Suites données aux recommandations du comité et du Conseil d’administration - Rapport No. 384, Mars 2018

Cas no 2999 (Pérou) - Date de la plainte: 30-OCT. -12 - Clos

Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body

1. 47. In its previous examination of the case, at its March 2014 meeting, the Committee requested the complainant organization and the Government to indicate whether the union official, Gustavo Roger Ospinal Rivadeneyra, was covered by any of the regularization plans for workers dismissed from enterprises related to ESSALUD, and whether any legal action had been initiated against his dismissal [see 371st Report, para. 743].
2. 48. In its communication of 16 September 2014, the Government attached a report from ESSALUD (dated 5 September 2014) which stated that: (i) Mr Ospinal Rivadeneyra was not registered as an employee of ESSALUD and neither did he have an employment relationship with it; and (ii) ESSALUD consulted the Civil Constitutional and Labour Law Unit of the General Office for Legal Affairs of the Central Legal Advice Bureau and was informed that Mr Ospinal Rivadeneyra is not involved in any legal proceedings by or against ESSALUD.
3. 49. The Committee takes due note of this information. In the light of this information, and noting that the complainant organization has not provided the information requested, the Committee will not pursue its examination of this case.