Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2011, published 101st ILC session (2012)

Equal Remuneration Convention, 1951 (No. 100) - French Polynesia

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Repetition

Articles 2 and 4 of the Convention. Application of the principle of equal remuneration for men and women. The Committee notes the statistics supplied by the Government on trends in the average wage of employees, by sector of activity and sex, between 2004 and 2008. It notes in particular that between 2004 and 2007 there was virtually no change in the gap between men’s and women’s average wages across all sectors (approximately 10 per cent) and that it even widened in 2008, rising to 13 per cent. The statistics also show that the average wages of men are higher in all sectors except construction and public administration. The Government further indicates that women’s hourly pay is still lower than that of men in all age groups.

In its previous comments the Committee noted that negotiation in the various sectors and enterprises might be one of the topics covered by the tripartite working groups responsible for modernizing and codifying labour law, in which case there would be an opportunity to address the matter of equal remuneration for men and women. ... It furthermore notes that, according to the Government, equal remuneration is not a subject the social partners deal with specifically and that the Government, for its part, has focused its action on local employment because of the economic situation.

In view of the fact that the gap between men’s and women’s average wages persists and has even worsened recently, the Committee asks the Government to take the necessary steps, in cooperation with the workers’ and employers’ organizations, to effectively reduce and eliminate the wage gap between men and women for work of equal value. ... In this connection, the Committee once again asks the Government to provide specific information on the supervisory and preventive activities conducted by labour inspectors to reduce remuneration differentials between men and women.

Objective job evaluation. In the absence of a reply from the Government on this point, the Committee is bound to repeat its request for information on the manner in which the Government encourages an objective evaluation of jobs in the public and private sectors, and on the measures taken to ensure that part-time work is not underpaid disproportionately in comparison to full-time work. The Committee also asks the Government to continue to send statistical information on men’s and women’s wages in the various sectors of the economy.