered in Iraq to which this Convention applies, regardless as to whether they are awaiting repatriation in locations outside Iraq or in Iraq, or whether they are employed in the public or private sector. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that rules and instructions will be issued after ratifying the MLC, 2006 and that the Committee’s comments will subsequently be taken into account. In the meantime, the Committee requests the Government to take the appropriate measures to put national legislation in line with the requirements of Convention No. 23.

Accommodation of Crews Convention (Revised), 1949 (No. 92). Articles 3 and 6–17. Implementing legislation – crew accommodation requirements. The Committee recalls its previous comment in which it noted that the national legislation does not give effect to any of the technical accommodation standards set out in Articles 6–17 of the Convention. The Committee notes, in this respect, the Government’s indication that the required standards have been adopted in certain contracts on board vessels that were recently constructed, and that contracts with large companies take into account international standards. The Committee draws the Government’s attention, in this respect, to Article 3 of the Convention, which requires ratifying Members to maintain in force laws or regulations – and not merely contracts – which ensure the application of the technical accommodation provisions of the Convention. Nevertheless, the Committee further notes the Government’s explanation that, in the context of the process of ratification of the MLC, 2006, texts that are in conformity with the Convention shall be incorporated in the instructions which will be issued by the Maritime Department. The Committee notes this information and recalls that Regulation 3.1 of the MLC, 2006 revises this Convention and similarly requires that Members adopt laws and regulations requiring that ships flying its flag meet the minimum accommodation standards for seafarers, working or living on board. The Committee hopes that, in the framework of the legislative reform, the Government will be able to adopt legislation to implement the minimum accommodation standards.

Seafarers’ Annual Leave with Pay Convention, 1976 (No. 146). Application of the Convention. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to introduce the necessary amendments to the Civil Marine Service Act in order to give effect to Articles 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11. It notes the Government’s indication that it will submit a proposal to the competent authority for the formulation of a new draft Act on the civil marine service or amend the previous law to bring it into conformity with the provisions of the Convention. While recalling that the requirements of Convention No. 146 are consolidated in Regulation 2.4 and the related provisions in the Code of the MLC, 2006, the Committee requests the Government to take account of the Committee’s previous comments and to take steps to implement the obligations under Articles 3–12 of the Convention.

Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1976 (No. 147). Article 2(a). Implementing legislation. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to indicate how substantial equivalence with the ILO Conventions enumerated in the Appendix to the Convention, is ensured in law and practice. In this regard, the Committee recalled that, in accordance with Article 2(a) of the Convention, each Member is under an obligation to satisfy itself that its relevant legislation is substantially equivalent to the Conventions or Articles of Conventions referred to in the Appendix to this Convention, even if the Member has not ratified them. This obligation, in the case of Iraq, relates to the following Conventions: the Officers’ Competency Certificates Convention, 1936 (No. 53) (Articles 3 and 4); the Sickness Insurance (Sea) Convention, 1936 (No. 56); the Medical Examination (Seafarers) Convention, 1946 (No. 73); the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87); the Prevention of Accidents (Seafarers) Convention, 1970 (No. 134) (Articles 4 and 7); and the Food and Catering (Ships’ Crews) Convention, 1946 (No. 68), unless the relevant shipboard living arrangements are covered by collective agreements.

The Committee notes that the Government has not provided the requested information on the implementation of Article 2(a) of the Convention, but, instead, has indicated that the Committee’s comments will be taken into account and will be included in instructions that will be issued by the Maritime Department after Iraq’s ratification of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that most of the requirements of Conventions Nos 53, 56, 73, 134 and 68 have been incorporated in the Regulations and the Code of the MLC, 2006. In the meantime, the Government is requested to provide information with respect to the implementation of Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147 regarding:

• – Convention No. 56. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1997 and the Civil Service Pensions Act No. 28 of 2006. For the purposes of substantial equivalence with Convention No. 56, the Committee once again wishes to draw the Government’s attention to the fact that there should be a compulsory sickness insurance scheme (Article 1) with cash benefits for the seafarer or his family at the national going rate for at least 26 weeks (Articles 2 and 4); medical benefit (Article 3); maternity benefit (Article 5); and death or survivor’s benefit (Article 6); benefits should cover the normal interval between engagements (Article 7); and the shipowners and seafarers should share the expenses of the scheme (Article 8). The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation substantially equivalent to Convention No. 56, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 73. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the standards concerning medical examinations for seafarers, medical certificates (issued every two years), and seafarers’ fitness in terms of hearing and sight as well as in terms of colour vision are complied with. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions in national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Convention No. 73, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 134 (Articles 4 and 7). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that all the instructions issued by the maritime administration are implemented, including the appointment of one or more crew members responsible for the prevention of accidents on board ship. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws and regulations that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 134 and deal with the nine general and specific subjects listed in Article 4(3) and provide for the appointment of one or more crew members as responsible for accident prevention under Article 7.
• – Convention No. 68 (Article 5). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that provision is made for food and water supplies that are suitable in terms of quantity and nutritive value, size of the crew and catering department and the duration of the voyage. It further notes that food allowances are provided to every officer and seafarer on board the vessel. The Committee once again requests the Government, unless the issue is covered by collective agreements, to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Article 5 of Convention No. 68 which provide for food and water supplies and that having regard to the size of the crew and the duration and nature of the voyage, are suitable in respect of quantity, nutritive value, quality and variety; and the arrangement and equipment of the catering department in every vessel in such a manner as to permit the service of proper meals to members of the crew, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 53 (Articles 3 and 4). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that sections 23 to 38 of the Maritime Civil Service Act contain provisions regarding the qualifications required for the functions performed by officers and seafarers on board vessels. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which establishes requirements in respect of the education of officers, prescribe requirements in respect of a minimum period of professional experience, and provide for the organization and supervision of examinations, so as to ensure substantial equivalence with Convention No. 53 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 87. The Committee wishes to recall that substantial equivalence to Convention No. 87 involves at the minimum the observance and implementation in respect of seafarers on ships registered in the national territory of the following four basic guarantees of freedom vis-à-vis the public authorities for workers and employers to exercise the right to organize: (i) all workers and employers should have the right to establish and join organizations of their own choosing without previous authorization (Article 2 of Convention No. 87); (ii) those organizations should have the right to draw up their constitutions and rules, to elect their representatives in full freedom, to organize their administration and activities and to formulate their programmes (Article 3 of Convention No. 87); (iii) the organizations are not liable to be dissolved or suspended by administrative authority (Article 4 of Convention No. 87); and (iv) the organizations should have the right to establish and join federations and confederations and affiliate with international organizations of workers and employers (Article 5 of Convention No. 87), such federations and confederations having the same rights as their constituent organizations (Article 6 of Convention No. 87). It further notes the Government’s indication that seafarers are considered as civil servants who are governed by laws related to their work. Noting that the Labour Code excludes from its scope of application public officials appointed in accordance with the Civil Service Law, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 87 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.

Article 2(a)(i). Standards of manning. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that every vessel has insurances and must carry a document which indicates the minimum manning standards that should be available on board. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which provide for standards of manning to ensure the safety of life on board.

Article 2(f). Inspections. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is an authority which is responsible for the categorization of vessels. It further notes that it has an integral inspection body which is in charge of inspections and investigations of complaints. The Committee requests the Government to provide details of the arrangements which exist to verify compliance with the national laws or regulations, required under Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147, applicable collective agreements and ratified international labour Conventions.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes with deep concern that the Government’s report has not been received. It expects that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments. The Committee informs the Government that, if it has not supplied replies to the points raised by 1 September 2020, then it may proceed with the examination of the application of the Convention on the basis of the information at its disposal at its next session.

Repetition

The Committee notes that a new Labour Code was adopted on 17 August 2015. It also notes the Government’s indication in its reports that a Tripartite Consultation Committee has recommended the ratification of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006), and that it is currently carrying out a comparative analysis between the provisions of the MLC, 2006 and the national regulations. The Committee notes these efforts and requests the Government to provide information on progress achieved in this regard. The Committee also reminds the Government of the possibility to avail itself of technical assistance from the Office concerning the implementation of Conventions. In the meantime, the Committee will continue to examine the conformity of national legislation with the requirements of the maritime Conventions. In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues to be addressed in relation to the application of these Conventions, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine these matters in a single comment, as follows.

Unemployment Indemnity (Shipwreck) Convention, 1920 (No. 8). Articles 2 and 3. Unemployment indemnity in the event of the loss or foundering of a ship. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to take all appropriate steps – preferably in the context of an overall revision of the maritime legislation – to ensure that: (i) in every case of loss or foundering of any vessel, seafarers employed thereon shall be paid for the days during which they remain unemployed an indemnity at the same rate as the wages payable under their contract although the total indemnity payable to any one seafarer may be limited to two months’ wages; and (ii) seafarers shall have the same remedies for recovering the indemnity against unemployment as they have for recovering arrears of wages earned during their service. The Committee once again requests the Government to take all appropriate steps to ensure that seafarers are paid the indemnification specified in Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.

Seamen’s Articles of Agreement Convention, 1926 (No. 22). Articles 3–14. Seafarers’ employment agreements and record of employment. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Labour Code (Act No. 71 of 1987) give effect to the requirements of the Convention and that seafarers continue to enjoy the status of public employees engaged on a permanent basis. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that a model seafarer’s employment agreement will be incorporated in instructions that will govern the implementation of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that the requirements of Convention No. 22 are consolidated in Regulation 2.1 and the Code of the MLC, 2006. Therefore, the Committee reminds the Government of its obligations to implement the provisions of Convention No. 22. The Government is requested to provide detailed information on any measures taken in this respect.

Repatriation of Seamen Convention, 1926 (No. 23). Article 5. Repatriation expenses. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to report on the concrete measures taken to ensure that the repatriation expenses are paid to all seafarers employed or engaged on board seagoing vessels registered in Iraq to which this Convention applies, regardless as to whether they are awaiting repatriation in locations outside Iraq or in Iraq, or whether they are employed in the public or private sector. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that rules and instructions will be issued after ratifying the MLC, 2006 and that the Committee’s comments will subsequently be taken into account. In the meantime, the Committee requests the Government to take the appropriate measures to put national legislation in line with the requirements of Convention No. 23.

Accommodation of Crews Convention (Revised), 1949 (No. 92). Articles 3 and 6–17. Implementing legislation – crew accommodation requirements. The Committee recalls its previous comment in which it noted that the national legislation does not give effect to any of the technical accommodation standards set out in Articles 6–17 of the Convention. The Committee notes, in this respect, the Government’s indication that the required standards have been adopted in certain contracts on board vessels that were recently constructed, and that contracts with large companies take into account international standards. The Committee draws the Government’s attention, in this respect, to Article 3 of the Convention, which requires ratifying Members to maintain in force laws or regulations – and not merely contracts – which ensure the application of the technical accommodation provisions of the Convention. Nevertheless, the Committee further notes the Government’s explanation that, in the context of the process of ratification of the MLC, 2006, texts that are in conformity with the Convention shall be incorporated in the instructions which will be issued by the Maritime Department. The Committee notes this information and recalls that Regulation 3.1 of the MLC, 2006 revises this Convention and similarly requires that Members adopt laws and regulations requiring that ships flying its flag meet the minimum accommodation standards for seafarers, working or living on board. The Committee hopes that, in the framework of the legislative reform, the Government will be able to adopt legislation to implement the minimum accommodation standards.

Seafarers’ Annual Leave with Pay Convention, 1976 (No. 146). Application of the Convention. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to introduce the necessary amendments to the Civil Marine Service Act in order to give effect to Articles 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11. It notes the Government’s indication that it will submit a proposal to the competent authority for the formulation of a new draft Act on the civil marine service or amend the previous law to bring it into conformity with the provisions of the Convention. While recalling that the requirements of Convention No. 146 are consolidated in Regulation 2.4 and the related provisions in the Code of the MLC, 2006, the Committee requests the Government to take account of the Committee’s previous comments and to take steps to implement the obligations under Articles 3–12 of the Convention.

Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1976 (No. 147). Article 2(a). Implementing legislation. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to indicate how substantial equivalence with the ILO Conventions enumerated in the Appendix to the Convention, is ensured in law and practice. In this regard, the Committee recalled that, in accordance with Article 2(a) of the Convention, each Member is under an obligation to satisfy itself that its relevant legislation is substantially equivalent to the Conventions or Articles of Conventions referred to in the Appendix to this Convention, even if the Member has not ratified them. This obligation, in the case of Iraq, relates to the following Conventions: the Officers’ Competency Certificates Convention, 1936 (No. 53) (Articles 3 and 4); the Sickness Insurance (Sea) Convention, 1936 (No. 56); the Medical Examination (Seafarers) Convention, 1946 (No. 73); the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87); the Prevention of Accidents (Seafarers) Convention, 1970 (No. 134) (Articles 4 and 7); and the Food and Catering (Ships’ Crews) Convention, 1946 (No. 68), unless the relevant shipboard living arrangements are covered by collective agreements.

The Committee notes that the Government has not provided the requested information on the implementation of Article 2(a) of the Convention, but, instead, has indicated that the Committee’s comments will be taken into account and will be included in instructions that will be issued by the Maritime Department after Iraq’s ratification of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that most of the requirements of Conventions Nos 53, 56, 73, 134 and 68 have been incorporated in the Regulations and the Code of the MLC, 2006. In the meantime, the Government is requested to provide information with respect to the implementation of Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147 regarding:

• – Convention No. 56. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Civil Service Pensions Act No. 28 of 2006. For the purposes of substantial equivalence with Convention No. 56, the Committee once again wishes to draw the Government’s attention to the fact that there should be a compulsory sickness insurance scheme (Article 1) with cash benefits for the seafarer or his family at the national going rate for at least 26 weeks (Articles 2 and 4); medical benefit (Article 3); maternity benefit (Article 5); and death or survivor’s benefit (Article 6); benefits should cover the normal interval between engagements (Article 7); and the shipowners and seafarers should share the expenses of the scheme (Article 8). The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation substantially equivalent to Convention No. 56, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 73. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the standards concerning medical examinations for seafarers, medical certificates (issued every two years), and seafarers’ fitness in terms of hearing and sight as well as in terms of colour vision are complied with. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions in national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Convention No. 73, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 134 (Articles 4 and 7). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that all the instructions issued by the maritime administration are implemented, including the appointment of one or more crew members responsible for the prevention of accidents on board ship. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws and regulations that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 134 and deal with the nine general and specific subjects listed in Article 4(3) and provide for the appointment of one or more crew members as responsible for accident prevention under Article 7.
• – Convention No. 68 (Article 5). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that provision is made for food and water supplies that are suitable in terms of quantity and nutritive value, size of the crew and catering department and the duration of the voyage. It further notes that food allowances are provided to every officer and seafarer on board the vessel. The Committee once again requests the Government, unless the issue is covered by collective agreements, to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Article 5 of Convention No. 68 which provide for food and water supplies and that having regard to the size of the crew and the duration and nature of the voyage, are suitable in respect of quantity, nutritive value, quality and variety; and the arrangement and equipment of the catering department in every vessel in such a manner as to permit the service of proper meals to members of the crew, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 53 (Articles 3 and 4). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that sections 23 to 38 of the Maritime Civil Service Act contain provisions regarding the qualifications required for the functions performed by officers and seafarers on board vessels. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which establishes requirements in respect of the education of officers, prescribe requirements in respect of a minimum period of professional experience, and provide for the organization and supervision of examinations, so as to ensure substantial equivalence with Convention No. 53 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 87. The Committee wishes to recall that substantial equivalence to Convention No. 87 involves at the minimum the observance and implementation in respect of seafarers on ships registered in the national territory of the following four basic guarantees of freedom vis-à-vis the public authorities for workers and employers to exercise the right to organize: (i) all workers and employers should have the right to establish and join organizations of their own choosing without previous authorization (Article 2 of Convention No. 87); (ii) those organizations should have the right to draw up their constitutions and rules, to elect their representatives in full freedom, to organize their administration and activities and to formulate their programmes (Article 3 of Convention No. 87); (iii) the organizations are not liable to be dissolved or suspended by administrative authority (Article 4 of Convention No. 87); and (iv) the organizations should have the right to establish and join federations and confederations and affiliate with international organizations of workers and employers (Article 5 of Convention No. 87), such federations and confederations having the same rights as their constituent organizations (Article 6 of Convention No. 87). It further notes the Government’s indication that seafarers are considered as civil servants who are governed by laws related to their work. Noting that the Labour Code excludes from its scope of application public officials appointed in accordance with the Civil Service Law, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 87 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.

Article 2(a)(i). Standards of manning. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that every vessel has insurances and must carry a document which indicates the minimum manning standards that should be available on board. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which provide for standards of manning to ensure the safety of life on board.

Article 2(f). Inspections. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is an authority which is responsible for the categorization of vessels. It further notes that it has an integral inspection body which is in charge of inspections and investigations of complaints. The Committee requests the Government to provide details of the arrangements which exist to verify compliance with the national laws or regulations, required under Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147, applicable collective agreements and ratified international labour Conventions.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes with concern that the Government’s report has not been received. It expects that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments initially made in 2015.

Repetition

The Committee notes that a new Labour Code was adopted on 17 August 2015. It also notes the Government’s indication in its reports that a Tripartite Consultation Committee has recommended the ratification of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006), and that it is currently carrying out a comparative analysis between the provisions of the MLC, 2006 and the national regulations. The Committee notes these efforts and requests the Government to provide information on progress achieved in this regard. The Committee also reminds the Government of the possibility to avail itself of technical assistance from the Office concerning the implementation of Conventions. In the meantime, the Committee will continue to examine the conformity of national legislation with the requirements of the maritime Conventions. In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues to be addressed in relation to the application of these Conventions, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine these matters in a single comment, as follows.

Unemployment Indemnity (Shipwreck) Convention, 1920 (No. 8). Articles 2 and 3. Unemployment indemnity in the event of the loss or foundering of a ship. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to take all appropriate steps – preferably in the context of an overall revision of the maritime legislation – to ensure that: (i) in every case of loss or foundering of any vessel, seafarers employed thereon shall be paid for the days during which they remain unemployed an indemnity at the same rate as the wages payable under their contract although the total indemnity payable to any one seafarer may be limited to two months’ wages; and (ii) seafarers shall have the same remedies for recovering the indemnity against unemployment as they have for recovering arrears of wages earned during their service. The Committee once again requests the Government to take all appropriate steps to ensure that seafarers are paid the indemnification specified in Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.

Seamen’s Articles of Agreement Convention, 1926 (No. 22). Articles 3–14. Seafarers’ employment agreements and record of employment. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Labour Code (Act No. 71 of 1987) give effect to the requirements of the Convention and that seafarers continue to enjoy the status of public employees engaged on a permanent basis. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that a model seafarer’s employment agreement will be incorporated in instructions that will govern the implementation of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that the requirements of Convention No. 22 are consolidated in Regulation 2.1 and the Code of the MLC, 2006. Therefore, the Committee reminds the Government of its obligations to implement the provisions of Convention No. 22. The Government is requested to provide detailed information on any measures taken in this respect.

Repatriation of Seamen Convention, 1926 (No. 23). Article 5. Repatriation expenses. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to report on the concrete measures taken to ensure that the repatriation expenses are paid to all seafarers employed or engaged on board seagoing vessels registered in Iraq to which this Convention applies, regardless as to whether they are awaiting repatriation in locations outside Iraq or in Iraq, or whether they are employed in the public or private sector. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that rules and instructions will be issued after ratifying the MLC, 2006 and that the Committee’s comments will subsequently be taken into account. In the meantime, the Committee requests the Government to take the appropriate measures to put national legislation in line with the requirements of Convention No. 23.

Accommodation of Crews Convention (Revised), 1949 (No. 92). Articles 3 and 6–17. Implementing legislation – crew accommodation requirements. The Committee recalls its previous comment in which it noted that the national legislation does not give effect to any of the technical accommodation standards set out in Articles 6–17 of the Convention. The Committee notes, in this respect, the Government’s indication that the required standards have been adopted in certain contracts on board vessels that were recently constructed, and that contracts with large companies take into account international standards. The Committee draws the Government’s attention, in this respect, to Article 3 of the Convention, which requires ratifying Members to maintain in force laws or regulations – and not merely contracts – which ensure the application of the technical accommodation provisions of the Convention. Nevertheless, the Committee further notes the Government’s explanation that, in the context of the process of ratification of the MLC, 2006, texts that are in conformity with the Convention shall be incorporated in the instructions which will be issued by the Maritime Department. The Committee notes this information and recalls that Regulation 3.1 of the MLC, 2006 revises this Convention and similarly requires that Members adopt laws and regulations requiring that ships flying its flag meet the minimum accommodation standards for seafarers, working or living on board. The Committee hopes that, in the framework of the legislative reform, the Government will be able to adopt legislation to implement the minimum accommodation standards.

Seafarers’ Annual Leave with Pay Convention, 1976 (No. 146). Application of the Convention. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to introduce the necessary amendments to the Civil Marine Service Act in order to give effect to Articles 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11. It notes the Government’s indication that it will submit a proposal to the competent authority for the formulation of a new draft Act on the civil marine service or amend the previous law to bring it into conformity with the provisions of the Convention. While recalling that the requirements of Convention No. 146 are consolidated in Regulation 2.4 and the related provisions in the Code of the MLC, 2006, the Committee requests the Government to take account of the Committee’s previous comments and to take steps to implement the obligations under Articles 3–12 of the Convention.

Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1976 (No. 147). Article 2(a). Implementing legislation. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to indicate how substantial equivalence with the ILO Conventions enumerated in the Appendix to the Convention, is ensured in law and practice. In this regard, the Committee recalled that, in accordance with Article 2(a) of the Convention, each Member is under an obligation to satisfy itself that its relevant legislation is substantially equivalent to the Conventions or Articles of Conventions referred to in the Appendix to this Convention, even if the Member has not ratified them. This obligation, in the case of Iraq, relates to the following Conventions: the Officers’ Competency Certificates Convention, 1936 (No. 53) (Articles 3 and 4); the Sickness Insurance (Sea) Convention, 1936 (No. 56); the Medical Examination (Seafarers) Convention, 1946 (No. 73); the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87); the Prevention of Accidents (Seafarers) Convention, 1970 (No. 134) (Articles 4 and 7); and the Food and Catering (Ships’ Crews) Convention, 1946 (No. 68), unless the relevant shipboard living arrangements are covered by collective agreements.

The Committee notes that the Government has not provided the requested information on the implementation of Article 2(a) of the Convention, but, instead, has indicated that the Committee’s comments will be taken into account and will be included in instructions that will be issued by the Maritime Department after Iraq’s ratification of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that most of the requirements of Conventions Nos 53, 56, 73, 134 and 68 have been incorporated in the Regulations and the Code of the MLC, 2006. In the meantime, the Government is requested to provide information with respect to the implementation of Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147 regarding:

