ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Page d'accueil > Profils par pays >  > Commentaires

Demande directe (CEACR) - adoptée 1993, publiée 80ème session CIT (1993)

Convention (n° 29) sur le travail forcé, 1930 - Barbade (Ratification: 1967)

Autre commentaire sur C029

Demande directe
  1. 2021
  2. 1995
  3. 1994
  4. 1993
  5. 1992
  6. 1990

Afficher en : Francais - EspagnolTout voir

In previous comments, the Committee noted that under section 30(2)(a) of the Defence Act, the Defence Board may refuse an application for discharge or transfer to the Reserve of a person enlisted in the regular force; under regulation 7 of the Defence (Officers) Regulations, 1979, the Defence Board may permit an officer at his request to resign his commission; and persons in the Barbados Defence Force who have received training but have not completed the full training period are required to repay a proportional part of the cost of their training if they seek to be discharged.

The Committee asked that the Government continue to supply information on the practice followed in accepting or refusing (1) the purchase of discharge or (2) the transfer to the Reserve of persons in the regular force in virtue of section 30(2)(a) of the Defence Act and (3) the resignation of officers at their request under the Defence (Officers) Regulations, 1979.

The Committee notes the Government's information in its report that during the period from September 1991 to 30 June 1992, two persons were granted discharges by purchase and two others withdrew their applications. The Committee asks the Government to continue to provide information and statistical data with respect to the practical application of the three above-mentioned procedures.

© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer