ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Page d'accueil > Profils par pays >  > Commentaires

Demande directe (CEACR) - adoptée 2003, publiée 92ème session CIT (2004)

Convention (n° 14) sur le repos hebdomadaire (industrie), 1921 - Bahamas (Ratification: 1976)

Autre commentaire sur C014

Demande directe
  1. 2013
  2. 2010
  3. 2008
  4. 2003
  5. 1995
  6. 1992
  7. 1991

Afficher en : Francais - EspagnolTout voir

The Committee notes the Employment Act of 2001.

Article 2, paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Convention. Unlike its predecessor, the Fair Labour Standard Act of 1970, the new Employment Act of 2001 does not mention that Sunday shall be a day of rest. The Government is asked to indicate how it ensures that the weekly period of rest shall, wherever possible, be fixed so as to coincide with the days already established by the traditions or customs of the country or district (Article 2, paragraph 3) and be granted simultaneously to the whole of the staff of each undertaking (Article 2, paragraph 2).

Article 4. The Government is furthermore asked to provide information on work executed on the customary weekly rest day. Please also indicate whether the Minister has made regulations as contemplated by section 3, paragraph 2, of the Employment Act of 2001 with regard to weekly rest, and if so provide copies.

© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer