Seguimiento dado a las recomendaciones del Comité y del Consejo de Administración - Informe núm. 333, Marzo 2004

Caso núm. 2160 (Venezuela (República Bolivariana de)) - Fecha de presentación de la queja:: 15-OCT-01 - Cerrado

Effect given to the recommendations of the Committee and the Governing Body

1. 164. At its March 2003 meeting, the Committee formulated the following recommendations on the issues that were still pending [see 330th Report, para. 179]:
   • The Committee requests the Government to supply a copy of any court ruling regarding the refusal to register the complainant (Trade Union of Revolutionary Workers of the New Millennium). At the same time, the Committee deplores the fact that the Government has not supplied any information in connection with its recommendation concerning the reinstatement of all the workers who were dismissed for participating in the establishment of the union in question, and urges the Government to take measures without delay to ensure that these workers are reinstated in their posts. The Committee requests the Government to keep it informed in this regard.
2. 165. In its communication of 4 September 2003, the Government states that the Ministry of Labour will comply with the ruling handed down by the judicial authority relating to the administrative decision refusing to register the trade union in question. Furthermore, the Government attaches the financial agreements concluded between six workers (Jonatán Pacheco, Iván Orlando Suárez, Jaime Gómez, Daniel León, Alcides A. Hernández and Gerardo Montenegro) and the INLACA corporation in which they freely recognize that those agreements should be considered as res judicata and renounce any proceedings.
3. 166. The Committee notes this information. It requests the Government to send it the ruling handed down concerning the refusal to register the complainant trade union. The Committee notes the agreements signed by six dismissed workers and requests the complainant trade union to indicate whether other workers remain dismissed for having participated in the establishment of the trade union (the complainant organization had also referred in its communication of 26 December 2001 to Jorge Amaro, Alfredo Aular, Guido Sivira, Otiel Montero and Orlando Acuña).