• – Convention No. 56. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Civil Service Pensions Act No. 28 of 2006. For the purposes of substantial equivalence with Convention No. 56, the Committee once again wishes to draw the Government’s attention to the fact that there should be a compulsory sickness insurance scheme (Article 1) with cash benefits for the seafarer or his family at the national going rate for at least 26 weeks (Articles 2 and 4); medical benefit (Article 3); maternity benefit (Article 5); and death or survivor’s benefit (Article 6); benefits should cover the normal interval between engagements (Article 7); and the shipowners and seafarers should share the expenses of the scheme (Article 8). The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation substantially equivalent to Convention No. 56, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 73. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the standards concerning medical examinations for seafarers, medical certificates (issued every two years), and seafarers’ fitness in terms of hearing and sight as well as in terms of colour vision are complied with. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions in national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Convention No. 73, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 134 (Articles 4 and 7). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that all the instructions issued by the maritime administration are implemented, including the appointment of one or more crew members responsible for the prevention of accidents on board ship. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws and regulations that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 134 and deal with the nine general and specific subjects listed in Article 4(3) and provide for the appointment of one or more crew members as responsible for accident prevention under Article 7.
• – Convention No. 68 (Article 5). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that provision is made for food and water supplies that are suitable in terms of quantity and nutritive value, size of the crew and catering department and the duration of the voyage. It further notes that food allowances are provided to every officer and seafarer on board the vessel. The Committee once again requests the Government, unless the issue is covered by collective agreements, to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Article 5 of Convention No. 68 which provide for food and water supplies and that having regard to the size of the crew and the duration and nature of the voyage, are suitable in respect of quantity, nutritive value, quality and variety; and the arrangement and equipment of the catering department in every vessel in such a manner as to permit the service of proper meals to members of the crew, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 53 (Articles 3 and 4). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that sections 23 to 38 of the Maritime Civil Service Act contain provisions regarding the qualifications required for the functions performed by officers and seafarers on board vessels. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which establishes requirements in respect of the education of officers, prescribe requirements in respect of a minimum period of professional experience, and provide for the organization and supervision of examinations, so as to ensure substantial equivalence with Convention No. 53 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 87. The Committee wishes to recall that substantial equivalence to Convention No. 87 involves at the minimum the observance and implementation in respect of seafarers on ships registered in the national territory of the following four basic guarantees of freedom vis-à-vis the public authorities for workers and employers to exercise the right to organize: (i) all workers and employers should have the right to establish and join organizations of their own choosing without previous authorization (Article 2 of Convention No. 87); (ii) those organizations should have the right to draw up their constitutions and rules, to elect their representatives in full freedom, to organize their administration and activities and to formulate their programmes (Article 3 of Convention No. 87); (iii) the organizations are not liable to be dissolved or suspended by administrative authority (Article 4 of Convention No. 87); and (iv) the organizations should have the right to establish and join federations and confederations and affiliate with international organizations of workers and employers (Article 5 of Convention No. 87), such federations and confederations having the same rights as their constituent organizations (Article 6 of Convention No. 87). It further notes the Government’s indication that seafarers are considered as civil servants who are governed by laws related to their work. Noting that the Labour Code excludes from its scope of application public officials appointed in accordance with the Civil Service Law, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 87 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.

Article 2(a)(i). Standards of manning. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that every vessel has insurances and must carry a document which indicates the minimum manning standards that should be available on board. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which provide for standards of manning to ensure the safety of life on board.

Article 2(f). Inspections. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is an authority which is responsible for the categorization of vessels. It further notes that it has an integral inspection body which is in charge of inspections and investigations of complaints. The Committee requests the Government to provide details of the arrangements which exist to verify compliance with the national laws or regulations, required under Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147, applicable collective agreements and ratified international labour Conventions.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments initially made in 2015.

Repetition

The Committee notes that a new Labour Code was adopted on 17 August 2015. It also notes the Government’s indication in its reports that a Tripartite Consultation Committee has recommended the ratification of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006), and that it is currently carrying out a comparative analysis between the provisions of the MLC, 2006 and the national regulations. The Committee notes these efforts and requests the Government to provide information on progress achieved in this regard. The Committee also reminds the Government of the possibility to avail itself of technical assistance from the Office concerning the implementation of Conventions. In the meantime, the Committee will continue to examine the conformity of national legislation with the requirements of the maritime Conventions. In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues to be addressed in relation to the application of these Conventions, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine these matters in a single comment, as follows.

Unemployment Indemnity (Shipwreck) Convention, 1920 (No. 8). Articles 2 and 3. Unemployment indemnity in the event of the loss or foundering of a ship. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to take all appropriate steps – preferably in the context of an overall revision of the maritime legislation – to ensure that: (i) in every case of loss or foundering of any vessel, seafarers employed thereon shall be paid for the days during which they remain unemployed an indemnity at the same rate as the wages payable under their contract although the total indemnity payable to any one seafarer may be limited to two months’ wages; and (ii) seafarers shall have the same remedies for recovering the indemnity against unemployment as they have for recovering arrears of wages earned during their service. The Committee once again requests the Government to take all appropriate steps to ensure that seafarers are paid the indemnification specified in Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.

Seamen’s Articles of Agreement Convention, 1926 (No. 22). Articles 3–14. Seafarers’ employment agreements and record of employment. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Labour Code (Act No. 71 of 1987) give effect to the requirements of the Convention and that seafarers continue to enjoy the status of public employees engaged on a permanent basis. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that a model seafarer’s employment agreement will be incorporated in instructions that will govern the implementation of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that the requirements of Convention No. 22 are consolidated in Regulation 2.1 and the Code of the MLC, 2006. Therefore, the Committee reminds the Government of its obligations to implement the provisions of Convention No. 22. The Government is requested to provide detailed information on any measures taken in this respect.

Repatriation of Seamen Convention, 1926 (No. 23). Article 5. Repatriation expenses. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to report on the concrete measures taken to ensure that the repatriation expenses are paid to all seafarers employed or engaged on board seagoing vessels registered in Iraq to which this Convention applies, regardless as to whether they are awaiting repatriation in locations outside Iraq or in Iraq, or whether they are employed in the public or private sector. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that rules and instructions will be issued after ratifying the MLC, 2006 and that the Committee’s comments will subsequently be taken into account. In the meantime, the Committee requests the Government to take the appropriate measures to put national legislation in line with the requirements of Convention No. 23.

Accommodation of Crews Convention (Revised), 1949 (No. 92). Articles 3 and 6–17. Implementing legislation – crew accommodation requirements. The Committee recalls its previous comment in which it noted that the national legislation does not give effect to any of the technical accommodation standards set out in Articles 6–17 of the Convention. The Committee notes, in this respect, the Government’s indication that the required standards have been adopted in certain contracts on board vessels that were recently constructed, and that contracts with large companies take into account international standards. The Committee draws the Government’s attention, in this respect, to Article 3 of the Convention, which requires ratifying Members to maintain in force laws or regulations – and not merely contracts – which ensure the application of the technical accommodation provisions of the Convention. Nevertheless, the Committee further notes the Government’s explanation that, in the context of the process of ratification of the MLC, 2006, texts that are in conformity with the Convention shall be incorporated in the instructions which will be issued by the Maritime Department. The Committee notes this information and recalls that Regulation 3.1 of the MLC, 2006 revises this Convention and similarly requires that Members adopt laws and regulations requiring that ships flying its flag meet the minimum accommodation standards for seafarers, working or living on board. The Committee hopes that, in the framework of the legislative reform, the Government will be able to adopt legislation to implement the minimum accommodation standards.

Seafarers’ Annual Leave with Pay Convention, 1976 (No. 146). Application of the Convention. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to introduce the necessary amendments to the Civil Marine Service Act in order to give effect to Articles 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11. It notes the Government’s indication that it will submit a proposal to the competent authority for the formulation of a new draft Act on the civil marine service or amend the previous law to bring it into conformity with the provisions of the Convention. While recalling that the requirements of Convention No. 146 are consolidated in Regulation 2.4 and the related provisions in the Code of the MLC, 2006, the Committee requests the Government to take account of the Committee’s previous comments and to take steps to implement the obligations under Articles 3–12 of the Convention.

Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1976 (No. 147). Article 2(a). Implementing legislation. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to indicate how substantial equivalence with the ILO Conventions enumerated in the Appendix to the Convention, is ensured in law and practice. In this regard, the Committee recalled that, in accordance with Article 2(a) of the Convention, each Member is under an obligation to satisfy itself that its relevant legislation is substantially equivalent to the Conventions or Articles of Conventions referred to in the Appendix to this Convention, even if the Member has not ratified them. This obligation, in the case of Iraq, relates to the following Conventions: the Officers’ Competency Certificates Convention, 1936 (No. 53) (Articles 3 and 4); the Sickness Insurance (Sea) Convention, 1936 (No. 56); the Medical Examination (Seafarers) Convention, 1946 (No. 73); the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87); the Prevention of Accidents (Seafarers) Convention, 1970 (No. 134) (Articles 4 and 7); and the Food and Catering (Ships’ Crews) Convention, 1946 (No. 68), unless the relevant shipboard living arrangements are covered by collective agreements.

The Committee notes that the Government has not provided the requested information on the implementation of Article 2(a) of the Convention, but, instead, has indicated that the Committee’s comments will be taken into account and will be included in instructions that will be issued by the Maritime Department after Iraq’s ratification of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that most of the requirements of Conventions Nos 53, 56, 73, 134 and 68 have been incorporated in the Regulations and the Code of the MLC, 2006. In the meantime, the Government is requested to provide information with respect to the implementation of Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147 regarding:

• – Convention No. 56. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Civil Service Pensions Act No. 28 of 2006. For the purposes of substantial equivalence with Convention No. 56, the Committee once again wishes to draw the Government’s attention to the fact that there should be a compulsory sickness insurance scheme (Article 1) with cash benefits for the seafarer or his family at the national going rate for at least 26 weeks (Articles 2 and 4); medical benefit (Article 3); maternity benefit (Article 5); and death or survivor’s benefit (Article 6); benefits should cover the normal interval between engagements (Article 7); and the shipowners and seafarers should share the expenses of the scheme (Article 8). The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation substantially equivalent to Convention No. 56, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 73. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the standards concerning medical examinations for seafarers, medical certificates (issued every two years), and seafarers’ fitness in terms of hearing and sight as well as in terms of colour vision are complied with. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions in national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Convention No. 73, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 134 (Articles 4 and 7). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that all the instructions issued by the maritime administration are implemented, including the appointment of one or more crew members responsible for the prevention of accidents on board ship. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws and regulations that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 134 and deal with the nine general and specific subjects listed in Article 4(3) and provide for the appointment of one or more crew members as responsible for accident prevention under Article 7.
• – Convention No. 68 (Article 5). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that provision is made for food and water supplies that are suitable in terms of quantity and nutritive value, size of the crew and catering department and the duration of the voyage. It further notes that food allowances are provided to every officer and seafarer on board the vessel. The Committee once again requests the Government, unless the issue is covered by collective agreements, to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Article 5 of Convention No. 68 which provide for food and water supplies and that having regard to the size of the crew and the duration and nature of the voyage, are suitable in respect of quantity, nutritive value, quality and variety; and the arrangement and equipment of the catering department in every vessel in such a manner as to permit the service of proper meals to members of the crew, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 53 (Articles 3 and 4). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that sections 23 to 38 of the Maritime Civil Service Act contain provisions regarding the qualifications required for the functions performed by officers and seafarers on board vessels. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which establishes requirements in respect of the education of officers, prescribe requirements in respect of a minimum period of professional experience, and provide for the organization and supervision of examinations, so as to ensure substantial equivalence with Convention No. 53 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 87. The Committee wishes to recall that substantial equivalence to Convention No. 87 involves at the minimum the observance and implementation in respect of seafarers on ships registered in the national territory of the following four basic guarantees of freedom vis-à-vis the public authorities for workers and employers to exercise the right to organize: (i) all workers and employers should have the right to establish and join organizations of their own choosing without previous authorization (Article 2 of Convention No. 87); (ii) those organizations should have the right to draw up their constitutions and rules, to elect their representatives in full freedom, to organize their administration and activities and to formulate their programmes (Article 3 of Convention No. 87); (iii) the organizations are not liable to be dissolved or suspended by administrative authority (Article 4 of Convention No. 87); and (iv) the organizations should have the right to establish and join federations and confederations and affiliate with international organizations of workers and employers (Article 5 of Convention No. 87), such federations and confederations having the same rights as their constituent organizations (Article 6 of Convention No. 87). It further notes the Government’s indication that seafarers are considered as civil servants who are governed by laws related to their work. Noting that the Labour Code excludes from its scope of application public officials appointed in accordance with the Civil Service Law, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 87 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.

Article 2(a)(i). Standards of manning. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that every vessel has insurances and must carry a document which indicates the minimum manning standards that should be available on board. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which provide for standards of manning to ensure the safety of life on board.

Article 2(f). Inspections. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is an authority which is responsible for the categorization of vessels. It further notes that it has an integral inspection body which is in charge of inspections and investigations of complaints. The Committee requests the Government to provide details of the arrangements which exist to verify compliance with the national laws or regulations, required under Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147, applicable collective agreements and ratified international labour conventions.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments.

Repetition

The Committee notes that a new Labour Code was adopted on 17 August 2015. It also notes the Government’s indication in its reports that a Tripartite Consultation Committee has recommended the ratification of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006), and that it is currently carrying out a comparative analysis between the provisions of the MLC, 2006 and the national regulations. The Committee notes these efforts and requests the Government to provide information on progress achieved in this regard. The Committee also reminds the Government of the possibility to avail itself of technical assistance from the Office concerning the implementation of Conventions. In the meantime, the Committee will continue to examine the conformity of national legislation with the requirements of the maritime Conventions. In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues to be addressed in relation to the application of these Conventions, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine these matters in a single comment, as follows.

Unemployment Indemnity (Shipwreck) Convention, 1920 (No. 8). Articles 2 and 3. Unemployment indemnity in the event of the loss or foundering of a ship. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to take all appropriate steps – preferably in the context of an overall revision of the maritime legislation – to ensure that: (i) in every case of loss or foundering of any vessel, seafarers employed thereon shall be paid for the days during which they remain unemployed an indemnity at the same rate as the wages payable under their contract although the total indemnity payable to any one seafarer may be limited to two months’ wages; and (ii) seafarers shall have the same remedies for recovering the indemnity against unemployment as they have for recovering arrears of wages earned during their service. The Committee once again requests the Government to take all appropriate steps to ensure that seafarers are paid the indemnification specified in Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.

Seamen’s Articles of Agreement Convention, 1926 (No. 22). Articles 3–14. Seafarers’ employment agreements and record of employment. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Labour Code (Act No. 71 of 1987) give effect to the requirements of the Convention and that seafarers continue to enjoy the status of public employees engaged on a permanent basis. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that a model seafarer’s employment agreement will be incorporated in instructions that will govern the implementation of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that the requirements of Convention No. 22 are consolidated in Regulation 2.1 and the Code of the MLC, 2006. Therefore, the Committee reminds the Government of its obligations to implement the provisions of Convention No. 22. The Government is requested to provide detailed information on any measures taken in this respect.

Repatriation of Seamen Convention, 1926 (No. 23). Article 5. Repatriation expenses. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to report on the concrete measures taken to ensure that the repatriation expenses are paid to all seafarers employed or engaged on board seagoing vessels registered in Iraq to which this Convention applies, regardless as to whether they are awaiting repatriation in locations outside Iraq or in Iraq, or whether they are employed in the public or private sector. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that rules and instructions will be issued after ratifying the MLC, 2006 and that the Committee’s comments will subsequently be taken into account. In the meantime, the Committee requests the Government to take the appropriate measures to put national legislation in line with the requirements of Convention No. 23.

Accommodation of Crews Convention (Revised), 1949 (No. 92). Articles 3 and 6–17. Implementing legislation – crew accommodation requirements. The Committee recalls its previous comment in which it noted that the national legislation does not give effect to any of the technical accommodation standards set out in Articles 6–17 of the Convention. The Committee notes, in this respect, the Government’s indication that the required standards have been adopted in certain contracts on board vessels that were recently constructed, and that contracts with large companies take into account international standards. The Committee draws the Government’s attention, in this respect, to Article 3 of the Convention, which requires ratifying Members to maintain in force laws or regulations – and not merely contracts – which ensure the application of the technical accommodation provisions of the Convention. Nevertheless, the Committee further notes the Government’s explanation that, in the context of the process of ratification of the MLC, 2006, texts that are in conformity with the Convention shall be incorporated in the instructions which will be issued by the Maritime Department. The Committee notes this information and recalls that Regulation 3.1 of the MLC, 2006 revises this Convention and similarly requires that Members adopt laws and regulations requiring that ships flying its flag meet the minimum accommodation standards for seafarers, working or living on board. The Committee hopes that, in the framework of the legislative reform, the Government will be able to adopt legislation to implement the minimum accommodation standards.

Seafarers’ Annual Leave with Pay Convention, 1976 (No. 146). Application of the Convention. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to introduce the necessary amendments to the Civil Marine Service Act in order to give effect to Articles 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11. It notes the Government’s indication that it will submit a proposal to the competent authority for the formulation of a new draft Act on the civil marine service or amend the previous law to bring it into conformity with the provisions of the Convention. While recalling that the requirements of Convention No. 146 are consolidated in Regulation 2.4 and the related provisions in the Code of the MLC, 2006, the Committee requests the Government to take account of the Committee’s previous comments and to take steps to implement the obligations under Articles 3–12 of the Convention.

Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1976 (No. 147). Article 2(a). Implementing legislation. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to indicate how substantial equivalence with the ILO Conventions enumerated in the Appendix to the Convention, is ensured in law and practice. In this regard, the Committee recalled that, in accordance with Article 2(a) of the Convention, each Member is under an obligation to satisfy itself that its relevant legislation is substantially equivalent to the Conventions or Articles of Conventions referred to in the Appendix to this Convention, even if the Member has not ratified them. This obligation, in the case of Iraq, relates to the following Conventions: the Officers’ Competency Certificates Convention, 1936 (No. 53) (Articles 3 and 4); the Sickness Insurance (Sea) Convention, 1936 (No. 56); the Medical Examination (Seafarers) Convention, 1946 (No. 73); the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87); the Prevention of Accidents (Seafarers) Convention, 1970 (No. 134) (Articles 4 and 7); and the Food and Catering (Ships’ Crews) Convention, 1946 (No. 68), unless the relevant shipboard living arrangements are covered by collective agreements.

The Committee notes that the Government has not provided the requested information on the implementation of Article 2(a) of the Convention, but, instead, has indicated that the Committee’s comments will be taken into account and will be included in instructions that will be issued by the Maritime Department after Iraq’s ratification of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that most of the requirements of Conventions Nos 53, 56, 73, 134 and 68 have been incorporated in the Regulations and the Code of the MLC, 2006. In the meantime, the Government is requested to provide information with respect to the implementation of Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147 regarding:

• – Convention No. 56. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Civil Service Pensions Act No. 28 of 2006. For the purposes of substantial equivalence with Convention No. 56, the Committee once again wishes to draw the Government’s attention to the fact that there should be a compulsory sickness insurance scheme (Article 1) with cash benefits for the seafarer or his family at the national going rate for at least 26 weeks (Articles 2 and 4); medical benefit (Article 3); maternity benefit (Article 5); and death or survivor’s benefit (Article 6); benefits should cover the normal interval between engagements (Article 7); and the shipowners and seafarers should share the expenses of the scheme (Article 8). The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation substantially equivalent to Convention No. 56, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 73. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the standards concerning medical examinations for seafarers, medical certificates (issued every two years), and seafarers’ fitness in terms of hearing and sight as well as in terms of colour vision are complied with. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions in national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Convention No. 73, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 134 (Articles 4 and 7). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that all the instructions issued by the maritime administration are implemented, including the appointment of one or more crew members responsible for the prevention of accidents on board ship. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws and regulations that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 134 and deal with the nine general and specific subjects listed in Article 4(3) and provide for the appointment of one or more crew members as responsible for accident prevention under Article 7.
• – Convention No. 68 (Article 5). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that provision is made for food and water supplies that are suitable in terms of quantity and nutritive value, size of the crew and catering department and the duration of the voyage. It further notes that food allowances are provided to every officer and seafarer on board the vessel. The Committee once again requests the Government, unless the issue is covered by collective agreements, to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Article 5 of Convention No. 68 which provide for food and water supplies and that having regard to the size of the crew and the duration and nature of the voyage, are suitable in respect of quantity, nutritive value, quality and variety; and the arrangement and equipment of the catering department in every vessel in such a manner as to permit the service of proper meals to members of the crew, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 53 (Articles 3 and 4). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that sections 23 to 38 of the Maritime Civil Service Act contain provisions regarding the qualifications required for the functions performed by officers and seafarers on board vessels. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which establishes requirements in respect of the education of officers, prescribe requirements in respect of a minimum period of professional experience, and provide for the organization and supervision of examinations, so as to ensure substantial equivalence with Convention No. 53 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• – Convention No. 87. The Committee wishes to recall that substantial equivalence to Convention No. 87 involves at the minimum the observance and implementation in respect of seafarers on ships registered in the national territory of the following four basic guarantees of freedom vis-à-vis the public authorities for workers and employers to exercise the right to organize: (i) all workers and employers should have the right to establish and join organizations of their own choosing without previous authorization (Article 2 of Convention No. 87); (ii) those organizations should have the right to draw up their constitutions and rules, to elect their representatives in full freedom, to organize their administration and activities and to formulate their programmes (Article 3 of Convention No. 87); (iii) the organizations are not liable to be dissolved or suspended by administrative authority (Article 4 of Convention No. 87); and (iv) the organizations should have the right to establish and join federations and confederations and affiliate with international organizations of workers and employers (Article 5 of Convention No. 87), such federations and confederations having the same rights as their constituent organizations (Article 6 of Convention No. 87). It further notes the Government’s indication that seafarers are considered as civil servants who are governed by laws related to their work. Noting that the Labour Code excludes from its scope of application public officials appointed in accordance with the Civil Service Law, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 87 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.

Article 2(a)(i). Standards of manning. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that every vessel has insurances and must carry a document which indicates the minimum manning standards that should be available on board. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which provide for standards of manning to ensure the safety of life on board.

Article 2(f). Inspections. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is an authority which is responsible for the categorization of vessels. It further notes that it has an integral inspection body which is in charge of inspections and investigations of complaints. The Committee requests the Government to provide details of the arrangements which exist to verify compliance with the national laws or regulations, required under Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147, applicable collective agreements and ratified international labour conventions.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes that a new Labour Code was adopted on 17 August 2015. It also notes the Government’s indication in its reports that a Tripartite Consultation Committee has recommended the ratification of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006), and that it is currently carrying out a comparative analysis between the provisions of the MLC, 2006 and the national regulations. The Committee notes these efforts and requests the Government to provide information on progress achieved in this regard. The Committee also reminds the Government of the possibility to avail itself of technical assistance from the Office concerning the implementation of Conventions. In the meantime, the Committee will continue to examine the conformity of national legislation with the requirements of the maritime Conventions. In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues to be addressed in relation to the application of these Conventions, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine these matters in a single comment, as follows.

Unemployment Indemnity (Shipwreck) Convention, 1920 (No. 8). Articles 2 and 3. Unemployment indemnity in the event of the loss or foundering of a ship. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to take all appropriate steps – preferably in the context of an overall revision of the maritime legislation – to ensure that: (i) in every case of loss or foundering of any vessel, seafarers employed thereon shall be paid for the days during which they remain unemployed an indemnity at the same rate as the wages payable under their contract although the total indemnity payable to any one seafarer may be limited to two months’ wages; and (ii) seafarers shall have the same remedies for recovering the indemnity against unemployment as they have for recovering arrears of wages earned during their service. The Committee once again requests the Government to take all appropriate steps to ensure that seafarers are paid the indemnification specified in Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.

Seamen’s Articles of Agreement Convention, 1926 (No. 22). Articles 3–14. Seafarers’ employment agreements and record of employment. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Labour Code (Act No. 71 of 1987) give effect to the requirements of the Convention and that seafarers continue to enjoy the status of public employees engaged on a permanent basis. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that a model seafarer’s employment agreement will be incorporated in instructions that will govern the implementation of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that the requirements of Convention No. 22 are consolidated in Regulation 2.1 and the Code of the MLC, 2006. Therefore, the Committee reminds the Government of its obligations to implement the provisions of Convention No. 22. The Government is requested to provide detailed information on any measures taken in this respect.

Repatriation of Seamen Convention, 1926 (No. 23). Article 5. Repatriation expenses. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to report on the concrete measures taken to ensure that the repatriation expenses are paid to all seafarers employed or engaged on board seagoing vessels registered in Iraq to which this Convention applies, regardless as to whether they are awaiting repatriation in locations outside Iraq or in Iraq, or whether they are employed in the public or private sector. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that rules and instructions will be issued after ratifying the MLC, 2006 and that the Committee’s comments will subsequently be taken into account. In the meantime, the Committee requests the Government to take the appropriate measures to put national legislation in line with the requirements of Convention No. 23.

Accommodation of Crews Convention (Revised), 1949 (No. 92). Articles 3 and 6–17. Implementing legislation – crew accommodation requirements. The Committee recalls its previous comment in which it noted that the national legislation does not give effect to any of the technical accommodation standards set out in Articles 6–17 of the Convention. The Committee notes, in this respect, the Government’s indication that the required standards have been adopted in certain contracts on board vessels that were recently constructed, and that contracts with large companies take into account international standards. The Committee draws the Government’s attention, in this respect, to Article 3 of the Convention, which requires ratifying Members to maintain in force laws or regulations – and not merely contracts – which ensure the application of the technical accommodation provisions of the Convention. Nevertheless, the Committee further notes the Government’s explanation that, in the context of the process of ratification of the MLC, 2006, texts that are in conformity with the Convention shall be incorporated in the instructions which will be issued by the Maritime Department. The Committee notes this information and recalls that Regulation 3.1 of the MLC, 2006 revises this Convention and similarly requires that Members adopt laws and regulations requiring that ships flying its flag meet the minimum accommodation standards for seafarers, working or living on board. The Committee hopes that, in the framework of the legislative reform, the Government will be able to adopt legislation to implement the minimum accommodation standards.

Seafarers’ Annual Leave with Pay Convention, 1976 (No. 146). Application of the Convention. In its previous comment, the Committee requested the Government to introduce the necessary amendments to the Civil Marine Service Act in order to give effect to Articles 4, 6, 8, 10 and 11. It notes the Government’s indication that it will submit a proposal to the competent authority for the formulation of a new draft Act on the civil marine service or amend the previous law to bring it into conformity with the provisions of the Convention. While recalling that the requirements of Convention No. 146 are consolidated in Regulation 2.4 and the related provisions in the Code of the MLC, 2006, the Committee requests the Government to take account of the Committee’s previous comments and to take steps to implement the obligations under Articles 3–12 of the Convention.

Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1976 (No. 147). Article 2(a). Implementing legislation. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to indicate how substantial equivalence with the ILO Conventions enumerated in the Appendix to the Convention, is ensured in law and practice. In this regard, the Committee recalled that, in accordance with Article 2(a) of the Convention, each Member is under an obligation to satisfy itself that its relevant legislation is substantially equivalent to the Conventions or Articles of Conventions referred to in the Appendix to this Convention, even if the Member has not ratified them. This obligation, in the case of Iraq, relates to the following Conventions: the Officers’ Competency Certificates Convention, 1936 (No. 53) (Articles 3 and 4); the Sickness Insurance (Sea) Convention, 1936 (No. 56); the Medical Examination (Seafarers) Convention, 1946 (No. 73); the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87); the Prevention of Accidents (Seafarers) Convention, 1970 (No. 134) (Articles 4 and 7); and the Food and Catering (Ships’ Crews) Convention, 1946 (No. 68), unless the relevant shipboard living arrangements are covered by collective agreements.

The Committee notes that the Government has not provided the requested information on the implementation of Article 2(a) of the Convention, but, instead, has indicated that the Committee’s comments will be taken into account and will be included in instructions that will be issued by the Maritime Department after Iraq’s ratification of the MLC, 2006. In that respect the Committee recalls that most of the requirements of Conventions Nos 53, 56, 73, 134 and 68 have been incorporated in the Regulations and the Code of the MLC, 2006. In the meantime, the Government is requested to provide information with respect to the implementation of Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147 regarding:

• -Convention No. 56. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and the Civil Service Pensions Act No. 28 of 2006. For the purposes of substantial equivalence with Convention No. 56, the Committee once again wishes to draw the Government’s attention to the fact that there should be a compulsory sickness insurance scheme (Article 1) with cash benefits for the seafarer or his family at the national going rate for at least 26 weeks (Articles 2 and 4); medical benefit (Article 3); maternity benefit (Article 5); and death or survivor’s benefit (Article 6); benefits should cover the normal interval between engagements (Article 7); and the shipowners and seafarers should share the expenses of the scheme (Article 8). The Committee therefore once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation substantially equivalent to Convention No. 56, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• -Convention No. 73. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the standards concerning medical examinations for seafarers, medical certificates (issued every two years), and seafarers’ fitness in terms of hearing and sight as well as in terms of colour vision are complied with. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions in national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Convention No. 73, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• -Convention No. 134 (Articles 4 and 7). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that all the instructions issued by the maritime administration are implemented, including the appointment of one or more crew members responsible for the prevention of accidents on board ship. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws and regulations that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 134 and deal with the nine general and specific subjects listed in Article 4(3) and provide for the appointment of one or more crew members as responsible for accident prevention under Article 7.
• -Convention No. 68 (Article 5). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that provision is made for food and water supplies that are suitable in terms of quantity and nutritive value, size of the crew and catering department and the duration of the voyage. It further notes that food allowances are provided to every officer and seafarer on board the vessel. The Committee once again requests the Government, unless the issue is covered by collective agreements, to indicate the specific provisions of the national laws or regulations substantially equivalent to Article 5 of Convention No. 68 which provide for food and water supplies and that having regard to the size of the crew and the duration and nature of the voyage, are suitable in respect of quantity, nutritive value, quality and variety; and the arrangement and equipment of the catering department in every vessel in such a manner as to permit the service of proper meals to members of the crew, in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• -Convention No. 53 (Articles 3 and 4). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that sections 23 to 38 of the Maritime Civil Service Act contain provisions regarding the qualifications required for the functions performed by officers and seafarers on board vessels. The Committee once again requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which establishes requirements in respect of the education of officers, prescribe requirements in respect of a minimum period of professional experience, and provide for the organization and supervision of examinations, so as to ensure substantial equivalence with Convention No. 53 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.
• -Convention No. 87. The Committee wishes to recall that substantial equivalence to Convention No. 87 involves at the minimum the observance and implementation in respect of seafarers on ships registered in the national territory of the following four basic guarantees of freedom vis-à-vis the public authorities for workers and employers to exercise the right to organize: (i) all workers and employers should have the right to establish and join organizations of their own choosing without previous authorization (Article 2 of Convention No. 87); (ii) those organizations should have the right to draw up their constitutions and rules, to elect their representatives in full freedom, to organize their administration and activities and to formulate their programmes (Article 3 of Convention No. 87); (iii) the organizations are not liable to be dissolved or suspended by administrative authority (Article 4 of Convention No. 87); and (iv) the organizations should have the right to establish and join federations and confederations and affiliate with international organizations of workers and employers (Article 5 of Convention No. 87), such federations and confederations having the same rights as their constituent organizations (Article 6 of Convention No. 87). It further notes the Government’s indication that seafarers are considered as civil servants who are governed by laws related to their work. Noting that the Labour Code excludes from its scope of application public officials appointed in accordance with the Civil Service Law, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation that are substantially equivalent to Convention No. 87 in accordance with Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147.

Article 2(a)(i). Standards of manning. The Committee notes the Government’s statement that every vessel has insurances and must carry a document which indicates the minimum manning standards that should be available on board. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the specific provisions of the national legislation which provide for standards of manning to ensure the safety of life on board.

Article 2(f). Inspections. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is an authority which is responsible for the categorization of vessels. It further notes that it has an integral inspection body which is in charge of inspections and investigations of complaints. The Committee requests the Government to provide details of the arrangements which exist to verify compliance with the national laws or regulations, required under Article 2(a) of Convention No. 147, applicable collective agreements and ratified international labour conventions.

[The Government is asked to reply in detail to the present comments in 2016.]

CMNT_TITLE

Articles 3 to 14. Seafarer’s employment agreement. The Committee has been requesting the Government for a number of years to specify the laws and regulations implementing the various provisions of the Convention. The Government has previously referred to the Maritime Civil Service Act No. 201 of 1975 and to the Labour Code (Act No. 71 of 1987) as being the two enactments that give effect to the requirements of the Convention. The Committee has been drawing the Government’s attention to the fact that these two texts do not give effect, or give effect only partially, to important provisions of the Convention such as Articles 3, 5, 6, 8 and 9. In view of the sparse and fragmented information provided by the Government in consecutive reports, the Committee is not in a position to verify the state of national law and practice with respect to seafarers’ employment agreements. The Committee accordingly asks the Government to clarify whether the Maritime Civil Service Act of 1975 is still in effect, which would imply that seafarers continue to enjoy the status of public employees engaged on a permanent basis. It also asks the Government to present a detailed report indicating the specific legal provisions that ensure compliance with the terms of each Article of the Convention.

Part V of the report form. Practical application. The Committee requests the Government to provide up-to-date information on the manner in which the Convention is applied in practice, including, for instance, statistical data on the number of seafarers, both nationals and non-nationals, currently employed on board Iraqi-flagged vessels, any standard form of crew agreement and discharge document currently in use, sample copies of seafarers’ employment agreements, and relevant extracts from inspection reports showing any infringements of the relevant legislation.

Finally, the Committee recalls that Convention No. 22, as well as 36 other international maritime labour Conventions, is revised by the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006). Most of the provisions of this Convention have been incorporated without any significant changes in Regulation 2.1 and the corresponding Code of the MLC, 2006, and therefore ensuring compliance with Convention No. 22 would facilitate compliance with the respective provisions of the MLC, 2006. The Committee requests the Government to keep the Office informed on any steps taken or envisaged for the ratification and effective implementation of the MLC, 2006.

CMNT_TITLE

The Government indicates in its report that measures to ensure compliance with the Convention fall within the mandate of the Ministry of Transport, and that it has neither observations on the Convention nor obstacles to report, since the subject matter is regulated by the Civil Maritime Service Act No. 201 of 1975. In the absence of further relevant information, the Committee sees itself obliged to revert to the points it had already raised in its previous direct request.

Article 5 of the Convention. Record of employment. The Committee hopes that the Government will soon be in a position to:

(i)    describe the format of the document containing a record of the seafarer’s employment on board the vessel, the particulars recorded in it and the manner in which such particulars are entered, as determined by national law; and

(ii)   communicate a sample of the document.

CMNT_TITLE

Article 5 of the Convention. Record of employment. Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes the clarification provided by the Tripartite Consultation Committee that measures ensuring compliance with this Article of the Convention do not fall under the scope of the Ministry of Labour but rather within the remit of the Ministry of Transport, which has already been approached.

The Committee hopes that the Government will soon be in a position to: (i) communicate a copy of the document containing a record of the seafarer’s employment on board the vessel; and (ii) describe its format, the particulars recorded in it and the manner in which such particulars are entered, as determined by national law.

Furthermore, the Committee invites the Government to consider the possibility of ratifying the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, which is the up to date international instrument regarding, inter alia, seafarers’ employment agreements, and whose ratification would result in the automatic denunciation of the present Convention. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide information in its next report on any consultations which have been held on this matter.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

With reference to its previous comments in relation to Article 5 of the Convention, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that, in accordance with Decree No. 150 of 1987, seamen have been granted the status of employees and that no reports on the quality of work or reference to wages are being made under the Decree. The Committee again requests the Government to describe the form of the document to be given to each seaman, the particulars to be recorded and the manner in which such particulars are to be entered, and to provide a copy of such document.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

With reference to its previous comments in relation to Article 5 of the Convention, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that, in accordance with Decree No. 150 of 1987, seamen have been granted the status of employees and that no reports on the quality of work or reference to wages are being made under the Decree. The Committee again requests the Government to describe the form of the document to be given to each seaman, the particulars to be recorded and the manner in which such particulars are to be entered, and to provide a copy of such document.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

With reference to its previous comments in relation to Article 5 of the Convention, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that, in accordance with Decree No. 150 of 1987, seamen have been granted the status of employees and that no reports on the quality of work or reference to wages are being made under the Decree. The Committee again requests the Government to describe the form of the document to be given to each seaman, the particulars to be recorded and the manner in which such particulars are to be entered, and to provide a copy of such document.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

With reference to its previous comments in relation to Article 5 of the Convention, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that, in accordance with Decree No. 150 of 1987, seamen have been granted the status of employees and that no reports on the quality of work or reference to wages are being made under the Decree. The Committee again requests the Government to describe the form of the document to be given to each seaman, the particulars to be recorded and the manner in which such particulars are to be entered, and to provide a copy of such document.

CMNT_TITLE

With reference to its previous comments in relation to Article 5 of the Convention, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that, in accordance with Decree No. 150 of 1987, seamen have been granted the status of employees and that no reports on the quality of work or reference to wages are being made under the Decree. The Committee again requests the Government to describe the form of the document to be given to each seaman, the particulars to be recorded and the manner in which such particulars are to be entered, and to provide a copy of such document.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes the information supplied by the Government in its reports and the attached documentation.

The Committee requests the Government to refer to Article 5 of the Convention which relates to the document that every seafarer must be given. This document has to contain a record of the seafarer's employment on board the vessel, but must not contain any statement as to the quality of the seafarer's work or as to his wages. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the manner in which the form of the document, the particulars to be recorded and the conditions for its establishment are determined, and to provide a copy of the document given to every seafarer.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes the information supplied by the Government in reply to its previous direct request.

Article 5 of the Convention. Please supply a copy of the official's document that is issued to each Iraqi seafarer. As regards foreign seafarers employed on Iraqi vessels, please supply a copy of the instructions issued under the terms of section 23 of the Labour Code of 1987, and a copy of the work permit with which they are provided.

Article 9, paragraph 1. Please supply a copy of decision No. 551 of 1989 respecting seafarers employed in the public sector.

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee takes note of the information supplied by the Government in reply to its previous direct request.

Article 5 of the Convention. The Committee notes from the Government's report that section 143(a), subparagraph 2, of the Labour Law, provides for all workmen in the public sector to be given a work card on which the main information contained in his file will be reproduced. The Committee also notes that, included in the information contained in the file, is the amount of wages received and any sanctions imposed upon the workman. The Committee wishes to draw the Government's attention to the fact that, in so far as the work card might be considered as being the document provided for in the Convention, it should contain no assessment of the quality of the work of the seaman nor any indication concerning his wages. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would indicate the steps taken or under consideration to prevent this information appearing on the card.

With regard to foreign workers, the Committee notes that Regulation No. 30 of 25 September 1973, referred to in the Governments' report, provides for the issue of a work permit to foreign nationals for them to exercise an activity in Iraq.

The Committee requests the Government to supply additional information concerning the way in which this work permit could take the place of the document provided for by this Article of the Convention in the case of foreign seamen employed on Iraqi vessels.

Article 9, paragraph 1. In its previous comments, the Committee pointed out that under section 40 of Law No. 201 of 1975, the Civil Marine Service, seamen may, as a rule, resign, but their resignation may be refused by the maritime organisation in question. In its report, the Government states that in the event of the seaman terminating the contract, under section 83 of Law No. 201 of 1975, the provisions of section 26(c) of the Labour Law become applicable. Under section 83, issues not covered by the above Law are regulated by the provisions of the Labour Law. In view of the fact, however, that the issue of the resignation of seamen is expressely covered by section 40 of Law No. 201, the Civil Marine Service, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would specify the way in which section 26(c) of the Labour Law could apply in this case.