ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards

Suites données aux recommandations du comité et du Conseil d’administration - Rapport No. 371, Mars 2014

Cas no 2816 (Pérou) - Date de la plainte: 22-SEPT.-10 - Clos

Afficher en : Francais - Espagnol

Go to:

  1. 95. At its March 2013 meeting, the Committee made the following recommendations on the allegations still pending [see 367th Report, para. 1007]:
    • – The Committee invites the Government to establish tripartite dialogue as a means of improving the system of collective bargaining in public administration and overcoming the difficulties and problems that, as this case illustrates, arise in practice. The Committee reminds the Government that technical assistance is available from the ILO, if it wishes to make use of it.
    • – The Committee requests the Government to send the administrative authority’s existing and future decisions concerning alleged misuse of email by union officials Ms María Covarrubias and Mr Jorge Carrillo Vértiz. As in the conclusions to its previous examination of the case, the Committee suggests that the employer and the workers’ organization strive to reach agreement on the modalities for the use of the email system.
  2. 96. In response to the Committee’s first recommendation, the Government states, in its communication dated 17 May 2013, that the Office of the National Superintendent for Customs and Tax Administration (SUNAT) is acting in strict compliance with current regulations, in a way that is respectful of the rights of the workers and in a context of willingness to engage in dialogue and to reach agreements that are in line with current regulations. In the collective bargaining context, SUNAT is interested in finding an equitable solution, as demonstrated by the fact that it has shown interest in, and a willingness to, work towards finding a peaceful solution by participating in various meetings, both as part of the collective bargaining process and on an informal level. In this regard, the Government highlights that in 2011, 2012 and 2013, SUNAT signed collective agreements with several trade union organizations. The Committee reiterates the importance of engaging in tripartite dialogue with a view to improving the system of collective bargaining, and of inviting SINAUT SUNAT, the complainant organization.
  3. 97. With regard to the Committee’s second recommendation, the Government states that the labour administration authority ruled that the body did not commit a breach of labour standards, since legal provisions exist concerning the use of email in public institutions. Moreover, the Government adds that SUNAT has implemented regulations on the use of email that reflect not only an internal policy, but are in line with a national policy aimed at optimizing its use through rational utilization, as set out in Directive No. 005 2003 INEI/DINP entitled “Rules on the use of email in public administration bodies”, approved by Departmental Decision No. 088-2003-INEI, which establishes that “the email accounts of the employees of public institutions must be used for activities related to the performance of their duties in those institutions”. In this regard, SUNAT issued Circular No. 006-2008, dated 11 March 2008, indicating that email was an official means of communication and information exchange provided to employees, who should use it exclusively for the performance of their duties. Therefore, the body in question is complying with the regulations governing the appropriate use of institutional email accounts, without breaching the fundamental standards governing the rights of workers.
  4. 98. The Committee reiterates its previous recommendations and once again requests the Government to indicate whether the administrative authority has adopted any decisions in relation to the use of email by union officials Ms María Covarrubias and Mr Jorge Carrillo Vértiz.
© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer