Seguimiento dado a las recomendaciones del Comité y del Consejo de Administración - Informe núm. 368, Junio 2013

Caso núm. 2697 (Perú) - Fecha de presentación de la queja:: 17-DIC-08 - Cerrado

Effect given to the recommendations of the Committee and the Governing Body

1. 106. The Committee examined this case at its November 2012 meeting when it requested the Government to keep it informed of the outcome of the appeal filed by the Lima Registry Zone against the court ruling ordering the reinstatement of the unionists Ms Ana Elizabeth Mújica Valencia, Ms María Yolanda Zaplana Briceño, Ms Mirian Reyes Candela, Ms Nelly Cecilia Marimón Lino Montes, Ms Rosemary Alexandra Almeyda Bedoya and Ms Rocío del Carmen Rojas Castellares [see 365th Report, paras 149–151].
2. 107. In its communications dated 11 January and 10 April 2013, the Government indicates that the Chamber of Constitutional and Social Law of the Supreme Court of Justice rejected the appeal on the grounds that it was inadmissible, thereby confirming the previous ruling ordering the reinstatements and the payment of the wages owed, ruling which had already been executed by the employer.
3. 108. The Committee notes this information with satisfaction.