ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Home > Country profiles >  > Comments

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2012, published 102nd ILC session (2013)

Labour Clauses (Public Contracts) Convention, 1949 (No. 94) - Rwanda (Ratification: 1962)

Other comments on C094

Display in: French - SpanishView all

Articles 1 and 2 of the Convention. Insertion of labour clauses in public contracts. The Committee has been commenting for over 30 years on the Government’s failure to enact legislation or adopt other measures with a view to implementing the basic requirements of the Convention. In its last report, the Government refers to Ministerial Order No. 5 of 13 July 2010 concerning written contracts of employment, which, however, bears little relevance to public contracts within the meaning of Article 1(1) of the Convention or to the labour clauses that public contracts should include as required under Article 2(1) of the Convention. The Committee once again recalls that the fact that the general labour legislation applies to workers engaged in the execution of public contracts, as provided for in section 96 of the Public Procurement Act of 2007, does not in itself give effect to Article 2 of the Convention which requires the insertion, in all public contracts to which the Convention applies, of labour clauses ensuring that the workers concerned benefit from wages, hours of work and other conditions of labour which are not less favourable than those established for work of the same character in the same area by collective agreement, arbitration award or national laws or regulations.
As the Committee has pointed out on a number of occasions, the legislation to which the Government refers in most cases lays down minimum standards, for instance as regards wage levels, and does not necessarily reflect the actual working conditions of workers. Thus, if the legislation lays down a minimum wage but workers in a particular profession are actually receiving higher wages, the Convention would require that any workers engaged in the execution of a public contract – in the same area and for work of the same character – be entitled to receive the prevailing wage rather than the minimum wage prescribed in the legislation.
In other terms, the application of the general labour legislation is not sufficient to ensure the application of the Convention, in as much as the minimum standards fixed by law are often improved upon by means of collective agreement or otherwise. The Committee therefore asks the Government once more to take steps without further delay in order to bring the national legislation into conformity with the provisions of the Convention, especially as regards: the determination of the terms of the labour clauses to be included in contracts after consultation with organizations of employers and workers concerned (Article 2(3)); the dissemination of those clauses, by advertising specifications or otherwise, so that tenderers are aware of the terms of the clauses (Article 2(4)); the posting of notices in conspicuous places to ensure that workers are informed of the conditions of work applicable to them (Article 4(a)(iii)); and the system of adequate sanctions, by the withholding of contracts or of payments due, for failure to apply the provisions of labour clauses (Article 5). Moreover, noting that under the Public Procurement Act of 2007, the Rwanda Public Procurement Authority (RPPA) is responsible for regulating and monitoring all public procurement operations, the Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information on any measures taken or planned by the RPPA with a view to ensuring fair labour conditions for those engaged in the execution of public contracts.
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer