National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
Display in: French - Spanish
Repetition The Committee notes that the Government’s reports have not been received. Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government’s statement that despite the absence of a fishing fleet or fishing activity in salt waters, it intends to continue being party to the Conventions. The Committee also notes that the Law on Maritime Navigation was adopted on 17 November 2011 and amended in 2013 and in 2015. The Committee will examine the impact of this Law on the application of the Conventions in its next session. For that purpose, the Committee firmly hopes that the Government’s reports on the application of the Conventions will shortly be received.
The Committee notes the Government’s report and the attached comments of the Union of Employers of Serbia and the Nezavisnost Trade Union Confederation. It notes the Government’s statement made under Convention No. 113 that following political developments in recent years, the Republic of Serbia has become a landlocked State and that no seagoing vessels are currently registered in the Marine Ship Registry. It also notes the Government’s indication that no concrete data are available as to whether any nationals are engaged as fishers on board foreign-flagged fishing vessels. The Committee understands that at present all fishing activities are limited to inland waters and involve freshwater fishing. In this connection, the Committee recalls that, as set out in Article 1, paragraph 1, the Convention applies to persons engaged in “maritime fishing in salt waters” and therefore the Convention is without object under the present circumstances. In light of the above, the Committee requests the Government to re-examine the advisability of remaining bound by the Convention. For all useful purposes, the Committee recalls that the Convention may be denounced every ten years and is current open to denunciation for one year since 6 November 2008. It accordingly requests the Government to keep the Office informed of any decisions taken in this regard.
The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
The Committee notes from the Government’s report that at present, no legislation exists in Serbia, to implement the Convention. The Committee asks the Government to indicate to what extent the relevant legislation of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia continues to be applicable to Serbia. The Government is requested to indicate the measures taken to give effect to the Convention.
The Committee notes from the Government’s report that at present, no legislation exists in Serbia, to implement the Convention. It further notes that there is no information available on the application of the Convention in Montenegro. The Committee asks the Government to indicate to what extent the relevant legislation of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia continues to be applicable, both to Serbia and to Montenegro. The Government is requested to indicate the measures taken to give effect to the Convention.