National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
Display in: French - SpanishView all
1. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in its latest report according to which a Labour Code should be examined by the Congress of New Caledonia before the end of the first half of 2007. The report also indicates that a working paper is ready and a delegation of the State Council visited Nouméa in March 2007 on a technical mission to finalize the preliminary draft text. The Government’s report adds that a compilation of occupational safety and health texts for professionals has been prepared and its dissemination should coincide with that of the new Labour Code. Furthermore, the report indicates that the transposition of the European Union Framework Directive on Prevention and Safety is being carried out in 2007 and that this text will serve, among other objectives, to generalize in New Caledonia the concept of risk evaluation in enterprises and that the issue of the manual handling of loads forms part of the reflection that enterprises will have to carry out in the context of their risk evaluation. The Committee further notes the information provided by the Government on the effect given in practice to the provisions respecting the maximum weight of loads, on the use of modern technical means for the handling of loads and on vocational training. While noting that these developments are promising, the Committee observes that the regulations on maximum weight have not changed since its last comment. It is accordingly once again bound to reiterate its comments on the following points:
1. The Committee notes that the provisions of the Labour Code of 1926, and particularly sections R.231-72, establish limits in the merchant marine sector for loads for which the manual transport is inevitable. The Committee also notes the Government’s announcement that a draft order prepared by the medical labour inspector will be submitted to the Government with a view to improving the regulations in force along the lines indicated by the Committee. In this respect, the Committee notes that the only regulation currently in force concerning the manual transport of loads by workers is Order No. 1211-T of 19 March 1993, which gives effect to section 5 of Order No. 34/CP of 23 February 1989, which itself only establishes minimum safety and health requirements for the manual transport of loads which constitute a risk for workers, and particularly to their backs and lumbar regions. The Committee recalls that, in its previous comment, it noted the information provided by the Government, and particularly the findings of a survey of occupational physicians.
2. Articles 3 and 7 of the Convention. The Committee noted the finding of this survey that in general heavy loads are only handled occasionally, except in the case of certain activities, and particularly removals and the unloading of containers loaded with imported products. Furthermore, in practice, the average weight of loads is lower than 55 kg, except in the case of the lifting of sick persons and their transport on stretchers. With regard to the criteria applied by occupational physicians to conclude that a worker is fit for the manual transport of loads over 55 kg, account is taken of Order No. 1211-T of 19 March 1993 giving effect to section 5 of Order No. 34/CP of 23 February 1989 respecting minimum safety and health requirements for the manual transport of loads which constitute a risk for workers, and particularly to their backs and lumbar regions. In this respect, the Committee noted that section 3 above remained unchanged. The absolute limit for occasional lifting is set at 105 kg, and a worker may be regularly authorized to carry loads of over 55 kg if he has been found fit by the occupational physician. While noting the findings of the above survey, the Committee therefore requested the Government to indicate the measures which had been taken or were envisaged to ensure that workers could not be required to engage in the manual transport of a loads heavier than 55 kg. Once again, the Committee referred to the ILO publication Maximum weight in lifting and carrying (Occupational Safety and Health Series, No. 59, Geneva, 1988), in which it is indicated that 55 kg is the limit recommended from the ergonomic point of view for the admissible weight of loads to be transported occasionally by a male worker between 19 and 45 years of age. Similarly, it states that 15 kg is the limit recommended from an ergonomic point of view for the admissible weight of loads to be transported occasionally by adult women. The Committee emphasizes that it has been raising this matter for many years. It therefore hopes that the Government will take the necessary measures to give effect to the provisions of the Convention.
3. Articles 4 and 6. The Committee previously noted the technical devices (trolleys, lifts, fixed or travelling cranes) used by workers depending on the financial means of the enterprise to limit or facilitate the manual transport of loads. The Committee requests the Government to continue providing information on the application of this Article in practice.
4. Part V of the report form. The Committee notes the information provided concerning occupational accidents. The Committee requests the Government to continue providing information on the effect given in practice to the provisions respecting the maximum weight of loads which may be transported manually and, in particular, on the action taken to prevent this type of occupational accident. The Committee hopes that the Government will take the necessary measures, as soon as possible, for the adoption of the above draft order and to ensure that this text reflects the points raised by the Committee in its comments and provides effective protection for workers called upon to lift and transport loads manually.
2. The Committee requests the Government to provide any new legislative text as soon as it is adopted.
[The Government is asked to reply in detail to the present comments in 2008.]