ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Home > Country profiles >  > Country comments > Texts of comments: Bolivia (Plurinational State of)

Comments adopted by the CEACR: Bolivia (Plurinational State of)

Adopted by the CEACR in 2021

C029 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.
Repetition
Articles 1(1), 2(1) and 25 of the Convention. Trafficking in persons. The Committee previously noted the adoption of the Organic Law against trafficking and smuggling of persons (Act No. 263 of 31 July 2012) and the implementing regulations (Decree No. 1486 of 6 February 2013) which define the fundamental components of trafficking in persons and provide for penalties.
The Committee notes the adoption of the Plurinational Policy against trafficking and smuggling of persons for 2013–17 and the National Action Plan for 2015–19. The Committee also notes the Government’s general indication, in its report, that, in the framework of the Multisectoral Plan for the integral development of the fight against trafficking and smuggling of persons for 2016–20, several actions are being implemented to prevent, control and sanction trafficking in persons, while providing support and promoting the reintegration of victims. The Committee notes that, as highlighted in the National Action Plan, Bolivia is principally a source country for trafficking for purposes of both sexual and labour exploitation within the country, mainly in the sugar cane and nut harvesting industries, domestic work, mining and begging. A significant number of Bolivians are also subjected to trafficking for labour exploitation abroad, mainly in Argentina, Brazil and Chile, in sweatshops, agriculture, textile factories and domestic work. The Committee refers, in this regard, to its last observation on the application of the Domestic Workers Convention, 2011 (No. 189), where it noted that, according to studies published by the Organization of American States (OAS), many victims of trafficking are Bolivian women who are taken to other countries as domestic workers and sometimes become victims of labour exploitation. It notes that, in September 2018, the La Paz Departmental Human Rights Ombudsperson (Defensoría del Pueblo) indicated that during the last few years the number of trafficking victims increased by 92.2 per cent, with 70 per cent of the victims being girls and young women aged from 12 to 22 years. According to its 2016 Global Report on Trafficking in Persons, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) indicated that between 2012 and 2015, 1,038 persons were prosecuted for trafficking but only 15 of them were convicted. The Committee notes that, in its last annual reports, the Public Prosecutor indicated that 701 cases of trafficking were registered in 2016 and 563 cases in 2017, but that no information is available on the number of persons convicted or judicial decisions handed down in that respect. The Committee further notes that, in its last concluding observations, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) of the United Nations was concerned about the high and growing number of cases of trafficking in human beings, in particular women and children in border areas, as well as of cases of internal trafficking of indigenous women for purposes of forced prostitution, in particular in areas in which major development projects are being implemented. The CEDAW recommended to undertake an assessment of the situation of trafficking in Bolivia as a baseline for measures to address trafficking and to improve the collection of data on trafficking disaggregated by sex, age and ethnicity (CEDAW/C/BOL/5-6, 28 July 2015, paragraphs 20 and 21). The Committee notes with concern the low number of convictions regarding trafficking in persons, despite the significant number of cases brought to justice. It accordingly urges the Government to strengthen its efforts to ensure that all persons who engage in trafficking are subject to prosecutions and that in practice, sufficiently effective and dissuasive penalties are imposed. In this regard, it requests the Government to provide information on the number of criminal proceedings initiated, persons convicted and penalties imposed on the basis of Act No. 263 against trafficking and smuggling of persons. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the concrete measures taken to effectively combat trafficking in persons, including through awareness-raising activities and enhanced access to justice, in the framework of the National Action Plan for 2015–20 and the Multisectoral Plan for 2016–20. Lastly, noting the Government’s statement that several actions are being implemented to support victims of trafficking, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on the concrete measures taken to protect victims of trafficking and to facilitate their access to immediate assistance and remedies, as well as the number of victims who have been identified and have benefited from such assistance.
The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

C029 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments.
Repetition
Articles 1(1), 2(1) and 25 of the Convention. Forced labour in indigenous communities. 1. Persistence of forced labour and servitude practices. The Committee previously noted the measures taken by the Government to combat forced labour practices in the country, mainly in the sugar cane and nut harvests, as well as in plantations and stock-breeding ranches, which affect particularly indigenous populations of Quechua and Guaraní origin. Referring to its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government’s indication, in its report, that the specific programme on “the progressive eradication of forced labour and other similar forms of work in indigenous communities in the Chaco zone, the Bolivian Amazon zone and the Santa Cruz region” was implemented until the end of 2015. It takes note of the adoption of the Human Rights Policy and Action Plan for 2015–20 which identifies among the existing challenges the persistence of forced labour and servitude practices of children and women, and generally provides for actions to be taken in order to eliminate such practices as well as any other form of labour exploitation in the country. Referring to its last observation on the Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182), where it urged the Government to take effective and time-bound measures to prevent children from becoming victims of debt bondage or forced labour in the sugar cane and nut harvesting industries, the Committee notes that, in its last concluding observations, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) expressed concern about the situation of Guaraní women who depend on working in agriculture and livestock and do not receive compensation or remuneration, and recommended that the Government take measures to prohibit and discourage all forms of slave labour affecting them (CEDAW/C/BOL/5-6, 28 July 2015, paragraphs 34 and 35). The Committee further notes that in November 2017, the Tarija Department Police investigated a forced labour case involving 25 people from the Guaraní indigenous group, including eight minors, exploited in the sugar cane harvest. The Committee requests the Government to continue to make every effort to eradicate forced labour and servitude practices, which affect particularly the indigenous populations of Quechua and Guaraní origin, and to provide information on any concrete measures taken to combat the root causes of the vulnerability of the victims, including in the framework of the Human Rights Policy and Action Plan for 2015–20 and of the Development Plan for the Guaraní People. It also requests the Government to provide information on any assessment undertaken on the impact of the programme on “the progressive eradication of forced labour and other similar forms of work in indigenous communities in the Chaco zone, the Bolivian Amazon zone and the Santa Cruz region”, as well as on any follow-up measures taken.
2. Strengthening of mobile labour inspection offices. The Committee previously noted the activities carried out by the Fundamental Rights Unit of the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Welfare (MTEPS) within the framework of the Development Plan for the Guaraní People, and particularly the strengthening of labour inspections at the regional level. It notes the Government’s indication that temporary mobile labour inspection offices were established in remote municipalities in the priority regions of the Chaco zone, the Bolivian Amazon zone and the Santa Cruz region, in order to investigate situations of forced labour and restore victims’ rights. It notes the Government’s indication, in its report on the application of the Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169), that the MTEPS identified that indigenous people are more vulnerable in remote areas, more particularly in the agriculture and wood extraction sectors, and increased the number of the regional labour inspectors specialized in forced labour, operating within the Fundamental Rights Unit, who are now carrying out activities in three departmental labour offices and five regional labour offices. The Committee notes the statistics forwarded by the Government for 2016 and 2017, which show that an increasing number of comprehensive mobile inspections as well as awareness-raising activities have been carried out. It notes however that, in their 2016 reports forwarded by the Government, several regional labour inspectors specialized in forced labour highlighted the lack of available resources, such as the absence of vehicles, dissemination of training material and staff which prevent labour inspections in extensive and remote areas, including where indigenous populations of Guaraní origin are located. It notes in particular that several regional labour inspectors pointed out the lack of specific guidance and criteria to identify forced labour cases and recommended the adoption of a specific procedure within the labour inspectorate to deal with such cases. Noting that as a result of the discussion which took place in the Conference Committee on the Application of Standards in May–June 2018, concerning the application of the Minimum Age Convention, 1973 (No. 138), the Conference Committee urged the Government to make available to labour inspection increased human, material and technical resources and training, especially in the informal sector. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken to strengthen the capacity of labour inspectors, particularly of those specialized in forced labour, and increase the state presence in remote areas, including through mobile labour inspections, in order to ensure that labour inspections are carried out safely and effectively and in a timely manner in the areas identified as having a high incidence of forced labour and servitude, indicating the number of inspections carried out, the offences reported and the judicial or administrative decisions taken. It also requests the Government to provide information on any specific guidance, criteria or procedure elaborated or implemented for forced labour cases in order to assist labour inspectors. The Committee further requests the Government to continue to provide information on the awareness-raising and capacity-building activities undertaken at local and regional levels on servitude and forced labour, more particularly among at-risks groups, as well as on the number of beneficiaries.
3. Strict enforcement of penal sanctions. The Committee previously requested the Government to provide information on the application of section 291 of the Penal Code, which provides for sanctions of imprisonment from two to eight years for any person who reduces an individual to slavery or a similar condition, as well as on the manner in which the National Agrarian Reform Institute (INRA) cooperates with the labour inspectorate and the judicial authorities. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that according to data available from the INRA, in 2016, indigenous communities benefited from more than 2 million hectares. It notes that according to the 2016 reports of the regional labour inspectors specialized in forced labour, forwarded by the Government, three cases involving servitude or forced labour in the region of the Chaco zone and Santa Cruz region where the use of the land did not respect its “social-economic function” were reported to the INRA in view of land restitution. It notes however that several regional labour inspectors specialized in forced labour requested better inter-institutional coordination, in particular with the Human Rights Ombudsperson (Defensoría del Pueblo) and the INRA. Taking into consideration the persistence of forced labour and servitude practices, which affect particularly indigenous populations of Quechua and Guaraní origin, the Committee notes with concern the Government’s indication that no judicial decision was issued on forced labour or similar forms of labour exploitation. While welcoming the statistics forwarded by the Government for 2016 and 2017, which show that an increasing number of workers have had their rights restored through labour inspections and that the amounts awarded to workers further to conciliation procedures between the labour inspectorate and employers are increasing, the Committee emphasizes that when the envisaged sanction consists of a fine, it does not constitute an effective sanction in light of the seriousness of the violation and recalls in this regard the dissuasive function of penal sanctions (see 2012 General Survey on the fundamental Conventions, paragraph 319). Noting that in its 2016 report, forwarded by the Government, the indigenous peoples specialist of the Fundamental Rights Unit of the MTEPS identified the lack of access to justice as one of the main causes of the persistence of forced labour and servitude practices. The Committee notes that, in its last concluding observations, the CEDAW also expressed concern about the persisting structural barriers in the “rural indigenous jurisdiction” and in the formal justice system that prevent women from gaining access to justice and obtaining redress (CEDAW/C/BOL/5-6, 28 July 2015, paragraph 10). The Committee further notes that, in its last annual report on Bolivia, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights highlighted the seriousness of the structural problems facing the administration of justice, such as impunity, low public confidence in institutions of justice, lack of access to justice, long delays in the delivery of justice, lack of independence of the judiciary, and obvious incapacity to guarantee due process (A/HRC/28/3/Add.2, 16 March 2015, paragraph 41). The Committee requests the Government to provide information on any measures taken to enhance access to justice for victims of forced labour and servitude practices, including of the indigenous populations of Quechua and Guaraní origin, and to strengthen cooperation between the labour inspectorate and other institutions, such as the Public Prosecutor, the Human Rights Ombudsperson or the National Agrarian Reform Institute (INRA), so that no situation of forced labour goes unpunished. It requests the Government to provide comprehensive information on the number of investigations, prosecutions and convictions on forced labour and servitude cases dealt with by the labour inspectorate or any other competent authority as well as on the penalties imposed, including penal sanctions based on section 291 of the Penal Code. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the number and outcomes of cases involving forced labour or servitude practices reported to the INRA in view of land restitution.
Articles 1(1) and 2(1). Indirect compulsion to work. As regards sections 7(1) and 50(b) of the Basic Act on the National Police (Act No. 734 of 8 April 1985) which empowers the police and the police courts to qualify persons as “vagrants” and “indigents”, and to impose the appropriate administrative security measures, the Committee previously noted the Government’s indication that rehabilitation and support centres have been set up accordingly to cooperate with the police. It recalled that persons considered as “vagrants” and “indigents” who do not disturb the public peace should not be subject to penalties, given that such penalties could ultimately constitute an indirect compulsion to work, and requested the Government to provide additional information in this regard. The Committee notes the Government’s repeated general indication that the national legislation prohibits forced labour and servitude practices. The Committee again requests the Government to provide specific information on the application of sections 7(1) and 50(b) of the Basic Act on the National Police (Act No. 734 of 8 April 1985) in practice, indicating the criteria used to identify and classify persons as vagrants and indigents and to admit them into rehabilitation and support centres. It requests the Government to provide information on the number of persons considered as vagrants and indigents by the authorities who have been placed in such centres, as well as on the measures taken to ensure that these persons who have not been convicted by a court of law are not subject to the obligation to perform work, as specified in Article 2(2)(c) of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide a copy of any relevant text governing the rehabilitation and support centres.

C078 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.
Repetition
In order to provide an overview of the issues concerning the application of the core Conventions on the medical examination of young persons, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 77 and 78 in a single comment.
Article 2(1) of Conventions Nos 77 and 78. Medical examination for fitness for employment. The Committee previously noted Decision No. 001 of 11 May 2004, issued by the Ministers of Labour and of Health and Sports (SEDES), section 1 of which provides that the Ministry of Health and Sports, through its ministries and municipal authorities, shall allocate the necessary and adequate medical personnel so that, in coordination with the Ministry of Labour, free medical examinations are carried out for boys, girls and young persons who are working in the industrial and agricultural sectors and who work on their own account in urban or rural areas, under the terms of section 137(1)(b) of the Code on Boys, Girls and Young Persons of 1999. In this respect, the Committee noted section 137(1)(b) of the Code, under the terms of which young persons engaged in work shall periodically undergo medical examination. It observed that the expression “medical examinations” contained in section 1 of Decision No. 001 of 11 May 2004 only appears to refer to the periodical medical examinations that young persons have to undergo during employment, but not the thorough medical examination of their fitness for work. The Government indicated, however, that the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Welfare was preparing a new Bill on occupational safety and health.
While noting that section 131(4) of the new Code on Children and Young Persons provides that the issuance of work permits is subject to prior medical examination for persons under 18 years, the Committee observes that this work permit can be granted to children from the age of ten. The Committee recalls that this issue was raised by this Committee as well as the Committee on the Application of Standards in 2015. In this regard, the Committee refers to its detailed comments of 2015 concerning the application of the Minimum Age Convention, 1973 (No. 138).
Periodical medical examinations (Article 3(2) and (3) of Conventions Nos 77 and 78). Medical examinations required until the age of 21 years in occupations which involve high health risks (Article 4 of Conventions Nos 77 and 78). Appropriate measures for the vocational guidance and physical and vocational rehabilitation of young persons found by medical examination to be unsuited to certain types of work or to have physical handicaps or limitations (Article 6 of Conventions Nos 77 and 78). Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes once again that the Bill on occupational safety and health has still not been adopted and that the Government does not appear to have taken any measures to give legal effect to these provisions of the Conventions. The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to adopt the Bill without delay to ensure observance of these provisions of the Conventions. It requests the Government to provide information on any progress made in this regard.
Article 7(2) of Convention No. 78. Supervision of the application of the system of medical examination for fitness for employment to children and young persons engaged either on their own account or on account of their parents. The Committee previously noted that no measure has been taken by the Government to ensure the supervision of the application of the system of medical examination for fitness for employment to children and young persons engaged either on their own account or on account of their parents, or in the informal economy. The Committee expresses the firm hope that the Bill on occupational safety and health will be adopted in the near future and that it will contain provisions determining the measures of identification to ensure the application of the system of medical examination for fitness for employment to children and young persons engaged either on their own account or on account of their parents in itinerant trading or in any other occupation carried out in the streets or in places to which the public have access, as well as the other methods of supervision to be adopted for ensuring the strict enforcement of the Convention, in accordance with Article 7(2) of the Convention.
Application of the Conventions in practice. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that due to economic constraints, there are certain shortcomings in the application of this Convention, particularly in the capitals of remote departments, such as Cobija and Trinidad, and in rural areas. Nevertheless, it noted that the Government had adopted measures, in accordance with the possibilities available to it, so that all young persons who work in the country will progressively be covered by the protection afforded by the Convention. Noting the absence of information in the Government’s report, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on progress achieved in relation to the application of the Convention in practice, by providing in particular, in accordance with available capacities, information concerning the number of children and young persons who are engaged in work and have undergone the periodical medical examinations envisaged in the Convention and extracts from the reports of the inspection services relating to any infringements reported and the penalties imposed.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

C122 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments.
Repetition
The Committee notes the observations of the International Organisation of Employers (IOE) and the Confederation of Private Employers of Bolivia (CEPB), received on 30 August 2016 and 10 September 2018, in which the aforementioned organizations reiterate their previous observations. The Committee notes the Government’s reply to the first observation of the employers’ organizations, received on 5 September 2016. The Committee requests the Government to send its comments on the second observation.
Articles 1 and 2 of the Convention. Formulation and implementation of an active employment policy. In their observations, the employers’ organizations maintain that the protectionist labour policy implemented by the State in the last 12 years has had a negative impact on the formal labour market, detracting from full employment in the country. They state that the system of absolute labour stability and immunity prevailing in the country makes it impossible for employers to terminate employment, hampers the restructuring of enterprises and the implementation of innovations or technologies, and invalidates decisions to close enterprises. In addition, they denounce a considerable increase in the minimum wage, the imposition of a second bonus, and the lack of diversity in the General Labour Act as regards contracting schemes. The organizations indicate that article 49.III of the Political Constitution provides that the State shall protect labour stability, and that section 4, paragraph I(b), of Supreme Decree No. 28699 of 1 May 2006 provides that the employment relationship shall be governed by the principle of continuity, and this is why the longest possible duration is assigned to that relationship. They add that the system of labour stability and the reinstatement procedure governed by the aforementioned legislation is inconsistent with the provisions of section 13 of the General Labour Act and section 8 of its implementing regulations, which establish that when workers are dismissed for reasons beyond their control, employers are obliged to pay compensation and severance pay. The Government indicates in its reply that the changes in employment policy have contributed to the protection of workers’ rights and to achieving full employment. The Committee requests the Government to provide up-to-date information on the changes made in law and practice relating to the issues raised by the employers’ organizations, particularly on the application of the principle of labour stability in enterprises and their impact on full employment.
Labour market trends. Rates of employment, unemployment and visible underemployment. In its previous comments, the Committee asked the Government to provide information on progress made with regard to developing and implementing an active employment policy, and on the participation of the social partners in such implementation. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that up to the fourth quarter of 2016 the unemployment rate stood at 4.5 per cent. The Government reports the adoption of the “Economic and social development plan 2016–20”, in the context of the pillars of the Patriotic Agenda 2025. The Government also indicates that the Patriotic Agenda was the result of national consultations involving the participation of over 60,000 people through workshops, seminars and discussions with 338 municipalities. The Government adds that, as part of the aforementioned plan, a medium-range employment plan was adopted providing for the creation of some 600,000 jobs during its five-year duration. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that, owing to the financial crisis affecting neighbouring countries, an emergency “Job creation plan” was adopted in May 2017, aimed at creating job opportunities and reducing the unemployment rate to 2.7 per cent. A number of measures have been adopted as part of that plan, such as: (i) the implementation of programmes to promote youth employment; (ii) the establishment of the “Seed capital fund”, which provides loans for micro and small enterprises; (iii) the adoption of the “Urban structure programme” and the “Programme for the protection and rehabilitation of productive areas”, which seek to create jobs by hiring individuals for public works construction projects; and (iv) the granting of a financial incentive to enterprises presenting proposals for the creation of a large number of jobs through public contracts. The Government refers to the implementation of the “Employment support programme”, whose main objective is to extend the coverage and effectiveness of active employment policies through improvements to the job placement system and the development of programmes that increase employability. In this respect, the Government indicates that from September 2012 to December 2016 a total of 18,846 jobseekers benefited from the “Employment support programme”. In addition, in 2016, the Public Employment and Vocational Guidance Service successfully implemented 19,225 job placements and provided training and vocational guidance for 2,814 job applicants. The Committee requests the Government to provide detailed, up-to-date information, including statistics disaggregated by sex and age, on the results achieved under the “Economic and social development plan 2016–20”, indicating in particular the rates of employment, unemployment and, if possible, visible underemployment.
Specific groups of socially vulnerable workers. The Government indicates that it has formulated active employment policies for socially vulnerable categories, particularly persons with disabilities. At the legislative level, the Committee notes that the Bill concerning labour market integration and economic support for persons with disabilities provides for the implementation of quotas in the public and private sectors (4 and 2 per cent, respectively) aimed at promoting entry into employment for persons with disabilities or their guardians (father, mother, spouse or legal guardian). The aforementioned Bill also provides for the payment of a monthly bonus in the event that the guardian of a person with a serious disability has been unable to benefit from the abovementioned employment programme. The Committee also notes that, in the context of the “Employment support programme”, job placement programmes were implemented with a view to improving the employability of persons with disabilities and/or their guardians. The Government indicates that 236 participants benefited from the “Employment support programme” in 2016 and that some 500 persons were estimated to have been beneficiaries in the second phase. As regards the victims of trafficking in persons, the Government indicates that section 24 of the Integrated Anti-Trafficking Act (No. 263 of 31 July 2012) provides that the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Welfare shall be obliged to arrange for the economic reintegration of victims. The Government indicates that the Directorate-General of Employment is formulating a policy with a view to their integration in the labour market, taking action in the area of prevention and with respect to the regulation of private employment agencies. The Committee requests the Government to continue providing information on the measures taken or contemplated for specific groups of socially vulnerable workers, and on the impact thereof.
Youth employment. The Government indicates that the National Constitution establishes the obligation for the State to ensure the integration of young persons in the labour market (articles 46–55 of the Constitution). The Committee notes that the Youth Act (No. 342 of 21 February 2013) provides that the State shall be obliged to create effective conditions for the entry of young persons into the labour market through job creation and the implementation of socio-economic policies. Moreover, the Education Act (No. 070 of 20 December 2010) establishes a system of vocational training. The Government indicates that one of the main objectives of the “Economic and social development plan 2016–20” regarding youth employment is to reduce the current unemployment rate for young persons in the 24–28 age group to 6.3 per cent. The Committee notes the adoption of an initial vocational training contract scheme (entitled “My first decent job”), which seeks to provide training for young persons on a low income in the 18–24 age group in various trades such as tailoring, industrial garment-making and construction of housing units. In this regard, the Government indicates that 1,367 young persons have benefited from the programme, of whom 56 per cent were women. The Government reports the adoption of a second contract scheme (entitled “Improving the employability and labour income of young persons”), which seeks to improve the employability of socially vulnerable young persons, in particular those who have not completed secondary education or who wish to establish and develop a microenterprise. The Committee requests the Government to provide detailed, up-to-date information, disaggregated by sex, on the results achieved by the measures taken to ensure entry into the labour market for young persons.
Informal economy and productive employment. The Government indicates that, in order to encourage the transition from informality to formality, the compulsory registration of employers and workers by size of enterprise has been reinforced. The Committee requests the Government to provide up-to-date information, disaggregated by sex and age, on the rate of informality in the country, and to provide detailed information on the measures taken to facilitate the transition of workers from the informal to the formal economy.
Microenterprises. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken to improve the productivity and competitiveness of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. It also requests the Government to provide information, including statistics, on the impact of such measures on the creation of jobs.
Cooperatives. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide information on the contribution of cooperatives to the creation of productive employment.
Coordination of education and vocational training policies with employment policy. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide detailed information on the coordination of education and vocational training policies with employment policy, and particularly on how the training opportunities provided by training institutes are coordinated with labour market demand for knowledge and skills.

C124 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.
Repetition
Article 2(1) of the Convention. Medical examination for fitness for employment and periodic re-examinations required for persons under 21 years of age. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Welfare was drafting a new Bill on occupational safety and health. The Committee notes the Government’s indication in its report that the Bill on occupational safety and health has not yet been adopted. Recalling that the Plurinational State of Bolivia ratified the Convention more than 30 years ago, the Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that the Bill on occupational safety and health is adopted as soon as possible in order to give effect to the provisions of the Convention. It requests the Government to provide information on any progress made in this regard.
Application of the Convention in practice. In its previous comments, the Committee noted the description by the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Welfare of the child labour inspection system (SITI), through which it will be possible to obtain information on the number of children and young persons working in the country. It noted that the inspection system is based on a standard questionnaire which seeks to evaluate the working conditions of these children and young persons and which is particularly concerned with the issue of the medical examination for fitness for employment. Noting the absence of information on this subject, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on the number of children and young persons covered by the Convention and extracts from the reports of the inspection services.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

C131 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes the observations of the Confederation of Private Employers of Bolivia (CEPB), received on 31 August 2021, and of the International Organisation of Employers (IOE), received on 1 September 2021. The Committee also notes the observations of the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), received on 1 September 2021.

Follow-up to the conclusions of the Committee on the Application of Standards (International Labour Conference, 109th Session, June 2021)

The Committee notes that, for the third consecutive year, the Conference Committee on the Application of Standards (Conference Committee) examined the application of the Convention by the Plurinational State of Bolivia. The Committee observes that the Conference Committee once again urged the Government to: (i) carry out full consultations with the social partners with regard to minimum wage setting; (ii) take into account the needs of workers and their families as well as economic factors when determining the level of the minimum wage as set out in Article 3 of the Convention; and (iii) accept an ILO direct contacts mission before the next session of the International Labour Conference in 2022. The Conference Committee also requested the Government to avail itself, without delay, of ILO technical assistance to ensure compliance with the Convention in law and practice.
Articles 3 and 4(1) and (2) of the Convention. Elements for the determination of the level of the minimum wage and full consultations with the social partners. In its previous comments, the Committee observed that divergences persisted between the Government and the CEPB and the IOE regarding both the holding of full and good faith consultations with the representative organizations of employers and the criteria reportedly taken into consideration in determining the minimum wage. The Committee notes the Government’s indication in its report that: (i) a series of mechanisms have been adopted for the direct participation of both employers and workers and meetings have been held with each of them in light of the principle of equality; (ii) these measures were not effective due to the positions adopted by the employers’ representatives, which led to the Government taking the decisions concerned, taking into consideration the national situation and the economic conditions of employers and workers; (iii) the increase in the national minimum wage for each financial year is determined on the basis of prior macroeconomic analysis and taking into account inflation, the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and other variables, which are presented and assessed in the various meetings held for that purpose, including those held by the Government with the Bolivian Central of Workers (COB), in which the claims of that organization are considered; in view of the circumstances resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, Supreme Decree No. 4501 of 1 May 2021 provided for an increase of only 2 percent in relation to the national minimum wage set in the 2019 financial year; and (iv) a direct contacts mission is not necessary as no difficulty is being experienced in the application of the Convention. Furthermore, the Committee notes the hope expressed by the IOE that the Plurinational State of Bolivia will make progress in the application of the Convention in accordance with the conclusions of the Conference Committee and in close consultation with the CEPB. The Committee further notes the CEPB’s indication that: (i) with the adoption of Supreme Decree No. 4501 of 1 May 2021, the centralization of dialogue continued solely with workers’ representatives and all prior consultation with employers’ representatives was omitted; (ii) their participation was prevented in the establishment, operation and modification of the machinery for the fixing of the national minimum wage and they were not able to put forward criteria in this regard; and (iii) objective technical parameters adapted to the real situation were absolutely not taken into consideration, in particular taking into account the difficult situation experienced due to the pandemic and its impact on economic trends and performance and on employers. Finally, the Committee notes the indication by the ITUC that: (i) while highlighting the efforts made by the Government to improve the life of workers, the Government should continue to organize consultations on the fixing of minimum wages in accordance with the Convention, enabling representative organizations to hold in-depth discussions on the machinery for fixing minimum wages, which does not mean codetermination of the minimum wage; and (ii) the increases in the minimum wage have taken fully into account economic factors. The Committee once again observes that contradictions and divergences persist between the Government and the CEPB concerning the holding of full and good faith consultations with the representative organizations of employers and on the criteria taken into account in determining the minimum wage. In this context, the Committee once again notes with regret the Government’s refusal to accept a direct contacts mission to the country with a view to finding a solution to the difficulties raised in the application of the Convention and to have recourse to ILO technical assistance in this respect. The Committee considers that the direct contacts mission could contribute to finding solutions to the divergences indicated and assist in the full application of the Convention. The Committee firmly expects that the Government will review its position and that a mission can take place before the 110th Session of the International Labour Conference, as the Conference Committee has been requesting since 2018.
[The Government is asked to reply in full to the present comments in 2022.]

C138 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments.
Repetition
The Committee notes the joint observations of the International Organisation of Employers (IOE) and the Confederation of Private Employers of Bolivia (CEPB) received on 31 August 2018.
Article 1 of the Convention. National policy and application of the Convention in practice. In its previous comments, the Committee noted numerous measures taken by the Government, including the adoption of the “Patriotic Agenda”, in the framework of which it had drawn up the Economic and Social Development Plan (PDES) 2016–20, one of the main planks of which is the progressive elimination of the causes of child labour.
The Committee notes that, in their joint observations, the IOE and the CEPB express concern at the lack of effective policies to combat child labour. The Committee notes the Government’s indication in its report that in 2016 a total of 12 per cent of children between 5 and 17 years of age, namely 393,000 children, were engaged in work (compared with 745,640 in 2008), as were 31,000 children under 10 years of age, 111,000 children aged 10 or 11 years, and 131,000 children aged 12 or 13 years. Moreover, the Government states that the Plurinational Comprehensive Protection System for Children and Young Persons (SIPPROINA) has formulated and adopted a “Public policy for children and young persons: Basic proposal”, whose prime objective is the comprehensive development of children and young persons and includes protection against child labour and forced labour. The Government also indicates that it is developing a public policy to tackle the underlying causes of child labour, which will be based on three strategies: (i) prevention; (ii) access to the justice system; and (iii) the protection of children and young persons engaged in child labour. Moreover, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Welfare (MTEPS) has approved an “Institutional strategic plan”, goal No. 2 of which (relating to fundamental rights) is the progressive elimination of child labour, under the responsibility of the Fundamental Rights Unit (UDF). The Government states that the first phase of implementation of the “Institutional strategic plan” will be to conduct a study on working children. While noting the measures taken by the Government, the Committee notes with concern the number of children under 14 years of age who are working. It also notes that the Government has not provided any information on the results achieved in practice by the abovementioned measures and has not indicated the measures taken to protect children living in rural areas, who are particularly affected by child labour. The Committee therefore requests the Government to provide information on the results achieved by the implementation of the abovementioned measures in relation to the progressive elimination of all forms of child labour, with a particular focus on children living in rural areas. The Committee also requests the Government to provide up-to-date information on the application of the Convention in practice, including statistics on the employment of children under 14 years of age, extracts from inspection reports and data on the number and type of offences reported. Lastly, it requests the Government to continue providing recent statistics on child labour, disaggregated by age and sex, particularly relating to children under 10 years of age, between 10 and 12 years of age, and between 12 and 14 years of age.
Article 3(2). Determination of hazardous types of work. The Committee previously noted the revision of section 136 of the Code for Children and Young Persons, prohibiting work which by its nature or conditions is hazardous, unhealthy or undermines the dignity of children and young persons and endangers their school attendance, and the revised list of hazardous types of work which are prohibited for children and young persons under 18 years of age. It asked the Government to provide information on the application of this provision in practice.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the purpose of mobile labour inspection offices is to reach remote areas where hazardous work is suspected to take place. Moreover, the Government indicates that when labour inspectors detect a case of hazardous work done by a child, the following procedure is adopted: (i) removal of the child from the situation of hazardous work; (ii) monitoring and guidance of the child to prevent his/her return to such work; (iii) notification of the Office for the Defence of the Rights of Children and Young Persons; and (iv) referral of the case to the relevant legal authorities. The Committee requests the Government to continue providing information on the application in practice of section 136 of the Code for Children and Young Persons, particularly in relation to cases detected and penalties imposed.

C138 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.
Repetition
The Committee notes the joint observations of the International Organisation of Employers (IOE) and the Confederation of Private Employers of Bolivia (CEPB), received on 31 August 2018, the Government’s report and the in-depth discussion on the application of the Convention by the Plurinational State of Bolivia that took place in the Committee on the Application of Standards at the 107th Session (June 2018) of the International Labour Conference.
Follow-up to the conclusions of the Committee on the Application of Standards (International Labour Conference, 107th Session, May–June 2018)
Article 2(1) of the Convention. Minimum age for admission to employment or work and labour inspection. In its previous comments, the Committee noted the observation made by the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) concerning the adoption by the Government of the new Code for Children and Young Persons of 17 July 2014, amending section 129 of the previous Code through the addition of section 129(II), which reduces, under exceptional circumstances, the minimum age for admission to work for children from 14 to 10 years for own-account workers, and reduces it to 12 years for children in an employment relationship. The ITUC observed that these exemptions from the minimum age of 14 years are incompatible with the exceptions to the minimum age authorized for light work established under Article 7(4) of the Convention, which does not authorize work by children under 12 years of age. The Committee also noted the ITUC’s statement that authorizing children to work from the age of 10 years would inevitably affect their compulsory schooling, which, in the Plurinational State of Bolivia, consists of a fixed period of 12 years, namely at least up to 16 years of age. The Committee also noted the joint observations of the IOE and the CEPB indicating that the high proportion of work in the informal economy (70 per cent) encourages child labour, since it is not subject to labour inspection, and that there is no child labour in the formal sector.
Also in its previous comments, the Committee deeply deplored the Government’s indication that the amendments made to section 129 of the Code for Children and Young Persons would remain in place as provisional measures. The Government indicated that the new exemptions from the minimum age of 14 years, as set out in section 129 of the Code, can only be registered and authorized on condition that the work done does not jeopardize the child’s right to education, health, dignity and general development. Furthermore, the Committee expressed deep concern at the distinction made between the minimum age fixed for own-account child workers (10 years), and the minimum age fixed for children engaged in an employment relationship (12 years). Lastly, the Committee noted that the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Welfare was giving effect to the Convention through integrated and inter-sectoral routine and complaint-based inspections conducted by the services for the protection of children and young persons in order to highlight cases involving work by children under 14 years of age.
Recalling that the objective of the Convention is to eliminate child labour and that it encourages the raising of the minimum age, but does not authorize its reduction once the minimum age has been set (14 years at the time of ratification of the Convention by the Plurinational State of Bolivia), and while duly noting the positive results of the economic and social policies implemented by the Government, the Committee urged the Government to repeal the provisions of the legislation setting the minimum age for admission to employment or work and to immediately prepare a new law, in consultation with the social partners, increasing the minimum age for admission to employment or work in conformity with the Convention. Lastly, the Committee observed the Government’s indication that there are 90 labour inspectors (four more than in 2012), and it asked the Government to provide the labour inspectorate with increased human and technical resources and training for inspectors with a view to ensuring a more effective application of the Convention.
The Committee notes that the Government representative drew the Conference Committee’s attention to Decision No. 0025/2017 of the Constitutional Court of 21 July 2017, which declared section 129(II) of the Code for Children and Young Persons and its related sections (130(III); 131(I), (III) and (IV); 133(III) and (IV); and 138(I)) to be unconstitutional. The Conference Committee noted that the Constitutional Court used Articles 1, 2 and 7 of the Convention as a reference point and the legal basis for its decision. In its conclusions, the Conference Committee urged the Government to adapt the national legislation, in consultation with the most representative employers’ and workers’ organizations, following the repeal of the provisions of the Code for Children and Young Persons by the Constitutional Court, in accordance with the Convention. The Conference Committee also urged the Government to provide the labour inspectorate with increased human, material and technical resources, in particular in the informal economy, in order to ensure the more effective application of the Convention in law and in practice.
The Committee notes the joint observations of the IOE and the CEPB, asking the Government to bridge the legal gap left by the Constitutional Court decision by amending the legislation to bring it into conformity with the Convention. The Committee notes with interest the Government’s indication in its report that, further to the decision of the Constitutional Court, the minimum age for access to employment or work established in section 129 of the Code for Children and Young Persons is 14 years, in conformity with the Convention. However, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that, since the decision of the Constitutional Court is binding, there is no need to revise the Code for Children and Young Persons since the provisions which are contrary to the Convention no longer have the force of law. Moreover, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that the number of labour inspectors has increased to 103 since 2017 and that the labour inspectorate used mobile offices in 2016–17 to carry out 1,874 inspections in connection with child labour and forced labour, of which 30 per cent were referred to the courts. While noting that section 129(II) of the Code for Children and Young Persons and its related sections have been declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court, the Committee also notes the importance in legal terms and in accordance with the ILO Constitution, of having the legislation being in conformity with the ratified Conventions. Accordingly, the Committee requests the Government, in consultation with the employers’ and workers’ organizations, to take all necessary steps to amend the Code for Children and Young Persons so as to fix the minimum age for access to employment or work at 14 years, in conformity with the Convention and the decision of the Constitutional Court in order to eliminate any confusion and thereby minimize the risk of non-compliance with the Convention. It requests the Government to send information on all progress made in this regard. The Committee also requests the Government to continue its efforts to strengthen the capacities of the labour inspectorate and to indicate the methods used to ensure that the protection provided for by the Convention is also afforded to children working in the informal economy.
Article 6. Apprenticeships. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that, under sections 28 and 58 of the General Labour Act, children under 14 years of age may work as apprentices with or without pay, and it reminded the Government that, under Article 6, the Convention does not apply to work done by persons at least 14 years of age in undertakings where such work is carried out as part of a course of education or a programme of training or vocational guidance. The Committee also noted the Government’s indication that labour inspectors were responsible for implementing measures to ensure that children under 14 years of age do not engage in apprenticeships. The Committee recognized that measures to reinforce the labour inspection services were essential to combat child labour, but noted that labour inspectors needed a basis in law consistent with the Convention to enable them to ensure that children are protected against conditions of work liable to jeopardize their health or development. It noted that, although the Government refers to Act No. 070 Avelino Siñani–Elizardo Pérez of 20 December 2010 which regulates the system of education and apprenticeships, this Act does not prescribe a minimum age for work as an apprentice.
The Committee notes once again with concern that the Government’s report still does not provide any new information on the steps taken to prohibit children under 14 years of age from engaging in apprenticeships. The Government merely indicates that sections 28–30 of the General Labour Act taken together with section 129 of the Code for Children and Young Persons fix the minimum age for apprenticeships at 14 years. However, the Committee notes that sections 28–30 of the General Labour Act do not prescribe the minimum age for signing an apprenticeship contract and do not make any reference to section 129 of the Code for Children and Young Persons. Recalling once again that it has been drawing the Government’s attention to this matter for over ten years, the Committee strongly urges the Government to take the necessary steps to harmonize the provisions of the national legislation with Article 6 of the Convention so as to fix without delay the minimum age for admission to employment or work at 14 years.
Article 7(1) and (4). Light work. The Committee previously noted that sections 132 and 133 of the Code for Children and Young Persons allow children between 10 and 18 years of age to perform light work, subject to the authorization of the competent authority, under conditions which limit their hours of work, do not endanger their life, health, safety or image, and do not interfere with their access to education. It recalled that under Article 7(1) and (4) of the Convention, the employment of persons in light work is permitted, under certain conditions, from 12 and not 10 years of age, and it therefore urged the Government to take the necessary steps to amend sections 132 and 133 of the Code for Children and Young Persons.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication that it does not consider it necessary to amend the legislation since Decision No. 0025/2017 of the Constitutional Court has invalidated the provisions of sections 132 and 133, which are contrary to the Convention. The Committee requests the Government, in consultation with the social partners concerned, in the light of the decision of the Constitutional Court, and the importance, in accordance with the ILO Constitution of having the legislation being in conformity with the ratified Conventions, to take the necessary steps to amend the Code for Children and Young Persons so that the age for admission to light work is fixed at no less than 12 years, in accordance with Article 7(1) and (4) of the Convention.
Article 9(3). Keeping of registers. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that, under section 138 of the Code for Children and Young Persons, registers for child workers are required in order to obtain authorization for work. The Committee observed that these registers include the authorization for children between 10 and 14 years of age to work. It also noted Decision No. 434/2016, which provides for the inclusion in a register of minors under 14 years of age who are engaged in work, and Decision No. 71/2016 created the Information System on Children and Young Persons (SINNA), which registers and contains information on the rights of the child, including information relating to children working on their own account or for a third party.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication that further to Decision No. 0025/2017 of the Constitutional Court declaring section 138(I) of the Code for Children and Young Persons unconstitutional, the SINNA system has been modified to enable the registration of young workers from the age of 14 and not 10 years. The Committee urges the Government, in consultation with the social partners, to take the necessary steps to amend the Code for Children and Young Persons so that, further to inclusion in the registers, only children who are at least 14 years of age may be permitted to work, in accordance with the Convention and the practice of the SINNA system.
The Committee reminds the Government that it may request technical assistance from the ILO in order to bring its law and practice into conformity with the Convention.
The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

C162 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of the ratified Conventions on occupational safety and health (OSH), the Committee considers it appropriate to examine the application of Conventions Nos 136 (benzene) and 162 (asbestos) together.

1. Benzene Convention, 1971 (No. 136)

Article 2 of the Convention. Substitution of benzene or of products containing it. The Committee notes that the Government, in its reply to the Committee’s previous comment, once again refers in its report to general OSH standards that do not contain specific provisions that give effect to Article 2 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to take concrete measures without delay to ensure the use of harmless or less harmful substitute products instead of benzene or products containing benzene.
Article 6(1) and (3). Prevention of the escape of benzene vapour into the air. Measurement of the concentration of benzene. The Committee notes that the Government reiterates information relative to the fixed maximum concentration of benzene in the air in places of employment (Article 6(2) of the Convention), once again without referring to the Committee’s request in its previous comment regarding the remaining provisions of Article 6 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to specify: (i) whether concrete measures have been adopted or are envisaged to prevent the escape of benzene vapours in the air of places of employment in premises where benzene, or products containing benzene, are manufactured, handled or used (Article 6(1)); and (ii) whether the competent authority has issued directions on carrying out the measurement of the concentration of benzene in the air of places of employment (Article 6(3)).
Article 7. Work processes in enclosed systems or workplaces equipped with means to ensure the removal of benzene vapour. The Committee notes that, in reply to its previous comment, the Government once again refers to Technical Safety Standard (NTS) 009/18, for the Presentation and Approval of OSH Programmes, which contains no specific provisions giving effect to Article 7 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to take concrete measures without delay to ensure that: (i) work processes involving the use of benzene or of products containing benzene are as far as practicable carried out in an enclosed system; and (ii) where it is not practicable for work to be carried out in an enclosed system, places of work in which benzene or products containing benzene are used are equipped with effective means to ensure the removal of benzene vapour to the extent necessary for the protection of the health of the workers.

2. Asbestos Convention, 1986 (No. 162)

Article 17(1) and (3) of the Convention. Demolition of plants or structures containing asbestos, and removal of asbestos by employers or qualified contractors. Elaboration of a work plan in consultation with the workers or their representatives. The Committee notes that, in reply to its previous comment, the Government once again refers in its report to general OSH standards, which contain no specific provisions giving effect to Article 17(1) and (3) of the Convention. The Committee urges the Government to take concrete measures without delay to ensure that: (i) the demolition of plants and structures and removal of asbestos provided under Article 17(1) of the Convention shall be undertaken only by employers or contractors who are recognised by the competent authority as qualified to carry out such work (Article 17(1)); and (ii) the workers or their representatives shall be consulted on the work plan to be drawn up by the employers or contractors (Article 17(3)).
Article 20(2), (3) and (4). Records of the monitoring of the working environment. Right to request the monitoring of the working environment. With reference to its previous comment, the Committee notes that the Government once again refers to general OSH standards which contain no specific provisions giving effect to Article 20(2), (3) and (4) of the Convention. The Committee urges the Government to take concrete measures without delay to ensure that: (i) the records of the monitoring of the working environment and of the exposure of workers to asbestos are kept for a period prescribed by the competent authority (Article 20(2)); (ii) the workers concerned, their representatives and the inspection services have access to these records (Article 20(3)); and (iii) the workers or their representatives have the right to request the monitoring of the working environment and to appeal to the competent authority concerning the results of the monitoring (Article 20(4)).
Furthermore, the Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report contains no responses to its earlier comments, which are reiterated below.

A. Protection against specific risks

1. Benzene Convention, 1971 (No. 136)

Article 4 of the Convention. Prohibition of the use of benzene as a solvent or diluent. With reference to its previous comments, the Committee notes that the Government reiterates in its report that the use of benzene is not prohibited. The Committee once again requests the Government to take the necessary measures, in accordance with Article 4 of the Convention, to prohibit the use of benzene and of products containing benzene as a solvent or a dilutent, except where the process is carried out in an enclosed system or where there are other equally safe methods of work.

2. Asbestos Convention, 1986 (No. 162)

Articles 3 and 4 of the Convention. Legislation and consultation. With reference to its previous comments, the Committee notes that the Government repeats in its report the information on the general OSH standards to which it referred previously, adding a reference to the Technical Safety Standard for the Presentation and Approval of Occupational Safety and Health Programmes (NTS-009/18), which does not contain any specific provisions on asbestos. The Committee notes with deep concern that the necessary measures have not been taken to bring the legislation into conformity with the requirements of Article 3. The Committee recalls the Resolution concerning asbestos, adopted by the 95th Session of the International Labour Conference, June 2006, which stated that the elimination of the future use of asbestos and the identification and proper management of asbestos currently in place are the most effective means to protect workers from asbestos exposure and to prevent future asbestos-related diseases and deaths. The Committee once again strongly urges the Government in accordance with Article 3 of the Convention, to take the necessary measures as soon as possible to: (a) prevent and control health hazards due to occupational exposure to asbestos; and (b) protect workers against such risks. It also urges the Government to take the necessary measures to consult the most representative organizations of employers and workers concerned with regard to the measures to be taken to give effect to the provisions of the Convention.
Articles 9, 10, 11 and 12. Preventive measures by law or regulation. Prohibition of the use of crocidolite and spraying. The Committee regrets to note that the necessary measures have not been adopted to bring the legislation into conformity with the requirements of Articles 9, 10, 11 and 12. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted or envisaged to ensure the application of Articles 9 and 10 (preventive measures by law or regulation), 11 (prohibition of crocidolite) and 12 (prohibition of spraying).
Article 15. Exposure limits. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the maximum permissible concentration of asbestos in the air in occupied areas is 5 million particles per cubic foot, in accordance with section 20 of Presidential Decree No. 2348 of 18 January 1951, which approved the Basic Regulations on industrial health and safety. The Government also refers to Annex D of Technical Standard on Minimum Conditions for the Performance of Work in Confined Spaces (NTS-008/17) which provides in general terms that the permissible exposure limits shall be those determined by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration of the Department of Labor of the United States (OSHA) which establishes limits for air contaminants. The Government indicates that Standards 29 CFR of the OSHA contain asbestos concentration limits (0.1 fibre per cubic centimetre of air as an eight hour time-weighted average and 1.0 fibre per cubic centimetre of air as averaged over a sampling period of 30 minutes, in accordance with Standards 29 CFR, 1910.1001). In this regard, the Committee observes that section 8 of NTS-008/17 determines that employers shall include in protocols for work in confined spaces the necessary safety mechanisms for entry into the premises, including preventive measures to be adopted during work, such as continuous monitoring of air in the workplace.
With reference to its previous comments on respiratory protective equipment and special protective clothing, the Government indicates that the Technical Standard on Demolition Work (NTS-006/17) provides that, when there is evidence of the existence of materials containing asbestos fibres, the requirements set out in the adequate procedures established by the national or foreign minimum safety and health standards applicable to work involving the risk of exposure to asbestos, shall be met. The Committee notes that NTS-009/18 provides that the enterprise or labour establishment shall attach to the occupational safety and health programme documents on the provision of work clothing and personal protective equipment. The Committee notes that the Government also indicates that the Regulations of Act No. 545 on safety in construction (DS No. 2936) establish the general requirement for the contractor to provide workers with appropriate individual protective equipment in relation to the hazards of the workplace in the sector. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that, in accordance with section 6(d) of DS No. 2936, the contractor shall provide without any cost to the workers, clothing, work apparel and personal protective equipment that is appropriate in relation to the risks analysed for the workplace, and that they shall be verified, inspected and reissued regularly in light of the deterioration and/or damage caused by their use. Finally, the Committee notes that the Government has not provided information on the application of Article 15(2) and (3) of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted or envisaged to: (a) prevent or control the release of asbestos dust into the air; (b) ensure that the exposure limits or other exposure criteria are complied with; and (c) reduce exposure to as low a level as is reasonably practicable. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide specific information on the measures taken in relation to respiratory protective equipment and special protective clothing, as provided for in Article 15(4) of the Convention.
Article 16. Practical measures for prevention and control. The Committee notes that NTS-009/18 provides that the enterprise or establishment shall undertake, through methodology, the identification of hazards and the assessment of risks in the activities undertaken, as well as other relevant measures. Under the terms of the Technical Safety Standard in force adopted by the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Welfare, or in the absence of such a Standard or another reference standard applicable to national conditions, the enterprise or labour establishment shall present a specific study on contaminating chemicals in the working environment (hazardous substances). The Committee requests the Government to provide additional information on the specific measures adopted to ensure that employers are made responsible for the establishment and implementation of practical measures for the prevention and control of the exposure of the workers that they employ to asbestos and for their protection against the hazards due to asbestos.
Article 21(3) and (4). Information on medical examinations. Other means of maintaining income when assignment to work involving exposure to asbestos is inadvisable. With reference to its previous comments, the Committee notes that NTS-009/18 provides that the enterprise or establishment shall indicate in the occupational safety and health programme the following information: (a) pre-recruitment medical examinations; (b) periodic examinations of workers in line with the risks identified in the “Hazard Identification and Risk Evaluation”, including the development of any occupational diseases that are detected; and (c) post-employment examinations of workers who have concluded their work in the enterprise or establishment (post-employment management). The Committee also notes section 404 of the General Act on occupational safety and health and welfare (Legislative Decree No. 16998), which provides that care shall be taken in the selection of workers that each worker is assigned to the work for which she/he is best suited from the viewpoint of her/his aptitude and physical strength. However, the Committee observes that specific measures have not been adopted to bring the legislation into conformity with the requirements set out in Article 21. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide specific information on the measures adopted or envisaged to ensure that: (a) workers are informed in an adequate and appropriate manner of the results of their medical examinations and receive individual advice concerning their health in relation to their work; and (b) when continued assignment to work involving exposure to asbestos is found to be medically inadvisable, every effort is made, consistent with national conditions and practice, to provide the workers concerned with other means of maintaining their income, in accordance with Article 21(3) and (4) of the Convention.
The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.
[The Government is asked to reply in full to the present comments in 2022.]

C167 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

Article 12(2) of the Convention. Obligation of the employer to take immediate steps to stop the operation and evacuate workers as appropriate. The Committee notes from the Government’s report that, as on previous occasions, none of the specific information requested by the Committee in its earlier comment relating to this Article of the Convention is provided. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the provisions of national legislation providing for the obligation of the employer to take immediate steps to stop the operation and evacuate workers as appropriate, and specify what measures have been adopted or has been envisaged to ensure that employers are obliged to take immediate steps to stop operations and evacuate workers as appropriate, where there is an imminent and serious danger to the safety of workers.
Article 22(1). Erection of structural frames and formwork under the supervision of a competent person. With regard to its earlier comments, the Committee notes that the Government again refers to Presidential Decree No. 2936, which is the implementing regulation of Act No. 545 ratifying the Convention, and to Technical Safety Standard (NTS) 009/18, which are standards that contain no provisions specifically giving effect to Article 22(1) of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to adopt concrete measures without delay to ensure that the erection of structural frames and formwork are carried out only under the supervision of a competent person.
Article 23. Work over water. The Committee notes that in reply to its earlier comment, the Government again refers to NTS 009/18, for the Presentation and Approval of Occupational Safety and Health Programmes, which contains no specific provisions giving effect to Article 23 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to take measures without delay to ensure that when work is done over or in close proximity to water that there shall be adequate provision for the protection of workers including: (a) preventing workers from falling into water; (b) the rescue of workers in danger of drowning; and (c) safe and sufficient transport.
Article 27(b). Storing, transporting, handling and use of explosives by a competent person. With reference to its earlier comments, the Committee notes that the Government, as previously, provides information on Presidential Decree No. 2936 but fails to reply to the Committee’s request in its earlier comment regarding Article 27(b) of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to specify whether it has adopted or envisages concrete measures to ensure that explosives are only stored, transported, handled or used by competent persons.
[The Government is asked to reply in full to the present comments in 2022.]

C182 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments.
Repetition
Articles 3(a), 7(1) and 8 of the Convention. Worst forms of child labour, sanctions applied and international cooperation. Sale and trafficking of children. In its previous comments, the Committee noted the adoption of Framework Act No. 263 on the sale and trafficking of persons of 6 February 2012. It noted that, under section 27 of the Act, the Government will cooperate with other institutions to design and implement protocols at the national and international levels for the early detection of trafficking, with particular attention being given to children. Furthermore, under the terms of section 28(4), special attention will be given to child victims with a view to their social reintegration. The Committee noted that section 34 amended several provisions of the Penal Code, making the penalties more severe for cases of trafficking involving children.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication in its report that it has adopted the National Plan of Action to Combat the Sale and Trafficking of Persons (2015–16), formulated under the auspices of the Inter-ministerial Council to Combat the Sale and Trafficking of Persons, which establishes specific measures for the coordination and implementation of an inter-institutional network of support and reintegration for victims. The Government indicates that the Plan includes two distinct policies: (i) promoting among the population attitudes and behaviour to prevent the crime of trafficking and smuggling; and (ii) protecting the rights of victims and vulnerable persons. The Government also refers to the Multi-sectoral Plan to Combat Trafficking and People Smuggling, within the framework of the Economic and Social Development Plan (PEDES), which includes action on prevention, supervision and punishment of perpetrators. The Committee notes the statistics provided by the Government on the number of complaints of trafficking, pornography and commercial sexual exploitation, but notes that the Government does not specify the number of cases involving victims under the age of 18 years. It also notes with interest the Act of 28 March 2016 ratifying the agreement between the Plurinational State of Bolivia and Argentina on the prevention and investigation of the crime of trafficking in persons and on assistance and protection for victims. It notes that this agreement is intended to reinforce coordinated and cooperative action to prevent and combat trafficking in persons, including children. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the results achieved within the framework of the National Plan of Action to Combat the Sale and Trafficking of Persons (2015–16), the PEDES and the agreement with Argentina. It also requests the Government to provide statistics on the number and nature of the violations reported involving children under 18 years of age, and on investigations, prosecutions and convictions related to these violations.
Article 7(2). Effective and time-bound measures. Clause (a). Preventing the engagement of children in the worst forms of child labour. Access to free basic education. The Committee previously noted the Juancito Pinto programme for the distribution of school vouchers intended to cover the costs of schooling for children enrolled in primary education, but observed that the programme only covers children in primary school, in this respect, the Government provided limited information and confined itself to indicating that 2,545 Bolivian nationals benefited from the Juancito Pinto programme between 2006 and 2013, and that the overall school drop-out rate fell from 6.5 per cent in 2005 to 1.51 per cent in 2013. However, the Committee noted the Avelino Siñani-Elizardo Pérez Act No. 070 of 20 December 2010 and the Strategic Institutional Plan (PEI) to ensure that children have access to universal education, including initial and vocational education and the transition from primary to secondary school.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the Juancito Pinto programme has resulted in a decrease in school failure and that the drop-out rate was 2.2 per cent in 2016 for primary school and 4.9 per cent for secondary school. The Committee also notes the statistics provided by UNESCO according to which the net school enrolment rate in primary school fell from 90.11 per cent in 2013 to 88.48 per cent in 2015, and rose slightly for secondary school from 75.73 per cent in 2013 to 77.58 per cent in 2015. Noting the persistence of the gap between the school attendance rates in primary and secondary school, the Committee requests the Government to renew its efforts to improve the operation of the education system and to increase the rate of school attendance in primary and secondary education, including within the framework of the Juancito Pinto programme and the PEI. It requests the Government to continue providing information on the results achieved in this respect, including updated statistics on the attendance and drop-out rates in primary and secondary school.
Article 7(2). Effective and time-bound measures. Clause (d). Identifying and reaching out to children at special risk. 1. Street children. The Committee noted previously that the revised list of hazardous types of work under section 136 of the Code for Children and Young Persons of 17 July 2014 includes the work of street children and it requested the Government to indicate the manner in which the Code protects street children from the worst forms of child labour.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the transitional provisions of the Code for Children and Young Persons require autonomous departments and municipal authorities to implement prevention and support programmes for street children and young persons for the restitution of their fundamental rights. In this context, the Government indicates that, with the support of UNICEF and the coordination of the National Promotion Committee, a protocol has been developed for the prevention and support for street children and young persons. This protocol, intended for all public officials and employees of private institutions who are participating in prevention and support measures for street children, establishes a basic structure for the assistance and prevention network. The Committee welcomes the adoption of the protocol and requests the Government to provide information on its implementation and the specific results achieved in protecting street children from the worst forms of child labour.
2. Indigenous children. In its previous comments, the Committee noted the statistical information concerning the measures taken to restore the social and labour rights of Guarani children. However, it noted that these statistics did not include information on the programmes and legislative measures taken to assist Guarani children. The Committee noted that the Plan of Action 2013–17 with UNICEF had the objective of providing specific attention to the children of indigenous peoples, including through the development of strategic policies, education and vocational programmes in indigenous languages and collaboration with indigenous groups and children.
The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report does not reply to these earlier comments. The Committee once again reminds the Government that the children of indigenous peoples are often victims of exploitation, and requests it to intensify its efforts to protect these children from the worst forms of child labour, including in cooperation with UNICEF. It once again requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted to prevent these children from becoming involved in situations of debt bondage or forced labour and from being recruited to carry out hazardous work in mines.

C182 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.
Repetition
The Committee notes the joint observations of the International Organisation of Employers (IOE) and the Confederation of Private Employers of Bolivia (CEPB) received on 1 September 2017.
Articles 3(a) and 7(2)(a) and (b) of the Convention. Debt bondage and forced and compulsory labour in the sugar cane and Brazil nut harvesting industries, and effective and time-bound measures. Preventing children from being engaged in the worst forms of child labour and providing direct assistance for their removal from child labour and for their rehabilitation and social integration. In its previous comments, the Committee noted the prevalence and conditions of exploitation of children working in hazardous conditions in sugar cane and nut harvesting plantations. The Committee also noted the Government’s corporate incentives programme “Triple Sello”, under which the provision of certain benefits is conditional on the enterprise demonstrating that it does not practice any form of child labour, including in work related to the harvesting of nuts. The Committee noted that, based on the Plan of Action 2013–17 with UNICEF, a programme had been established in 17 Bolivian nut and sugar cane producing municipalities to provide education assistance to children, and that 3,400 children had been reintegrated into basic education.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication in its report that no cases of child labour have been identified in the sugar cane production sector. With regard to the nut production sector, the Government indicates that a tripartite agreement has been signed with the representatives of employers and their workers in the sector, including a clause prohibiting child labour. According to the Government, during the harvest period, labour inspectors undertake inspections to assess the conditions of work, and also keep a special record of cases of children working in the sector. The Government adds that these inspectors are empowered to impose penalties when they detect violations of labour rules. However, the Committee notes that the Government does not indicate the number of violations identified or the penalties imposed. It also notes with regret the absence of information on the effective and time-bound measures taken to prevent children becoming victims of debt bondage or forced labour. The Committee once again urges the Government to take effective and time-bound measures to prevent children from becoming victims of debt bondage or forced labour in the sugar cane and Brazil nut harvesting industries, and to remove child victims from these worst forms of child labour and ensure their rehabilitation and social integration. The Committee once again requests the Government to explain the manner in which it ensures that persons using the labour of children under 18 years of age in the sugar cane and Brazil nut harvesting industries, under conditions of debt bondage or forced labour, are prosecuted and that effective and dissuasive sanctions are applied. The Committee requests the Government to indicate how the tripartite agreement signed in the nut production sector will concretely impact on child labour, and to provide a copy of the agreement.
Articles 3(d) and 7(2)(a) and (b). Hazardous types of work. Children working in mines. Effective and time-bound measures for prevention, assistance and removal. The Committee noted previously that over 3,800 children work in the tin, zinc, silver and gold mines in the country. It also noted the awareness-raising and educational measures and the economic alternatives offered to the families of children working in mines. The Committee noted that, according to the Government’s statistical data, only 8 per cent of the inspections carried out in mines found children under the age of 12 years working there. However, the Committee also noted that around 2,000 children were identified in 2013 in labour activities in traditional artisanal mines in the municipalities of Potosí and Oruro. The Committee further noted that 145 young persons below 18 years of age were found working in mines in Cerro Rico in June and July 2014. Finally, the Committee noted the Government’s indication that it intended to formulate a national policy for the eradication of child labour within the next two years.
The Committee notes the joint observations of the IOE and the CEPB that it is necessary for the Government to adopt a national plan for the eradication of child labour after consulting the social partners.
The Committee notes that, according to the Government, the Ministry of Labour has taken action directed at employers in the mining sector to discourage them from using child labour. The Government also refers to the establishment by the Ministry of Labour of Integrated Mobile Offices (Oficinas Móviles Integrales) in remote areas where the presence of the worst forms of child labour is suspected, including in mining areas. However, the Committee notes with regret that the national policy for the eradication of child labour has not yet been adopted. The Committee therefore requests the Government to take the necessary measures for the adoption in the very near future of the national policy for the eradication of child labour and to provide information on this subject. It also requests the Government to indicate the effectiveness of the action undertaken by Integrated Mobile Offices in preventing children from being engaged in hazardous work in mines, their removal from such work and their rehabilitation.
Article 5. Monitoring mechanisms and application in practice. The Committee previously noted the lack of resources of labour inspectors and the difficulties encountered in gaining access to plantations in the Chaco region. It also noted that the most recent information provided by the Government merely repeated the statistics provided previously indicating that only 5 per cent of the inspections carried out had identified children under 14 years of age engaged in work.
The Committee notes that, according to the Government, the labour inspectorate has six inspectors specialized in the progressive elimination of child labour. It adds that inspectors supervise labour standards relating to all fundamental rights. The Government adds that in remote areas where there are no Ministry of Labour offices, it has established Integrated Mobile Offices composed of labour inspectors with competence for the exhaustive supervision of the application of labour standards. The Committee notes that 265 inspections relating to child labour were carried out in 2015, all of which were undertaken by the Mobile Offices. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication in its report on the application of the Minimum Age Convention, 1973 (No. 138), that studies and analysis have been carried out of the situation of children working in domestic service, mines, on their own account, in sugar cane fields and those engaged in hazardous types of work, but it notes that the Government has not provided the findings of these studies. The Government indicates that the analyses in the studies are helping in the formulation of a plan of action which will be coordinated by municipal authorities and government departments. The Committee requests the Government to continue providing updated statistics on the results of routine and unscheduled inspections, including inspections carried out by inspectors specialized in child labour. It also requests the Government to ensure that these statistics clearly indicate the nature, scope and trends of the worst forms of child labour, particularly in the sugar cane and Brazil nut harvest, and in the mining sector. Finally, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on the adoption of the plan of action referred to above.
The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Adopted by the CEACR in 2019

C087 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2019, published 109th ILC session (2021)

In its previous comments, the Committee noted the observations of the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) of 30 August 2013, referring to a confrontation between the police and trade union demonstrators, which resulted in seven persons being wounded and 37 arrested and prosecuted, and requested the Government to provide information on the investigations and judicial procedures conducted. In the absence of a reply in this respect, the Committee reiterates its previous request.
Articles 2, 3 and 4 of the Convention. Legislative issues. The Committee recalls that, for many years, it has been requesting the Government to bring certain legislative texts into conformity with the Convention.
  • -With regard to the possibility of dissolving trade union organizations by administrative authority, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that, while section 129 of Regulatory Decree No. 224 (of 23 August 1943) of the General Labour Act establishes the grounds for and forms of the dissolution of trade union organizations by the Executive Branch, it has not been applicable since the ratification of the Convention, as Article 4 of the Convention takes precedence over the Decree. In this respect, the Committee recalls the need to ensure the conformity of the legislative provisions with the Convention, even when they are in abeyance or are no longer applied in practice.
  • -With regard to the prohibition on general strikes and sympathy strikes, and the imposition of penalties on the instigators or promotors of illegal strikes, the Committee notes that, in its previous comments, it noted the repeal of section 234 of the Penal Code, which criminalized the promotion of any lock-out, protest or strike declared to be illegal by the labour authorities, and requested the Government to indicate whether the reform of the Penal Code had led to the repeal of sections 1 and 2 of Legislative Decree No. 2565 (of June 1951), prohibiting and criminalizing illegal strikes. The Committee notes the Government’s reply indicating that this Legislative Decree has not been expressly repealed and once again recalls the need to repeal these provisions.
The Committee also notes that the Government has not provided information in relation to the other legislative matters that it has been commenting on for many years:
  • -the exclusion of agricultural workers from the scope of the General Labour Act of 1942 (section 1 of the General Labour Act, and its Regulatory Decree No. 224 of 23 August 1943), which implies their exclusion from the guarantees afforded by the Convention;
  • -the denial of the right to organize of public servants (section 104 of the General Labour Act);
  • -the excessive requirement of 50 per cent of the workers in an enterprise to establish a trade union, in the case of an industrial union (section 103 of the General Labour Act);
  • -the broad powers of supervision conferred upon the labour inspectorate over trade union activities (section 101 of the General Labour Act, which provides that labour inspectors shall attend the deliberations of trade unions and monitor their activities); in this regard, the Committee previously noted the Government’s indications that the conduct of labour inspectors must be in line with article 51 of the Political Constitution of the State of 2009, that is with deep-rooted respect for the principles of trade union unity, trade union democracy and the ideological and organizational independence that shall be enjoyed by all trade unions;
  • -the requirement of a three-quarters majority of the workers to call a strike (section 114 of the General Labour Act and section 159 of the Regulatory Decree); the illegality of strikes in the banking sector (section 1(c) of Supreme Decree No. 1958 of 1950); and the possibility of imposing compulsory arbitration by decision of the executive authorities to bring an end to a strike, including in services other than those that are essential in the strict sense of the term (section 113 of the General Labour Act); and
  • -the requirement that trade union officers must be of Bolivian nationality, literate, over 21 years of age (sections 5 and 7 of Legislative Decree No. 2565 and section 138 of Regulatory Decree No. 224 of 23 August 1943), and be a permanent employee of the enterprise (sections 6(c) and 7 of Legislative Decree No. 2565), and the power of the authorities, in certain circumstances, to disregard ex officio the appointment of union leaders and to order the restructuring of the boards of unions or federations, which are incompatible with the right of workers’ organizations to freely elect their representatives.
Recalling that the above provisions are incompatible with the right of workers, without distinction whatsoever, to establish and join organizations, and for those organizations to organize their activities, formulate their programmes and elect their representatives in full freedom, the Committee hopes that the Government will adopt the necessary measures to amend or repeal these provisions with a view to ensuring conformity with the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to keep it informed in this regard.
The Committee recalls that, in its 2016 comments, the Government indicated that work was being carried out together with the Bolivarian Workers’ Confederation on the drafting of a new Labour Code and a preliminary draft of new legislation governing public servants. The Committee notes the Government’s indications that it will continue to work towards the adoption of this legislation. Regretting the absence of progress in this respect, the Committee expresses the firm hope that the new legislation governing public servants and the new Labour Code will be adopted in the very near future and that, taking into account the Committee’s comments, they will be in full conformity with the provisions of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to report any developments in this respect and recalls once again that, if it so wishes, it may have recourse to ILO technical assistance.

C098 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2019, published 109th ILC session (2021)

The Committee notes the observations of the International Organisation of Employers (IOE) and the Confederation of Private Employers of Bolivia (CEPB), received on 3 September 2019. The Committee notes that the aforementioned organizations allege that the Government is violating the principle of free and voluntary negotiation by imposing the obligation on employers to negotiate and sign a wage agreement which implements the wage increase fixed unilaterally by the executive authority, and to do this within a fixed period of time or otherwise incur a fine. The Committee requests the Government to send its comments on this matter.
Articles 1, 2 and 4 of the Convention. Legislative issues. The Committee recalls that it has been referring for many years in its comments to the following matters relating to Articles 1, 2 and 4 of the Convention:
  • -the need to adjust the amount of fines (the amount of which ranges from 1,000–5,000 Bolivian bolivianos) as envisaged in Act No. 38 of 7 February 1944, in order to make them a sufficient deterrent against possible acts of anti-union discrimination or interference; and
  • -the need to guarantee the right to collective bargaining of public servants not engaged in the administration of the State and agricultural workers (the Constitution already does so, but the General Labour Act has not been amended accordingly).
In its previous comments, the Committee noted the Government’s indication that: (i) the issue of fines had been discussed with the Bolivian Workers’ Federation (COB) at round-table meetings; (ii) with regard to the exclusion of public servants not engaged in the administration of the State, a draft new Civil Service Act had been drawn up; and (iii) with regard to the exclusion of agricultural workers, work was also being carried out on drafting a new Labour Code. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that work is ongoing with regard to the above-mentioned issues. Noting with regret the lack of progress in this regard, the Committee firmly hopes that the new Civil Service Act and the new Labour Code will be adopted in the very near future and that, taking account of the Committee’s comments, they will be in full conformity with the provisions of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on any developments in this regard and once again reminds it that it may request technical assistance from the Office, if it wishes.
Application of the Convention in practice. In its last direct request, the Committee asked the Government to provide full statistical data on the number of collective agreements concluded in the country, with an indication of the sectors and the number of workers covered. Observing that the information supplied by the Government once again refers to the number of collective agreements concluded in the different cities of the country, without indicating whether these are public or private sector agreements, or the number of workers covered by them, the Committee expresses the hope that the Government will be able to collect the statistics in question in the near future and requests it to send them as soon as they are available.

C100 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2019, published 109th ILC session (2021)

Articles 1 and 2 of the Convention. Gender wage gap. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to provide up-to-date statistical information on the remuneration received by men and women in the public and the private sectors, disaggregated by sex and by sector of activity, and on the specific measures taken to reduce the wage gap and on the results obtained. The Committee notes the statistical information, provided by the Government in its report, on the wage gap in the private sector as of March 2018, prepared by the National Institute of Statistics (INE), which confirms that, in almost all categories, men earn one percentage point more than women: among managers and administrators, men’s wages are 1.35 per cent higher than those of women; among professionals, men earn 1.23 per cent more than women; and men skilled workers earn 1.68 per cent more than women skilled workers. The Committee notes however, that the Government has not provided information on the measures adopted with a view to promoting the effective application of the principle of the Convention and the results achieved. In this respect, the Committee wishes to recall that, giving legislative effect to the principle of equal remuneration for men and women for work of equal value is important, but not sufficient to achieve the goal of the Convention. It is also important to take effective measures in order to accomplish real progress in attaining the Convention’s objective of equal remuneration for men and women for work of equal value (see the 2012 General Survey on the fundamental Conventions, paragraphs 670 and 710). The Committee therefore requests the Government to: (i) take the necessary measures, without delay, to address the existing gender pay gap with a measurable impact, particularly through education and training measures for women that enable them to access a wider range of jobs with career prospects and higher wages, including in sectors where men predominate, in both the private and public sectors; and (ii) provide statistical information on the labour market participation rates of men and women, disaggregated by sex, economic sector and occupation, as well as information disaggregated by sex on participation rates in education and vocational training.
Article 3. Objective job evaluation. Noting the absence in the Government’s report of specific information on the measures adopted or envisaged with a view to promoting the adoption of a method for the objective evaluation of jobs, in accordance with Article 3 of the Convention, the Committee once again urges the Government to take the necessary measures to adopt a method of measuring and comparing the relative value of different jobs in order to determine whether jobs are of equal value.
Monitoring application. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to provide information on any measures adopted to establish suitable mechanisms for reporting cases of wage discrimination, the number of any such complaints filed and the action taken in this regard. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Welfare has mechanisms to receive such complaints through the inspectorate units located in the nine departmental and 15 regional labour offices throughout the national territory, and that there were no complaints of wage discrimination in 2018. In this respect, the Committee wishes to recall that, where no cases or complaints, or very few, are being lodged, this is likely to indicate a lack of an appropriate legal framework, lack of awareness of rights, lack of confidence in or absence of practical access to procedures, or fear of reprisals. The lack of complaints could also indicate that the system of recording violations is insufficiently developed. In its General Survey of 2012 on the fundamental Conventions (paragraph 871), the Committee invites member States to raise awareness of the relevant legislation, to enhance the capacity of the competent authorities, including judges, labour inspectors and other public officials, to identify and address cases of discrimination and unequal pay, and also to examine whether the applicable substantive and procedural provisions, in practice, allow claims to be brought successfully. The Committee also stresses the need to collect and publish information on the nature and outcome of discrimination and equal remuneration complaints and cases, as a means of raising awareness of the legislation and of the avenues for dispute resolution, and in order to examine the effectiveness of the procedures and mechanisms. The Committee requests the Government to continue providing information on the application of the mechanisms for reporting cases of wage discrimination, the number of any such complaints filed and the follow-up given to these complaints.

C100 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2019, published 109th ILC session (2021)

Article 1(b) of the Convention. Equal remuneration for men and women for work of equal value. Legislation. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to provide information on any developments in the adoption of the preliminary draft amendment to the General Labour Act of 24 May 1939 (or the Government’s proposed text for a new General Labour Act), to give full effect to the principle of the Convention, as enshrined in the 2009 Political Constitution (article 5(V)): “the State shall promote the integration of women into work and shall ensure that women receive the same remuneration as men for work of equal value, in both the public and private sectors”). The Committee notes the Government’s indication in its report that the Government’s proposal to reform the General Labour Act has been ready for several years. It has not been adopted due to disagreement between workers’ representatives, and the Government is awaiting a general consensus. In this respect, the Committee wishes to recall that the Convention acknowledges that employers’ and workers’ organizations must have a key role in its implementation if it is to be effective (see the 2012 General Survey on the fundamental Conventions, paragraph 655). The Committee trusts that the Government will maintain social dialogue with employers’ and workers’ organizations with a view to ensuring that the Government’s proposed text for the new General Labour Act gives full effect to the principle of equal remuneration for men and women for work of equal value, in accordance to article 48 of the Constitution and with the Convention. The Committee once again requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that the Government’s proposed text for the new General Labour Act is adopted in the near future and that it gives full effect to the Convention. Meanwhile, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on the proactive measures adopted to give effect to the principle, for example, regular awareness-raising campaigns and information for the general public, the promotion of clauses on equal remuneration for men and women for work of equal value or the promotion of methods to measure and compare the value of different jobs.
The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.

C111 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2019, published 109th ILC session (2021)

Article 1(1)(a) of the Convention. Discrimination on the ground of sex. Sexual harassment. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to provide information on the measures taken to tackle and prevent sexual harassment at the workplace, in light of article 15 of the Political Constitution of the State (2009), which provides that all persons, including women, are entitled to be free from physical, sexual or psychological violence, both within the family and in society, and that the State shall adopt the necessary measures to prevent, eliminate and punish gender-based and generational violence, as well as any act of commission or omission intended to degrade the human condition or cause death, pain or physical, sexual or psychological suffering. The Committee notes that the Government refers in its report to the existing regulatory framework intended to penalize discrimination on the ground of sex and sexual harassment. Specifically, the Government refers to, in addition to article 15 of the Constitution: (i) section 9 of Supreme Decree No. 224 of 23 August 1943, which establishes that there shall be no compensation for the dismissal of a worker for the performance of immoral acts in the workplace, according to the Government, this covers cases of sexual harassment; (ii) Act No. 1599 of 18 October 1994 ratifying the Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment and Eradication of Violence against Women (the Convention of Belém do Pará); (iii) Supreme Decree No. 1053 of 23 November 2011, which declares 25 November of every year as the “National Day against all forms of violence against women”; (iv) Supreme Decree No. 1363 of 28 September 2012, which declares awareness-raising campaigns to be necessary and a priority with the aim of preventing, combating and eliminating all forms of violence against women; and (v) Act No. 348 of 9 March 2013 guaranteeing women a life free from violence. The Government indicates that this Act mandates the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Security to adopt protection measures against all forms of sexual or workplace harassment and internal and administrative procedures for reporting, investigating, addressing, handling and penalizing such harassment. The Committee notes the different texts adopted to combat, inter alia, violence against women throughout the years, but notes that the Government has not provided information on specific measures to implement the principle enshrined in article 15 of the Constitution. In this respect, the Committee wishes to recall that legislative measures to give effect to the principles of the Convention are important, but not sufficient to effectively respond to the complex realities and various forms of discrimination, which require the adoption of differentiated measures. Proactive measures are required to address the underlying causes of discrimination and de facto inequalities resulting from discrimination deeply entrenched in traditional and societal values (see General Survey on the fundamental Conventions, 2012, paragraph 856). The Committee therefore urges the Government to send detailed information on the specific measures adopted in relation to Act No. 348 of 9 March 2013 in order to give effect in practice to the above-mentioned provisions. In particular, the Committee requests the Government to report the internal and administrative procedures for reporting, investigating, addressing, handling and penalizing sexual harassment in the workplace, with a view to evaluating the results of the legislative implementation.
Articles 2 and 3. National gender equality policy. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to provide information on the measures taken or envisaged to promote women’s access to formal employment without discrimination, including through measures to afford men and women better education and vocational training opportunities that will facilitate their access to a greater variety of job opportunities at all levels, including in sectors where they are not currently present or are under-represented. The Committee also requested the Government to provide statistical information on the participation rate of men and women in the labour market, disaggregated by sex, economic sector and occupation, together with statistical information, disaggregated by sex, on participation rates in education and vocational training. The Committee notes the information from the Government on: (i) the reduction of the overall unemployment rate from 7.4 per cent in 2013 to 4.5 per cent in 2017, when the rate for men was 4.2 per cent and for women was 4.9 per cent; and (ii) the Employment Support Programme (PAE) 2012–2017, the objectives of which include work skills training along with direct economic support for the jobseeker to promote access to opportunities in formal enterprises and training in specific skills for integration into particular jobs. Furthermore, it includes a labour market integration component for women in non-traditional activities, through skills improvement courses and the provision of economic support for training, along with awareness-raising activities in enterprises on this matter. Between September 2012 and April 2017, some 19,544 persons benefited from the programme, of which 61.54 per cent were women and 38.46 per cent were men. The Committee notes that the second Employment Support Programme began in May 2018 and, as of June 2018, 446 persons had benefited, of which 57.18 per cent were women and 42.82 per cent were men. The second Employment Support Programme seeks to increase the coverage and usage rates of the public employment service by jobseekers and enterprises through the implementation of different components that provide men and women with increased education and professional training opportunities. The Committee also notes that, as of December 2017, some 67.2 per cent of economically active men and 47.1 per cent of economically active women were employed in urban areas. In the same period, women were clustered in economic occupations traditionally assigned to women: 10.3 per cent of economically active women and 4.1 per cent of economically active men were family workers or unpaid apprentices; 6.7 per cent of women and 0.2 per cent of men were domestic workers; 13.1 per cent of men and 1.1 per cent of women were manual workers; 41.8 per cent of men and only 15.4 per cent of women worked in manufacturing; 19.6 per cent of men and 0.9 per cent of women worked in construction; and 14.7 per cent of men and 1.3 per cent of women worked in the transport sector. As of December 2017, the total number of students had increased by 15.42 per cent since 2000. In public and private educational establishments, 49 per cent of the students were women, and 51 per cent were men. Women accounted for almost 51 per cent of university students. The Government indicates this it is continuing to implement the National Plan for Equality of Opportunities, which seeks to encourage women to exercise their labour rights and promote their access to decent work. The Committee notes that the statistical data by sector of economic activity provided by the Government reflect the persistence of significant occupational gender segregation, despite the Government’s efforts. Recalling that it is essential to monitor the results and effectiveness of the plans and policies executed, the Committee urges the Government to provide information on: (i) the implementation of awareness-raising and educational programmes to combat gender prejudices and stereotypes, with a view to eliminating occupational gender segregation; (ii) the specific measures adopted as part of the second Employment Support Programme and the results achieved; and (iii) the measures adopted or envisaged to conduct regular monitoring and evaluation of the results achieved with a view to reviewing and adjusting the measures and strategies in place.
National equality policy with respect to race. In its previous comments, the Committee once again asked the Government to provide information on the activities undertaken by the National Committee against Racism and All Forms of Discrimination and on the adoption of an action policy against racism and discrimination. The Committee also requested the Government to ensure equality in access to education and vocational training for indigenous peoples, Afro-Bolivians and migrants to enable them to enjoy equality of opportunity in access to employment and remuneration. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government on the adoption of Supreme Decree No. 29894 of 25 January 2009 establishing the Office of the Deputy Minister for Decolonization, the General Directorate for Combating Racism and the Unit for the Management of Public Policies against Racism and Discrimination. The Committee also notes that the National Committee against Racism and All Forms of Discrimination has organized four national meetings of student youth brigades against racism and all forms of discrimination (2016–19), set up a toll-free hotline and individual attention for the reception of cases of discrimination, and systematized the information on administrative and judicial proceedings initiated on grounds of racism and all forms of discrimination. In 2018, the Office of the Deputy Minister reported 233 complaints, of which 189 were undergoing administrative processing in December 2018, 30 had been settled, five cases had been dismissed, four cases had been shelved and five further cases were continuing. With regard to remuneration, the Committee notes that, since 2006, wages have increased for the population in general, especially the most vulnerable populations such as the indigenous population, through significant increases to the annual minimum wage. Furthermore, a social inclusion policy has been implemented for education, health, housing, nutrition and social security. The Committee requests the Government to continue providing information on the outcomes of the measures adopted under the action policy against racism and discrimination and, particularly, the outcomes of the complaints reported by the Office of the Deputy Minister and the penalties imposed, where applicable. Noting the absence of information in the Government’s report in this respect, the Committee reiterates its request to the Government to provide information on the specific measures adopted to promote quality in access to education and vocational training for indigenous peoples, Afro-Bolivians and migrants to enable them to enjoy equality of opportunity in access to employment. The Committee also requests the Government to provide the available statistical information on the labour market participation of men and women, disaggregated by race and colour.
General observation of 2018. Regarding the above issues and more generally, the Committee would like to draw the Government’s attention to its general observation on discrimination based on race, colour and national extraction which was adopted in 2018. In the general observation, the Committee notes with concern that discriminatory attitudes and stereotypes based on the race, colour or national extraction of men and women workers continue to hinder their participation in education, vocational training programmes and access to a wider range of employment opportunities, resulting in persisting occupational segregation and lower remuneration received for work of equal value. Furthermore, the Committee considers that it is necessary to adopt a comprehensive and coordinated approach to tackling the obstacles and barriers faced by persons in employment and occupation because of their race, colour or national extraction, and to promote equality of opportunity and treatment for all. Such an approach should include the adoption of interlocking measures aimed at addressing gaps in education, training and skills, providing unbiased vocational guidance, recognizing and validating the qualifications obtained abroad, and valuing and recognizing traditional knowledge and skills that may be relevant both to accessing and advancing in employment and to engaging in an occupation. The Committee also recalls that, in order to be effective, these measures must include concrete steps, such as laws, policies, programmes, mechanisms and participatory processes, remedies designed to address prejudices and stereotypes and to promote mutual understanding and tolerance among all sections of the population.
The Committee draws the Government’s attention to its general observation of 2018 and requests the Government to provide information in response to the questions raised in that observation.
Workers with disabilities. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to provide information on the application of Act No. 223 and Supreme Decree No. 1893 of 12 February 2014, including statistical data on the number of persons with disabilities participating in the labour market and accessing education and vocational training; as well as on the specific programmes and policies to promote the labour market integration and non-discrimination in the workplace of persons with disabilities. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government on the adoption of Act No. 977 of 26 September 2017 on labour market integration and economic support, which establishes measures for the labour market integration of persons with disabilities, their fathers, mothers and spouses, the guardians of persons with disabilities under the age of 18 years and those with serious or very serious disabilities. Furthermore, it provides economic support to persons with serious and very serious disabilities, in an institutional manner and concurrent with municipal governments, public bodies and private enterprises. The Act envisages the organization of short training courses in vocational skills to improve the skill levels of persons with disabilities. The Government also reports that, within the Plurinational Education System, as part of the policy of inclusion, persons with disabilities benefit from direct admission to teacher training colleges. In 2018, the colleges had 98 students in total with different specialisms. The Government further reports the allocation of a budget of US$40 million for the implementation of all the components of the Job Creation Plan (2017–2022), which includes labour market integration policies for men and women workers, specific measures for the labour market integration of persons with disabilities and the implementation of pilot projects facilitating the labour market integration of victims of smuggling and trafficking and women victims of all forms of violence. The Committee welcomes the measures adopted and requests the Government to provide information on the efficacy and the outcomes of these measures, including statistical data, disaggregated by sex and economic sector, on the number of persons with disabilities participating in the labour market and accessing education and vocational training.
Real or perceived HIV status. In its previous comments, the Committee reiterated its request to the Government to provide information on policies and programmes on HIV and AIDS in the world of work adopted under Act No. 3729 of 2007 for the prevention of HIV/AIDS, and on any other laws and regulations, collective agreements or judicial rulings that seek to provide specific protection against stigma and discrimination based on real or perceived HIV status in employment and occupation. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government on the constitutional regulatory framework, Act No. 3729 of 2007 for the prevention of HIV/AIDS and Act No. 045 of 8 October 2010 against racism and all forms of discrimination. The Committee notes with regret that the Government has not provided specific information on the policies and programmes adopted on HIV and AIDS in the world of work. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide information on any legislation, collective agreements and court rulings that provide specific protection against stigma and discrimination based on real or perceived HIV status in employment and occupation.
Enforcement. The Committee previously requested the Government to provide information on measures to ensure women’s access to appropriate administrative and judicial remedies in the event of discrimination. In this respect, the Government reports that: (i) article 8(II) of the Constitution establishes gender equity as one of the values upon which the State is based; (ii) article 14(II) of the Constitution, prohibits and penalizes discrimination on the grounds of sex, colour, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, origin, culture, nationality, citizenship, language, religious creed, ideology, political or philosophical affiliation, civil status, social or economic conditions, type of occupation, level of education, disability, pregnancy or other factors, with the aim or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of the rights of any person; (iii) article 4(2) of the Constitution establishes that the State guarantees genuine and effective equality between men and women, respect for and protection of rights, especially those of women, in the context of diversity as a value, eliminating distinctions or discrimination based on cultural, economic, physical, social or any other type of differences of sex; and (iv) section 3(I) and (II) of Act No. 348 of 14 October 2014 establishes that the eradication of violence against women is a priority for the Plurinational State of Bolivia, as it is one of the most extreme forms of gender-based discrimination, and it shall be mandatory for state bodies and all public institutions to adopt the necessary measures and policies, allocating sufficient economic and human resources. The Committee notes the existence of this regulatory framework but notes that the Government does not refer to the measures adopted to ensure women’s access to appropriate administrative and judicial remedies in the event of discrimination. The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure women’s access to appropriate administrative and judicial remedies in the event of discrimination and to provide information in this respect.

C117 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2019, published 109th ILC session (2021)

Parts I and II of the Convention. Improvement of standards of living. The Committee notes the adoption in 2016 of the Social and Economic Development Plan (PDES) 2016-2020, the objectives of which include the eradication of extreme poverty, the universalization of basic services (such as water, transport and housing), the improvement of healthcare and education, and the elimination of hunger and malnutrition. The Committee also notes the Government’s information regarding the various policies and measures adopted within the framework of the PDES to improve the population’s standard of living, particularly groups in vulnerable situations, and the impact of those. The Government indicates that, between 2005 and 2017, there was a gradual reduction in the income gap between the 10 per cent richest and 10 per cent poorest. Poverty fell by 20 per cent and moderate poverty by 22 per cent. Additionally, in 2016, 31 per cent of the population received conditional and unconditional transfers, which were granted to population target groups (children, older persons and mothers). The Government adds that, between 2007 and 2015, 4,305 direct jobs and 27,586 indirect jobs were generated, following the establishment of 13 public enterprises. Regarding measures adopted to ensure maintenance of minimum standards of living of wage earners (Article 5), the Government indicates that, since 2006, based on a tripartite approach, workers’ wages have progressively increased through annual wage agreements with a view to benefiting those sectors that are traditionally excluded. The Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information, including statistics disaggregated by sex, age and region, on the measures adopted within the framework of the Social and Economic Development Plan (PDES) 2016-2020, and the results achieved. The Committee also requests the Government to provide detailed and updated information on all measures intended to ensure the improvement in the standards of living of the Bolivian population (Article 2), particularly for groups in vulnerable situations, such as women, young persons, persons with disabilities, older persons, small producers practicing subsistence agriculture and indigenous communities. The Committee also requests the Government to include updated statistical information disaggregated by sex and age, on the impact of such plans on the essential family needs of the workers as food and its nutritive value, housing, clothing, medical care and education (Article 5(2)), in both urban and rural areas.
Article 4. Promotion of productive capacity and the improvement of standards of living of agricultural producers. The Committee notes the detailed information provided by the Government on the implementation of various projects to encourage production of small agricultural producers. The Government refers, among other measures, to the implementation of the SME Productive Programme, whose objective is to provide short, medium and long-term resources to small and medium-sized enterprises for productive activities through intermediate credit institutions. In addition, in 2015, the PROMyPE – JIWASA project was carried out in five of the country’s departments, in collaboration with the Swiss and Danish Governments. The aim of the project is to economically strengthen and support micro and small productive enterprises in peri-urban and urban areas. Further, the Bank for Productive Development has developed activities aimed at those sectors which were previously excluded from traditional funding sources. In this connection, the Government indicates that, between 2008 and 2015, it provided support to 36,488 small producers and 1,418 associations through credits, training and technical assistance. The Government refers to the implementation of the Comprehensive Development Plan for the agricultural and rural sector, and the establishment of agricultural insurance cover, which provides compensation for producers whose land has been affected by natural disasters. The Committee notes, however, the direct import and marketing by the Government of inputs for production through the Bolivia Input programme. Furthermore, under Supreme Decree No. 2738 of 20 April 2016, the Bolivian Social Seal was created, which aims at identifying and promoting production from sustainable family agriculture in order to establish a more favourable position on the domestic market for this production. Lastly, the Government reports the establishment of a coordination process for indigenous peoples and farmers as suppliers for public enterprises within the framework of the “Service for the development of productive public enterprises (SEDEM)” by offering a fair price for their products and improving their conditions of production. The Committee requests the Government to continue providing detailed and updated information on the measures adopted with a view to promoting productive capacity and improving standards of living of agricultural producers, as well as the outcome of such measures.
Part III. Migrant workers. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to provide information on the transfer of Bolivian migrant workers’ resources to their regions of origin and on their wage conditions. It also requested the Government to provide information on migratory movements to and from Argentina and the situation of sugar and tobacco workers. The Government indicates that there are no regulations governing the transfer of Bolivian migrant workers’ resources to their regions of origin, as the workers have total freedom to dispose of their wages. With respect to migratory movements to and from Argentina, the Government indicates that, while the migration of Bolivians outside the country has been considerable since 2003, this migratory flow is of a temporary nature as the workers return once the high season of sugar cane harvesting activities is over. The Government reports that in 2017 and 2018, 97,973 Bolivians left to work in Argentina on a temporary basis. With regard to tobacco production in Bolivia, the Government indicates that in 2018 tobacco producers changed 75 per cent of their crops for corn and bean crops, owing to the heavy rainfall. The greatest increase in crop cultivation has been in sugar cane, which rose by 9.1 per cent in 2018. With regard to the applicable legislation in this sector, the Government refers to Supreme Decree No. 20255 of 24 May 1984, which establishes rights and obligations relating to paid work by sugar cane harvesters and cotton pickers. The Committee notes, however, that the Government does not provide any information regarding the pay conditions of Bolivian migrant workers. The Committee reiterates its request to the Government to provide detailed and updated information on the pay conditions of Bolivian migrant workers. The Committee also requests the Government to provide updated and detailed information on the impact of all measures adopted to ensure that family needs are taken into account in the working conditions of migrant workers, both national and international, who are obliged to live away from their homes. The Committee also requests the Government to supply updated statistical information disaggregated by sex on the number of migrant workers obliged to live away from their homes.
Part IV. Remuneration of the workers. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to provide information on the impact of the new regulation on financial services to protect wage earners and independent producers against usury. It also requested the Government to provide information on the manner in which the decisions from courts of law or other tribunals or administrative decisions had enabled advances on wages to be regulated and limited. The Committee notes, however, the Government’s indication that national legislation does not provide for advances on wages. The Government adds that, while payment intervals are generally monthly, weekly and daily payments can also be made. In such cases, the competent authority checks that the total wages received during a month is not less than the national minimum wage. With regard to monitoring the payment of wages, the Government refers to the adoption of Supreme Decree No. 3433 of 13 December 2017, which provides for the establishment of the compulsory register of employers. Section 5 of this Decree establishes the obligation for employers to submit monthly payrolls for their workers, with a view to monitoring compliance with the timely payment of workers’ wages. The Committee also notes the measures adopted to protect wage earners and independent producers against usury. In this regard, the Government refers to section 59 of Act No. 393 of 21 August 2013 on financial services, which introduces, through the Financial Stability Board (CEF), maximum limits on active interest rates for funding allocated to the production sector and social housing. To that end, Supreme Decree No. 1842 of 18 December 2013 was adopted, which provides for the establishment of minimum credit portfolio levels for loans for the production sector and social housing, to be upheld by financial intermediaries. The Government also refers to section 5 of Supreme Decree No. 2055 of 10 July 2014, which determines the maximum annual interest rates for credit for the productive sector, depending on the size of the productive unit. Lastly, the Committee notes the establishment of the Savers’ Protection Fund, aimed at protecting the savings of natural and legal persons deposited with financial intermediary entities, as well as the adoption of models and formats of all standard contracts for the authorized operations, to prevent users from being exploited. The Committee requests the Government to continue sending detailed and updated information on the measures adopted to encourage wage earners and independent producers to engage in one of the forms of voluntary forms of thrift set out in the Convention. It also requests the Government to provide specific and detailed information on the measures adopted to protect wage earners and independent producers against usury, specifying in particular the measures taken to reduce loan interest rates by monitoring the operations of lenders and increasing facilities for obtaining loans for appropriate ends through cooperative credit unions or institutions subject to the monitoring of the competent authority.
Part VI. Vocational education and training. In reply to the Committee’s previous comments, the Government indicates that, in accordance with section 17 of the Constitution, all persons are entitled to receive universal, productive, free, integrated and intercultural education at every level, without discrimination. The Committee notes the measures adopted for the progressive development of broad systems of education, vocational training and apprenticeship. Further, the Government refers to the adoption of various measures regarding training in new techniques of production, such as the creation in 2008 of “Pro-Bolivia”, an institution that carries out activities of investigation, innovation, technical assistance, training and funding for small productive units and micro and small enterprises, aimed at increasing productivity. Thirteen technological centres for productive innovation (CETIP) were also established with a view to improving the technical skills and incorporation of technology into micro and small enterprises, and the skills certification processes for producers. The Committee requests the Government to continue providing detailed and updated information on the measures taken for the progressive development of broad systems of education, vocational training and apprenticeship, and the manner in which training in new techniques of production have been organized as part of the policy that gives effect to the Convention (Articles 15 and 16).

C169 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2019, published 109th ILC session (2021)

The Committee notes the observations of the International Organisation of Employers (IOE), received on 2 September 2019, which include general comments on the application of the Convention. The Committee also notes the observations of the General Confederation of Workers of Peru (CGTP), received on 23 March 2017, which include the report of the Coordinator of Indigenous Organizations of the Amazon River Basin (COICA) concerning the application of the Convention in various countries.
Articles 2, 3 and 33 of the Convention. Human rights and the institutional framework. Coordinated and systematic action. The Committee notes the Government’s indication in its report that the application of standards relating to the rights of indigenous peoples is a cross-cutting matter in the competent State institutions, both at the central level and in autonomous, departmental, municipal governments and indigenous autonomies. It also notes that, under the terms of the Framework Act on Autonomies and Decentralization of 2010, the statutes were approved of the Guaraní Charagua Iyambae Autonomous Authority, the Original Indigenous Autonomous Authority of Raqaypamba and the Autonomous Government of the Original Uru Chipaya Nation. In accordance with the Act, Original Indigenous Peasant Autonomies (AIOCs) are empowered to elect their authorities directly, administer their economic resources, exercise indigenous jurisdiction within their territorial jurisdiction, and are competent to determine and manage development plans and programmes in accordance with their identity and vision (sections 8 and 9). The Government also refers to the adoption of the Patriotic Agenda 2025, which constitutes the General Economic and Social Development Plan.
The Committee takes due note of the press release of 12 November 2019 of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR), in which the IACHR, in the context of the protests and confrontations of November 2019, refers to the deterioration of public order in the Plurinational State of Bolivia and expresses concern at expressions of hate and other forms of violence against indigenous peoples and their symbols.
The Committee welcomes the cross-cutting approach that has been adopted by the Government to ensure respect for the rights recognized in the Convention. The Committee notes with concern the issues raised by the IACHR and firmly hopes that the Government will take measures to prevent and penalize any form of violence against indigenous peoples. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the manner in which the peoples covered by the Convention participate in the planning, execution and evaluation of measures intended to protect their rights, including in the context of the measures adopted under the General Economic and Social Development Plan, and also to indicate the manner in which it is ensured that the institutions responsible for the implementation of these measures have the necessary resources for the discharge of their functions. The Committee further requests the Government to provide information on the functioning of coordination between Original Indigenous Peasant Autonomies and other levels of government in relation to the management and financing of development programmes for indigenous peoples.
Article 6. Consultation. In its previous observation, the Committee noted the process of concertation concerning a legislative proposal on prior consultation, which included the participation of indigenous organizations, intercultural and Afro-Bolivian communities and representatives of the executive, legislative and electoral authorities. The Committee also noted that the Bill was submitted to the Plurinational Legislative Assembly for approval, and requested the Government to provide information on developments in this regard. The Committee notes that the Government has not provided information on this subject and once again requests the Government to provide information on any progress in the adoption of legislation on prior consultation. The Committee recalls the need for the consultation of indigenous peoples in the context of this process and for them to be able to participate in an appropriate form through their representative institutions, so that they can express their views and have an influence on the outcome of the process.
Consultation with the peoples of the Isidoro Sécure Indigenous Territory and National Park (TIPNIS). In its previous observation, the Committee noted that the Government was holding consultations in relation to the project for the construction of the Villa Tunari-San Ignacio de Moxos highway, which would affect the TIPNIS. It noted that, of the 69 indigenous communities affected, 58 decided to engage in consultation and 11 decided not to do so, and it requested the Government to provide information enabling it to examine the manner in which the difficulties arising in relation to the project were resolved. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that, despite the fact the majority of indigenous communities agreed to the construction of the highway, consensus was not reached with all the indigenous communities inhabiting the TIPNIS, for which reason construction was suspended. The Committee notes the adoption on 13 August 2017 of Act No. 969 on the protection and sustainable and comprehensive development of the Isiboro Sécure Indigenous Territory and National Park (TIPNIS), as a result of the consultation of the Mojeño-Trinitario, Chimán and Yuracaré peoples. The Act provides that communication and integration action to improve, establish and maintain the rights of indigenous peoples, such as free movement, through the opening of local paths, roads, river, air and other navigation systems, shall be planned in a participatory manner with the indigenous peoples (section 9). It also provides that the exploitation of renewable natural resources and the development of productive activities may be undertaken with the participation of private entities on condition that agreements or associations exist with the indigenous peoples of the TIPNIS, with the authorization and monitoring of the competent State bodies, and with the guarantee of a margin of earnings for those peoples (section 10). The Committee notes that, in order to ensure compliance with Act No. 969, it is planned to establish a Joint Commission under the responsibility of the Office of the President, composed of the Ministries involved and the Mojeño-Trinitario, Chimán and Yuracaré peoples residing in the territory of the TIPNIS. The Committee requests the Government to indicate whether road and infrastructure development projects have been undertaken in the TIPNIS, with an indication of the manner in which the indigenous peoples residing in the area were consulted in this regard. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the agreements or associations established between the private sector and indigenous peoples for the exploitation of renewable natural resources and the development of productive activities, with an indication of the manner in which the peoples have participated in the benefits of these activities. Please also provide information on the activities of the Joint Commission established to ensure effective compliance with Act No. 969.
Article 15. Consultations. Natural resources. The Committee notes the adoption on 19 May 2014 of the Act on minerals and metallurgy, section 207 of which guarantees the right to prior, free and informed consultation by the State with original indigenous rural nations and peoples, intercultural communities and the Afro-Bolivian people, in relation to any application for the conclusion of an administrative mining contract likely to directly affect their collective rights. However, the Committee notes that this legal provision exempts from the requirement of consultation mining prospection and exploration operations, as well as administrative mining contracts for the rehabilitation of sites and lease and shared irrigation contracts, as pre-established rights. In accordance with section 209 of the Act, the parties to the consultation have to meet the conditions of: pre colonial existence and ancestral possession of the territory; maintenance of their cultural patterns; identification as members of a nation or people; and access and collective management of their lands and territories. The Act also provides that prior consultation shall be held in a maximum of three meetings and shall not have a duration of over four months from the final notification of the consultation process to the parties concerned (sections 211 and 212).
The Committee notes that Presidential Decree No. 2298, of 18 March 2015, includes provisions for the holding of consultations and the participation of indigenous peoples in relation to oil extraction activities. It provides that the competent authority, in accordance with the territorial identification, organizational independence and traditions and customs of indigenous peoples, shall convene in writing the representation bodies liable to be affected with a view to holding an information and coordination meeting for the development of the consultation process. In the event that, exceptionally, it is not possible to hold or conclude consultation processes for reasons that cannot be attributed to the competent authority, the latter shall issue a decision determining the situation with regard to the implementation of the project and reporting all of the efforts made to follow the process of consultation and to safeguard the rights of indigenous peoples.
The Committee recalls that Article 15(2) of the Convention establishes the requirement for consultation with indigenous peoples before undertaking or permitting any programmes for the exploration or exploitation of natural resources pertaining to their lands, and it therefore requests the Government: (1) to amend the Act on mining and metallurgy to bring it into conformity with the Convention so as to ensure that indigenous peoples are consulted before any mining exploration or exploitation operations are undertaken on their lands; (2) to ensure that any mining, oil or gas exploration or exploitation programme or activity undertaken on the lands of the peoples covered by the Convention is the subject of consultation with the peoples concerned; and (3) to indicate the manner in which in practice the requirement of access and the collective management of lands is understood under the terms of the Act as being a matter for consultation.
The Committee recalls that, in its 2011 general observation, it emphasized that the application of the right to consultation must be adapted to the situation of the peoples concerned, ensuring that the communities affected participate as early as possible in the process, including in the preparation of environmental impact studies. In this regard, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the manner in which the consultation processes undertaken in relation to mining and oil extraction activities have taken into account the decision-making institutions and procedures of the peoples concerned. It also requests the Government to provide information on the consultation processes undertaken in relation to mining and oil projects in which agreement has been reached with the peoples consulted, with an indication of the manner in which the concerns of indigenous peoples who have not been able to participate in the consultation processes have been taken into consideration.
The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.

C169 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2019, published 109th ILC session (2021)

Article 1 of the Convention. Identification. In previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to provide information on the procedures used to determine the peoples covered by the Convention and on the measures adopted to ensure that no groups of the national population that should be covered by the scope of the Convention are excluded from the protection afforded by the instrument. The Government indicates in its report that, according to the data of the 2012 national census, a total of 1,837,105 people declared that they belonged to the Quechua nation; 1,598,807 to the Aymara; and 145,653 to the Chiquitana. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the criterion of self identification with an original indigenous nation is the fundamental criterion for the establishment of original indigenous rural identity. The Committee requests the Government to continue providing updated statistical data on the number of persons belonging to the peoples covered by the Convention, disaggregated by sex, age, people and geographical location, with an indication of the manner in which the criteria of self-identification is applied in the census. The Committee refers to its general observation of 2018, in which it reiterated the importance of the availability of reliable statistical data on the peoples covered by the Convention, including their socio-economic conditions, as a tool for effectively guiding and defining public policies, and it encourages the Government to provide information in this regard.
Article 4. Special measures. Peoples in a highly vulnerable situation. The Committee welcomes the adoption in December 2013 of Act No. 450 on the protection of native indigenous nations and peoples in a highly vulnerable situation. The Committee notes that the objective of the Act is to establish sectoral and intersectoral prevention, protection and reinforcement mechanisms and policies to safeguard the individual and collective systems and ways of life of native indigenous nations and peoples that are highly vulnerable, and whose physical and cultural survival is under extreme threat (section 1). With a view to achieving this aim, the Act provides for the establishment of the General Directorate for the Protection of Original Indigenous Nations and Peoples, under the responsibility of the executive authorities, as the body responsible for developing and implementing prevention, protection and reinforcement plans and strategies to safeguard their way of life in coordination with autonomous territorial bodies and the organizations of indigenous nations and peoples (section 4). The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted by the General Directorate for the Protection of Native Indigenous Nations and Peoples with a view to the identification and protection of indigenous peoples in a highly vulnerable situation, and the mechanisms established for their protection.
Articles 5 and 7. Recognition of cultural practices. Development. The Committee notes that the Government reports the adoption of the Patriotic Agenda 2025, which constitutes the General Economic and Social Development Plan, and which is based on 13 pillars, including the eradication of extreme poverty and the socialization and universal provision of basic services. The Committee also notes the adoption of the General Act on coca (Act No. 906), in March 2017, which protects and revalues original and ancestral coca as the cultural heritage of the Bolivian people, and establishes mechanisms to control its production, dissemination, commercialization, consumption and promotion (section 1). The Act seeks to promote scientific, medicinal and socio-cultural research into coca and to prevent its use for unlawful purposes (section 2). The Committee also notes that Presidential Decree No. 3204 of 7 June 2017 established the Comprehensive National Development Fund (FONADIN), to replace the Alternative National Development Fund (FONADAL), with the objective of promoting comprehensive sustainable development and the strengthening of education, health and sanitation systems adopting a gender and generational approach, through the implementation and financing of plans, programmes, projects and activities in the areas authorized by Act No. 906 for the production of coca. The FONADIN will also promote the transparency and the development of participation and community social control mechanisms for all plans, programmes and projects (sections 4 and 5). The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted to reduce the poverty of indigenous peoples and to ensure their access to basic services, with an indication of the impact of these measures and the manner in which the peoples concerned participate in their design, implementation and follow-up. With reference to Act No. 906, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on the indigenous peoples in the areas authorized for the production of coca and on the specific measures adopted to promote, regulate and control the use of traditional coca. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted by the FONADIN for the sustainable development of the areas authorized for the production of coca, with an indication of the manner in which the peoples concerned participate in the development and implementation of these measures.
Forestry resources. The Committee notes that, in reply to its request for information on the manner in which the situation of indigenous communities affected by logging concessions has been addressed, the Government indicates that the number of indigenous communities participating in the wood trade is tending to increase, as is the management of forests. It indicates that sustainable management for the generation of income is the challenge that has to be taken up by indigenous communities, and that the consolidation of their land rights is a priority for the Government. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted to promote the sustainable management of forests by indigenous communities, and their impact. The Committee once again requests information on the manner in which the situation has been addressed of indigenous peoples that are particularly affected by projects for the extraction of wood resources.
Articles 14 and 19. Lands. In its previous comments, the Committee noted the application of the system of the collective ownership of the land of indigenous nations and peoples, as recognized by the 2009 Constitution (Article 30(II)(c)), and it requested the Government to indicate the surface area of the lands that have been registered for the peoples covered by the Convention. The Committee notes that, although the Government has provided information on the process of the constitution of eight indigenous territories as original indigenous rural autonomous authorities, it has not provided specific information on the lands for which titles have been issued and registered for indigenous communities. With reference to agrarian development programmes, the Government indicates that, within the framework of Patriotic Agenda 2525: General Economic and Social Development Plan, development plans, projects and programmes have been developed for indigenous peoples by the Ministry of Rural Development and Lands. It adds that the agrarian insurance scheme Pachamama has been established as a measure to contribute to the protection of agricultural production and the means of subsistence of agricultural producers faced with adverse climate events. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide updated information on the surface area of the lands that have been registered for the peoples covered by the Convention, with an indication of the number of beneficiary communities or peoples and their location. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the institutions responsible for resolving issues relating to the lands of indigenous peoples and for giving effect to the respective adjudication procedures, with an indication of the means and resources available to such institutions for the discharge of their functions. Please also provide detailed information on the impact of the measures adopted to promote rural development programmes on the lands of the peoples covered by the Convention.
Articles 20, 21 and 22. Conditions of work. Employment and vocational training. In its previous comments, the Committee noted the measures taken by the Government to combat debt bondage and forced labour practices affecting indigenous workers, including through mobile labour inspections, and requested the Government to continue providing information on this subject. The Government indicates that, through the establishment of mobile offices, the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Welfare transfers on a temporary basis to remote regions of the country, where indigenous workers are most vulnerable, which enables it to verify on the spot the situation of workers from very vulnerable indigenous families in cattle and agricultural ranches and logging companies. It indicates that, in 2017, a total of 804 mobile inspections were conducted. The Government adds that trade union and indigenous authorities participate in the comprehensive labour inspection model, and that indigenous universities are currently operating which offer careers relating to community productivity and development, agronomy in the altiplano and tropical areas, the textile industry, the food industry and fish farming. The Committee notes the measures adopted to reinforce the presence of the State in remote regions where indigenous workers are more vulnerable to the exploitation of their labour and requests the Government to provide specific information on the impact of the measures adopted in terms of combating forced labour and ensuring respect for the human and labour rights of persons belonging to indigenous peoples. In this regard, the Committee also refers to its 2019 direct request on the application of the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29). In addition, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures adopted to promote the access to skilled employment of indigenous men and women, including information on vocational training plans and programmes and their impact.
Article 26. Education. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government on the legislative framework respecting intracultural, intercultural and plurilingual education and the Plurinational Community Education Model. The Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information on the measures adopted to encourage the use of indigenous languages and to promote intercultural education, with an indication of their impact. The Committee also requests the Government to provide statistical data on the enrolment rate of persons from indigenous peoples in primary, secondary and university education.

C189 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2019, published 109th ILC session (2021)

The Committee notes the observations of the National Federation of Waged Domestic Workers of Bolivia (FENATRAHOB), received on 18 September 2018. The Committee requests the Government to provide its comments in this regard.
Article 2 of the Convention. Scope of application. Exclusions. In reply to the Committee’s previous comments, the Government indicates that section 1(3) of Act No. 2450 of 9 April 2003 regulating waged domestic work (Act No. 2450 of 2003) provides that “work performed in service or commercial premises, even if it is carried out in private houses, shall not be considered waged domestic work”, with the aim of avoiding commercial activities being disguised as waged domestic work. By way of example, the Government indicates that the intention is to avoid workers being employed under the waged domestic work regime, for example when they carry out kitchen work in establishments selling food where the employer also resides. The Government adds that no categories or groups of waged domestic workers have been excluded from the application of Act No. 2450 of 2003. The Government indicates that waged domestic workers who perform work occasionally or sporadically on an occupational basis are not covered by Act No. 2450 of 2003 and are governed by the general system established in the General Labour Act. In this respect, the Government reports that Act No. 2450 of 2003 was developed with the participation of the representatives of waged domestic workers, who are aware of the informality that is characteristic of occasional or sporadic domestic work. The Committee requests the Government to provide a detailed explanation of the reasons why waged workers who perform domestic work occasionally or sporadically on an occupational basis are excluded from the scope of application of Act No. 2450 of 2003. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the consultations that were held prior to this exclusion with the most representative employers’ and workers’ organizations, as well as with the representative organizations of domestic workers and the representative organizations of employers of domestic workers, where such organizations exist. The Committee also requests the Government to send detailed information on the manner in which it is ensured that the excluded workers receive protection at least equivalent to that received by waged domestic workers covered by Act No. 2450 of 2003.
Article 3(2)(a). Freedom of association and collective bargaining. The Committee notes the observations of FENATRAHOB affirming that, on 6 July 2018, its members participated in a demonstration protesting the delay in the entry into force of the Supreme Decree on the registration with the National Health Fund of waged domestic workers. FENATRAHOB reports that, during the demonstration, the police used tear gas to repress its members, without considering that there were children present. FENATRAHOB also reports that the right to collective bargaining of waged domestic workers has been limited, as they do not have access to collective bargaining forums and do not participate in decision-making processes regarding their rights. FENATRAHOB further affirms that the Government did not send it a copy of the report on the application of the Convention. In this regard, the Committee recalls that, under article 23 of the ILO Constitution, Governments shall communicate to the most representative workers’ and employers’ organizations copies of the reports on the application of ratified Conventions. The Committee requests the Government to reply to the observations of FENATRAHOB in relation to the allegations regarding police action against its members during the protest that took place on 6 July 2018 and the measures taken by the Government in that respect, if any. The Committee also requests the Government to adopt the necessary measures to guarantee that the representative workers’ and employers’ organizations receive a copy of the report on the application of the Convention with sufficient time to formulate their observations in that regard.
Article 3(2)(b). Elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labour. In reply to the Committee’s previous comments, the Government refers, inter alia, to section 18 of Comprehensive Act No. 263 of 31 July 2012 on human trafficking and smuggling, which establishes that, to receive the prior authorization required to operate, private employment agencies must have, inter alia, internal rules of procedure that incorporate the principles of prevention and protection against trafficking and smuggling of persons and related offences. In the absence of information provided by the Government in this respect, the Committee reiterates its request to the Government to provide information on the effect given in practice in relation to domestic workers to the Comprehensive Act to combat the trafficking and smuggling of persons, including statistical information on the number and nature of the violations reported, investigations, prosecutions and convictions in that regard.
Articles 3(2)(c) and 4. Child labour. Minimum age. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure the amendment of section 129 of the Code of Children and Young Persons to bring the minimum age for admission to employment or work into conformity with the age specified in the Minimum Age Convention, 1973 (No. 138), that is 14 years, as a minimum. The Committee also requested the Government to provide specific information on the measures adopted or envisaged for the abolition of child domestic labour. The Committee notes with interest that Constitutional Court Decision No. 0025/2017 of 21 July 2017 declared unconstitutional and abrogated, among other provisions, section 129(II) of the Code of Children and Young Persons. Section 129(II) provided for the possibility of authorizing own-account work by girls, boys or young persons between the ages of 10 and 14 years, and work for third parties by young persons between 12 and 14 years of age. Consequently, following the above-mentioned Decision, section 129 of the Code of Children and Young Persons fixes the minimum age of work at 14 years, in accordance with the provisions of Convention No. 138. Nevertheless, the Committee observes that the Government has not included information in its report on the measures adopted or envisaged with a view to abolishing child domestic labour in practice. Consequently, the Committee reiterates its request to the Government to provide detailed and updated information on the measures adopted or envisaged with a view to eliminating child domestic labour in practice.
Article 5. Effective protection against abuse, harassment and violence. In reply to the Committee’s previous comments, the Government reiterates that waged domestic workers benefit from the same protection against abuse, harassment and violence as that afforded to all workers under the Constitution and Act No. 348 of 9 March 2013 on guaranteeing to women a life free from violence. The Government also reiterates that waged domestic workers may lodge complaints or requests relating to abuse, physical assault or sexual or other types of harassment with the Brigade for the Protection of Women and Families, the police, the Office of the Public Prosecutor and other competent authorities. The Government indicates that no complaints of sexual harassment suffered by waged domestic workers have been lodged with the labour offices. In this respect, the Committee stresses, as it has done previously in relation to the Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111), that an absence of complaints is not necessarily an indication that no sexual harassment is taking place. Regarding complaints brought before the courts, the Government provides general information on the complaints lodged for cases of violence against women. However, the Government indicates that it does not have information regarding which of these complaints referred to cases involving victims who were waged domestic workers, as the courts make no distinction as to the type of work or condition of the victim or complainant. In this regard, the Committee emphasizes that gathering statistical information on the number of complaints received of cases of abuse, harassment and violence against waged domestic workers does not constitute discrimination against such workers, but would allow the competent authorities to gain an understanding of the magnitude of the problem with a view to adopting the measures they consider appropriate and evaluating their impact. The Committee reiterates its request to the Government to provide detailed and updated information on the application in practice of the provisions of Act No. 348 of 2013 and Act No. 2450 of 2003 in relation to the protection of domestic workers against any form of abuse, harassment or violence. The Committee also once again requests the Government to provide statistical data on the number of complaints received of harassment, abuse and violence by the various competent bodies, the outcome of these complaints, the penalties imposed on those responsible and the compensation granted.
Articles 6 and 9. Domestic workers who reside in the household in which they work. In reply to the Committee’s previous comments, the Government indicates that it is customary when waged domestic services are contracted for the contracting parties to freely agree whether the waged domestic worker will reside in the house for which he or she works (cama adentro) or not (cama afuera). The Government also indicates that the custom is generally that waged domestic workers are not required to remain in the household or accompany members of the household during periods of rest or annual leave. The Government adds that, if this is not the case, the waged domestic worker receives extra payment for the period of time worked. The Government also indicates that, under section 16(c) of Act No. 2450 of 2003, employers are prohibited from holding workers’ personal effects, including identity and travel documents. In the event of violations of this provision, the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Welfare (MTEPS), through the labour inspectorate, is competent to summon the employer to appear before it and return the withheld documentation to the worker. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the provisions of the legal system under which it is guaranteed that waged domestic workers are free to reach agreement with their employer or potential employer on whether to reside in the household for which they work in accordance with Article 9(a) of the Convention, and, if they do reside in the household for which they work, they are not obliged to remain in the household or with household members during periods of daily and weekly rest or annual leave in accordance with Article 9(b) of the Convention. Furthermore, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on the application in practice of section 16(c) of Act No. 2450 of 2003, particularly on the number of complaints received regarding the withholding of identity and travel documents of waged domestic workers by their employer, the outcome of these complaints and the compensation awarded.
Article 7. Written contract of employment. In reply to the Committee’s previous comments, the Government reports that the MTEPS organizes information and awareness-raising campaigns, as well as workshops on the labour rights of waged domestic workers in different cities in the country. The Government indicates that, between the approval of Act No. 2450 of 2003 and March 2015, only four written employment contracts were concluded in the sector. FENATRAHOB also reports low numbers of employment contracts approved by the MTEPS. In this context, the departmental representatives of the Ombudsman from La Paz and the union of waged domestic workers of San Pedro ran a campaign between November 2014 and June 2015 to promote the conclusion of written contracts in the sector. The Government reports that this campaign provided information to 810 households. With regard to trial periods, the Government reports that waged domestic workers are governed by section 13 of the General Labour Act, which provides that, “… the trial period is deemed to include only the first three months …”. With regard to terms of repatriation, the Government refers to sections 4 to 19 of the Foreign Affairs Service Act of the Plurinational State of Bolivia, Act No. 465 of 19 December 2013 (Act No. 465 of 19 December 2013), which establishes the authorities competent to execute plans, programmes or projects for the repatriation or return of Bolivian nationals and their families upon their request. However, the Government does not indicate how it is ensured in practice that domestic workers are informed of the terms of the trial period and repatriation, where applicable. Lastly, the Committee observes that the Government has not provided information in its report on the measures adopted or envisaged with a view to ensuring that waged domestic workers from underprivileged communities, including indigenous and tribal communities, are informed of the terms and conditions of employment in an appropriate, verifiable and easily understandable manner. The Committee requests the Government to continue sending detailed and updated information on the measures adopted or envisaged to ensure that waged domestic workers are informed of the terms and conditions of employment – including the trial period and terms of repatriation, where applicable – in an appropriate, verifiable and easily understandable manner. In this regard, the Committee requests the Government to provide updated information on the measures adopted or envisaged with a view to promoting the conclusion of written contracts of employment in the waged domestic work sector, as well as statistical information on the number of written contracts concluded. The Committee reiterates its request to the Government to provide detailed and updated information on the measures adopted or envisaged with a view to ensuring that waged domestic workers from underprivileged communities, including indigenous and tribal communities, are informed of their terms and conditions of employment in an appropriate, verifiable and easily understandable manner. The Committee also reiterates its request to the Government to indicate the means through which this information is provided, including printed or audiovisual material, and the languages in which it is available.
Article 8(1) and (4). Migrant domestic workers. In reply to the Committee’s previous comments, the Government reports that, in 2006, the issue of international migration was included on the political agenda, making it a central and priority concern. In this context, a “national agreement for Bolivians abroad” was concluded between various stakeholders, including representatives of national institutions, international organizations and civil society. However, the Government reports that there are no provisions in the legal system establishing an obligation to provide waged domestic workers with a written job offer or contract of employment enforceable in the country in which the work is to be performed prior to crossing the national borders for the purposes of taking up the domestic work to which the offer or contract applies. Regarding the right to repatriation of migrant domestic workers on the expiry or termination of the contract, the Government refers to sections 4 and 19 of Act No. 465 of 2013, which establish the authorities competent to execute plans, programmes or projects for the repatriation or return of Bolivian nationals and their families when such requests are made collectively. However, the Government has not provided information on the conditions under which waged domestic workers are repatriated on the expiry or termination of their contract. The Committee requests the Government to adopt the necessary measures to ensure that migrant waged domestic workers who are recruited in one country for domestic work in another receive a written job offer or contract of employment that is enforceable in the country in which the work is to be performed, addressing the terms and conditions of employment referred to in Article 7 of the Convention, prior to crossing national borders for the purpose of taking up the domestic work to which the offer or contract applies. The Committee also requests the Government to specify the conditions under which migrant domestic workers are entitled to repatriation on the expiry or termination of the employment contract for which they were recruited. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the measures adopted under the “national agreement for Bolivians abroad” in relation to waged domestic workers.
Article 10(1) and (3). Equality of treatment in relation to hours of work. Periods during which domestic workers are not free to dispose of their time. In its previous comments, the Committee suggested that the Government might consider the possibility of establishing a working day of a maximum of eight hours for all domestic workers, including those domestic workers who reside in the household for which they work. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that there is no mechanism for recording hours of work in the waged domestic work sector for the ordinary working day or overtime. The Government adds that the implementation in practice of such a recording mechanism would not receive the support of waged domestic workers, as it could lead to deductions from wages for tardiness or absences. In relation to periods during which waged domestic workers are not free to dispose of their time as they please and remain at the disposal of the household in order to respond to possible calls, the Government indicates that these are considered to be hours of work under section 47 of the General Labour Act. This section provides that the effective working hours include the time during which the worker is at the disposal of the employer. Nevertheless, the Committee observes that the Government has not provided information on the measures adopted or envisaged with a view to establishing a working day of a maximum of eight hours, like all other workers, for all waged domestic workers, including those who reside in the household for which they work. In this respect, the Committee recalls that Article 10 of the Convention establishes that measures shall be taken “towards ensuring equal treatment between domestic workers and workers generally in relation to normal hours of work”. The Committee therefore requests the Government to adopt the necessary measures to establish, like all other workers, a working day of a maximum of eight hours for waged domestic workers, including those waged domestic workers who reside in the household for which they work. The Committee also requests the Government to indicate how the application of section 47 of the General Labour Act is ensured in practice in the waged domestic work sector.
Article 11. Minimum wage. In response to the Committee’s previous comments, the Government indicates that, while the MTEPS has a monitoring system for labour complaints, it is not possible to provide information on which of the cases detected of violation of the obligation to pay at least the minimum wage correspond to the waged domestic work sector. Nevertheless, the Government provides a copy of the wage and occupational safety and health book (LSySST), through which the obligation is fulfilled to record the payment of wages to waged domestic workers, in accordance with the provisions of section 1(II) of Resolution No. 218 of 28 March 2014. The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to compile information on the cases where violations of the obligation to pay at least the minimum wage to waged domestic workers are detected. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the number of wage and occupational safety and health books registered.
Article 13. Occupational safety and health. In reply to the Committee’s previous comment, the Government reports that the MTEPS facilitates first aid training during fairs, campaigns and workshops held on the rights of waged domestic workers. The Government indicates that this training has been brought to the attention of the employers’ organization of waged domestic workers, the Housewives’ League. Furthermore, the wage and occupational safety and health book, the registration of which is compulsory, includes a section for recording the training received by the waged domestic worker at the expense of the employer in the area of occupational safety and health. On this matter, FENATRAHOB indicates that there are no specific regulations to mitigate the ever-present risks in the sector (such as handling electrical appliances, cooking food at high temperatures and performing tasks in unsanitary locations), and the general legislation on safety and health is applied, which is intended for industrial and mining activities, as well as all industrial activities involving polluting gases and unsanitary environments. FENATRAHOB also indicates that consultations have not been held with the social partners in relation to the application in practice of this Article of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to continue providing detailed and updated information on the measures adopted or envisaged that duly take into account the specific characteristics of waged domestic work, in order to ensure the occupational safety and health of such workers. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the consultations held with the social partners in this respect.
Article 14(1). Social security. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that section 24 of Act No. 2450 of 2003 provides that the registration with the National Health Fund (within the framework of the short-term social security scheme) of waged domestic workers is subject to further regulation by supreme decree. In this regard, the Committee requested the Government to take the necessary measures for the approval of those regulations. The Government reports the establishment of working groups, the members of which include FENATRAHOB, with the aim of drafting the above-mentioned regulations, which are currently being formulated. In this regard, FENATRAHOB reports that no measures have been adopted to ensure access to social security, including maternity, for waged domestic workers. It also reports that, in 2017, several meetings were held, with the technical assistance of the ILO, involving various institutions, such as the National Health Fund and the MTEPS, with a view to formulating draft regulations. FENATRAHOB indicates that, in this context, the Financial Unit of the Ministry of Health issued a report, without providing a technical basis, stating that the inclusion of waged domestic workers in the social security system would lead to its financial collapse. FENATRAHOB indicates that, thanks to coordination between different labour sectors and social entities, substantial progress was made in the final formulation of the draft supreme decree. In June 2018, FENATRAHOB was informed that the draft was before the Cabinet of Ministers for consideration. However, FENATRAHOB stresses that it has still not received information on the current status of the adoption process of the draft. With regard to long-term social security (pensions), the Government indicates that, under the provisions of Act No. 065 of 10 December 2010, any worker or natural person can make voluntary contributions with the objective of receiving a pension for old age, invalidity or death. However, FENATRAHOB reports that waged domestic workers still do not have access to the long-term social security system. The Committee reiterates its request to the Government to take the necessary measures for the approval of the regulations needed to guarantee the access of domestic workers to the National Health Fund, and to provide a copy of the regulations once they have been adopted. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on how the access of waged domestic workers to long-term social security (pensions) is ensured in practice, including statistical information on the number of waged domestic workers registered with this scheme.
Article 15. Private employment agencies. The Committee recalls that, in its previous comments, it noted that section 25(I) of Act No. 263 of 2012 provides that the MTEPS shall, by means of specific regulations, determine operational requirements, rights, duties, inspections, prohibitions and penalties for the purposes of preventing the trafficking and smuggling of persons and related crimes. In this regard, the Committee requested the Government to indicate whether these regulations had been adopted, and whether the social partners had been consulted on that matter. The Government reports that the regulations are still being formulated. The Committee requests the Government to adopt the necessary measures, in collaboration with the social partners, with a view to adopting the regulations on the operation and requirements of employment agencies and to provide a copy of the regulations once they have been adopted.
Articles 16 and 17(1). Effective access to courts, tribunals or other dispute resolution mechanisms. Complaint mechanisms. In reply to the Committee’s previous comments, the Government indicates that it does not have information on the complaints lodged by waged domestic workers with various competent bodies. The Government indicates once again that, on the basis of the principle of equality, the monitoring system for labour complaints does not identify the sector in which the victim works. The Committee indicates that gathering information on the complaints lodged by waged domestic workers with the competent bodies does not constitute a discriminatory act against those workers. With respect to complaints mechanisms, the Government reports that the labour inspection services have received training to handle complaints from all workers, including waged domestic workers. The Government indicates that there is a free-of-charge telephone line that is publicized through various media channels and a section for addressing complaints and advice on the institution’s website. In addition, as part of the MTEPS regional fairs and campaigns for waged domestic workers, labour inspectors provide advice on labour rights to such workers and handle complaints and allegations. Recognizing the importance of reliable and sufficiently disaggregated data as a firm foundation for evaluating compliance with obligations under the Convention, the Committee emphasizes once again that the collection of data specific to waged domestic work does not amount to discrimination. The Committee reiterates its request to the Government to provide information on the number of complaints lodged by waged domestic workers with the various competent bodies, the penalties imposed on those responsible and the compensation granted. The Committee requests the Government to continue sending detailed and updated information on the measures taken or envisaged to ensure in practice compliance with these Articles of the Convention. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the number of reports and complaints lodged with labour inspectors by waged domestic workers and their outcomes.
Article 17(2) and (3). Labour inspection and penalties. Access to household premises. In reply to the Committee’s previous comments, the Government indicates that, under Article 25(I) of the Political Constitution of the State, every person has the right to the inviolability of his or her home, except in the event of judicial permission. The Government reports that the MTEPS is not competent to conduct inspections in private homes or residences. Inspections of private residences are only possible with the prior authorization of the owner or with an order issued by a judge. In this respect, the Committee recalls that Article 17(2) of the Convention establishes that measures shall be developed and implemented for labour inspection, enforcement and penalties with due regard “for the special characteristics of domestic work, in accordance with national laws and regulations”. The Committee therefore reiterates its request to the Government to provide detailed and updated information on the measures adopted or envisaged in relation to labour inspection, with due regard for the special characteristics of domestic work, in accordance with the national legislation.
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer