ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Home > Country profiles >  > Comments > All Comments

DISPLAYINEnglish - French - Spanish

CMNT_TITLE

The Committee notes the Government’s second and third reports on the application of the Convention. It notes the observations of the French Confederation of Christian Workers (CFTC) and the French Democratic Confederation of Labour (CFDT), supported by the French Confederation of Management – General Confederation of Professional and Managerial Employees (CFE–CGC), transmitted by the Government. The Committee notes that the Government has submitted comments in reply to these observations. The Committee also notes that a delegation of the French Government visited the headquarters of the International Labour Office on 14 December 2017 to discuss methods of implementation of the Convention. The Committee notes that the Amendments of 2016 to the Annexes of the Convention entered into force for France on 8 June 2017. The Committee recalls that the amendments are aimed at aligning the technical requirements of the Convention with the more modern standards adopted by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). In particular, they are intended to change the biometric in the seafarer’s identity document from a fingerprint template in a two-dimensional barcode to a facial image stored in a contactless electronic chip, as defined by ICAO Document 9393.
Articles 2 to 5 of the Convention. Seafarers’ identity documents. In its previous comment, the Committee noted the Government’s explanation of the financial and technical considerations which had not permitted the implementation of the Convention. The Committee notes that Act No. 2013-619 of 16 July 2013 amended the Transport Code to incorporate the requirement to issue seafarers’ identity documents. However, the Committee notes that section L.5512-4 of the Code provides that a decree of the Council of State shall determine the conditions of implementation, particularly with regard to the following points: (1) the biometric data of the document holder; (2) a personal identification number; (3) the period within which seafarers’ identity documents shall be delivered; (4) the fees payable; (5) the remedies and their time limits in the event of refusal, suspension or withdrawal of the document; (6) the model document and the information included in it; (7) the holder’s right of access to personal data; (8) the conditions of verification of the holders of seafarers’ identity documents; and (9) data processing storage and security measures. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the application of the Convention in France is awaiting the publication of these regulations. The Committee notes that the CFTC emphasizes the unusual nature of the situation, as sections L.5512-1 to L5512-4 were established by the Act of 16 July 2013 and as, in France, implementation decrees must be published within a “reasonable period of time”, which has been substantially exceeded in its view. The Committee recalls the resolution adopted at the Third Meeting of the Special Tripartite Committee of the MLC, 2006, which expresses concern at the difficulties seafarers continue to have in accessing shore leave and transiting in certain ports and terminals around the world and recognizes that although an increased number of member States have ratified Convention No. 185, there still appear to be problems in ensuring the Convention works in the way that it was originally intended. Noting the efforts made to give effect to the Convention, the Committee requests the Government to adopt the necessary regulatory measures to that end.

CMNT_TITLE

Articles 1 to 7 of the Convention. Seafarers’ identity documents. The Committee notes the information contained in the Government’s first report on the application of the Convention. It notes that, within the framework of the consultations held with the representative national employers’ and workers’ organizations before the ratification of the Convention, it was agreed that its application would be extended to fishers. The Committee also notes the explanations provided by the Government on the technical and financial considerations which have until now prevented the implementation of the Convention. It notes that both in its report and its interventions during the first meeting of the Preparatory Tripartite Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, Committee, held in Geneva in September 2010, the Government supported the possibility of incorporating a microchip into the seafarers’ identity document, in order to ensure compatibility with the standards of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). The Committee notes that, pending the issuance of the seafarers’ identity documents with biometric elements as provided for by the Convention, it has been deemed necessary to create a new maritime workbook, issued by an Order of 24 January 2007. The maritime workbook provides better guarantees of security, through the attribution of a serial number and the incorporation of a device for its traceability. It proves the holder’s status as an able seafarer under the terms of the regulated profession, but explicitly indicates that it does not constitute a seafarer’s identity document, and does not therefore correspond to the objectives of the Convention. The Committee is fully aware of the fact that the introduction of the devices and systems required for the implementation of the Convention may take some time, particularly in view of the highly technical nature of certain requirements and procedures and recommended practices. The Committee hopes that the Government will soon be in a position to report on- progress made in the implementation of the Convention and requests it to provide the Office, upon the completion of its current assessment of the possibility of including a microchip in seafarers’ identity documents, as indicated in its report, all relevant information concerning the application of the Convention, including a specimen of the seafarers’ identity document which will be issued by the French authorities.
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer