Abolition of Forced Labour Convention, 1957 (No. 105) - Sierra Leone (Ratification: 1961)

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

Article 1(a) of the Convention. Penal sanctions involving compulsory labour as a punishment for expressing political views. 1. Public Order Act of 1965. The Committee previously requested the Government to amend the provisions of sections 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act of 1965 according to which offences related to the publication of false news and seditious offences are punishable with imprisonment not exceeding one year or seven years, respectively (which may involve compulsory labour by virtue of section 51 of the Correctional Service Act of 2014). The Committee notes with interest that Part V (sections 26 to 37) of the Public Order Act of 1965 concerning defamatory and seditious libel has been repealed by the Public Order (Amendment) Act of 2020.

The Committee also noted, in its previous comments, that contravening the requirements set forth under section 24 of the Public Order Act of 1965 for convening or holding a public meeting is punishable with a fine or imprisonment for a period not exceeding six months (which may involve compulsory labour). The Committee recalls that the Convention protects persons who express political views or views ideologically opposed to the established political, social or economic system by establishing that in the context of activities they carry on for these purposes (like for example holding a public meeting) they cannot be punished with sanctions involving an obligation to work. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the scope of liability for individuals who contravene section 24 of the Public Order Act. It also requests the Government to provide information on the application of this provision in practice, including on courts decisions handed down and any sanction that may have been imposed.

2. Political Parties Act, 2002. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that section 12(5) of the Political Parties Act, 2002, prohibits a political party from holding a public meeting without having been issued a final certificate of registration by the Political Parties Registration Commission (PPRC), and that under section 28 of the Act the executive members of a political party that do so are liable on conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding one year (which may involve compulsory labour). The Committee requested the Government to provide information on the application in practice of these sections, including information on the activities of the PPRC.

The Committee notes that the Government refers to two instances where the PPRC mediated and resolved a political impasse concerning two national parties. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the activities of the PPRC with regard to the issuance or refusal of final certificates of registration of political parties (section 12(5)) as well as on the application in practice of section 28 of the Political Parties Act, including relevant court rulings and any sentences imposed.

3. Independent Media Commission Act, 2000. The Committee previously noted that, under section 40(a) of the Independent Media Commission Act, 2000, any person who operates a media institution without a license from or registration by the Independent Media Commission (IMC) is liable on summary conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding two years (which may involve compulsory prison labour). The Committee requested the Government to provide information about the application of section 40 of the Act in practice, including information on activities of the IMC involving the denial of licensing and registration of media institutions, as well as on any relevant cases involving prosecutions under this section and the imposition of prison sentences. The Committee notes that the Independent Media Commission Act, 2000, has been repealed by the Independent Media Commission Act, 2020. It notes with interest that the contraventions of the relevant provisions of the Act, 2020, are punishable with fines only.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2020, published 109th ILC session (2021)

The Committee notes with deep concern that the Government’s report has not been received. It expects that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments. The Committee informs the Government that, if it has not supplied replies to the points raised by 1 September 2021, then it may proceed with the examination of the application of the Convention on the basis of the information at its disposal at its next session.

Repetition

Article 1(a) of the Convention. Penal sanctions involving compulsory labour as a punishment for expressing political views. In its earlier comments the Committee asked the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act, 1965 (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences), as well as information on the activities of the Independent Media Commission (IMC) referred to in the Government’s report. It further requested particulars of the outcome of the work of the Constitutional Review Committee, to which the Government had been referring since 1995. The Committee notes with regret that no report in reply to its comments has been received from the Government.

Noting that the Supreme Court, in a November 2009 ruling, dismissed a challenge (under section 25 of the Constitution guaranteeing the freedom of expression) to the constitutional validity of the provisions of the Public Order Act, 1965, which criminalize defamatory and seditious libel, the Committee once again asks the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act, 1965.

The Committee notes that section 12(5) of the Political Parties Act, 2002, prohibits a political party from holding a public meeting without having been issued a final certificate of registration by the Political Parties Registration Commission (PPRC), and that under section 28 of the Act the executive members of a political party that does so are liable on conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding one year (which may involve compulsory labour by virtue of section 45 of the Prisons Ordinance, 1960). The Committee requests the Government to provide information about the application in practice of these sections of the Act, including information on the activities of the PPRC, as well as on relevant court rulings and any sentences imposed.

The Committee notes that, under section 40(a) of the Independent Media Commission Act, 2000, any person who operates a media institution without a licence from or registration by the IMC is liable on summary conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding two years (which may involve compulsory prison labour). The Committee requests the Government to provide information about the application of section 40 of the Act in practice, including information on activities of the IMC involving the denial of licensing and registration of media institutions, as well as on any relevant cases involving prosecutions under this section and the imposition of prison sentences.

Noting from the “Strategic Plan (2009–11)” of the Human Rights Commission of Sierra Leone that the constitutional review process has yet to be completed, the Committee again requests particulars of the outcome of work of the Constitutional Review Committee, once that work is completed.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2019, published 109th ILC session (2021)

The Committee notes with deep concern that the Government’s report has not been received. It expects that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments. The Committee informs the Government that, if it has not supplied replies to the points raised by 1 September 2020, then it may proceed with the examination of the application of the Convention on the basis of the information at its disposal at its next session.

Repetition

Article 1(a) of the Convention. Penal sanctions involving compulsory labour as a punishment for expressing political views. In its earlier comments the Committee asked the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act, 1965 (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences), as well as information on the activities of the Independent Media Commission (IMC) referred to in the Government’s report. It further requested particulars of the outcome of the work of the Constitutional Review Committee, to which the Government had been referring since 1995. The Committee notes with regret that no report in reply to its comments has been received from the Government.

Noting that the Supreme Court, in a November 2009 ruling, dismissed a challenge (under section 25 of the Constitution guaranteeing the freedom of expression) to the constitutional validity of the provisions of the Public Order Act, 1965, which criminalize defamatory and seditious libel, the Committee once again asks the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act, 1965.

The Committee notes that section 12(5) of the Political Parties Act, 2002, prohibits a political party from holding a public meeting without having been issued a final certificate of registration by the Political Parties Registration Commission (PPRC), and that under section 28 of the Act the executive members of a political party that does so are liable on conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding one year (which may involve compulsory labour by virtue of section 45 of the Prisons Ordinance, 1960). The Committee requests the Government to provide information about the application in practice of these sections of the Act, including information on the activities of the PPRC, as well as on relevant court rulings and any sentences imposed.

The Committee notes that, under section 40(a) of the Independent Media Commission Act, 2000, any person who operates a media institution without a licence from or registration by the IMC is liable on summary conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding two years (which may involve compulsory prison labour). The Committee requests the Government to provide information about the application of section 40 of the Act in practice, including information on activities of the IMC involving the denial of licensing and registration of media institutions, as well as on any relevant cases involving prosecutions under this section and the imposition of prison sentences.

Noting from the “Strategic Plan (2009–11)” of the Human Rights Commission of Sierra Leone that the constitutional review process has yet to be completed, the Committee again requests particulars of the outcome of work of the Constitutional Review Committee, once that work is completed.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2018, published 108th ILC session (2019)

The Committee notes with concern that the Government’s report has not been received. It expects that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments initially made in 2013.

Repetition

Article 1(a) of the Convention. Penal sanctions involving compulsory labour as a punishment for expressing political views. In its earlier comments the Committee asked the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act, 1965 (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences), as well as information on the activities of the Independent Media Commission (IMC) referred to in the Government’s report. It further requested particulars of the outcome of the work of the Constitutional Review Committee, to which the Government had been referring since 1995. The Committee notes with regret that no report in reply to its comments has been received from the Government.

Noting that the Supreme Court, in a November 2009 ruling, dismissed a challenge (under section 25 of the Constitution guaranteeing the freedom of expression) to the constitutional validity of the provisions of the Public Order Act, 1965, which criminalize defamatory and seditious libel, the Committee once again asks the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act, 1965.

The Committee notes that section 12(5) of the Political Parties Act, 2002, prohibits a political party from holding a public meeting without having been issued a final certificate of registration by the Political Parties Registration Commission (PPRC), and that under section 28 of the Act the executive members of a political party that does so are liable on conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding one year (which may involve compulsory labour by virtue of section 45 of the Prisons Ordinance, 1960). The Committee requests the Government to provide information about the application in practice of these sections of the Act, including information on the activities of the PPRC, as well as on relevant court rulings and any sentences imposed.

The Committee notes that, under section 40(a) of the Independent Media Commission Act, 2000, any person who operates a media institution without a licence from or registration by the IMC is liable on summary conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding two years (which may involve compulsory prison labour). The Committee requests the Government to provide information about the application of section 40 of the Act in practice, including information on activities of the IMC involving the denial of licensing and registration of media institutions, as well as on any relevant cases involving prosecutions under this section and the imposition of prison sentences.

Noting from the “Strategic Plan (2009–11)” of the Human Rights Commission of Sierra Leone that the constitutional review process has yet to be completed, the Committee again requests particulars of the outcome of work of the Constitutional Review Committee, once that work is completed.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2017, published 107th ILC session (2018)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments initially made in 2012. The Committee also notes that the Government had been requested to provide information to the Committee on the Application of Standards at the 106th Session of the International Labour Conference for failure to supply reports and information on the application of ratified Conventions.

Repetition

Article 1(a) of the Convention. Penal sanctions involving compulsory labour as a punishment for expressing political views. In its earlier comments the Committee asked the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act, 1965 (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences), as well as information on the activities of the Independent Media Commission (IMC) referred to in the Government’s report. It further requested particulars of the outcome of the work of the Constitutional Review Committee, to which the Government had been referring since 1995. The Committee notes with regret that no report in reply to its comments has been received from the Government.

Noting that the Supreme Court, in a November 2009 ruling, dismissed a challenge (under section 25 of the Constitution guaranteeing the freedom of expression) to the constitutional validity of the provisions of the Public Order Act, 1965, which criminalize defamatory and seditious libel, the Committee once again asks the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act, 1965.

The Committee notes that section 12(5) of the Political Parties Act, 2002, prohibits a political party from holding a public meeting without having been issued a final certificate of registration by the Political Parties Registration Commission (PPRC), and that under section 28 of the Act the executive members of a political party that does so are liable on conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding one year (which may involve compulsory labour by virtue of section 45 of the Prisons Ordinance, 1960). The Committee requests the Government to provide information about the application in practice of these sections of the Act, including information on the activities of the PPRC, as well as on relevant court rulings and any sentences imposed.

The Committee notes that, under section 40(a) of the Independent Media Commission Act, 2000, any person who operates a media institution without a licence from or registration by the IMC is liable on summary conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding two years (which may involve compulsory prison labour). The Committee requests the Government to provide information about the application of section 40 of the Act in practice, including information on activities of the IMC involving the denial of licensing and registration of media institutions, as well as on any relevant cases involving prosecutions under this section and the imposition of prison sentences.

Noting from the “Strategic Plan (2009–11)” of the Human Rights Commission of Sierra Leone that the constitutional review process has yet to be completed, the Committee again requests particulars of the outcome of work of the Constitutional Review Committee, once that work is completed.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2016, published 106th ILC session (2017)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report contains no reply to its previous comments. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.

Repetition

Article 1(a) of the Convention. Penal sanctions involving compulsory labour as a punishment for expressing political views. In its earlier comments the Committee asked the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act, 1965 (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences), as well as information on the activities of the Independent Media Commission (IMC) referred to in the Government’s report. It further requested particulars of the outcome of the work of the Constitutional Review Committee, to which the Government had been referring since 1995. The Committee notes with regret that no report in reply to its comments has been received from the Government.

Noting that the Supreme Court, in a November 2009 ruling, dismissed a challenge (under section 25 of the Constitution guaranteeing the freedom of expression) to the constitutional validity of the provisions of the Public Order Act, 1965, which criminalize defamatory and seditious libel, the Committee once again asks the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act, 1965.

The Committee notes that section 12(5) of the Political Parties Act, 2002, prohibits a political party from holding a public meeting without having been issued a final certificate of registration by the Political Parties Registration Commission (PPRC), and that under section 28 of the Act the executive members of a political party that does so are liable on conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding one year (which may involve compulsory labour by virtue of section 45 of the Prisons Ordinance, 1960). The Committee requests the Government to provide information about the application in practice of these sections of the Act, including information on the activities of the PPRC, as well as on relevant court rulings and any sentences imposed.

The Committee notes that, under section 40(a) of the Independent Media Commission Act, 2000, any person who operates a media institution without a licence from or registration by the IMC is liable on summary conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding two years (which may involve compulsory prison labour). The Committee requests the Government to provide information about the application of section 40 of the Act in practice, including information on activities of the IMC involving the denial of licensing and registration of media institutions, as well as on any relevant cases involving prosecutions under this section and the imposition of prison sentences.

Noting from the “Strategic Plan (2009–11)” of the Human Rights Commission of Sierra Leone that the constitutional review process has yet to be completed, the Committee again requests particulars of the outcome of work of the Constitutional Review Committee, once that work is completed.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2013, published 103rd ILC session (2014)

Article 1(a) of the Convention. Penal sanctions involving compulsory labour as a punishment for expressing political views. 1. Public Order Act. The Committee previously noted that the Public Order Act, 1965 contains penalties of imprisonment (involving compulsory labour, pursuant to section 45 of the Prisons Ordinance, 1960) for offences related to public meetings (pursuant to section 24), the publication of false news (pursuant to section 32) and seditious libel (pursuant to section 33). It also noted that the Supreme Court had dismissed a challenge (made pursuant to article 25 of the Constitution guaranteeing freedom of expression) relating to the constitutional validity of the Act’s criminalization of defamatory and seditious libel.

The Committee notes the Government’s statement that the Public Order Act suppresses publications, views and opinions perceived to be critical to the established order, mostly through seditious libel. In this regard, the Government states that the Human Rights Commission of Sierra Leone has requested the Government to repeal the seditious libel provisions in the Public Order Act. The Government also states that the Act prohibits public meetings except with the expressed permission of the Inspector General of Police or established authorities, and that the Human Rights Commission of Sierra Leone has received reports that the activities of a particular society were disrupted due to a ban.

The Committee notes the statement in the Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights regarding assistance to Sierra Leone in the field of human rights, of 22 February 2011, that restrictions resulting from the application of seditious libel legislation limit the full enjoyment of the rights of freedom of expression and information. The Committee recalls that Article 1(a) of the Convention prohibits the use of forced or compulsory labour, including compulsory prison labour, as a punishment for holding or expressing political views or views ideologically opposed to the established political, social or economic system. The Committee accordingly requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that section 33 of the Public Order Act is amended or repealed so that no prison sentence involving compulsory labour can be imposed on persons who, without using or advocating violence, express certain political views or opposition to the established political, social and economic system. It also requests the Government to provide, in its next report, information on the application in practice of section 24 of the Public Order Act concerning public meetings, indicating in particular if any meetings have been prohibited, pursuant to section 24(2). It further requests the Government to provide information on the application in practice, of section 32 of the Public Order Act, including providing copies on any relevant court decisions.

2. Political Parties Act. The Committee previously noted that section 12(5) of the Political Parties Act, 2002, prohibits a political party from holding a public meeting without having been issued a final certificate of registration by the Political Parties Registration Commission (PPRC). Pursuant to section 28 of the Act, the executive members of a political party that hold such a meeting are liable on conviction to a term of imprisonment (involving compulsory prison labour) not exceeding one year.

The Committee notes an absence of information on this point in the Government’s report. With reference to paragraph 302 of its 2012 General Survey on the fundamental Conventions concerning rights at work, the Committee recalls that under Article 1(a) of the Convention, the range of activities that must be protected from punishment involving forced or compulsory labour comprises the freedom to express political or ideological views as well as the right of association and of assembly, through which citizens seek to secure the dissemination and acceptance of their views. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide information regarding the application in practice of sections 12(5) and 28 of the Political Parties Act, including any prosecutions, convictions and sentences imposed, as well as copies of relevant court decisions.

3. Independent Media Commission Act. The Committee previously noted that, under section 40(a) of the Independent Media Commission Act, 2000, any person who operates a media institution without a licence from or registration by the Independent Media Commission is liable on summary conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding two years (involving compulsory prison labour). The Committee once again requests the Government to provide information concerning the application of section 40(a) of the Independent Media Commission Act, 2000, in practice, indicating if there have been any prosecutions and convictions pursuant to this provision, and if so, to provide copies of the relevant court decisions. It also requests the Government to provide information on any refusals for applications of licences for radio or television (pursuant to section 17(3) of the Act) or for registration of newspapers (pursuant to section 27(1) of the Act) made by the Independent Media Commission.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2012, published 102nd ILC session (2013)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Repetition

Article 1(a) of the Convention. Penal sanctions involving compulsory labour as a punishment for expressing political views. In its earlier comments the Committee asked the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act, 1965 (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences), as well as information on the activities of the Independent Media Commission (IMC) referred to in the Government’s report. It further requested particulars of the outcome of the work of the Constitutional Review Committee, to which the Government had been referring since 1995. The Committee notes with regret that no report in reply to its comments has been received from the Government.

Noting that the Supreme Court, in a November 2009 ruling, dismissed a challenge (under section 25 of the Constitution guaranteeing the freedom of expression) to the constitutional validity of the provisions of the Public Order Act, 1965, which criminalize defamatory and seditious libel, the Committee once again asks the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act, 1965.

The Committee notes that section 12(5) of the Political Parties Act, 2002, prohibits a political party from holding a public meeting without having been issued a final certificate of registration by the Political Parties Registration Commission (PPRC), and that under section 28 of the Act the executive members of a political party that does so are liable on conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding one year (which may involve compulsory labour by virtue of section 45 of the Prisons Ordinance, 1960). The Committee requests the Government to provide information about the application in practice of these sections of the Act, including information on the activities of the PPRC, as well as on relevant court rulings and any sentences imposed.

The Committee notes that, under section 40(a) of the Independent Media Commission Act, 2000, any person who operates a media institution without a licence from or registration by the IMC is liable on summary conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding two years (which may involve compulsory prison labour). The Committee requests the Government to provide information about the application of section 40 of the Act in practice, including information on activities of the IMC involving the denial of licensing and registration of media institutions, as well as on any relevant cases involving prosecutions under this section and the imposition of prison sentences.

Noting from the “Strategic Plan (2009–11)” of the Human Rights Commission of Sierra Leone that the constitutional review process has yet to be completed, the Committee again requests particulars of the outcome of work of the Constitutional Review Committee, once that work is completed.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2011, published 101st ILC session (2012)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Repetition

Article 1(a) of the Convention. Penal sanctions involving compulsory labour as a punishment for expressing political views. In its earlier comments the Committee asked the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act, 1965 (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences), as well as information on the activities of the Independent Media Commission (IMC) referred to in the Government’s report. It further requested particulars of the outcome of the work of the Constitutional Review Committee, to which the Government had been referring since 1995. The Committee notes with regret that no report in reply to its comments has been received from the Government.

Noting that the Supreme Court, in a November 2009 ruling, dismissed a challenge (under section 25 of the Constitution guaranteeing the freedom of expression) to the constitutional validity of the provisions of the Public Order Act, 1965, which criminalize defamatory and seditious libel, the Committee once again asks the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act, 1965.

The Committee notes that section 12(5) of the Political Parties Act, 2002, prohibits a political party from holding a public meeting without having been issued a final certificate of registration by the Political Parties Registration Commission (PPRC), and that under section 28 of the Act the executive members of a political party that does so are liable on conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding one year (which may involve compulsory labour by virtue of section 45 of the Prisons Ordinance, 1960). The Committee requests the Government to provide information about the application in practice of these sections of the Act, including information on the activities of the PPRC, as well as on relevant court rulings and any sentences imposed.

The Committee notes that, under section 40(a) of the Independent Media Commission Act, 2000, any person who operates a media institution without a licence from or registration by the IMC is liable on summary conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding two years (which may involve compulsory prison labour). The Committee requests the Government to provide information about the application of section 40 of the Act in practice, including information on activities of the IMC involving the denial of licensing and registration of media institutions, as well as on any relevant cases involving prosecutions under this section and the imposition of prison sentences.

Noting from the “Strategic Plan (2009–11)” of the Human Rights Commission of Sierra Leone that the constitutional review process has yet to be completed, the Committee again requests particulars of the outcome of work of the Constitutional Review Committee, once that work is completed.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2010, published 100th ILC session (2011)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Article 1(a) of the Convention. Penal sanctions involving compulsory labour as a punishment for expressing political views. In its earlier comments the Committee asked the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act, 1965 (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences), as well as information on the activities of the Independent Media Commission (IMC) referred to in the Government’s report. It further requested particulars of the outcome of the work of the Constitutional Review Committee, to which the Government had been referring since 1995. The Committee notes with regret that no report in reply to its comments has been received from the Government.

Noting that the Supreme Court, in a November 2009 ruling, dismissed a challenge (under section 25 of the Constitution guaranteeing the freedom of expression) to the constitutional validity of the provisions of the Public Order Act, 1965, which criminalize defamatory and seditious libel, the Committee once again asks the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act, 1965.

The Committee notes that section 12(5) of the Political Parties Act, 2002, prohibits a political party from holding a public meeting without having been issued a final certificate of registration by the Political Parties Registration Commission (PPRC), and that under section 28 of the Act the executive members of a political party that does so are liable on conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding one year (which may involve compulsory labour by virtue of section 45 of the Prisons Ordinance, 1960). The Committee requests the Government to provide information about the application in practice of these sections of the Act, including information on the activities of the PPRC, as well as on relevant court rulings and any sentences imposed.

The Committee notes that, under section 40(a) of the Independent Media Commission Act, 2000, any person who operates a media institution without a licence from or registration by the IMC is liable on summary conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding two years (which may involve compulsory prison labour). The Committee requests the Government to provide information about the application of section 40 of the Act in practice, including information on activities of the IMC involving the denial of licensing and registration of media institutions, as well as on any relevant cases involving prosecutions under this section and the imposition of prison sentences.

Noting from the “Strategic Plan (2009–11)” of the Human Rights Commission of Sierra Leone that the constitutional review process has yet to be completed, the Committee again requests particulars of the outcome of work of the Constitutional Review Committee, once that work is completed.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2009, published 99th ILC session (2010)

Article 1, subparagraph a, of the Convention. Penal sanctions involving compulsory labour as a punishment for expressing political views. In its earlier comments the Committee asked the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act, 1965 (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences), as well as information on the activities of the Independent Media Commission (IMC) referred to in the Government’s report. It further requested particulars of the outcome of the work of the Constitutional Review Committee, to which the Government had been referring since 1995. The Committee notes with regret that no report in reply to its comments has been received from the Government.

Noting that the Supreme Court, in a November 2009 ruling, dismissed a challenge (under section 25 of the Constitution guaranteeing the freedom of expression) to the constitutional validity of the provisions of the Public Order Act, 1965, which criminalize defamatory and seditious libel, the Committee once again asks the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act, 1965.

The Committee notes that section 12(5) of the Political Parties Act, 2002, prohibits a political party from holding a public meeting without having been issued a final certificate of registration by the Political Parties Registration Commission (PPRC), and that under section 28 of the Act the executive members of a political party that does so are liable on conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding one year (which may involve compulsory labour by virtue of section 45 of the Prisons Ordinance, 1960). The Committee requests the Government to provide information about the application in practice of these sections of the Act, including information on the activities of the PPRC, as well as on relevant court rulings and any sentences imposed.

The Committee notes that, under section 40(a) of the Independent Media Commission Act, 2000, any person who operates a media institution without a licence from or registration by the IMC is liable on summary conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding two years (which may involve compulsory prison labour). The Committee requests the Government to provide information about the application of section 40 of the Act in practice, including information on activities of the IMC involving the denial of licensing and registration of media institutions, as well as on any relevant cases involving prosecutions under this section and the imposition of prison sentences.

Noting from the “Strategic Plan (2009–11)” of the Human Rights Commission of Sierra Leone that the constitutional review process has yet to be completed, the Committee again requests particulars of the outcome of work of the Constitutional Review Committee, once that work is completed.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2005, published 95th ILC session (2006)

The Committee notes that no report has been received from the Government. It must therefore repeat its previous observation on the following matters:

Article 1(a) of the Convention. In its earlier comments the Committee requested the Government to supply information on the evolution of the political situation, in so far as it relates to the application of the Convention. The Committee noted that in July 1996, the Constitutional Reinstatement Provisions Act reinstated the suspended parts of the 1991 Constitution and requested the Government to provide information on the application of provisions concerning the freedom of speech and press, freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

The Committee notes the Government’s indications in the report that, since 1996, the political climate of Sierra Leone has improved with regards to speech and press freedom, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, an independent media commission has been established and more radio stations and newspapers have emerged. The Government also states that the Constitutional Review Committee is still ongoing.

The Committee hopes that the Government will provide, in its next report, information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences), as well as the information on the activities of the independent media commission referred to in the Government’s report. Please also provide particulars of the outcome of work of the Constitutional Review Committee, to which the Government has been referring since 1995.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2004, published 93rd ILC session (2005)

The Committee notes the Government’s reply to its earlier comments.

Article 1(a) of the Convention. In its earlier comments the Committee requested the Government to supply information on the evolution of the political situation, in so far as it relates to the application of the Convention. The Committee noted that in July 1996, the Constitutional Reinstatement Provisions Act reinstated the suspended parts of the 1991 Constitution and requested the Government to provide information on the application of provisions concerning the freedom of speech and press, freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

The Committee notes the Government’s indications in the report that, since 1996, the political climate of Sierra Leone has improved with regards to speech and press freedom, freedom of peaceful assembly and association, an independent media commission has been established and more radio stations and newspapers have emerged. The Government also states that the Constitutional Review Committee is still ongoing.

The Committee hopes that the Government will provide, in its next report, information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences), as well as the information on the activities of the independent media commission referred to in the Government’s report. Please also provide particulars of the outcome of work of the Constitutional Review Committee, to which the Government has been referring since 1995.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2003, published 92nd ILC session (2004)

The Committee notes with regret that no report has been received from the Government for the sixth year in succession. It must therefore repeat its previous observation on the following matters:

In its earlier comments the Committee requested the Government to supply indications on the evolution of the political situation, in so far as it relates to the application of the Convention. It noted that the Constitution adopted in 1991 (Act No. 6 of 1991) which provided for the recognition and protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms, had been suspended. The Government informed the Committee in its latest report (1995) that public meetings of a political nature remained banned and that new guidelines for publications had been introduced.

The Committee noted that in July 1996 the Constitutional Reinstatement Provisions Act reinstated the suspended parts of the 1991 Constitution. It further noted the change of government in May 1997 and hoped that the Government would supply information on the developments of the political situation in the country, in so far as the application of the Convention is concerned, and in particular, information on the application of provisions concerning the freedom of speech and press, freedom of peaceful assembly and association. The Committee also asked the Government to provide, in its next report, the information requested in its previous observation on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences). Please also provide particulars of the outcome of work of the Constitutional Review Committee, to which the Government referred in its 1995 report.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2002, published 91st ILC session (2003)

The Committee notes with regret that no report has been received from the Government for the fifth year in succession. It must therefore repeat its previous observation on the following matters:

In its earlier comments the Committee requested the Government to supply indications on the evolution of the political situation, in so far as it relates to the application of the Convention. It noted that the Constitution adopted in 1991 (Act No. 6 of 1991) which provided for the recognition and protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms, had been suspended. The Government informed the Committee in its latest report (1995) that public meetings of a political nature remained banned and that new guidelines for publications had been introduced.

The Committee noted that in July 1996 the Constitutional Reinstatement Provisions Act reinstated the suspended parts of the 1991 Constitution. It further noted the change of government in May 1997 and hoped that the Government would supply information on the developments of the political situation in the country, in so far as the application of the Convention is concerned, and in particular, information on the application of provisions concerning the freedom of speech and press, freedom of peaceful assembly and association. The Committee also asked the Government to provide, in its next report, the information requested in its previous observation on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences). Please also provide particulars of the outcome of work of the Constitutional Review Committee, to which the Government referred in its 1995 report.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2001, published 90th ILC session (2002)

The Committee notes with regret that no report has been received from the Government. It must therefore repeat its previous observation on the following matters:

In its earlier comments the Committee requested the Government to supply indications on the evolution of the political situation, in so far as it relates to the application of the Convention. It noted that the Constitution adopted in 1991 (Act No. 6 of 1991) which provided for the recognition and protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms, had been suspended. The Government informed the Committee in its latest report (1995) that public meetings of a political nature remained banned and that new guidelines for publications had been introduced.

The Committee noted that in July 1996 the Constitutional Reinstatement Provisions Act reinstated the suspended parts of the 1991 Constitution. It further noted the change of government in May 1997 and hoped that the Government would supply information on the developments of the political situation in the country, in so far as the application of the Convention is concerned, and in particular, information on the application of provisions concerning the freedom of speech and press, freedom of peaceful assembly and association. The Committee also asked the Government to provide, in its next report, the information requested in its previous observation on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences). Please also provide particulars of the outcome of work of the Constitutional Review Committee, to which the Government referred in its 1995 report.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2000, published 89th ILC session (2001)

The Committee notes with regret that no report has been received from the Government. It must therefore repeat its previous observation on the following matters:

In its earlier comments the Committee requested the Government to supply indications on the evolution of the political situation, in so far as it relates to the application of the Convention. It noted that the Constitution adopted in 1991 (Act No. 6 of 1991) which provided for the recognition and protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms, had been suspended. The Government informed the Committee in its latest report (1995) that public meetings of a political nature remained banned and that new guidelines for publications had been introduced.

The Committee noted that in July 1996 the Constitutional Reinstatement Provisions Act reinstated the suspended parts of the 1991 Constitution. It further noted the change of government in May 1997 and hoped that the Government would supply information on the developments of the political situation in the country, in so far as the application of the Convention is concerned, and in particular, information on the application of provisions concerning the freedom of speech and press, freedom of peaceful assembly and association. The Committee also asked the Government to provide, in its next report, the information requested in its previous observation on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences). Please also provide particulars of the outcome of work of the Constitutional Review Committee, to which the Government referred in its 1995 report.

The Committee hopes that the Government will take all necessary measures in the near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1999, published 88th ILC session (2000)

The Committee notes with regret that no report has been received from the Government. It must therefore repeat its previous observation on the following matters:

In its earlier comments the Committee requested the Government to supply indications on the evolution of the political situation, in so far as it relates to the application of the Convention. It noted that the Constitution adopted in 1991 (Act No. 6 of 1991) which provided for the recognition and protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms, had been suspended. The Government informed the Committee in its latest report (1995) that public meetings of a political nature remained banned and that new guidelines for publications had been introduced. The Committee noted that in July 1996 the Constitutional Reinstatement Provisions Act reinstated the suspended parts of the 1991 Constitution. It further noted the change of government in May 1997 and hoped that the Government would supply information on the developments of the political situation in the country, in so far as the application of the Convention is concerned, and in particular, information on the application of provisions concerning the freedom of speech and press, freedom of peaceful assembly and association. The Committee also asked the Government to provide, in its next report, the information requested in its previous observation on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences). Please also provide particulars of the outcome of work of the Constitutional Review Committee, to which the Government referred in its 1995 report.

The Committee hopes that the Government will take all necessary measures in the near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1998, published 87th ILC session (1999)

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:

In its earlier comments the Committee requested the Government to supply indications on the evolution of the political situation, in so far as it relates to the application of the Convention. It noted that the Constitution adopted in 1991 (Act No. 6 of 1991) which provided for the recognition and protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms, had been suspended. The Government informed the Committee in its latest report (1995) that public meetings of a political nature remained banned and that new guidelines for publications had been introduced. The Committee noted that in July 1996 the Constitutional Reinstatement Provisions Act reinstated the suspended parts of the 1991 Constitution. It further notes the change of government in May 1997 and hopes that the Government will supply information on the developments of the political situation in the country, in so far as the application of the Convention is concerned, and in particular, the information on the application of provisions concerning the freedom of speech and press, freedom of peaceful assembly and association. The Committee also asks the Government to provide, in its next report, the information requested in its previous observation on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences). Please also provide particulars of the outcome of work of the Constitutional Review Committee, to which the Government referred in its 1995 report.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1997, published 86th ILC session (1998)

In its earlier comments the Committee requested the Government to supply indications on the evolution of the political situation, in so far as it relates to the application of the Convention. It noted that the Constitution adopted in 1991 (Act No. 6 of 1991) which provided for the recognition and protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms, had been suspended. The Government informed the Committee in its latest report (1995) that public meetings of a political nature remained banned and that new guidelines for publications had been introduced.

The Committee notes that in July 1996 the Constitutional Reinstatement Provisions Act reinstated the suspended parts of the 1991 Constitution. It further notes the change of government in May 1997 and hopes that the Government will supply information on the developments of the political situation in the country, in so far as the application of the Convention is concerned, and in particular, the information on the application of provisions concerning the freedom of speech and press, freedom of peaceful assembly and association. The Committee also asks the Government to provide, in its next report, the information requested in its previous observation on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences). Please also provide particulars of the outcome of work of the Constitutional Review Committee, to which the Government referred in its 1995 report.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1993, published 80th ILC session (1993)

The Committee notes that the Constitution adopted in 1991 (Act No. 6 of 1991) which provides for the recognition and protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms, was suspended in May 1992. The Committee notes that a council to advise on the reintroduction of a multi-party system has been established.

In its previous comments the Committee referred to the 1978 Constitution (in relation to the Recognized Party) and the Public Order Act. The Committee requested information on the application in practice of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences). The Committee notes the Government's indication in its report that following structural changes in the Ministry of Labour, the Law Officers Department will probably soon provide the information requested.

The Committee hopes that the Government will supply the information in question as well as indications on the evolution of the political situation, as far as it relates to the application of the Convention.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1992, published 79th ILC session (1992)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government's report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation on the following matters:

Article 1(a) of the Convention. 1. In comments made for a number of years, the Committee has asked for information on the practical application of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences), including the number of convictions for offences thereunder and particulars of relevant court decisions defining or illustrating the scope of these provisions. The Committee noted from the Government's report received in 1983 that the information requested was being collected. The Committee noted from that report that correspondence had been reopened requesting the Law Officers Department to state whether there had been convictions under sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act during the period 1986-87. The Committee hoped that the information requested would soon be supplied. 2. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that articles 15, 16 and 17 of the Constitution of Sierra Leone, 1978, exclude from the protection of the freedoms of conscience and of assembly and association and from the protection against discrimination, anything contained in, or done under, the authority of any law that makes provision which is reasonably required for safeguarding the proper functioning of the Recognised Party, or which imposes restrictions on the establishment of political parties other than the Recognised Party, or regulates the behaviour of members of that Party, except in so far as that provision is shown not to be reasonably justifiable in a democratic society. The Committee requested the Government to supply copies of all statutory provisions relating to the establishment of political parties, the functioning and interest of the Recognised Party and the behaviour of its members. Recalling the Government's statement in its 1983 report that it was expecting a reply from the Law Officers Department, and noting that no additional information has been provided on this subject, the Committee hoped that copies of the statutory provisions would soon be supplied.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1991, published 78th ILC session (1991)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government's report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:

Article 1(a) of the Convention. 1. In comments made for a number of years, the Committee has asked for information on the practical application of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences), including the number of convictions for offences thereunder and particulars of relevant court decisions defining or illustrating the scope of these provisions. The Committee noted from the Government's report received in 1983 that the information requested was being collected. The Committee notes from the Government's most recent report that correspondence has been reopened requesting the Law Officers Department to state whether there had been convictions under sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act during the period 1986-87. The Committee hopes that the information requested will soon be supplied. 2. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that articles 15, 16 and 17 of the Constitution of Sierra Leone, 1978, exclude from the protection of the freedoms of conscience and of assembly and association and from the protection against discrimination, anything contained in, or done under, the authority of any law that makes provision which is reasonably required for safeguarding the proper functioning of the Recognised Party, or which imposes restrictions on the establishment of political parties other than the Recognised Party, or regulates the behaviour of members of that Party, except in so far as that provision is shown not to be reasonably justifiable in a democratic society. The Committee requested the Government to supply copies of all statutory provisions relating to the establishment of political parties, the functioning and interest of the Recognised Party and the behaviour of its members. Recalling the Government's statement in its 1983 report that it was expecting a reply from the Law Officers Department, and noting that no additional information has been provided on this subject in the Government's most recent report, the Committee hopes that copies of the statutory provisions will soon be supplied.

TEXT

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1990, published 77th ILC session (1990)

The Committee notes that no report has been received from the Government. It must therefore repeat its previous observation on the following matters:

Article 1(a) of the Convention. 1. In comments made for a number of years, the Committee has asked for information on the practical application of sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act (concerning public meetings, the publication of false news and seditious offences), including the number of convictions for offences thereunder and particulars of relevant court decisions defining or illustrating the scope of these provisions. The Committee noted from the Government's report received in 1983 that the information requested was being collected. The Committee notes from the Government's most recent report that correspondence has been reopened requesting the Law Officers Department to state whether there had been convictions under sections 24, 32 and 33 of the Public Order Act during the period 1986-87. The Committee hopes that the information requested will soon be supplied. 2. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that articles 15, 16 and 17 of the Constitution of Sierra Leone, 1978, exclude from the protection of the freedoms of conscience and of assembly and association and from the protection against discrimination, anything contained in, or done under, the authority of any law that makes provision which is reasonably required for safeguarding the proper functioning of the Recognised Party, or which imposes restrictions on the establishment of political parties other than the Recognised Party, or regulates the behaviour of members of that Party, except in so far as that provision is shown not to be reasonably justifiable in a democratic society. The Committee requested the Government to supply copies of all statutory provisions relating to the establishment of political parties, the functioning and interest of the Recognised Party and the behaviour of its members. Recalling the Government's statement in its 1983 report that it was expecting a reply from the Law Officers Department, and noting that no additional information has been provided on this subject in the Government's most recent report, the Committee hopes that copies of the statutory provisions will soon be supplied.

TEXT

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.