ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Home > Country profiles >  > Comments

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1994, published 81st ILC session (1994)

Workmen's Compensation (Accidents) Convention, 1925 (No. 17) - Kenya (Ratification: 1964)

Other comments on C017

Direct Request
  1. 2012

Display in: French - SpanishView all

1. In reply to the Committee's previous comments, the Government states in its report that it has found it necessary to once again refer the proposed legislation on the Work Injury Benefits (Insurance) Scheme to the Tripartite Labour Advisory Board for further detailed discussions with a view to bringing it into total harmony with the relevant provisions of the Convention. It adds that the proposed legislation which also aims at incorporating the views of the Committee has now been submitted to Parliament for possible enactment. The Committee notes this information. It hopes that this legislation will be adopted soon so as to give full effect to the provisions of the Convention, that the final text will eliminate all previously noted discrepancies with the Convention on the following points and that it will also take into consideration the points raised by the ILO in its communication dated 12 October 1990.

Article 2 of the Convention. Section 22(2) of the draft text excludes the compensation of industrial accidents for workers ordinarily employed outside Kenya but temporarily employed in Kenya by an employer who carries on business chiefly outside Kenya, unless an agreement has been concluded to the contrary. This exclusion falls outside the cases mentioned in Article 2, paragraph 2, of the Convention.

Article 5. (a) In its previous comments, the Committee drew the Government's attention to the fact that the provisions of the previous draft text provided, contrary to the Convention, for the payment of a lump sum where a degree of incapacity is less than 40 per cent or where the amount of the compensation is less than a certain sum, under conditions which are not authorized by this provision of the Convention. The Committee notes in this context that section 56(1) of the latest draft text supplied by the Government prohibits the conversion into a lump sum of a pension in cases in which the degree of permanent disability is higher than 20 per cent. It therefore hopes that section 48(1)(c) and (d) will be brought into line with section 56(1) so as to provide for the payment of compensation in the form of a lump sum only when the degree of incapacity does not exceed 20 per cent.

(b) Furthermore, the Committee considers that it would be desirable to replace the term "accident" by the term "death" in section 4(1)(b) and section 50(1), in order to take into account situations in which the death of a victim of an industrial accident occurs after the accident.

Article 7. In view of the fact that the additional compensation to be provided in cases where the incapacity requires the constant help of another person must be paid, in accordance with this provision of the Convention, for as long as the state of health of the injured person requires it, the Committee considers that it would be desirable to delete from section 57(1) of the draft text the words "as may be required for a specified period which shall be reviewed from time to time".

Articles 9 and 10. (a) Section 69(2) of the draft text provides for the fixing of maximum amount of compensation for expenses, particularly for medical, surgical, pharmaceutical and hospital treatment, and the supply and replacement of artificial limbs and surgical appliances, whereas the determination of a ceiling of this type is not authorized by the Convention, as the Committee has emphasized for many years.

(b) Furthermore, the Committee wishes to draw the Government's attention to the fact that the medical aid provided for in Article 9 of the Convention must be provided to injured workmen irrespective of the duration of their incapacity for work. It therefore considers that it would be desirable to delete from the definition of the term "accident" in section 2 of the draft text the terms "or results in that worker being incapacitated for work for more than three consecutive days excluding the day of the accident and any Sunday, or if Sunday is not a rest day, one rest day", particularly since section 36(2) of the draft text already provides for a waiting period of three days for the payment of cash benefit when the incapacity lasts for less than three weeks.

2. The Committee recalls that in its report of 1991, the Government stated that it had the intention of immediately updating the Workmen's Compensation Act which is currently in force with a view to meeting the requirements of Article 5 of the Convention, as well as raising the level of payments for medical, surgical or pharmaceutical aid in the event of industrial accidents, in order to give better effect to Articles 9 and 10 of the Convention. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would indicate in its next report whether the above amendments have been adopted.

The Committee also wishes to draw the Government's attention to the possibility of availing itself of the technical assistance of the Office for the implementation of the new system of compensating industrial accidents.

© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer