ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Page d'accueil > Profils par pays >  > Commentaires

Demande directe (CEACR) - adoptée 1992, publiée 79ème session CIT (1992)

Convention (n° 13) sur la céruse (peinture), 1921 - Luxembourg (Ratification: 1928)

Autre commentaire sur C013

Réponses reçues aux questions soulevées dans une demande directe qui ne donnent pas lieu à d’autres commentaires
  1. 2021

Afficher en : Francais - EspagnolTout voir

The Committee notes from the Government's report that there are very few exceptions to the prohibition of the use of white lead and sulphate of lead, and of all products containing these pigments, in the internal painting of buildings set forth in the Grand Ducal Decree of 30 March 1932. It recalls that under Article 1 of the Convention exceptions can be made where the use of white lead, suphate of lead or other products containing these pigments is considered necessary for railway stations or industrial establishments by the competent authority after consultation with the employers' and workers' organisations concerned. The Government is, therefore, requested to provide further information in its next report on the type of situations for which exceptions to the prohibition of the use of white lead were made and to indicate the manner in which the employers' and workers' organisations concerned were consulted.

The Committee further notes that the Government has not supplied any statistics concerning lead poisoning among working painters, as requested in the report form under Article 7 of the Convention. The Government is, therefore, requested to provide statistics on morbidity and mortality due to lead poisoning in its next report.

© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer