Weekly Rest (Industry) Convention, 1921 (No. 14) - Peru (Ratification: 1945)

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2023, published 112nd ILC session (2024)

Previous comment on Convention No. 1: Observation

Previous comment on Convention No. 14: Direct request

Previous comment on Convention No. 52: Direct request

Previous comment on Convention No. 101: Direct request

Previous comment on Convention No. 106: Direct request

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of the ratified Conventions on working time, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 1 (hours of work, industry), 14 (weekly rest, industry), 52 (holidays with pay), 101 (holidays with pay, agriculture) and 106 (hours of rest, commerce and offices) in a single comment.

The Committee notes the observations of the National Confederation of Private Business Institutions (CONFIEP) on the application of Conventions Nos 1 and 52, received on 31 August 2023, and the observations of the Autonomous Workers’ Confederation of Peru (CATP) on the application of Conventions Nos 1, 14, 52, 101 and 106, received on 1 September 2023.

The Committee notes the decision by the tripartite committee set up to examine the two separate representations made in 2020 under article 24 of the Constitution of the ILO by the Federation of Mineworkers of the Shougang Hierro Peru and Others and the Santa Luisa de Huanzalà Mineworkers Union. The Committee notes that the tripartite committee did not find violations of Convention No. 1 in relation to the alleged violation of working time limits during COVID-19. The Committee also notes that, taking into account the context of the acute health crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic during which the representations were made, the tripartite committee emphasized the importance of engaging in broad social dialogue with all representative organizations of workers and employers in the relevant sectors when taking action to find effective and sustainable solutions to crises (such as the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic), as well as in the context of collective bargaining. The tripartite committee also recalled the impact of excessive working hours on the health and safety of workers and emphasized the fundamental nature of the occupational safety and health Conventions, as recently recognized by the ILO.

A. Hours of work

Article 2(b) of Convention No. 1. Averaging of hours of work within the weekly limits. In its previous comments, the Committee noted the lack of conformity with the Convention of section 2(1)(b) of the single consolidated text of Legislative Decree No. 854 on hours of work, overtime hours and work, as amended by Act No. 27,761 (Presidential Decree No. 007-2002-TR of 4 July 2002), which allows employers to adopt an uneven distribution of working hours in the same week, without establishing maximum limits for daily hours of work. The Committee notes that the Government has not provided information on this subject. The Committee recalls that the Convention establishes an overall daily limit of nine hours in the case of the variable distribution of working hours within a week. The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to bring section 2(1)(b) of the single consolidated text of the Act on working time and overtime hours and work into conformity with Article 2(b) of the Convention with a view to guaranteeing that, in the case of the variable distribution of working hours within a week, an overall daily limit of nine hours is established in addition to the weekly limit of 48 hours. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted or envisaged to ensure the application of this provision in practice.

Article 6(1)(b) and (2). Overtime hours. Circumstances in which temporary exceptions may be permitted, Overtime pay and maximum number of hours permitted. With reference to its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that overtime hours are of an exceptional nature in accordance with section 9 of the single consolidated text of the Act on hours of work and overtime hours and work. However, the Committee notes that section 9 provides that overtime work shall be voluntary and shall only be compulsory in cases of unforeseen circumstances or force majeure. The Committee also notes that the CATP, in its observations, indicates that in certain sectors the limits on working time are exceeded and that, for example in the context of subcontracting, workers have to accept very long working days. The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that overtime hours are only worked in exceptional cases of unforeseen pressure of work and are only allowed to enable enterprises to cope with unforeseen cases of pressure of work, in accordance with Article 6(1)(b) of the Convention.

Furthermore, in its previous comments, the Committee noted the absence of conformity of section 10 of the single consolidated text of the Act on hours of work and overtime hours and work, as it allows overtime pay to be replaced by compensatory rest. The Committee notes that the Government has not provided any further information on this subject. The Committee also notes the absence of legislative provisions establishing the maximum number of overtime hours that may be allowed in each case. With reference to compensation for overtime hours, the Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to bring section 10 of the single consolidated text of the Act on hours of work and overtime hours and work into conformity with Article 6(2) of the Convention in order to guarantee that overtime hours are paid at a rate of not less than 125 per cent of the regular rate, irrespective of any compensatory rest afforded to workers. The Committee also requests the Government to indicate the maximum number of additional hours that may be allowed in practice.

B. Weekly rest

Article 5 of Convention No. 14 and Article 8(3) of Convention No. 106. Compensatory rest. In relation to its previous comments, the Committee notes that the Government refers in its report to section 3 of Legislative Decree No. 713 of 8 November 1991, which consolidates the legislation on paid leave for workers subject to the labour regulations governing the private sector, but does not provide additional information, and indicates that the national legislation is in conformity with the provisions of the Conventions. In this regard, the Committee notes the CATP’s indication that section 3 of Legislative Decree No. 713 has still not been amended, in contravention of the provisions of the Conventions on weekly rest. It adds that this situation not only endangers the health and life of workers, but also the well-being of their families. The Committee recalls that the rationale for compensatory rest is the need to protect the health and well-being of workers and emphasizes the importance that any financial compensation is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the requisite compensatory rest (2018 General Survey concerning working-time instruments, paragraph 267). The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to bring section 3 of Legislative Decree No. 713 into conformity with the Conventions with a view to ensuring that workers who are subject to exceptions to the principle of weekly rest are entitled to compensatory rest of not less than 24 consecutive hours in each period of seven days, irrespective of any financial compensation.

C. Holidays with pay

Article 4 of Convention No. 52 and Article 8 of Convention No. 101. Monetary compensation for leave not taken. Partial relinquishment of holidays. In relation to its previous comments, the Committee notes that the Government refers to section 23 of Legislative Decree No. 713, which establishes the remuneration and compensation which shall be received by workers in the event that they do not take their holidays within the year following that in which they became due. The Committee recalls that Article 4 of Convention No. 52 and Article 8 of Convention No. 101 provide that any agreement to relinquish the right to annual holiday with pay, or to forgo such holiday, shall be void. The Committee therefore requests the Government to take the necessary measures to bring section 23 of Legislative Decree No. 713 into conformity with the Convention in order to ensure that workers benefit effectively from the right to annual holidays with pay in the form of a period of rest and leisure that is sufficiently long to preserve their health and well-being.

The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2013, published 103rd ILC session (2014)

Article 5 of the Convention. Compensatory rest. The Committee requests the Government to refer to the comments made under Article 8(3) of the Weekly Rest (Commerce and Offices) Convention, 1957 (No. 106).

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2008, published 98th ILC session (2009)

Article 5 of the Convention. Compensatory rest. The Committee requests the Government to refer to the comments made under Article 8, paragraph 3, of Convention No. 106.

Part V of the report form. Practical application. The Committee notes the statistical information sent by the Government on the number of inspections carried out during the period 2007–08 for the purpose of supervising the legislation on weekly rest and the number of breaches recorded. It requests the Government to continue to provide general information on the manner in which the Convention is applied in practice, including, for instance, extracts of reports from the labour inspection services indicating the number and nature of breaches of the rules on weekly rest and the penalties imposed, information on the number of workers covered by the legislation, etc.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2005, published 95th ILC session (2006)

Article 5 of the Convention. Compensatory rest. The Committee notes that, in its 2003 report on Convention No. 106, the Government indicated that no amendment had been made to section 3 of Legislative Decree No. 713, under the terms of which employees who work on a rest day without compensatory rest during the rest of the week benefit from an increase in their wage rate of 100 per cent. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken to ensure compliance with Article 5 of the Convention, under the terms of which States must make, as far as possible, provision for compensatory periods of rest for the suspensions or diminutions made in virtue of the exceptions prescribed by Article 4 of the Convention.

Part V of the report form. The Committee requests the Government to provide general indications on the manner in which the Convention is applied in practice, providing, for example, extracts from inspection services reports and, if possible, other information on the number of workers protected by the legislation, the number and nature of the contraventions reported, etc.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2002, published 91st ILC session (2003)

The Committee notes the information provided by the Government. It requests the Government to supply further information on the following point.

Article 2 of the Convention. The Committee notes that section 25 of the Political Constitution entitles workers to weekly rest, stating that laws or agreements shall regulate its enjoyment and compensation. It further notes that neither Legislative Decree No. 276 of 6 March 1984 on the administrative career and remuneration in the public sector nor Legislative Decree No. 800, which establishes a specific daily working time in the public administration from Monday to Friday, are applicable to public industrial undertakings.

The Committee, accordingly, again requests the Government to indicate the manner in which the Convention is applied to public industrial undertakings. It also requests the Government to refer to the comments it has made under Convention No. 106.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1995, published 82nd ILC session (1995)

The Committee notes the information in the Government's latest report and, in particular, the adoption of Legislative Decree No. 713 of 7 November 1991 and Supreme Decree No. 012-92-TR of 2 December 1992 concerning paid rest for workers in private activities. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the manner in which the Convention is applied to public industrial undertakings. It also requests the Government to refer to the comments that it has made under Convention No. 106.