ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Home > Country profiles >  > Country comments > Texts of comments: Botswana

Comments adopted by the CEACR: Botswana

Adopted by the CEACR in 2021

C029 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments.
Repetition
Articles 1(1), 2(1) and 25 of the Convention. Trafficking in persons. The Committee welcomes the enactment of the Anti-Human Trafficking Act in 2014, providing for the prohibition of human trafficking in Botswana, the establishment of a Human Trafficking (Prohibition) Committee, as well as measures on the protection and assistance of victims of trafficking. It notes that under the terms of section 9, the offence of trafficking in persons for the purposes of forced labour is punishable by a fine not exceeding 1 million Botswana pula (BWP) (approximately $93,170) and/or a sentence of imprisonment of up to 30 years. The Committee further notes that, in its report to the Human Rights Council for the Universal Periodic Review of January 2018, the Government indicates that an Anti-Human Trafficking National Action Plan has been developed for the 2017–20 period, following consultations with civil society organizations to raise awareness on human trafficking issues (A/HRC/WG.6/29/BWA/1, paragraphs 119 and 149). The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the application in practice of the Anti-Human Trafficking Act, including the number of investigations, prosecutions, convictions and penalties imposed. The Committee further requests the Government to provide information regarding the adoption and implementation of the Anti-Human Trafficking National Action Plan, as well as on the activities carried out by the Human Trafficking (Prohibition) Committee.
Article 2(2)(c) of the Convention. Work of prisoners for the benefit of private individuals. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that under section 95(1) of the Prisons Act (Cap. 21:03), a prisoner may be employed outside a prison under the immediate order and for the benefit of a person other than a public authority. The Government indicated that this section had never been implemented in practice, and that the conditions of work, earning schemes and contract guidelines of prisoners had not yet been developed to provide for the engagement of prisoners in work for private individuals. It also indicated that prisoners assigned to work for private parties shall do so of their own free will and that their payment would be based on the prescribed earnings scheme. In this respect, the Government stated that consultations with the relevant stakeholders were under way, in order to amend section 95(1) of the Prisons Act.
The Committee notes with regret the Government’s information that no consultations have been held since the last report. It wishes to recall that, to be compatible with the Convention, prisoners’ work for private parties must be performed on a voluntary basis, implying the free and informed consent of the prisoners and a certain number of safeguards, especially regarding remuneration and occupational safety and health, indicating the existence of conditions of work which approximate to those of a free employment relationship (see the 2012 General Survey on the fundamental Conventions, paragraph 279). The Committee therefore requests the Government to take the necessary measures to amend section 95(1) of the Prisons Act, in order to ensure that any work or service performed by prisoners for private entities is carried out voluntarily, with their formal, freely given and informed consent, such consent being authenticated by conditions of work approximating those of a free labour relationship. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on any progress made in this regard.

C105 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.
Repetition
Article 1(a) of the Convention. Sanctions involving the obligation to work as a punishment for expressing political views or views ideologically opposed to the established political, social or economic system. The Committee previously noted that sentences of imprisonment, involving compulsory prison labour pursuant to section 92 of the Prisons Act, Cap 21:03 of 1979, may be imposed under sections 47 and 48 of the Penal Code on any person who prints, makes, imports, publishes, sells, distributes or reproduces any publication prohibited by the President “in his absolute discretion” as being “contrary to the public interest”. Similar sentences may be imposed under section 51(1)(c), (d) and (2) concerning seditious publications. Sentences of imprisonment may also be imposed under sections 66–68 of the Penal Code on any person who manages, or is a member, or in any way takes part in the activity of an unlawful society, particularly of a society declared unlawful as being “dangerous to peace and order”. In this connection, the Committee observed that the above provisions are worded in terms broad enough to lend themselves to application as a means of punishment for the expression of views and, in so far as they are enforceable with sanctions involving compulsory labour, they are incompatible with the Convention. The Committee therefore requested the Government to take appropriate measures, on the occasion of the revision of the Penal Code, to bring the above provisions into conformity with the Convention.
The Committee notes with regret the Government’s statement, in its report, that no amendment to the Penal Code is planned. It wishes to recall once again that Article 1(a) of the Convention prohibits punishment by penalties involving compulsory labour, including compulsory prison labour, of persons who, without having recourse to violence, express political opinions or views opposed to the established political, social or economic system. The Committee expresses the firm hope that appropriate measures will be taken without delay, in both law and practice, to ensure that no penalties involving compulsory labour may be imposed for the peaceful expression of political views opposed to the established system, either by restricting the scope of application of these provisions to situations of violence, or by repealing sanctions involving compulsory prison labour. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the developments made in this regard.
Article 1(c). Punishment for breaches of labour discipline. The Committee previously noted that section 43(1)(a) of the Trade Disputes Act (No. 15 of 2004) punishes with imprisonment involving compulsory prison labour any wilful breach of a contract of employment by an employee who is acting either alone or in combination with others, if such breach affects the operation of essential services. The Committee observed that the list of essential services specified in the Schedule to the Trade Disputes Act includes services such as the Bank of Botswana, railway services, and transport and telecommunications services necessary to the operation of all these services, which did not seem to meet the criteria of essential services in the strict sense of the term.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the list of essential services is going to be reviewed by a task force which has been established for this purpose, within the framework of the ongoing labour law review process. The Committee also notes, referring to its comments made in 2017 under the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), that the Trade Disputes Act has been amended in 2016, in response to new developments and the specific circumstances in the country. It notes that the list of essential services was thus expanded to include teaching services, veterinary services and diamond sorting, cutting and selling services. Referring to its General Survey of 2012 on the fundamental Conventions (paragraph 311), the Committee points out that essential services should be understood in the strict sense of the term, that is services, the interruption of which may endanger the life, personal safety and health of the whole or part of the population, and observes that the aforementioned essential services do not seem to meet the criteria of essential services in the strict sense of the term. The Committee therefore expresses the firm hope that the Government will take the necessary measures, in the framework of the current labour law review process, to ensure that no prison sentences involving compulsory labour are imposed as a punishment for breaches of labour discipline affecting the operation of essential services that do not meet the criteria of essential services in the strict sense of the term. It requests the Government to provide information on the progress made in this regard.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

C138 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments.
Repetition
Article 1 of the Convention. National policy and the application of the Convention in practice. In its previous comments, the Committee noted the Government’s indication that within the framework of the national Action Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour (APEC), several measures were initiated, such as: revision of relevant legislation on child labour including labour laws; drafting of the list of types of hazardous work prohibited to children under 18 years of age; development of awareness-raising campaigns on child labour as well as development of training modules, tools and manuals for stakeholders and implementers. Moreover, the Committee noted from a report on Botswana by the ILO–IPEC in June 2012 that, within APEC, 200 teachers were trained under the ILO–IPEC project entitled “Supporting Children’s Rights through Education, the Arts and the Media” (SCREAM) and a total of 1,927 children were prevented and withdrawn from child labour, including in the agricultural sector.
The Committee notes the absence of information on this point in the Government’s report. It notes the Government’s indication, in its report to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the Universal Periodic Review of January 2018, that civil society organizations have reported that child labour is an issue of paramount importance in Botswana (A/HRC/WG.6/29/BWA/1, paragraph 7). The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the actions undertaken and the results achieved to ensure the progressive elimination of child labour, particularly within the framework of the implementation of the APEC.
Article 2(1). Scope of application. The Committee previously noted that, in accordance with its Part 3, the Employment Act, 1982, applies only to any person who has entered into a contract of employment for the hire of her/his labour. It had noted the statement in the ILO–IPEC Outline Summary for the project “Contributing to the elimination of worst forms of child labour in Botswana with special emphasis on agriculture and commercial sexual exploitation” of March 2010 that children working in the informal economy, such as in agriculture or in the home, have less protection and support than children working in the formal economy.
The Committee notes the Government’s statement that it will take into consideration the Committee’s comments on the protection of children in the informal economy during the ongoing review of labour laws. It observes that the Government held a Labour Law Review Committee workshop in August 2018. The Committee once again reminds the Government that the Convention applies to all sectors of economic activity and covers all forms of employment or work whether they are carried out on the basis of an employment relationship or not, and whether they are remunerated or not. The Committee expresses the firm hope that the Government will take the necessary measures to ensure that the review of labour laws does not fail to take into account the Committee’s comments, thus ensuring that the protection afforded by the Convention is accorded to all children carrying out economic activities without an employment contract, particularly children working on a self-employed basis or in the informal economy, including in agriculture. It requests the Government to provide information on any progress made in this regard.
Article 2(3). Age of completion of compulsory schooling. The Committee previously noted the Government’s indication that basic education comprises ten years of education which, if started at the age of 7 years, would be completed at the age of 16 years. It noted the Government’s statement that schooling is not compulsory, though legislation to make basic education compulsory was under consideration. It also noted that, according to section 18 of the Children’s Act of 2009, every child has a right to free basic education and that any parent or guardian who, without reasonable excuse, denies a child the opportunity of going to school shall be guilty of an offence and shall be punished.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the Ministry of Basic Education is currently reviewing the Education and Training Act of 1967 to align it with the Children’s Act of 2009 with a view to making basic education free and compulsory. The Government indicates that a draft Bill has been prepared and has to be submitted to Parliament for consideration. Considering that compulsory education is one of the most effective means of combating child labour, the Committee expresses the firm hope that the revision of the Education and Training Act will ensure the introduction of compulsory schooling up to the minimum age for admission to employment or work of 15 years, in compliance with Article 2(3) of the Convention. It requests the Government to provide information on the progress achieved in this respect.
Article 3(1) and (2). Hazardous work. With regard to the adoption of the list of hazardous types of work prohibited to children under 18 years of age, the Committee refers to its comments under the Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182).
Article 7(3). Determination of light work. In its previous comments, the Committee noted the Government’s statement that it would determine light work activities that may be permitted to children of 14 years of age. The Government also stated that, in practice, children perform light work such as kitchen and household help, the distribution of flyers or advertisements and childcare.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the determination of light work activities permitted to children will be considered during the ongoing labour law review process. The Government further states that the Commissioner’s office must give its approval to any company wishing to hire a child in light work activities. The Committee hopes that the Government will take the necessary measures to determine the types of light work activities that may be undertaken by children of 14 years of age and above, within the framework of the labour law review process. It requests the Government to provide a copy of the list of the types of light work permitted for children, once it is adopted.
The Committee expresses the hope that the Government will continue to take into consideration the Committee’s comments during the course of the labour law review process. The Committee reminds the Government that it may avail itself of ILO technical assistance in order to bring its legislation into conformity with the Convention.

C182 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments.
Repetition
Article 7(2) of the Convention. Effective and time-bound measures. Clause (c). Access to free basic education. The Committee previously noted the Government’s information that, in Botswana, the seven-year primary education is free while secondary education is highly subsidized, with parents only contributing 5 per cent towards the cost of education. Moreover, children whose families cannot afford this contribution are exempted and are further provided with other educational necessities like uniforms and books. It noted that the Ministry of Education and Skills Development (MOESD) together with UNICEF have been working to develop an Out-of-School Education for Children Programme which seeks to secure a new deal for marginalized and out-of-school children. Finally, the Committee noted that the proportion of primary-aged children not in primary school has not dropped below 10 per cent in the last ten years, and that, according to UNICEF statistics for 2008–12, the net attendance rates in primary education are 85.5 per cent for boys and 88.2 per cent for girls, and in secondary education it is 35.5 per cent for boys and 43.6 per cent for girls.
It notes the Government’s statement in its report that a number of measures were initiated to improve attendance and reduce drop-out rates, such as the implementation of the Inclusive Education Policy, the introduction of the Reception Class Programme in primary schools in 2014, and the development of the Out-of-School Education for Children Policy. It notes that, according to the Government, the completion rate in primary education was 99.3 per cent in 2015. The Government also states that the Ministry of Basic Education has developed an access and retention draft plan, to be approved and implemented in 2018. As reported by the Global Education Monitoring Report of 2017–18, the gross enrolment ratio in primary education was 108 per cent in 2014–15, and the primary adjusted net enrolment ratio was 91 per cent. The Committee notes that, according to the UNESCO statistics, nearly 17 per cent of children are out of school. Considering that education is key in preventing the engagement of children in the worst forms of child labour, the Committee encourages the Government to pursue its efforts to facilitate access to free basic education. It requests the Government to continue to provide information on the measures taken in this regard, and the results obtained, particularly with regard to increasing the school enrolment and completion rates and reducing school drop-out rates, in primary and secondary education.
Clause (d). Identifying and reaching out to children at special risk. HIV/AIDS orphans and other vulnerable children (OVCs). The Committee previously noted that a number of significant measures have been taken by the Government for the care and support of HIV/AIDS orphans and OVCs, in the framework of the national Programme for orphans and OVCs, such as maintaining a registry of all orphans and children in need of care, providing these children with food rations and toiletries on a monthly basis, supporting them with uniforms and transport facilities to school, and initiating a special dispensation programme through government sponsorship for tertiary education. The Committee also noted that, according to the Government, in the year 2013–14, a total of 1,600 orphans and OVCs were enrolled in schools and vocational training.
The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the national programme for orphans and OVCs continues to be implemented, as well as the special dispensation for facilitating access to tertiary and vocational education, which has sponsored 8,189 children since 2010, including 1,164 for the year 2017–18. It states that more than 27,000 children are currently registered as orphans. The Government also indicates that the programme for orphans and OVCs provides psychosocial support, aiming at building life skills among OVCs. The Committee notes that, in its report to the Human Rights Council for the Universal Periodic Review of January 2018, the Government stated that it would conduct the second situational analysis on OVCs during the course of 2017 (A/HRC/WG.6/29/BWA/1, paragraph 47).
The Committee observes that, in Botswana, according to estimates made by UNAIDS in 2017, approximately 61,000 children aged 0 to 17 years are orphans due to HIV/AIDS. It takes note of the Government’s indication, in its report to the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women of November 2017, that HIV disproportionally affects women and girls and, therefore, the National HIV/AIDS Policy and its strategic framework, revised in 2013, has embraced gender sensitivity (CEDAW/C/BWA/4, paragraph 19). It notes that, according to UNAIDS, the Government elaborated a new National Strategic Framework for HIV and AIDS for the 2018–23 period, which has positioned HIV prevention as paramount. Recalling that OVCs are at an increased risk of being engaged in the worst forms of child labour, the Committee encourages the Government to pursue its efforts to ensure that children orphaned by HIV/AIDS and OVCs are prevented from being engaged in the worst forms of child labour. It requests the Government to continue providing information on the measures taken in this regard and on the results achieved, particularly as part of the national programme for orphans and OVCs and of the National Strategic Framework for HIV and AIDS for 2018–23.

C182 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.
Repetition
The Committee notes the observations of the Botswana Federation of Trade Unions (BFTU), received on 1 September 2018.
Articles 3(a) and 6 of the Convention. All forms of slavery or practices similar to slavery and programmes of action. Sale and trafficking of children. The Committee takes due note of the adoption of the Anti-Human Trafficking Act in July 2014, introducing a specific offence of trafficking in persons in the national legislation, as well as the establishment of a Human Trafficking (Prohibition) Committee in 2015. It notes that the perpetrator of trafficking for the purposes of forced labour or exploitation of another person’s prostitution is liable to a term of imprisonment of up to 30 years and/or a fine not exceeding 1 million Botswana pula (approximately US$93,170), pursuant to section 9 of the Anti-Human Trafficking Act. The law provides for the creation of centres for child victims of trafficking, to ensure protection, care, counselling, education and rehabilitation of children (section 18). The Committee notes the Government’s indication in its report that a National Action Plan on human trafficking has been developed. Furthermore, it notes the Government’s indication that the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Strategic Plan on combating trafficking in persons, especially women and children for the 2009–19 period, is being implemented through the SADC Regional Political Cooperation Programme. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) indicates that together with SADC Member States, including Botswana, UNODC has developed an Anti-Trafficking in Persons Data Collection System, to ensure the collection of reliable data on the crime of trafficking in persons.
The Committee notes the observations of the BFTU reporting the continued existence of practices of trafficking in children despite national laws and control measures. The BFTU also states that public education on trafficking and slavery is not adequately done. The Committee urges the Government to strengthen its efforts to ensure the effective application of the Anti-Human Trafficking Act and requests it to provide information in this regard, including the number of infringements reported, investigations, prosecutions, convictions and penalties applied for the sale and trafficking of children under 18 years of age. It also requests the Government to provide information on the adoption and implementation of the National Plan of Action on human trafficking and its impact in terms of the elimination of trafficking in children.
Article 4(1). Determination of hazardous work. The Committee previously noted the Government’s statement that the Tripartite Labour Advisory Board had prepared a draft list of hazardous types of work prohibited to young persons, which was being circulated to the relevant ministries for their endorsement. The Committee accordingly requested the Government to pursue its efforts to ensure the adoption, in the near future, of the list determining the types of hazardous work prohibited to persons under 18 years of age.
The Committee notes with interest the drafting of the list of hazardous types of work by the tripartite constituents, which includes such types of work as: handling and spraying of pesticide and herbicide and the exposure to chemicals, toxic dust, fumes and gases; garbage collecting; the lifting of heavy loads; unsupervised fishing and extraction of water from wells; the brewing of alcoholic beverages; working underground, at night or at heights; and building and construction work. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the incorporation of the list of hazardous types of work into the Employment Act will be considered during the ongoing labour law review process. The Committee expresses the firm hope that the draft list of types of hazardous work prohibited to children under 18 years of age will be adopted in the very near future. It requests the Government to supply a copy of this list, once it is adopted.
Article 7(2). Effective and time-bound measures. Clause (b). Direct assistance for the removal of children from the worst forms of child labour. Child victims of commercial sexual exploitation. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women expressed concern, in its concluding observations of 2010, that women and girls enter into prostitution to support themselves and their families as a result of poverty. It noted that, within the national Action Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour (APEC), a total of 1,927 children were prevented and withdrawn from child labour, including from commercial sexual exploitation. The Committee also noted the Government’s statement that children engaged in commercial sexual exploitation are identified as children in need of protection under the Children’s Act of 2009 and that, according to section 54, the Minister shall develop programmes and rehabilitative measures to reintegrate abused or exploited children.
The Committee notes the Government’s statement that children in need of protection can be placed in child welfare institutions, and receive psychosocial support. The Government indicates that, taking into account all forms of vulnerability, there are currently more than 450 children in child welfare institutions. The Government also states that a study on violence against children has recently been completed and that the results will give an indication of the prevalence of violence, in its different forms, among children. The Committee requests the Government to pursue its efforts to remove children engaged in commercial sexual exploitation, and to provide them with the necessary and appropriate direct assistance, pursuant to section 54 of the Children’s Act. It requests the Government to provide information on the number of child victims of commercial sexual exploitation who have been effectively removed, rehabilitated and socially integrated as a result of the measures implemented, including by providing the statistics compiled as a result of the study on violence against children.
The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Adopted by the CEACR in 2020

C087 - Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2020, published 109th ILC session (2021)

Article 3 of the Convention. Right of workers’ organizations to organize their activities and formulate their programmes. In its previous comments, the Committee drew the Government’s attention to several provisions of the Trade Unions and Employers Organisations’ Act (TUEO Act) and of the Trade Disputes Act (TDA), which are not fully in line with the Convention, and requested the Government, in the framework of the ongoing labour law reform, to take the necessary measures, in consultation with the social partners.
With respect to the TUEO Act:
  • -repeal section 8, which sanctions each officer or any person acting or purporting to act as an officer of a trade union or federation that failed to apply for registration within 28 days of its formation (although the official recognition of an organization through its registration constitutes a relevant aspect of the right to organize, the exercise of legitimate trade union activities should not be dependent upon registration, and penalties in this regard should not be imposed on the trade union or its members);
  • -amend section 10 so as to afford industrial organizations an opportunity to rectify the absence of some of the formal registration requirements provided for in that section;
  • -repeal sections 11 and 15, which result in the automatic dissolution and banning of activities of non-registered organizations;
  • -repeal section 20(3), second sentence, which prohibits young members (15–18 years old) from being officers or trustees of a workers’ or employers’ organization (minors legally allowed to work should be able to be candidates for trade union office);
  • -amend section 39, which allows the Registrar or Attorney-General to apply for an interdict to restrain any unauthorized or unlawful expenditure of funds or use of any trade union property, and section 41(3), which provides the Registrar with broad supervisory powers over the financial assets of a trade union, to ensure that supervision is limited to exceptional cases and that trade unions enjoy autonomy and independence (supervision is compatible with the Convention only when it is limited to the obligation of submitting annual financial reports, verification based on serious grounds to believe that the actions of an organization are contrary to its rules or the law and verification called for by a significant number of workers).
The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the above comments in relation to the TUEO Act have been considered in the ongoing labour law review process.
With regard to the TDA:
  • -amend section 43(3) (prohibiting an employer to hire workers to replace striking or locked-out workers only if the parties have concluded an agreement on the provision of minimum services or, if no such agreement has been made, within 14 days of the commencement of the strike). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the Labour Law Review Committee (LLRC) understands that this provision is rightfully placed because the minimum service to which it refers to, is not related to essential services, but to the regulation of strikes in general, and that, accordingly, this provision has not been proposed for amendment. The Committee wishes to clarify that the suggested amendment is aimed at limiting the power to hire external replacement workers, so that it is only permitted in cases of acute national crisis, to essential services in the strict sense of the term and to cases where minimum service can be imposed, and
  • -amend section 43(4) (prohibiting picketing if the parties have concluded an agreement on the provision of minimum services or, if no such agreement has been made, within 14 days of the commencement of the strike or lockout). The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the LLRC understands that this provision is rightfully placed because the minimum service to which it make reference to, is not related to essential services, but to the regulation of strikes in general, and that, accordingly, this provision has not been proposed for amendment. The Committee wishes to clarify that the suggested amendment is aimed at allowing pickets to take place in the absence of an agreement on the provision of minimum services and at any time after the commencement of a strike or lockout.
Trusting that all pending matters in relation to the TUEO and TDA Acts will be addressed in the framework of the ongoing labour law review process, the Committee urges the Government to take measures to ensure that such Acts are amended, in consultation with the social partners, so as to bring them into full conformity with the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to continue providing information on any progress achieved in this regard and to provide a copy of the amended Acts once adopted.

C087 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2020, published 109th ILC session (2021)

The Committee takes note of the observations of the Botswana Federation of Trade Unions (BFTU) received on 1 October 2020 relating to matters examined in the present comment. It notes that the observations of the BFTU also allege dismissals of workers because of industrial action following the adoption on 9 April 2020 of an Emergency Powers Act, which included a clause that restricted workers and employers from taking part in industrial action. The Committee requests the Government to provide its comments thereon.
Not having received other supplementary information, the Committee reiterates its comments adopted in 2019 and reproduced below.
The Committee notes the Government’s reply to the observations made by the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) and the Trainers and Allied Workers Union (TAWU) in 2013 and 2014.
Legislative developments. The Committee recalls that, following the recommendations made by the Conference Committee on the Application of Standards (Conference Committee) in 2017 and 2018: (i) the Government had embarked on a labour law review process; (ii) a tripartite Labour Law Review Committee (LLRC) was established; and (iii) the LLRC decided to focus the review on the Employment Act and the Trade Unions and Employers Organisations (TUEO) Act, the Public Service Act of 2008 (PSA) and the Trade Disputes Act of 2016 (TDA). In its last observation, the Committee had noted that both the Government and the Botswana Federation of Trade Unions (BFTU) had indicated that the work by the LLRC was ongoing and that progress was being made with respect to the implementation of the Conference Committee’s recommendations. The Committee had also noted the Government’s indication that, given that a review of the list of essential services was of critical importance to workers, a task team had been formed to review such list under section 46 of the TDA.
In its last report, the Government indicates that, while the labour law review is still ongoing, on 8 August 2019, the Parliament passed the TDA (Amendment) Act 2019, which amends the list of the essential services. The Committee notes with satisfaction that, in line with its recommendations, the following services have been deleted from the list of essential services: diamond sorting, cutting and selling services; teaching services; government broadcasting services; the Bank of Botswana; vaccine laboratory services; railways operation and maintenance services; immigration and customs services; transportation and distribution services of petroleum products; sewerage services; public veterinary services; and services necessary to the operation of any of these services.
The Committee takes note that, accordingly, the list of essential services under section 46 of the TDA (Amendment) Act 2019 contains the following services: air traffic control services; fire services; the provision of food to pupils of school age and the cleaning of schools; electrical services (electricity teams for generation, transmission and distribution); water and sanitation services; and health services as well as transport and telecommunication services required for the provision of any of the previously mentioned services. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that such ancillary transport and telecommunication services have been included in light of the particular circumstances prevailing in the country and considering, for instance, the need for ambulances or the services of operators who take note and transmit the details of patients in cases of accidents for paramedics to attend to the scene.
The Committee recalls that, in its previous comments, it had also requested the Government to take the following legislative measures:
  • -amend section 2(1)(iv) of the TUEO Act and section 2(11)(iv) of the TDA, which exclude employees of the prison service from their scope of application, as well as section 35 of the Prison Act, which prohibits members of the prison service from becoming members of a trade union or anybody affiliated to a trade union. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that while it considers that prison staff perform a security function, the LLRC with ILO assistance is engaging the relevant stakeholders on this matter;
  • -amend section 43 of the TUEO Act, which provides for inspection of accounts, books and documents of a trade union by the Registrar at “any reasonable time”. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that this matter is being considered in the labour law review process;
  • -amend section 48B(1) of the TUEO Act, which grants certain facilities (such as access to premises or representation of members in case of complaint, etc.) only to unions representing at least one third of the employees in the enterprise. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that this matter is being considered in the labour law review process.
Trusting that all pending matters in relation to the above-mentioned Acts will be addressed in the framework of the ongoing labour law review process, the Committee urges the Government to take measures to ensure that such Acts are amended, in consultation with the social partners, so as to bring them into full conformity with the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to continue providing information on any progress achieved in this regard and to provide a copy of the amended Acts once adopted.
The Committee had previously taken note that the labour law review process had been extended to include the PSA and had requested the Government to provide information on the progress made in this regard. Noting that the Government has not provided information in this respect, the Committee reiterates its previous request to the Government to provide information on the progress made in the review of the PSA and to provide a copy of the amended Act, once adopted.
The Committee reminds the Government that it may continue to avail itself of technical assistance from the ILO with respect to all issues raised in its comments.
The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government, which reiterates the content of its previous request adopted in 2019.

C098 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2020, published 109th ILC session (2021)

The Committee takes note of the observations of the Botswana Federation of Trade Unions (BFTU) received on 1 October 2020 relating to issues examined in the present comment. It notes that the BFTU, in its observations, also alleges repeated acts of anti-union discrimination, including anti-union dismissals, in the mining sector, as well as violations of the right to collective bargaining in the private sector. The Committee requests the Government to provide its comments in response to these allegations.
Not having received other supplementary information, the Committee reiterates its comments adopted in 2019 and reproduced below.
Legislative issues. The Committee recalls that for many years it has been requesting the Government to take the following legislative measures:
(a) amend section 2 of the Trade Disputes Act (TDA), section 2 of the Trade Union and Employers’ Organizations (TUEO Act), and section 35 of the Prisons Act so as to ensure that prison staff are afforded all the guarantees provided under the Convention;
(b) adopt specific legislative provisions ensuring that all union committee members, including those of unregistered trade unions, enjoy an adequate protection against anti-union discrimination;
(c) adopt specific legislative provisions ensuring adequate protection against acts of interference by employers coupled with effective and sufficiently dissuasive sanctions;
(d) repeal section 35(1)(b) of the TDA, which permits an employer or employers’ organization to apply to the Commissioner to withdraw the recognition granted to a trade union on the grounds that the trade union refuses to negotiate in good faith with the employer;
(e) amend section 20(3) of the TDA (this section read together with section 18(1)(a) and (e) allows the Industrial Court to refer a trade dispute to arbitration, including where only one of the parties made an urgent appeal to the Court for determination of the dispute) so as to ensure that the recourse to compulsory arbitration does not affect the promotion of collective bargaining;
(f) take the necessary legislative measures so as to ensure that if no union reaches the required threshold to be recognized as a bargaining agent, i.e., one third of the employees in a bargaining unit (section 48 of the TUEO Act read with section 32 of the TDA), the existing unions are given the possibility, jointly or separately, to bargain collectively, at least on behalf of their own members; and
(g) take the necessary legislative measures so as to ensure that the limitation imposed in the Public Service Act on the scope of collective bargaining for public sector workers not engaged in the administration of the State will fully comply with the Convention.
The Committee had previously expressed the hope that the abovementioned legislative measures would be taken in the framework of the ongoing labour legislation review process to ensure the full conformity of the abovementioned Acts with the Convention. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that the Committee’s comments and concerns have been considered in the ongoing labour legislation review process which is being conducted with the assistance of the Office. It also notes the Government’s indication that on 8 August 2019, the Parliament passed the TDA (Amendment) Act 2019. The Committee observes, however, that while the said Act refers to issues related to the application of the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), it does not address the questions raised by the Committee in the present comment. The Committee therefore recalls its previous request to the Government and expresses its firm hope that the necessary measures will be taken in the framework of the ongoing labour legislation review process so as to ensure the full conformity of the abovementioned Acts with the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the progress made in this respect.
Article 4 of the Convention. Collective bargaining in practice. The Committee recalls that it has previously requested the Government to reply to observations made by the Trainers and Allied Workers Union (TAWU) in 2013 concerning violations of the right to collective bargaining in practice. While noting that the Government has not provided a reply to the said allegations, the Committee observes, from the information provided in the report, that out of the 40 collective agreements concluded between 2017 and 2019, three were negotiated by the TAWU. The Committee further notes that the 40 collective agreements were negotiated in a broad variety of sectors, including mining, retail, education, health, hotel, communication and services. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the number of collective agreements signed and in force in the country and to indicate the sectors and the number of workers covered.
The Committee reminds the Government that it may continue to avail itself of technical assistance from the Office with respect to all issues raised in its present comments.

C144 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2020, published 109th ILC session (2021)

The Committee notes the observations from the Botswana Federation of Trade Unions (BFTU) received on 1 October 2020. The BFTU indicates that the Government submitted in 2019 a revised list of essential services to Parliament, without previously consulting the Labour Advisory Board (LAB) as provided by the law. The BFTU further indicates that the reports submitted to the ILO in 2019 and 2020 have not been consulted with the social partners. Finally, the BFTU alleges that the last tripartite meeting to discuss the measures to be taken to address the COVID-19 pandemic took place on 17 March 2020. Many measures have been taken since then without consultation. The Committee requests the Government to provide its comments in this regard.
Article 5(1) of the Convention. Effective tripartite consultations. In its 2018 observation, the Committee requested the Government to provide detailed updated information on the content and outcome of effective tripartite consultations held within the Labour Advisory Board (LAB) and the High Level Consultative Committee (Sub-HLCC) on all matters related to international labour standards covered under Article 5(1) of the Convention, particularly with regard to the possible ratification of the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), and the Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention, 1969 (No. 129). The Committee further requested information on the frequency of consultations, as well as on jurisprudence relevant to the application of the Convention. The Government reports that the LAB met in 2016 and 2017 to discuss the Trade Disputes Bill of 2015 and the appointment of mediators and arbitrators. The Government also refers to the Labour Sector Committee of the High Level Consultative Council (HLCC), a tripartite structure that discusses issues pertaining to labour and employment, indicating that the HLCC meets four times a year. The Government adds that Botswana’s labour laws are currently being reviewed by a tripartite Labour Law Review Committee with a view to aligning them with the provisions of ratified ILO Conventions, closing legislative gaps and transposing various judicial decisions into law. Noting that the Government has not provided the information requested relating to the implementation of Article 5(1) of the Convention, the Committee once again requests that the Government provide updated detailed information on the specific content and outcome of effective tripartite discussions held by the relevant bodies on all matters related to international labour standards as required under Article 5(1)(a) through (e) of the Convention, including with respect to the possible ratification of Conventions Nos 81 and 129. The Committee also invites the Government to continue to provide information on the activities of the tripartite bodies concerned, as well as on the results of the review of the tripartite Labour Law Review Committee insofar as they are relevant to the application of the provisions of the Convention.
In the context of the global COVID-19 pandemic, the Committee recalls the comprehensive guidance provided by international labour standards. It encourages the Government to engage in tripartite consultation and social dialogue more broadly as a solid foundation for developing and implementing effective responses to the profound socio-economic impacts of the pandemic. The Committee invites the Government to continue to provide updated information in its next report on the measures taken in this respect, in accordance with Article 4 of the Convention and Paragraphs 3 and 4 of Recommendation No. 152, including with regard to steps taken to reinforce the capacity of the tripartite constituents and strengthen mechanisms and procedures, as well as challenges and good practices identified.

Adopted by the CEACR in 2019

C151 - Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2019, published 109th ILC session (2021)

Article 1 of the Convention. Application of the Convention to prison staff. In its previous comments, the Committee had recalled that the Convention applies to the prison service and that the exception contained in Article 1(3) of the Convention only applies to the armed forces and the police. The Committee had requested the Government to amend the relevant legislation to ensure that prison officers enjoy the rights enshrined in the Convention. While reaffirming the full application of the present Convention to prison staff, the Committee refers to the most recent comments concerning the collective rights of this category of workers it has made under the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), and the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98).
Article 5. Protection against acts of interference. In its previous comments, the Committee had noted that the legislation did not ensure adequate protection to public employees’ organizations against acts of interference by public authorities in their establishment, functioning or administration. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the Public Service Act of 2008 is part of the ongoing labour law review. The Committee firmly expects that the necessary measures will be taken in the framework of the ongoing labour review process so as to ensure that the legislation adequately protects public employees’ organizations against acts of interference by public authorities. It requests the Government to provide information on the progress made in this respect.
Application of the Convention in practice. The Committee notes that, in reply to previous observations of the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) concerning anti-union discrimination, refusal of union recognition and restrictions to collective bargaining in practice, the Government indicates that there is no persecution of trade union leaders and that the eight public sector unions that exist in the country have successfully negotiated with the Government salary increases for their respective bargaining units for 2019–20 and 2020–21 financial years.
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer