Equality of Treatment (Social Security) Convention, 1962 (No. 118) - Tunisia (Ratification: 1965)

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2020, published 109th ILC session (2021)

Articles 4 and 5 of the Convention. Payment of old-age, invalidity and survivors’ benefits in the case of residence abroad. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to bring the legislation into full conformity with the Convention by removing the restrictions relating to the payment of old-age, invalidity and survivors’ benefits to Tunisian nationals where the latter are not resident in Tunisia at the date on which the application for benefits is made (section 49 of Decree No. 74-499 of 27 April 1974 and section 77 of Act No. 81-6 of 12 February 1981). The Committee notes the reply provided by the Government in its report concerning the measures taken with a view to ensure the application in practice of Article 4 and 5 of the Convention. It notes, in particular, that in line with the instructions of the Ministry of Social Affairs of 2007 and 2016 on the application of the Circular of the Tunisian Central Bank No. 93/21 of 10 December 1993, as modified by Circular 2007–21 of 14 August 2007, the National Social Security Fund (CNSS) transfers old-age, invalidity and survivors’ benefits abroad to Tunisian nationals living abroad, nationals of countries that have concluded bilateral agreements with Tunisia and nationals of European Union (EU) countries that are not bound by bilateral agreements with Tunisia, when they reside in their country of origin. The Government also indicates that, by virtue of the many bilateral agreements on social security concluded by Tunisia with other countries such as France, pensions are also transferred to third countries bound to both countries by instruments of coordination in the area of social security. Taking this into consideration, the Government is of the view that the incompatibility of the legislation with Articles 4 and 5 of the Convention is largely superseded by the multiplicity of international social security agreements providing for the export of benefits, which give effect to the above-mentioned Articles in practice. Lastly, the Committee notes once again the Government’s indication that a draft law and decree has been prepared with a view to ensuring the conformity of the national legislation with the Government’s obligations under the Convention. Taking note of the information provided by the Government on the measures taken to ensure in practice the payment of social security benefits to Tunisian nationals residing abroad in the same way as foreign nationals, the Committee recalls that applying the Convention also requires the adoption of legislative provision that give effect to its provisions. The Committee firmly hopes that the Government will adopt, without any further delay, the legislative amendments that are necessary to put the national legislation in full conformity with Articles 4 and 5 of the Convention by removing the condition of residence at the time of application to which nationals are subject for the payment of old-age, invalidity and survivor’s benefits abroad. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the legislative measures adopted in this regard and on any developments concerning the conclusion of additional bilateral or multilateral agreements for the maintenance of social security rights and payment of benefits abroad, notably with the European Union. Lastly, the Committee requests the Government to provide statistical information concerning the transfer of social security benefits abroad for the branches of the Convention accepted by Tunisia.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2016, published 106th ILC session (2017)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.

Repetition

Articles 4 and 5 of the Convention. Payment of old-age, invalidity and survivors’ benefits in the case of residence abroad. For many years, the Committee has been drawing the Government’s attention to the restrictions relating to the payment of old-age, invalidity and survivors’ benefits to Tunisian nationals where the latter are not resident in Tunisia at the date on which the application for benefits is made (section 49 of Decree No. 74-499 of 27 April 1974 concerning old-age, invalidity and survivors’ schemes in the non-agricultural sector and section 77 of Act No. 81-6 of 12 February 1981 concerning the organization of social security schemes in the agricultural sector), although this requirement is lifted for foreign nationals of countries bound to Tunisia by a bilateral or multilateral social security treaty that covers the export of benefits. Under this legislation, Tunisian nationals do not benefit from equality of treatment with foreign nationals, contrary to Article 4(1) of the Convention, and they may be refused old-age, invalidity and survivors’ benefits, contrary to Article 5(1) of the Convention, if they apply for the benefit when they are residing abroad in a country that has not concluded a bilateral treaty with Tunisia. The Government previously pointed out that the competent technical services had held consultations with the ILO on the subject and that a Bill intended to adapt the abovementioned provisions was being drawn up. Instructions had been given to the national social security institutions to set aside the requirement of the physical presence of the beneficiary in relation to the application for invalidity, old-age or survivors’ benefits or for employment injury benefits.

In its 2014 report, the Government indicates that the legislative reform aimed at bringing the national legislation into line with the Convention remains on the agenda of a technical committee responsible for social protection and that, in practice, the social security funds undertake the free transfer abroad of the benefits due regardless of the nationality of the beneficiaries. The Government also refers to the network of bilateral and regional social security agreements by which Tunisia is bound that have the purpose of guaranteeing rights acquired abroad.

While taking due note of this information, the Committee observes that the situation has not changed since 2007 and that legislative measures must still be taken to bring the national legislation fully into line with Articles 4 and 5 of the Convention. It also observes that the report does not contain the previously requested statistical information on the transfer of benefits abroad. The Committee therefore hopes that the Government will provide information in its next report on the specific legislative measures taken to bring the legislation into full conformity with the Convention and also provide information on the previously requested statistics.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2015, published 105th ILC session (2016)

Articles 4 and 5 of the Convention. Payment of old-age, invalidity and survivors’ benefits in the case of residence abroad. For many years, the Committee has been drawing the Government’s attention to the restrictions relating to the payment of old-age, invalidity and survivors’ benefits to Tunisian nationals where the latter are not resident in Tunisia at the date on which the application for benefits is made (section 49 of Decree No. 74-499 of 27 April 1974 concerning old-age, invalidity and survivors’ schemes in the non-agricultural sector and section 77 of Act No. 81-6 of 12 February 1981 concerning the organization of social security schemes in the agricultural sector), although this requirement is lifted for foreign nationals of countries bound to Tunisia by a bilateral or multilateral social security treaty that covers the export of benefits. Under this legislation, Tunisian nationals do not benefit from equality of treatment with foreign nationals, contrary to Article 4(1) of the Convention, and they may be refused old-age, invalidity and survivors’ benefits, contrary to Article 5(1) of the Convention, if they apply for the benefit when they are residing abroad in a country that has not concluded a bilateral treaty with Tunisia. The Government previously pointed out that the competent technical services had held consultations with the ILO on the subject and that a Bill intended to adapt the abovementioned provisions was being drawn up. Instructions had been given to the national social security institutions to set aside the requirement of the physical presence of the beneficiary in relation to the application for invalidity, old-age or survivors’ benefits or for employment injury benefits.

In its 2014 report, the Government indicates that the legislative reform aimed at bringing the national legislation into line with the Convention remains on the agenda of a technical committee responsible for social protection and that, in practice, the social security funds undertake the free transfer abroad of the benefits due regardless of the nationality of the beneficiaries. The Government also refers to the network of bilateral and regional social security agreements by which Tunisia is bound that have the purpose of guaranteeing rights acquired abroad.

While taking due note of this information, the Committee observes that the situation has not changed since 2007 and that legislative measures must still be taken to bring the national legislation fully into line with Articles 4 and 5 of the Convention. It also observes that the report does not contain the previously requested statistical information on the transfer of benefits abroad. The Committee therefore hopes that the Government will provide information in its next report on the specific legislative measures taken to bring the legislation into full conformity with the Convention and also provide information on the previously requested statistics.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2011, published 101st ILC session (2012)

Articles 4 and 5 of the Convention. Old-age, invalidity and survivors’ benefits in case of residence abroad. In the comments it has been sending to the Government for many years, the Committee has recalled that section 49 of Decree No. 74-499 of 27 April 1974 respecting the old-age, invalidity and survivors’ schemes in the non-agricultural sector and section 77 of Act No. 81-6 of 12 February 1981 concerning the organization of social security schemes in the agricultural sector, provide that the granting of the above benefits to nationals of Tunisia is subject to the applicant residing in Tunisia on the date on which the application is made, although this requirement is lifted for foreign nationals of countries bound to Tunisia by a bilateral or multilateral social security treaty. Under this legislation, Tunisian nationals do not benefit from equality of treatment with foreign nationals, in accordance with Article 4(1) of the Convention, and they may be refused old-age, invalidity and survivors’ benefits contrary to Article 5(1) of the Convention, if they apply for the benefit when they are residing abroad in a country that has not concluded a bilateral treaty with Tunisia. The Committee had therefore requested the Government to bring the national legislation into full conformity with the Convention by abolishing the above residence requirement for Tunisian nationals.

In its reports received in June 2010 and May 2011, the Government points out that, wishing to bring Tunisian legislation fully into line with the Convention, the competent government services have held in-depth discussions with the ILO. A bill intended to adapt the abovementioned provisions has been put forward with a view to finalizing the reform in respect of the Convention. As an immediate measure, the Government points out that it has instructed the national social security fund to cease requiring the physical presence of the beneficiary who applies for an invalidity, old-age or survivors’ benefit or for employment injury and sickness benefits. Furthermore, social security funds have received clear instructions to neutralize the residence requirement provided for under the abovementioned texts, with respect to entitlements and the payment of benefits, both in the case of nationals of Tunisia and nationals of States bound to Tunisia by international agreements, in which the residence clause for the same branches has been lifted.

The Committee notes with interest the measures taken by the Government to bring national practice into line with Articles 4 and 5 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the way in which the instructions given are applied by the social security institutions by supplying statistical information on the transfer of benefits abroad. The Committee hopes that the Government will finalize the reform of the abovementioned provisions with ILO technical assistance in order to anchor the established practice in national legislation.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2009, published 99th ILC session (2010)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:

Articles 4 and 5 of the Convention. With reference to its previous comments, the Committee recalls that section 49 of Decree No. 74-499 of 27 April 1974 respecting the old-age, invalidity and survivors’ schemes in the non-agricultural sector and section 77 of Act No. 81-6 of 12 February 1981 to organize social security schemes in the agricultural sector provide that the grant of the above benefits to nationals of Tunisia is subject to the applicant residing in Tunisia at the date on which the application is made, although this requirement is lifted for foreign nationals of countries which are bound to Tunisia by a bilateral or multilateral social security treaty. As Tunisian nationals do not benefit from equality of treatment with foreign nationals, in accordance with Article 4(1) of the Convention, and may be refused, contrary to Article 5(1) of the Convention, the provision of old‑age, invalidity and survivors’ benefit in the event that they are resident abroad when applying for the benefit in a country that has not concluded a bilateral treaty with Tunisia, the Committee previously requested the Government to bring the national legislation into full conformity with the Convention by abolishing the above residence requirement for Tunisian nationals.

Over the course of the past 25 years, the Government indicated in 1987 that, even though Tunisian nationals are obliged to be resident in Tunisia on the date of making the application for the pension, the residence requirement was subsequently lifted in relation to the provision of pension arrears. In 2002, the Government added, although without citing the relevant provisions, that the requirement of residence in Tunisia for the grant of pensions is also lifted for Tunisian nationals in the event of the assignment of a Tunisian worker to an enterprise based in a country with which Tunisia has concluded a social security agreement, or in the event of a temporary stay in the country of origin of the worker and her or his dependants. With regard to the requirement for Tunisian nationals to be resident in Tunisia at the time when the application for benefit is made, the Government undertook to take the Committee’s comments into consideration in the revision of the texts in question. However, in its last report, received in September 2006, the Government no longer refers to this intention and confines itself simply to indicating that when section 49 of Decree No. 74-499 of 1974 and section 77 of Act No. 81-6 of 1981 are “read in conjunction” with the provisions of the bilateral and multilateral social security agreements concluded by Tunisia, the requirement of residence is also lifted for the nationals of the contracting countries and for Tunisians resident in those countries. The clause relating to the lifting of the residence requirement forms part of the Association Agreement with the European Union in which the principle of free remittance is fully valid in relation to all social security benefits envisaged in sections 62 to 64 of the Agreement for the nationals of both contracting parties.

The Committee observes that the outcome of reading the above provisions in conjunction, as indicated by the Government, namely the raising of the residence requirement, only concerns Tunisian nationals resident in countries to which Tunisia is bound by bilateral or multilateral agreements and does not therefore resolve the problem of inequality of treatment of Tunisian nationals who may not benefit from any system of reciprocity established by such agreements. Nor is it clear to which residence requirement the Government is referring in its report: the requirement to be resident in Tunisia at the date of applying for the benefits or the residence requirement after making the application when pension arrears are due. Finally, with regard to a reading of the above legislation in conjunction with the provisions of Convention No. 118, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would demonstrate, by referring to decisions of the institutions administering social security, that the requirement to be resident in Tunisia at the time of making the application for benefits that is imposed under these laws is effectively raised for all Tunisian nationals, in the same way as for nationals of any other State that has ratified the Convention, wherever they are resident outside Tunisia and even in the absence of bilateral or multilateral agreements with the State in question. By way of illustration, the Committee requests the Government to explain the manner in which section 49 of Decree No. 74-499 of 1974 and section 77 of Act No. 81-6 of 1981 would apply in practice to Tunisian nationals and nationals of Egypt, Mauritania, the Syrian Arab Republic or Turkey, and their dependants, who are resident in one of these countries at the time that they make the application for their benefits in Tunisia.

Furthermore, the Committee notes the Government’s statement in its report that it has accepted the obligations of the Convention for the following branches of social security: medical care, sickness benefit, maternity benefit, employment injury benefit, and it indicates that invalidity and retirement pensions are not covered by the clause raising the residence requirement envisaged by the Convention as these benefits are not among the branches of social security accepted by Tunisia when ratifying the Convention. The Committee is bound to recall that when ratifying the Convention in 1965 Tunisia accepted its obligations in respect of the following branches: (a) medical care; (b) sickness benefit; (c) maternity benefit, (g) employment injury benefit; and (i) family benefit. On 21 April 1976, Tunisia extended its obligations to the following branches: (d) invalidity benefit; (e) old-age benefit; and (f) survivors’ benefit which, under the terms of Article 2(5) of the Convention, are deemed to be an integral part of the ratification and to have the force of ratification as from the above date. Under the terms of Article 2(2) of the Convention, Tunisia is under the obligation to apply the provisions of the Convention in respect of all the branches accepted. The Committee therefore hopes that the Government will ensure that institutions administering social security responsible for reading the national legislation “in conjunction” with the provisions of the Convention are correctly informed (by a circular, if necessary) of the extent and scope of Tunisia’s international obligations under the Convention and ascertain that invalidity and retirement pensions are covered by the clause raising the residence requirement for nationals of Tunisia on an equal footing with the nationals of other countries which have ratified the Convention, in accordance with the specifications of Articles 4 and 5.

Branch (g) (Employment injury benefit). In its previous comments concerning Equality of Treatment (Accident Compensation) Convention, 1925 (No. 19), the Committee noted that, by virtue of section 59 of Act
No. 94-28 of 21 February 1994 establishing the compensation scheme for occupational accidents and diseases, foreign beneficiaries of periodical payments who cease to reside in Tunisia receive as the whole of their compensation a lump sum equal to three times the total of the annual periodical payment which was or would have been granted to them, subject to the more favourable provisions of bilateral social security agreements or international treaties. In reply, the Government indicates that, taking into account the hierarchy of standards, the provisions of Conventions, including those of Convention No. 19, prevail over section 59 referred to above. The provisions of Conventions are imperative laws of immediate application and do not require instructions to be issued to institutions administering social security for their implementation. The Committee takes due note of these statements which, mutatis mutandis, would also be applicable to the provisions of Convention No. 118. Article 5(1) of Convention No. 118 requires the payment of periodical payments due in respect of employment injury in the event of residence abroad irrespective of the conclusion of any other bilateral or multilateral social security agreement. In view of the complementary obligations of Tunisia under Conventions Nos 19 and 118, the Committee requests the Government to confirm explicitly whether the nationals of all the States that have ratified Convention No. 19 and the nationals of all the States that have accepted the obligations of Convention No. 118 for branch (g) (Employment injury benefit), as well as Tunisian nationals, benefit from the provision of their periodical payments – and not a lump sum equal to three times the annual periodical payment – when they cease to be resident on the territory of Tunisia. In the absence of clear instructions to institutions administering social security, please provide examples of the application in practice of Act No. 94-28 of 21 February 1994, with particular reference to section 59, based on a specific case of the remittance of benefits consisting of the current payment of periodical payments in respect of employment injury, for example, to a national of Egypt, Mauritania, the Syrian Arab Republic or Turkey, and to their dependants resident in one of these countries.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2007, published 97th ILC session (2008)

The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in September 2006 in reply to its comments of 2002 relating to Conventions Nos 19 and 118. However, it notes that the Government has not provided a detailed report on Convention No. 118 covering the period of the five last years in accordance with the report form adopted by the Governing Body. The Committee therefore hopes that the Government will not fail to provide a detailed report for examination at its session in November–December 2009 together with replies to the following observations.

Articles 4 and 5 of the Convention. With reference to its previous comments, the Committee recalls that section 49 of Decree No. 74-499 of 27 April 1974 respecting the old-age, invalidity and survivors’ schemes in the non-agricultural sector and section 77 of Act No. 81-6 of 12 February 1981 to organize social security schemes in the agricultural sector provide that the grant of the above benefits to nationals of Tunisia is subject to the applicant residing in Tunisia at the date on which the application is made, although this requirement is lifted for foreign nationals of countries which are bound to Tunisia by a bilateral or multilateral social security treaty. As Tunisian nationals do not benefit from equality of treatment with foreign nationals, in accordance with Article 4, paragraph 1, of the Convention, and may be refused, contrary to Article 5, paragraph 1, of the Convention, the provision of old-age, invalidity and survivors’ benefit in the event that they are resident abroad when applying for the benefit in a country that has not concluded a bilateral treaty with Tunisia, the Committee previously requested the Government to bring the national legislation into full conformity with the Convention by abolishing the above residence requirement for Tunisian nationals.

Over the course of the past 25 years, the Government indicated in 1987 that, even though Tunisian nationals are obliged to be resident in Tunisia on the date of making the application for the pension, the residence requirement was subsequently lifted in relation to the provision of pension arrears. In 2002, the Government added, although without citing the relevant provisions, that the requirement of residence in Tunisia for the grant of pensions is also lifted for Tunisian nationals in the event of the assignment of a Tunisian worker to an enterprise based in a country with which Tunisia has concluded a social security agreement, or in the event of a temporary stay in the country of origin of the worker and her or his dependants. With regard to the requirement for Tunisian nationals to be resident in Tunisia at the time when the application for benefit is made, the Government undertook to take the Committee’s comments into consideration in the revision of the texts in question. However, in its last report, received in September 2006, the Government no longer refers to this intention and confines itself simply to indicating that when section 49 of Decree No. 74-499 of 1974 and section 77 of Act No. 81-6 of 1981 are “read in conjunction” with the provisions of the bilateral and multilateral social security agreements concluded by Tunisia, the requirement of residence is also lifted for the nationals of the contracting countries and for Tunisians resident in those countries. The clause relating to the lifting of the residence requirement forms part of the Association Agreement with the European Union in which the principle of free remittance is fully valid in relation to all social security benefits envisaged in sections 62 to 64 of the Agreement for the nationals of both contracting parties.

The Committee observes that the outcome of reading the above provisions in conjunction, as indicated by the Government, namely the raising of the residence requirement, only concerns Tunisian nationals resident in countries to which Tunisia is bound by bilateral or multilateral agreements and does not therefore resolve the problem of inequality of treatment of Tunisian nationals who may not benefit from any system of reciprocity established by such agreements. Nor is it clear to which residence requirement the Government is referring in its report: the requirement to be resident in Tunisia at the date of applying for the benefits or the residence requirement after making the application when pension arrears are due. Finally, with regard to a reading of the above legislation in conjunction with the provisions of Convention No. 118, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would demonstrate, by referring to decisions of the institutions administering social security, that the requirement to be resident in Tunisia at the time of making the application for benefits that is imposed under these laws is effectively raised for all Tunisian nationals, in the same way as for nationals of any other State that has ratified the Convention, wherever they are resident outside Tunisia and even in the absence of bilateral or multilateral agreements with the State in question. By way of illustration, the Committee requests the Government to explain the manner in which section 49 of Decree No. 74-499 of 1974 and section 77 of Act No. 81-6 of 1981 would apply in practice to Tunisian nationals and nationals of Egypt, Mauritania, the Syrian Arab Republic or Turkey, and their dependants, who are resident in one of these countries at the time that they make the application for their benefits in Tunisia.

Furthermore, the Committee notes the Government’s statement in its report that it has accepted the obligations of the Convention for the following branches of social security: medical care, sickness benefit, maternity benefit, employment injury benefit, and it indicates that invalidity and retirement pensions are not covered by the clause raising the residence requirement envisaged by the Convention as these benefits are not among the branches of social security accepted by Tunisia when ratifying the Convention. The Committee is bound to recall that when ratifying the Convention in 1965 Tunisia accepted its obligations in respect of the following branches: (a) medical care; (b) sickness benefit; (c) maternity benefit, (g) employment injury benefit; and (i) family benefit. On 21 April 1976, Tunisia extended its obligations to the following branches: (d) invalidity benefit; (e) old-age benefit; and (f) survivors’ benefit which, under the terms of Article 2, paragraph 5, of the Convention, are deemed to be an integral part of the ratification and to have the force of ratification as from the above date. Under the terms of Article 2, paragraph 2, of the Convention, Tunisia is under the obligation to apply the provisions of the Convention in respect of all the branches accepted. The Committee therefore hopes that the Government will ensure that institutions administering social security responsible for reading the national legislation “in conjunction” with the provisions of the Convention are correctly informed (by a circular, if necessary) of the extent and scope of Tunisia’s international obligations under Convention No. 118 and ascertain that invalidity and retirement pensions are covered by the clause raising the residence requirement for nationals of Tunisia on an equal footing with the nationals of other countries which have ratified the Convention, in accordance with the specifications of Articles 4 and 5.

Branch (g) (Employment injury benefit). In its previous comments concerning Convention No. 19, the Committee noted that, by virtue of section 59 of Act No. 94-28 of 21 February 1994 establishing the compensation scheme for occupational accidents and diseases, foreign beneficiaries of periodical payments who cease to reside in Tunisia receive as the whole of their compensation a lump sum equal to three times the total of the annual periodical payment which was or would have been granted to them, subject to the more favourable provisions of bilateral social security agreements or international treaties. In reply, the Government indicates that, taking into account the hierarchy of standards, the provisions of Conventions, including those of Convention No. 19, prevail over section 59 referred to above. The provisions of Conventions are imperative laws of immediate application and do not require instructions to be issued to institutions administering social security for their implementation. The Committee takes due note of these statements which, mutatis mutandis, would also be applicable to the provisions of Convention No. 118. Article 5, paragraph 1, of Convention No. 118 requires the payment of periodical payments due in respect of employment injury in the event of residence abroad irrespective of the conclusion of any other bilateral or multilateral social security agreement. In view of the complementary obligations of Tunisia under Conventions Nos 19 and 118, the Committee requests the Government to confirm explicitly whether the nationals of all the States that have ratified Convention No. 19 and the nationals of all the States that have accepted the obligations of Convention No. 118 for branch (g) (Employment injury benefit), as well as Tunisian nationals, benefit from the provision of their periodical payments – and not a lump sum equal to three times the annual periodical payment – when they cease to be resident on the territory of Tunisia. In the absence of clear instructions to institutions administering social security, please provide examples of the application in practice of Act No. 94-28 of 21 February 1994, with particular reference to section 59, based on a specific case of the remittance of benefits consisting of the current payment of periodical payments in respect of employment injury, for example, to a national of Egypt, Mauritania, the Syrian Arab Republic or Turkey, and to their dependants resident in one of these countries.

[The Government is asked to report in detail in 2009.]

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2002, published 91st ILC session (2003)

Article 5 of the Convention. With reference to its previous comments, the Committee recalls that section 49 of Decree No. 74-499 of 27 April 1974 respecting the old-age, invalidity and survivors’ schemes in the non-agricultural sector and section 77 of Act No. 81-6 of 12 February 1981 to organize social security schemes in the agricultural sector provide that the grant of the above benefits to nationals of Tunisia is subject to the applicant residing in Tunisia at the date on which the application is made, although this requirement is lifted for foreign nationals of countries which are bound to Tunisia by a bilateral or multilateral social security agreement.

In reply, the Government states that, on the basis of the above provisions, the requirement of residence in Tunisia for the grant of pensions is also lifted for Tunisian nationals in the event of the assignment of a Tunisian worker to an enterprise based in a country with which Tunisia has concluded a social security agreement, or in the event of a temporary stay in the country of origin of the worker and her or his dependents. In view of the fact that cases of assignment or temporary stay abroad are not mentioned in the provisions referred to by the Government, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would indicate by virtue of which provisions of laws or regulations the residence requirement is lifted in the above cases and provide a copy of them. However, with regard to the requirement for Tunisian nationals to be resident in Tunisia at the time on which the application for benefit is made, the Government indicates that the Committee’s comments will be taken into consideration in the revision of the texts in question. The Committee therefore once again hopes that the Government will endeavour to take the necessary measures to ensure, in accordance with Article 5 of the Convention, that Tunisian nationals, in the same way as the nationals of any other State which has accepted the obligations of the Convention for the corresponding branch, and not only those covered by a reciprocal scheme under bilateral or multilateral social security agreements, are guaranteed the provision of long-term benefits in case of residence abroad, without any restriction and regardless of whether they are resident in Tunisia at the time of the application or when the pension is due.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2001, published 90th ILC session (2002)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

  Article 5 of the Convention. In response to the Committee’s previous comments, the Government refers to Article 8 of the Convention, concerning the methods of applying Articles 5 and 7 of the Convention and states that Tunisia has concluded bilateral social security agreements with ten States, five of which have ratified the Convention (France, Germany, Italy, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya and the Netherlands) and that discussions are in progress with other States such as Greece, Spain, Switzerland, Portugal and Sweden. It adds that these agreements provide for the nationals of both countries to receive equal treatment under national social security legislation and set up a reciprocity scheme for workers of both countries when they transfer their residence to the other country to engage in an occupational activity covered by social security or to stay in that country.

The Committee notes this information. It recalls that Decree No. 74-499 of 27 April 1975 respecting old-age and invalidity benefits and survivors’ insurance in the non-agricultural sector provides, in section 49, for the unconditional grant of pensions and allowances in Tunisia only for nationals of countries which are linked to Tunisia by a diplomatic treaty setting up a reciprocal old-age, invalidity and survivors’ insurance scheme or which have acceded to a multilateral agreement having the same purpose. With regard to Tunisian nationals, under the abovementioned provision and section 77 of Act No. 81-6 of 12 February 1981 to organize social security schemes in the agricultural sector, for these benefits to be granted the worker must be resident in Tunisia at the date on which he applies for them. In these circumstances, the Committee must emphasize that, according to Article 5 of the Convention, nationals of Tunisia like nationals of any other State which has accepted the obligations of the Convention for a given branch, and not only those covered by a reciprocal scheme established in bilateral or multilateral social security agreements, must be guaranteed the provision of long-term benefits in case of residence abroad, without restriction and regardless of their new country of residence. The Committee hopes that the Government will be able to indicate in its next report the measures taken or envisaged to ensure that this provision of the Convention is fully applied.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1997, published 86th ILC session (1998)

Article 5 of the Convention. In response to the Committee's previous comments, the Government refers to Article 8 of the Convention, concerning the methods of applying Articles 5 and 7 of the Convention and states that Tunisia has concluded bilateral social security agreements with ten States, five of which have ratified the Convention (France, Germany, Italy, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya and the Netherlands) and that discussions are in progress with other States such as Greece, Spain, Switzerland, Portugal and Sweden. It adds that these agreements provide for the nationals of both countries to receive equal treatment under national social security legislation and set up a reciprocity scheme for workers of both countries when they transfer their residence to the other country to engage in an occupational activity covered by social security or to stay in that country.

The Committee notes this information. It recalls that Decree No. 74-499 of 27 April 1975 respecting old-age and invalidity benefits and survivors' insurance in the non-agricultural sector provides, in section 49, for the unconditional grant of pensions and allowances in Tunisia only for nationals of countries which are linked to Tunisia by a diplomatic treaty setting up a reciprocal old-age, invalidity and survivors' insurance scheme or which have acceded to a multilateral agreement having the same purpose. With regard to Tunisian nationals, under the above-mentioned provision and section 77 of Act No. 81-6 of 12 February 1981 to organize social security schemes in the agricultural sector, for these benefits to be granted the worker must be resident in Tunisia at the date on which he applies for them. In these circumstances, the Committee must emphasize that, according to Article 5 of the Convention, nationals of Tunisia like nationals of any other State which has accepted the obligations of the Convention for a given branch, and not only those covered by a reciprocal scheme established in bilateral or multilateral social security agreements, must be guaranteed the provision of long-term benefits in case of residence abroad, without restriction and regardless of their new country of residence. The Committee hopes that the Government will be able to indicate in its next report the measures taken or envisaged to ensure that this provision of the Convention is fully applied.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1996, published 85th ILC session (1997)

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Article 5 of the Convention. In response to the Committee's previous comments, the Government states that Decree No. 74-499 of 27 April 1974 concerning the old-age, invalidity and survivors' scheme in the non-agricultural sector provides in section 49 for the grant of pensions and allowances without any requirement of residence in Tunisia for nationals of countries which are linked with Tunisia by a diplomatic treaty instituting a regime of reciprocity with regard to old-age, invalidity and survivors' insurance or which have acceded to a multilateral Convention for the same purpose.

The Committee takes note of this information. It points out, however, that so far as Tunisian nationals are concerned both the above-mentioned provision and section 77 of Act No. 81-6 of 12 February 1981 organizing social security schemes in the agricultural sector, make the grant of the above-mentioned benefits conditional on the applicant residing in Tunisia on the date of application for the benefit. Since under Article 5 of the Convention nationals of Tunisia - like nationals of any other State which has accepted the obligations of the Convention - should enjoy long-term benefits in case of residence abroad, without restriction, even where they reside outside Tunisia on the date of application or when the arrears fall due, the Committee once again expresses the hope that the Government will take the necessary measures to bring the national law into full conformity with the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1992, published 79th ILC session (1992)

Article 5 of the Convention. In response to the Committee's previous comments, the Government states that Decree No. 74-499 of 27 April 1974 concerning the old-age, invalidity and survivors' scheme in the non-agricultural sector provides in section 49 for the grant of pensions and allowances without any requirement of residence in Tunisia for nationals of countries which are linked with Tunisia by a diplomatic treaty instituting a regime of reciprocity with regard to old-age, invalidity and survivors' insurance or which have acceded to a multilateral Convention for the same purpose.

The Committee takes note of this information. It points out, however, that so far as Tunisian nationals are concerned both the above-mentioned provision and section 77 of Act No. 81-6 of 12 February 1981 organising social security schemes in the agricultural sector, make the grant of the above-mentioned benefits conditional on the applicant residing in Tunisia on the date of application for the benefit. Since under Article 5 of the Convention nationals of Tunisia - like nationals of any other State which has accepted the obligations of the Convention - should enjoy long-term benefits in case of residence abroad, without restriction, even where they reside outside Tunisia on the date of application or when the arrears fall due, the Committee once again expresses the hope that the Government will take the necessary measures to bring the national law into full conformity with the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1988, published 75th ILC session (1988)

The Committee takes note of the information supplied by the Government in its report on the payment abroad of pensions due to nationals of other countries residing abroad.

Article 5 of the Convention. With reference to its earlier comments, the Committee notes that the condition of residence in Tunisia at the date of filing of the claim for invalidity, old-age and survivors' benefits under the schemes of the agricultural and non-agricultural sectors, appears to apply only to Tunisian nationals. Since, however, under this provision of the Convention, Tunisian nationals - like the nationals of other States bound by the Convention - must receive benefits without any restrictions, even if they are resident outside Tunisia at the date when the claim is filed or payments fall due, the Committee hopes that the Government will take the necessary measures to bring the legislation into full conformity with the Convention.