Weekly Rest (Commerce and Offices) Convention, 1957 (No. 106) - Cyprus (Ratification: 1966)

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2022, published 111st ILC session (2023)

Articles 7 and 8 of the Convention. Permanent and temporary exemptions – Compensatory rest. Further to its previous comments on section 16(2) of the Organization of Working Time Act which provides that, in case of deviations from the regular weekly rest scheme, compensatory rest may, under certain circumstances, be replaced by other suitable protection, the Committee notes that the Government, in its report, indicates that the Ministry of Labour and Social Insurance will re-examine the relevant provisions of the Organization of Working Time Law in collaboration with the social partners and other competent authorities. The Committee recalls that under Articles 7(2) and 8(3) of the Convention, granting compensatory rest of a total duration equivalent to the period provided for under Article 6 is an absolute requirement and must be granted in all cases of authorized exceptions to the basic 24-hour weekly rest rule. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted to ensure that compensatory rest is granted, without exception, whenever deviations from the ordinary weekly rest scheme are authorized. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the application in practice of section 16(2) of the Organization of Working Time Act, including the number of cases in which workers working during their weekly rest period are not granted compensatory rest and the type of other suitable protection they are offered in these cases.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2013, published 103rd ILC session (2014)

Articles 7 and 8 of the Convention. Permanent and temporary exemptions – Compensatory rest. The Committee recalls its previous comment in which it drew the Government’s attention to section 16(2) of the Organisation of Working Time Act which provides that, in case of deviations from the regular weekly rest scheme, compensatory rest may, under certain circumstances, be replaced by other suitable protection. In its latest report, the Government indicates that this point has already been clarified by European case law (Jaeger case C-151/02 of 9 September 2003), according to which a reduction in the daily rest period of 11 consecutive hours by any working time performed in addition to the normal working time is subject to the condition that equivalent compensating rest periods be accorded to the workers concerned at times immediately following the corresponding periods worked. While noting the Government’s explanations, the Committee observes that the judgment of the European Court of Justice to which reference is made relates to the interpretation of the Council Directive 93/104/EC of 1993 in connection with on-call service, but does not pronounce on the possibility afforded by the directive to offer some other form of appropriate protection, instead of compensatory rest, in exceptional cases in which it is not possible for objective reasons to grant such equivalent periods of compensatory rest. In any event, the Committee recalls that under Articles 7(2) and 8(3) of the Convention, granting compensatory rest of a total duration equivalent to the period provided for under Article 6 is an absolute requirement and must be granted in all cases of authorized exceptions to the basic 24-hour weekly rest rule. The Committee accordingly requests the Government to re-examine the relevant provisions of the Organisation of Working Time Act with a view to ensuring that compensatory rest is granted, without exception, whenever deviations from the ordinary weekly rest scheme are authorized.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2009, published 99th ILC session (2010)

Article 6 of the Convention. Regular weekly rest scheme. The Committee notes the Government’s explanations concerning the Regulation of the Operation of Shops and Employment Terms of their Employees Act No. 155(I) of 2006 which reply only partially to the points raised by the Committee in its previous comment. The Committee is obliged once again to draw the Government’s attention to section 6(3) of the Organization of Working Time Act No. 63(I) of 2002, as amended, which empowers the employer to decide at his/her discretion to grant to his/her employees either two separate rest periods of 24 consecutive hours each within a 14-day period, or alternatively, a continuous rest period of 48 hours in every period of 14 days. In this connection, the Committee is bound to recall that the basic standard defined in this Article of the Convention is that workers are entitled to an uninterrupted weekly rest period comprising not less than 24 hours in the course of each period of seven days, and this rest period should, to the extent possible, be provided simultaneously to all workers of the same establishment and should coincide with the day already designated by tradition or custom as day of weekly rest. The Convention is thus articulated around three basic principles: regularity (rest to be taken at seven-day intervals), continuity (rest of at least 24 consecutive hours) and uniformity (weekly break to be taken simultaneously by all workers). The Convention permits, of course, special weekly rest schemes, or permanent exceptions, from the general weekly rest standard (Article 7), in particular when keeping certain establishments in operation on the day of rest is required under exceptional conditions. It seeks to guarantee, however, that exceptions to the normal weekly rest are authorized on limited and well-circumscribed grounds, and only after consultations with the representative organizations of employers’ and workers’ organizations concerned. The Committee considers that as it is currently worded, section 6(3) of the Organization of Working Time Act offers, in general, the choice between two alternative weekly rest schemes thus going beyond what is prescribed by Article 6(1) of the Convention. The Committee therefore asks the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged to ensure that the accumulation or distribution of weekly rest over a period longer than a week is an exception, and not an alternative to the basic standard, and that is authorized only under the limited conditions set out in Article 7 of the Convention.

Articles 7 and 8. Exceptions. Compensatory rest. The Committee notes that under section 15 of the Organization of Working Time Act, the Act does not apply to the extent that other legislative arrangements regulate working time for specified occupations or activities. The Committee would appreciate if the Government would specify and transmit copies of any such legislative arrangements that may have so far been adopted.

Moreover, the Committee notes that section 16(2) of the Organization of Working Time Act allows for deviations to the regular weekly rest scheme by means of collective agreements on condition that provision is made for compensatory rest to be granted to the workers concerned, or for other suitable protection, where due to exceptional circumstances it is objectively impossible to grant compensatory rest. Such deviations are permitted with respect to the following activities: (i) work taking place at a distant place; (ii) security and surveillance services; (iii) activities requiring continuity of services (for instance, hospitals, ports and airports, media, television and radio, fire brigade, electricity generation and water supply, industries which cannot suspend their operations, research and development, agriculture and city transport); (iv) foreseeable increase in workload (especially in agriculture, forestry and postal services); (v) railway personnel; (vi) force majeure; and (vii) accident, actual or threatened. The Committee requests the Government to provide additional explanations on any working time arrangements which may have been introduced by virtue of section 16(2) of the Organization of Working Time Act with respect to the above-listed activities and transmit copies of all relevant collective agreements. Finally, the Committee recalls that under Articles 7(2) and 8(3) of the Convention, compensatory rest of a total duration equivalent to the period provided for under Article 6 is an absolute requirement and must be granted in all cases of authorized exceptions to the basic weekly rest scheme. The Committee accordingly requests the Government to consider the partial amendment of section 16(2) of the Organization of Working of Time Act so as to ensure that compensatory rest is granted for all deviations from the ordinary weekly rest scheme without exception.

Part V of the report form. Application in practice. The Committee notes that the Government has not communicated for many years general information concerning the application of the Convention in practice. It would therefore appreciate receiving up to date information in this regard, including, for instance, statistics on the approximate number of workers covered by the relevant legislation, labour inspection results showing the number of contraventions observed concerning weekly rest and sanctions imposed, etc.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2003, published 92nd ILC session (2004)

The Committee notes the Organization of Working Time Act No. 63(I) of 2002.

Articles 6, 7 and 8 of the Convention. Section 6, paragraph 3, of the Organization of Working Time Act provides that any employer may decide to grant to an employee one rest period of 48 consecutive hours within a period of 14 days.

The Committee recalls that Article 6 of the Convention stipulates an uninterrupted weekly rest period comprising not less than 24 hours in the course of each period of seven days.

Special weekly rest schemes may, in accordance with Article 7 of the Convention, only be authorized by the public authority after consultation with the representative employers’ and workers’ organizations concerned to specified categories of persons or specified types of establishments, regard being paid to all proper social and economic considerations. Section 6, paragraph 3, of the Organization of Working Time Act, however, is not restricted to specified circumstances as stipulated under Article 7. It applies to all employees without limitation whatsoever and is therefore possibly open to abuse.

Also, temporary exceptions, including the suspension of the rest period, are only permissible under certain conditions as laid down in Article 8, like cases of force majeure, or in the event of abnormal pressure of work due to special circumstances, while section 6, paragraph 3, of the Organization of Working Time Act applies in all circumstances.

The Committee therefore requests the Government to take the necessary steps to bring section 6, paragraph 3, of the Organization of Working Time Act in line with the provisions of the Convention and to inform it accordingly.

Article 7. The Government is asked to indicate and to communicate legislative arrangements mentioned in section 15 of the Organization of Working Time Act, which may regulate special weekly rest schemes for specific occupations.

Article 8, paragraph 3. According to section 16, paragraph 2, of the Organization of Working Time Act a compensatory rest period is granted for deviations from the ordinary weekly rest period, apart from deviations in exceptional circumstances in which it is objectively impossible to grant a compensatory rest period and where suitable protection shall be granted instead.

The Committee reiterates that for temporary exemptions, Article 8, paragraph 3, is demanding in all cases for a compensatory rest period of a total duration at least equivalent to the period provided for under Article 6. The Committee therefore asks the Government to take the necessary action to bring the legislation in line with Article 8, paragraph 3, and to inform it accordingly.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1991, published 78th ILC session (1991)

With reference to its previous comments, the Committee notes with satisfaction the issuance on 18 May 1990 of the Employees (Hours of Work) (Amendment) Order of 1990 which expressly provides that in cases where work has to be carried out during the weekly rest day compensatory rest should be granted, in accordance with Article 8, paragraph 3, of the Convention.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1987, published 74th ILC session (1987)

With reference to its previous comments, the Committee notes with satisfaction the adoption of Ordinance No. 247 of 1985 (amending section 4 of the Ordinance of 1961 respecting the hours of work of employees) which guarantees employees an uninterrupted weekly rest period, in accordance with Article 6 of the Convention.

The Committee hopes that the Government will complete the above-mentioned Order by a provision granting a compensatory rest period in cases where work has to be performed on the day of weekly rest, as required by Article 8, paragraph 3 of the Convention.