ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Page d'accueil > Profils par pays >  > Commentaires

Observation (CEACR) - adoptée 2022, publiée 111ème session CIT (2023)

Convention (n° 98) sur le droit d'organisation et de négociation collective, 1949 - Belize (Ratification: 1983)

Afficher en : Francais - EspagnolTout voir

Articles 1 and 3 of the Convention. Protection against acts of anti-union discrimination. In its previous comments, the Committee recalled allegations by the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) of anti-union discrimination in the banana plantation sector and in export processing zones and requested the Government to ensure that the competent authorities take fully into account in their control and prevention activities the issue of anti-union discrimination, and that the workers in the country are fully informed of their rights regarding this issue. The Committee notes that the Government states that no acts of anti-union discrimination were denounced to the authorities in the above-mentioned sectors during the reporting period (July 2017 to June 2021). The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that its Labour Department has been closely monitoring these sectors by conducting inspections of workplaces to ensure that workers are adequately protected, including against acts of anti-union discrimination in respect of their employment. While it welcomes the information provided regarding the conduct of labour inspections, the Committee requests the Government to take all the necessary measures to ensure that Belizean workers are fully informed of their rights with respect to anti-union discrimination. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on any developments in this regard and to continue reporting on any statistics concerning the anti-union discrimination acts reported to the authorities.
Article 4. Promotion of collective bargaining. In its previous comments under the Collective Bargaining Convention, 1981 (No. 154), the Committee raised the need to amend section 25 of the Trade Unions and Employers’ Organizations (Registration, Recognition and Status) Act (TUEOA), which provides that the tripartite body entrusted with the certification of the representative trade unions may, before granting any certification to a trade union, include additional employees to the bargaining unit, or exclude some employees therefrom in order to render the unit more appropriate. The Committee notes that the Government states that section 25 of the TUEOA was not amended but that discussions continue at the Labour Advisory Board and the Tripartite Body regarding the TUEOA, which is likely to be amalgamated with the Trade Unions Act. Taking note of the above, the Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that objective and pre-established criteria for the certification of the representative trade unions are provided under the new legislation. The Committee requests the Government to provide information of any progress made in this regard and to provide a copy of the text once adopted.
The Committee previously requested the Government to continue promoting social dialogue in order to bring section 27(2) of the TUEOA, which stipulates that a trade union may be certified as the bargaining agent if it is supported by at least 51 per cent of employees, into conformity with the Convention. The Committee notes that the Government states that no agreement was reached on any legislative changes in this regard, but that discussions continue at the Tripartite Body and the Labour Advisory Board regarding a proposed new Trade Union and Employers’ Organizations Act which would amalgamate the Trade Unions Act and the TUEOA. The Committee recalls that the requirement of too high a percentage for representativity to be authorized to engage in collective bargaining may hamper the promotion and development of free and voluntary collective bargaining within the meaning of the Convention (2012 General Survey on the fundamental Conventions, paragraph 233). Noting the Government’s indication that ten collective agreements covering a total of 1592 workers were concluded between 2007 and 2021, the Committee considers that the very low coverage of collective agreements in the country could appear to be related to the restrictive requirements to engage in collective bargaining contained in the legislation. In this regard, the Committee also recalls that under a system of the designation of an exclusive bargaining agent, if no union represents the required percentage of workers to be declared the exclusive bargaining agent, collective bargaining rights should be granted to all the unions in the unit, at least on behalf of their own members (2012 General Survey on the fundamental Conventions, paragraph 234). The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures, within the framework of the discussions concerning the proposed new Trade Union and Employers’ Organizations Act, to bring its legislation into line with the Convention with respect to the representativity of bargaining agents. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on any developments in this regard and reminds it of the possibility to avail itself of ILO technical assistance.
Promotion of collective bargaining in practice. As already mentioned above, the Committee notes that the Government reports that the ten collective agreements reached between 2007 and 2021 were concluded in the energy, public services, port, communications, banking, food and municipal sectors, and that five of these agreements, including one which was renewed, were still in force at the end of the reporting period. The Committee requests the Government to continue providing information on the number of collective agreements signed and in force in the country, the sectors concerned and the number of workers covered by these agreements, and to report on any measures taken to promote the full development and utilization of collective bargaining under the Convention.
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer