ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Home > Country profiles >  > Comments

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2003, published 92nd ILC session (2004)

Weekly Rest (Industry) Convention, 1921 (No. 14) - Ireland (Ratification: 1930)

Other comments on C014

Direct Request
  1. 2013
  2. 2012
  3. 2011
  4. 2010
  5. 2009
  6. 2008
  7. 2003

Display in: French - SpanishView all

Article 4 of the Convention. Section 13, paragraph 3, of the Organisation of Working Time Act of 1997 provides that an employer may, in lieu of granting an employee in each period of seven days a rest period of at least 24 hours, grant to him or her, in the next following days, two rest periods each of which shall be a period of at least 24 consecutive hours.

According to Article 4, the public authority may authorize total suspension from the provisions of Article 2, paragraph 1, which enshrines a weekly rest period of 24 consecutive hours in every period of seven days, special regard being had to all proper humanitarian and economic considerations and after consultation with responsible associations of employers and workers, wherever such exist.

The provisions of section 13, paragraph 3, of the Organisation of Working Time Act of 1997 may lead to abuse since they leave it entirely to the determination of the employer to suspend a weekly rest period, without being subject to any safeguards. According to the intention of Article 4, a proportionality test is needed between the interest of the workers to have a weekly rest period in the course of each period of seven days and the objective need of some industrial undertakings to suspend the weekly rest period for economic reasons. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate how it ensures the full application of Article 4.

Article 5. According to section 14, paragraph 1, of the Organisation of Working Time Act of 1997, an employee who is required to work on Sunday shall be compensated by remuneration or paid time off or by a combination of remuneration and paid time off. The Committee recalls that Article 5 demands, as far as possible, compensatory rest, irrespective of monetary compensation. It therefore asks the Government to indicate whether Article 5 is applied in practice.

© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer