Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention, 1969 (No. 129) - Slovenia (Ratification: 1992)

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2024, published 113rd ILC session (2025)

Previous comment

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of ratified Conventions on labour inspection, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 81 (labour inspection) and 129 (labour inspection in agriculture) together.

Article 3(1)(a) and (b) and (2) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(1)(a) and (b) and (3) of Convention No. 129. Functions entrusted to labour inspectors. 1.Labour inspectorate’s competence in establishing employment relationships. In reply to the Committee’s previous request the Government indicates that the number of violations of the prohibition of work under civil law contracts while elements of an employment relationships exist, as identified by the labour inspectorate, was 95 in 2020, 42 in 2021 and 44 in 2022. The Committee notes that according to the labour inspection report for 2023 there were 109 violations identified during that year. The Government indicates that, in some cases, inspectors issued decisions prohibiting workers from carrying out work until the correction of the irregularity. According to the 2023 labour inspection report, the higher number of identified violations in 2023 compared to previous years is primarily due to the greater attention paid by the labour inspectorate to the use of civil contracts and the implementation of several targeted or intensified actions. According to the 2023 labour inspection report, it is complex to prove the existence of employment relationships since the standard of proof is high, while the continuous emergence of new flexible forms of work makes it difficult to carry out effective controls and keep up with normative regulation. The Committee requests the Government to continue providing information on the activities of the labour inspectorate with respect to establishing employment relationships for those who perform work based on a civil law contract, despite the existence of elements of an employment relationship which effectively amount to an employment contract.In this respect, it requests the Government to indicate the number of instances where inspectors ordered that employers provide a written employment contract in cases where it was established that work is being performed under civil law contracts while elements of employment relationships exist, in accordance with section 19(2) of the Labour Inspection Act.The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken to adapt inspection activities to the rise of new forms of work, including targeted inspections, training and capacity building.

2. Mediation and conciliation duties. In reply to the Committee’s previous request, the Government indicates that the labour inspectorate implemented the project “Eliminating Conflict at Work” from 2017 until the end of March 2023. According to the Government, the project facilitated labour inspections through preventive activities and mediation, decreasing the number of reports made to the labour inspectorate, thereby reducing inspectors’ workload. The Committee notes that the project employed six people, two for mediations, and four transferred from the labour inspectorate, including three inspectors, all without inspection powers. New inspectors were recruited in the labour inspectorate to replace those transferred. The Committee notes that, labour inspectors may still offer mediation for dispute resolution between workers and employers under the Employment Relationship Act. In this respect, the Committee recalls that, in accordance with Article 3(2) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(3) of Convention No. 129, any further duties which may be entrusted to labour inspectors shall not be such as to interfere with the effective discharge of their primary duties. Referring to its General Survey of 2006 on Labour Inspection, paragraph 72, the Committee recalls the importance of not overburdening inspectorates with tasks which by their nature may be understood as incompatible with their primary function of enforcing legal provisions. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on the measures it is taking to ensure that additional duties assigned to labour inspectors are not such as to interfere with the effective discharge of their primary duties, including through the promotion of the use of mediation services provided by mediation institutions. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on mediation activities undertaken by labour inspectors under the Employment Relationship Act, including the number of labour inspectors and the proportion of time and resources that they devote to mediation as compared with their primary functions.

3. Supervision of the Labour Market Regulation Act by inspectors monitoring working conditions and employment relationships. The Committee previously noted that inspections of the implementation of the Labour Market Regulation Act (LMRA) are carried out by inspectors monitoring working conditions and employment relationships under the employment inspection services within the labour inspectorate and requested the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that the control duties by the labour inspectorate under the LMRA do not prejudice the exercise of its primary duty to secure the enforcement of the legal provisions relating to conditions of work and the protection of workers. The Government indicates that it cannot provide an estimate of the proportion of time devoted by the inspectors to supervising implementation of the LMRA, given that the labour inspectorate does not maintain records or statistics on the amount of time inspectors spend investigating specific topics. It indicates that the duration of an inspection procedure depends on various factors, and a single inspection may assess the compliance with legislation across multiple areas, not limited to a single regulation. Taking note of this information, the Committee requests that the Government indicate specifically how it ensures that the control duties by the labour inspectorate under the LMRA do not prejudice the exercise of its primary duty to secure the enforcement of the legal provisions relating to conditions of work and the protection of workers.

Articles 5(a), 17 and 18 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 12, 22, 23 and 24 of Convention No. 129. Effective cooperation between the labour inspectorate and the justice system and enforcement of administrative penalties. The Government refers once again to section 11a(4) of the Minor Offence Act, according to which state prosecutors should immediately inform the minor offence authority of their decisions that affect minor offence proceedings, if criminal proceedings were initiated, and of the final court decision. The Government reiterates that a joint meeting of the representatives of the Office of the State Prosecutor General and the management of the labour inspectorate was organized in 2019 to promote the cooperation between the labour inspectorate and state prosecutors. Noting the absence of updated information,the Committee once again requests the Government to provide information on the impact of the agreement between the labour inspectorate and the Office of the State Prosecutor General, including the number and nature of feedbacks received by the inspectorate upon the filing of criminal complaints and also during pretrial investigations. It once again requests the Government to provide information on the outcome of the cases referred to the justice system by the labour inspectorate, including specifically the number of convictions in relation to the infringements reported, the nature of sanctions applied and the amount of fines imposed.

Articles 6 and 11 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 15 and 20(a) of Convention No. 129. Costs for inspection procedures imposed on liable persons. In its previous comments the Committee noted the Government’s indication that funds allocated to the labour inspectorate from the public budget are approximately equivalent to its claims under non-tax revenues, including fines, court fees, costs of proceedings and administrative charges. It noted that the large proportion of revenues from fines and fees may lead to uncertainty of the budgeting. The Government indicates that the Republic of Slovenia operates on a two-year State budget and that non-tax revenues, such as fines and fees, contribute to the national budget. It indicates that the Inspectorate's funding, derived from integral resources, covers civil servant salaries, material costs, training, statutory obligations, and personal protective equipment, ensuring smooth operation across 15 locations. According to the Government, the Inspectorate's investment resources are planned according to the needs of the fixed assets required to provide ergonomic workplaces and to carry out the core activity of inspection. The Committee once again requests the Government to further provide information on the measures taken or envisaged to ensure that sufficient budgetary resources are allocated for the labour inspectorate. It once again requests the Government to provide specific information on the budget of the labour inspectorate, including a specific identification as to the amount of revenues obtained for the labour inspectorate through charging inspection costs as a proportion of the overall budget for the inspectorate.

Article 14 of Convention No.81 and Article 19 of Convention No. 129. Notification of cases of occupational diseases. The Committee notes that the number of cases of occupational diseases reported to the labour inspectorate is particularly low (3 in 2020, none in 2021 and 2022 and 1 in 2023). Furthermore, according to the 2020–23 labour inspection reports although employers are required to report occupational diseases, the labour inspectorate has been pointing out a problem in this respect, since Slovenia does not have an adequate system solution for identifying, confirming and reporting occupational diseases. The Committee notes that the Rules on occupational diseases were adopted and published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia on 24 February 2023 and its provisions are applicable as of 1 May 2023. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged to improve the detection and identification of cases of occupational disease, including their notification to the labour inspectorate. In this respect it requests the Government to provide information on the practical implementation of the new Rules on occupational diseases.

Article 16 of Convention No. 81 and Article 21 of Convention No. 129. Adequacy and frequency of labour inspection visits. The Committee notes that, according to the annual labour inspection reports, the number of inspections carried out decreased from 17,334 in 2020 to 10,101 in 2023 as the inspections became more in-depth and that, since as the inspectorate deals with more complex violations, the number of inspections should continue to decrease. The Committee notes the disaggregated information on the numbers of inspections by issues examined and types of inspections. In this respect, the Committee notes that the number of planned inspections recorded remains significantly lower than extraordinary inspections. In this respect, the Government emphasises the proactive character of both planned and extraordinary inspections and explains that the extent of regular inspections is underrepresented in the statistical reports due to a specific recording practice: although all the actions planned and carried out in a given period are proactive and they have the character of a regular inspection, in the labour inspectorate's statistical reports, these proactive inspections are often categorized as extraordinary inspections. According to the Government, this categorization leads to a lower reported number of regular inspections, even though many proactive inspections are being carried out. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the number and types of inspections conducted, including in agriculture. Noting the Government’s indications with respect to the recording practice of the Labour Inspectorate, the Committee requests the Government to provide information onthe number of inspections that are carried out following the inspection plan and those that are the result of a complaint or an accident.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2024, published 113rd ILC session (2025)

Previous comment

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of ratified Conventions on labour inspection, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 81 (labour inspection) and 129 (labour inspection in agriculture) together.

Article 3(1)(a), (b) and (2) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(1)(a), (b) and (3) of Convention No. 129. Functions entrusted to labour inspectors. Additional duties entrusted to labour inspectors related to immigration. The Committee notes with concern that sections 44(5), 51, 60, 61, 63, and 66 of the Employment, Self-employment and Work of Aliens Act (ESWAA), which provide that labour inspectors can impose fines on migrant workers for the performance of work and are obliged to inform the police when its supervision activities lead to the suspicion of illegal residence of migrant workers, are still in force. In this context, the Committee notes that the Government has not provided specific information on the number of cases in which sanctions were imposed on migrant workers, the violations concerned, and the type of sanctions imposed, as previously requested by the Committee. The Committee once again recalls that neither Convention No. 81 nor Convention No. 129 contain any provision suggesting that any worker be excluded from the protection afforded by labour inspection on account of their irregular employment status (2006 General Survey on labour inspection, paragraph 77). Referring once again to paragraph 452 of its 2017 General Survey on occupational safety and health, the Committee further indicates that workers in a vulnerable situation may not be willing to cooperate with the labour inspection services if they fear negative consequences as a result of inspection activities, such as the loss of their job or expulsion from the country. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide information on the number of cases in which sanctions were imposed on migrant workers, the violations concerned and the sanctions imposed.

The Government indicates in its report that, in accordance with section 19 of the Prevention of Undeclared Work and Employment Act, labour inspectors may, when there are grounds to suspect undeclared employment, issue a decision prohibiting such undeclared work, and they must immediately inform the competent authority thereof. It indicates that despite the transfer of the power to monitor the prohibition of undeclared work from the labour inspectorate to the Financial Administration of the Republic of Slovenia, the labour inspectorate still receives a large number of reports of such suspected violations and related questions, which it refers to the Financial Administration of the Republic of Slovenia. The Committee notes that the number of violations of the provisions governing the conditions of employment, self-employment and work of foreigners in Slovenia increased from 49 in 2019 to 77 in 2023. The Government indicates that most violations were found for non-compliance with section 7(4) of the ESWAA when employers allowed foreigners to do work other than work for which consent had been granted in the procedure for issuing or extending a single permit, a European Union Blue Card, a written authorization, or for which a seasonal work permit had been issued. Additionally, there were violations involving improper employment contracts for foreigners, unauthorized provision of short-term services by third-country providers, and improper use of fixed-term employment contracts. The Committee once again requests the Government to take measures to ensure that the duties entrusted to labour inspectors do not interfere with the fundamental objective of securing the protection of workers in accordance with the primary duties set out in Article 3(1) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(1) of Convention No. 129. Noting the information provided regarding the violations of the Employment, Self-employment and Work of Aliens Act, the Committee urges the Government to provide information on the manner in which the labour inspection services ensure the enforcement of employers’ obligations with regard to the rights of migrant workers, in particular those in an irregular situation or without an employment contract, including specific information as to the payment of remunerations and any other benefits owed for the work they performed.

Article 10 of Convention No. 81 and Article 14 of Convention No. 129. Number of labour inspectors and their conditions of service. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that despite the increase in the number of labour inspectors, the heavy workload persisted. The Government indicates that the labour inspectorate continued its efforts to increase the number of inspectors, as well as the number of other staff providing support to inspectors. The Committee notes the number of employees of the labour inspectorate increased from 118 (89 inspectors) in 2020 to 129 (97 inspectors) in 2023. The Committee notes that, according to the labour inspection reports, the labour inspectorate has boosted the number of inspectors especially in the field of employment relationships given that the majority of complaints concern this issue, and that the number of inspectors monitoring compliance with occupational safety and health will need to be increased in the future. At the same time the Committee notes that the number of business entities has risen by more than 20,000, from 221,711 in 2020 to 241,128 in 2023. The annual labour inspection reports indicate that despite these personnel reinforcements the inspectors are unable to cope adequately with the increase of business entities and the increased number of reports received by the labour inspectorate, which in 2023 amounted to approximately 6,000. While taking note of the increase in the number of inspectors from 2020 to 2023, the Committee requests the Government to continue its efforts to increase the number of labour inspectors and indicate the measures taken to ensure that the number of inspectors monitoring working conditions and employment relationships and also the number of OSH inspectors are sufficient to secure the effective discharge of the duties of the inspectorate.

Article 6 of Convention No. 81 and Article 8 of Convention No. 129. Stability and independence of labour inspectors. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that issues related to external pressure facing inspectors from both complainants and employers in the form of insults, misconduct and aggressiveness continued to exist. The Committee also noted a series of measures taken by the labour inspectorate to address the risk of third-party violence to which labour inspectors are exposed and the Committee urged the Government to strengthen its efforts in this respect. The labour inspection reports for 2020–23 provide information about abusive and insulting attitudes with threats, especially in inspections carried out by female inspectors, even if the inspection was carried out jointly by two female inspectors. The Committee notes that the Government has not provided information on this matter. The Committee once again urges the Government to strengthen its efforts to address the issues related to violence, harassment and other external pressure facing labour inspectors, including with a view to ensuring their independence from improper external influences. It requests the Government to indicate the measures taken in this respect.

Article 12(1)(b) of Convention No. 81 and Article 16(1)(b) of Convention No. 129. Access to workplaces liable to inspection. The Committee previously noted that pursuant to section 21 of the Inspections Act, persons owning or possessing business premises, production premises or other premises or land can refuse inspectors’ free access under certain conditions, and the Committee requested the Government to provide detailed information on the implementation of section 21 of the Inspections Act in practice. The Committee notes from the labour inspection reports of 2020, 2021, and 2023 that employers obstruct inspectors by hindering inspections, withholding documents and not complying with imposed measures. The Government indicates that from 1 June 2020 to 31 May 2023, 15 obstructions of access to the employer’s premises and obstructions of inspection were recorded, and in 410 cases, inspectors found difficulties in obtaining the required documentation. Furthermore, inspectors issued fines in 6 cases for obstructing or preventing the inspector from entering premises, accessing equipment and facilities, and in 260 cases for preventing the inspector from carrying out their inspection duties unhindered. The Committee notes that it is unclear whether inspectors have been denied access to workplaces under section 21 as the Government does not provide information on the reasons for each denial under one or more of the exceptions in section 21. Nonetheless, the Committee once again recalls that, by virtue of Article 12(1)(b) of Convention No. 81 and Article 16(1)(b) of Convention No. 129, labour inspectors should be empowered to enter by day premises which they may have reasonable cause to believe to be liable to inspection in order to efficiently ensure workers’ protection, and that these Articles do not allow for any restrictions. Noting that the Government has not amended the relevant legislative framework, the Committee once again urges the Government to take measures to bring the national legislation into conformity with Article 12 of Convention No. 81 and Article 16 of Convention No. 129 to ensure that that labour inspectors are empowered to enter by day premises which they may have reasonable cause to believe to be liable to inspection. In the meantime, it requests the Government to continue to provide detailed information on the implementation of section 21 of the Inspections Act in practice, indicating the number of times that inspectors have been denied access to workplaces under this section, the reasons given for each denial under one or more of the exceptions provided for in section 21, and the outcome of any proceedings reviewing each denial.

The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2023, published 112nd ILC session (2024)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments.

Repetition

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of ratified Conventions on labour inspection, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 81 (labour inspection) and 129 (labour inspection in agriculture) together.

The Committee takes note of the Government’s report and the supplementary information provided in light of the decision adopted by the Governing Body at its 338th Session (June 2020).

Article 3(1)(a), (b) and (2) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(1)(a), (b) and (3) of Convention No. 129. Functions entrusted to labour inspectors. 1. Labour inspectorate’s competence in establishing employment relationships. Following its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to continue to provide information on the work of the labour inspectorate with respect to establishing employment relationships when work is based on a civil law contract despite the existence of elements of an employment relationship, in accordance with section 19(1)(6) and 19(2) of the Labour Inspection Act (LIA).

The Committee notes the Government’s information in its report that, in 2018, inspectors found 109 violations of the prohibition of work under civil-law contracts while elements of employment relationships exist. The 2019 annual labour inspection report (Annual Report) shows that inspectors found 98 cases of such violations in 2019. The Government also states that it is complex to prove the existence of employment relationships and that the standards of proof are high. In particular, it is difficult to verify the continuity of work of a particular worker, especially in cases when records of such work are modified or inadequate, or the employer does not keep such records. The Government further states that, when a violation is detected, inspectors may temporarily prohibit the performance of the work concerned until the correction of the irregularity, order the conclusion of a written employment contract within three working days, or impose fines if necessary. In this regard, inspectors issued 17 prohibition orders in 2018 and 6 in 2019. There were also 13 cases recorded in 2018 of an inspector ordering the liable person to provide the worker concerned with a written employment contract. The Committee requests the Government to continue providing information on the activities of the labour inspectorate with respect to establishing employment relationships for those who perform work based on a civil law contract, despite the existence of elements of an employment relationship which effectively amount to an employment contract.

2. Mediation and conciliation duties. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that labour inspectors may offer mediation for the settlement of a dispute between a worker and employer under the Employment Relationship Act (ERA) as amended in 2016 (section 216). It also noted that the labour inspectorate was aiming to promote the use of mediation services provided by mediation institutions under the Project on Eliminating Conflict at Work.

The Committee notes the Government’s indication that, even though the role of the inspector in mediation is provided for by the ERA, inspectors rarely carry out this function in practice, and when they do, it is informal and not recorded. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that the Project on Eliminating Conflict at Work will last six years from 2017 and aims to promote the use of mediation in the settlement of disputes. In this regard, the Government states that the labour inspectorate organizes free workshops and provides professional assistance in areas within its competence. The Government also indicates that the peaceful resolution of disputes of a non-legal nature by mediation contributes to alleviating the burden on the labour inspectorate by reducing the number of cases in its regular work, because many conflicts are resolved by mediation within the project that would otherwise have been the subject of an inspection procedure or that had been subject to an inspection procedure but had been concluded without reaching resolution. The Government further states that inspectors usually refer a case to the project unit of the labour inspectorate when a person requests help without an inspection being carried out, or when the law does not foresee a fine for a violation and the inspection procedure would not resolve the conflict. According to the information available on the website of the labour inspectorate, the mediation is carried out at the premises of the labour inspectorate by a neutral third-party. The Committee recalls that, in accordance with Article 3(2) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(3) of Convention No. 129, any further duties which may be entrusted to labour inspectors shall not be such as to interfere with the effective discharge of their primary duties. Referring to its General Survey of 2006, Labour inspection, paragraph 72, the Committee recalls the importance of not overburdening inspectorates with tasks which by their nature may be understood as incompatible with their primary function of enforcing legal provisions. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on the measures it is taking to ensure that additional duties assigned to labour inspectors are not such as to interfere with the effective discharge of their primary duties. In this respect, it requests further information on the implementation of the Project on Eliminating Conflict at Work, including the appointment of mediators and the functioning and the staffing of the project unit, indicating if it is staffed by inspectors.

3. Supervision of the Labour Market Regulation Act by inspectors monitoring working conditions and employment relationships. The Committee previously noted that inspections of the implementation of the Labour Market Regulation Act (LMRA) are carried out by inspectors monitoring working conditions and employment relationships under the employment inspection services (EIS) within the labour inspectorate (section 150). Noting the heavy workload of the labour inspectorate, it requested the Government to indicate whether the inspectors who supervise the LMRA are recruited within the current budget of the labour inspectorate, or with a separate line of budget.

The Committee notes the Government’s information that the recruitment of all new inspectors who are employed by the labour inspectorate falls under the budget line “wages” of the applicable budget for the relevant year, adjusted with regard to the personnel plan and new recruitments concluded. There are no separate budget lines for different inspection areas, namely working conditions and employment relationships, health and safety at work and social affairs. The Committee also notes that, according to the 2019 Annual Report, the labour inspectorate detected 180 violations of the LMRA in 2018 and 105 such violations in 2019. The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that the control duties by the labour inspectorate under the LMRA do not prejudice the exercise of its primary duty to secure the enforcement of the legal provisions relating to conditions of work and the protection of workers. It also requests the Government to indicate in detail the proportion of time devoted by the inspectors to supervising implementation of the LMRA, including monitoring working conditions and employment relationships with respect to employment services, temporary employment agencies, job certification processes and unemployment insurance, compared to the time devoted to the exercise of the primary functions of labour inspectors as defined in Article 3(1) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(1) of Convention No. 129.

Articles 4 and 5(b) of Convention No. 81 and Articles 7 and 12 of Convention No. 129. Supervision by a central labour inspection authority and effective cooperation between the labour inspectorate and other government services. The Committee requested the Government to provide information on the role that the Inspection Council established in accordance with section 11 of the Inspection Act (IA) plays in coordinating with the labour inspectorate, including the impact of this coordination on the planning and carrying out of labour inspections as well as any joint inspections undertaken.

The Committee notes the Government’s information on the role of the Inspection Council in planning the joint performance of inspection tasks from different inspection services. The Government indicates that the Inspection Council drafts the Strategic Orientations and Priorities of Inspectorates and Inspection Services based upon the annual work plan that different inspection services and inspectorates draw up independently. During this process, the members of inspection services agree on any joint inspections and campaigns. At the end of every year, the Inspection Council also invites members to draw up reports on the implementation of the Strategic Orientations and Priorities of Inspectorates and Inspection Services for the year, on the basis of which the Council then draws up a joint report and presents it to the Government. The Committee takes note of this information.

Articles 5(a), 17 and 18 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 12, 22, 23 and 24 of Convention No. 129. Effective cooperation between the labour inspectorate and the justice system and enforcement of administrative penalties. The Committee previously noted that labour inspectors did not regularly receive feedback with regard to criminal complaints lodged with the State Prosecutor’s Office. It thus requested further information on the measures taken or envisaged to promote effective cooperation between the labour inspectorate and the justice system. It also requested the Government to indicate the impact of inspectors’ powers to impose fines against minor offences on the work of the labour inspectorate.

The Committee notes the Government’s indication that, according to section 11a(4) of the Minor Offence Act, state prosecutors should immediately inform the minor offence authority of their decisions referred to that affect minor offence proceedings, if criminal proceedings were initiated, and of the final court decision. However, in practice this provision is often not implemented. The Committee takes due note of the Government’s indication that, in order to effectively prosecute offenders and to promote the cooperation between the labour inspectorate and state prosecutors, a joint meeting of the representatives of the Office of the State Prosecutor General and the management of the labour inspectorate was held in January 2019. An agreement was reached on the provision of feedback about the criminal complaints filed and on establishing communication between inspectors and state prosecutors upon the filing of criminal complaints and during pretrial investigations. Upon the request of the labour inspectorate, the Office of the State Prosecutor General provided training for inspectors in 2019 in order to ensure the effective filing of criminal complaints. The Government also states that the fact that the labour inspectorate is also a minor offence authority affects its volume of work. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the impact of the agreement between the labour inspectorate and the Office of the State Prosecutor General, including the number and nature of feedbacks received upon the filing of criminal complaints and also during pretrial investigations. It once again requests the Government to provide information on the outcome of the cases referred to the justice system by the labour inspectorate, including specifically the number of convictions in relation to the infringements reported, the nature of sanctions applied and the amount of fines imposed.

Articles 6 and 11 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 15 and 20(a) of Convention No. 129. Costs for inspection procedures imposed on liable persons. The Committee previously noted that the IA obliges the person in breach of the laws or any other regulations to cover the cost of inspection procedures in establishing facts and evidence (section 31).

The Committee takes due note of the Government’s indication that funds allocated to the labour inspectorate from the public budget are approximately equivalent to its claims under non-tax revenues, including fines, court fees, costs of proceedings and administrative charges. The Committee observes that the large proportion of revenues from fines and fees may lead to uncertainty of the budgeting. It recalls that, by virtue of Article 11 of Convention No. 81 and Article 15 of Convention No. 129, it is essential for Member States to allocate the necessary material resources so that labour inspectors can carry out their duties effectively. The Committee therefore requests the Government to further provide information on the measures taken or envisaged to ensure that sufficient budgetary resources are allocated for the labour inspectorate. In this respect, it requests the Government to continue providing information on the budget of the labour inspectorate, including a specific identification as to the amount of revenues obtained for the Inspectorate through charging inspection costs as a proportion of the overall budget for the inspectorate.

Article 16 of Convention No. 81 and Article 21 of Convention No. 129. Adequacy and frequency of labour inspection visits. The Committee previously noted that the labour inspectorate conducts regular inspections, reactive inspections based on complaints and control visits to follow up on a previous decision. However, it noted the low proportion of regular inspections performed by the labour inspectorate reported in the 2017 Annual Report.

The Committee notes that, according to the statistical information provided by the Government and in the 2019 Annual Report, the number of inspections carried out was 14,541 in 2017, 12,928 in 2018 and 14,118 in 2019. Moreover, the number of regular inspections decreased from 810 in 2017 to 492 in 2018. The Committee also notes that, according to the supplementary information provided by the Government, from 1 January to 31 May 2020, 4,362 inspections were carried out, including 85 regular inspections, 2,573 inspections based on complaints, 1,173 inspections as part of targeted activities and 531 control visits. The Government further indicates that these inspections were mostly carried out in cases where, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the life and health of workers was at risk at the workplace. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken or envisaged to ensure a sufficient number of inspection visits, in particular regular inspections, and to provide information on the manner in which it determines the priorities for inspection. It also requests the Government to continue to provide information on the number of labour inspections carried out, disaggregating unannounced regular inspections from complaint-based reactive inspections.

Article 20 of Convention No. 81 and Article 26 of Convention No. 129. Annual inspection report. Following its previous comments, the Committee notes the annual labour inspection reports for the years 2015 to 2019 submitted to the Office, as well as their publication on the labour inspectorate’s website.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2023, published 112nd ILC session (2024)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.

Repetition

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of ratified Conventions on labour inspection, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 81 (labour inspection) and 129 (labour inspection in agriculture) together.

The Committee takes note of the Government’s report and the supplementary information provided in light of the decision adopted by the Governing Body at its 338th Session (June 2020).

Legislation. The Committee previously noted the legislative reforms regarding the Labour Inspection Act (LIA) of 2014 and requested the Government to indicate the extent to which labour inspectors are bound by the general principles established under the Inspections Act (IA) as well as how the overlapping or conflicting provisions under the IA and the LIA are applied in practice to the daily work of labour inspectors.

The Committee notes the Government’s reference in its report to section 3 of the LIA providing that unless otherwise provided by the LIA, the performance of inspection and inspectors shall be subject to the provisions of the IA governing inspection, the provisions governing the general administrative procedure and the provisions of specific regulations governing the supervision of individual inspection services that operate within the inspectorate. The Government states in this respect that inspectors carry out their work pursuant to the LIA, but that for issues not regulated in the LIA, they carry out inspections pursuant to the IA. In this respect, the Committee notes that qualifications of inspectors, the initiation of inspections, additional powers including seizure of documents, inspection records, and entities liable to inspection are covered by the LIA (sections 9–11 and 13–15), while inspection procedures and access to workplaces are regulated by the IA. The Committee takes note of the information provided by the Government.

Article 3(1)(a), (b) and (2) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(1)(a), (b) and (3) of Convention No. 129. Functions entrusted to labour inspectors. Additional duties entrusted to labour inspectors related to immigration. The Committee previously noted with concern that labour inspectors can impose fines on migrant workers for the performance of work that violates the Employment, Self-employment and Work of Aliens Act (ESWAA) (sections 51, 60, 61, 63, and 66), and are obliged to inform the police authority when its supervision activities lead to the suspicion of illegal residence of migrant workers (section 44(4)). It requested the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that the control duties by the labour inspectorate under the ESWAA do not prejudice the exercise of its primary duty to secure the enforcement of the legal provisions relating to conditions of work and the protection of workers. It also requested information on the manner in which the labour inspectorate ensure the enforcement of employers’ obligations with regard to the rights of migrant workers.

The Committee notes the Government’s indication that sanctions for violations of the ESWAA do not affect the protection of labour rights of migrant workers or their right to suitable working conditions. In accordance with section 19(1)-2 of the LIA, inspectors may prohibit the worker concerned from performing work until the correction of the irregularity, if during an inspection they find that the employer has enabled a foreigner or a person without citizenship to work contrary to regulations governing the employment of foreigners. According to the 2019 annual report on inspection activities (Annual Report), the inspectors found 49 infringements in 2019, compared to 29 in 2018. The Government also states that the labour inspectorate imposed sanctions on migrant workers due to such violations in a few cases in 2018 and 2019. The Government further indicates that a migrant worker whose employment contract is determined to be null and void in accordance with section 23 of the Employment Relationship Act (ERA) only enjoys the protection of labour rights if they prove the existence of an employment relationship in court.

The Committee recalls that, in accordance with Article 3(1) and (2) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(1) and (3) of Convention No. 129, the function of the system of labour inspection is to secure the enforcement of the legal provisions relating to conditions of work and the protection of workers while engaged in their work, and that any further duties which may be entrusted to labour inspectors shall not be such as to interfere with the effective discharge of their primary duties. It also recalls that neither Convention No. 81 nor Convention No. 129 contain any provision suggesting that any worker be excluded from the protection afforded by labour inspection on account of their irregular employment status (paragraph 77, General Survey of 2006, Labour inspection). Referring to paragraph 452 of its General Survey of 2017, Working together to promote a safe and healthy working environment, the Committee further indicates that workers in a vulnerable situation may not be willing to cooperate with the labour inspection services if they fear negative consequences as a result of inspection activities, such as the loss of their job or expulsion from the country. The Committee requests the Government to take measures to ensure that the duties entrusted to labour inspectors do not interfere with the fundamental objective of securing the protection of workers in accordance with the primary duties set out in Article 3(1) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(1) of Convention No. 129. It requests the Government to provide further specific information on the number of cases in which sanctions were imposed on migrant workers, the violations concerned and the sanctions imposed. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide information on the manner in which the labour inspection services ensure the enforcement of employers’ obligations with regard to the rights of migrant workers, in particular those in an irregular situation or without an employment contract, including specific information as to the payment of remunerations and any other benefits owed for the work they performed.

Articles 6 and 10 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 8 and 14 of Convention No. 129. Number of labour inspectors and their conditions of service. Stability and independence of labour inspectors. The Committee previously noted the continuous decline in the number of labour inspectors and their heavy workload, as well as issues related to external pressure facing inspectors from both complainants and employers, as documented in the Annual Report for 2017. It requested the Government to take measures to ensure that the number of labour inspectors is sufficient to secure the effective discharge of the duties of the inspectorate, and to provide information on measures taken to address the pressure facing labour inspectors.

The Committee notes the Government’s information that the number of approved posts at the labour inspectorate increased from 106 in 2017 to 121 in 2019, and that recruitment procedures are under way. According to the 2019 Annual Report, there are 120 employees at the labour inspectorate, including 91 inspectors (up from 81 in 2018) and the number of business entities increased from 215,354 in 2018 to 220,236 in 2019. The Annual Report further states that inspectors, in particular those in charge of monitoring working conditions and employment relationships and social affairs, still face difficulties to promptly process all requests. In 2019, the labour inspectorate received 7,215 complaints, of which about 80 per cent fall into the competence of inspectors monitoring working conditions and employment relationships. Information in the 2019 Annual Report also indicates that the number of these inspectors has increased in recent years in response to their heavy workload, but that there has been a decrease in the number of occupational safety and health (OSH) inspectors (from 41 in 2008 to 31 in 2019). In this regard, the Annual Report states that measures will be taken to reinforce OSH inspections.

The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that a risk assessment undertaken of the work of the inspectorate indicated that nearly all employees of the labour inspectorate, and particularly inspectors, are exposed to the risk of third-party violence, due to the nature of their work. In order to address this, the labour inspectorate has taken measures to prevent unauthorized access to its offices, drafted instructions outlining measures to reduce such violence, and organized various lectures and workshops on stress management, communication in difficult situations and other relevant topics. Concerning protection against aggression, certain inspections are carried out by two inspectors or together with other supervisory authorities, and inspectors may also request that police officers be present at the inspection. The Government also indicates that, in addition to the provisions on the independence of inspectors provided for by the IA and the LIA, certain inspections are carried out by inspectors from the head office instead of local units if it is assessed necessary to prevent the external influence from local stakeholders. The Committee also notes that, however, the 2019 Annual Report states that labour inspectors continue to be overwhelmed with the amount of assigned cases and face a significant level of external pressure from both complainants and employers in the form of insults, misconduct and aggressiveness concerning matters beyond their mandate. While taking note of the increase in the number of inspectors from 2017 to 2019, the Committee requests the Government to reinforce its efforts to ensure that the number of labour inspectors is sufficient to secure the effective discharge of the duties of the inspectorate, regarding both inspectors monitoring working conditions and employment relationships and OSH inspectors. It also requests the Government to continue to provide information on the measures taken in this respect. In addition, the Committee urges the Government to strengthen its efforts to address the issues raised in the 2019 Annual Report related to violence, harassment and other external pressure facing labour inspectors, including with a view to ensuring their independence from improper external influences.

Article 12(1)(b) of Convention No. 81 and Article 16(1)(b) of Convention No. 129. Access to workplaces liable to inspection. The Committee previously noted that pursuant to section 21 of the IA regarding business and other premises not belonging to the person liable, persons owning or possessing business premises, production premises or other premises or land can refuse inspectors’ free access under certain conditions. The Committee notes the Government’s explanation in response to its request that an inspection may only be denied in the exceptional cases provided for by section 21 of the IA. The Government also indicates that, if a person unjustifiably refuses to allow an inspection, they may be subject to the same measures as a witness who refuses to testify, and the inspection may be carried out against their will. With reference to its comments above on the LIA and the IA, the Committee notes that the LIA does not contain provisions relating to access to workplaces liable to inspection. The Committee recalls that, by virtue of Article 12(1)(b) of Convention No. 81 and Article 16(1)(b) of Convention No. 129, labour inspectors should be empowered to enter by day premises which they may have reasonable cause to believe to be liable to inspection in order to efficiently ensure workers’ protection, and that these Articles do not allow for any restrictions. With reference to its General Survey of 2006, Labour Inspection, paragraph 266, the Committee also recalls that restrictions placed in law or in practice on inspectors’ right of entry into workplaces can only stand in the way of achieving the objectives of labour inspection as set out in the Convention. The Committee once again urges the Government to take measures to bring the national legislation into conformity with Article 12 of Convention No. 81 and Article 16 of Convention No. 129 to ensure that that labour inspectors are empowered to enter by day premises which they may have reasonable cause to believe to be liable to inspection. In the meantime, it requests the Government to provide detailed information on the implementation of section 21 of the IA in practice, indicating the number of times that inspectors have been denied access to workplaces under this section, the reasons given for each denial under one or more of the exceptions provided for in section 21, and the outcome of any proceedings reviewing each denial.

The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2020, published 109th ILC session (2021)

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of ratified Conventions on labour inspection, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 81 (labour inspection) and 129 (labour inspection in agriculture) together.

The Committee takes note of the Government’s report and the supplementary information provided in light of the decision adopted by the Governing Body at its 338th Session (June 2020).

Article 3(1)(a), (b) and (2) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(1)(a), (b) and (3) of Convention No. 129. Functions entrusted to labour inspectors. 1. Labour inspectorate’s competence in establishing employment relationships. Following its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to continue to provide information on the work of the labour inspectorate with respect to establishing employment relationships when work is based on a civil law contract despite the existence of elements of an employment relationship, in accordance with section 19(1)(6) and 19(2) of the Labour Inspection Act (LIA).

The Committee notes the Government’s information in its report that, in 2018, inspectors found 109 violations of the prohibition of work under civil-law contracts while elements of employment relationships exist. The 2019 annual labour inspection report (Annual Report) shows that inspectors found 98 cases of such violations in 2019. The Government also states that it is complex to prove the existence of employment relationships and that the standards of proof are high. In particular, it is difficult to verify the continuity of work of a particular worker, especially in cases when records of such work are modified or inadequate, or the employer does not keep such records. The Government further states that, when a violation is detected, inspectors may temporarily prohibit the performance of the work concerned until the correction of the irregularity, order the conclusion of a written employment contract within three working days, or impose fines if necessary. In this regard, inspectors issued 17 prohibition orders in 2018 and 6 in 2019. There were also 13 cases recorded in 2018 of an inspector ordering the liable person to provide the worker concerned with a written employment contract. The Committee requests the Government to continue providing information on the activities of the labour inspectorate with respect to establishing employment relationships for those who perform work based on a civil law contract, despite the existence of elements of an employment relationship which effectively amount to an employment contract.

2. Mediation and conciliation duties. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that labour inspectors may offer mediation for the settlement of a dispute between a worker and employer under the Employment Relationship Act (ERA) as amended in 2016 (section 216). It also noted that the labour inspectorate was aiming to promote the use of mediation services provided by mediation institutions under the Project on Eliminating Conflict at Work.

The Committee notes the Government’s indication that, even though the role of the inspector in mediation is provided for by the ERA, inspectors rarely carry out this function in practice, and when they do, it is informal and not recorded. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that the Project on Eliminating Conflict at Work will last six years from 2017 and aims to promote the use of mediation in the settlement of disputes. In this regard, the Government states that the labour inspectorate organizes free workshops and provides professional assistance in areas within its competence. The Government also indicates that the peaceful resolution of disputes of a non-legal nature by mediation contributes to alleviating the burden on the labour inspectorate by reducing the number of cases in its regular work, because many conflicts are resolved by mediation within the project that would otherwise have been the subject of an inspection procedure or that had been subject to an inspection procedure but had been concluded without reaching resolution. The Government further states that inspectors usually refer a case to the project unit of the labour inspectorate when a person requests help without an inspection being carried out, or when the law does not foresee a fine for a violation and the inspection procedure would not resolve the conflict. According to the information available on the website of the labour inspectorate, the mediation is carried out at the premises of the labour inspectorate by a neutral third-party. The Committee recalls that, in accordance with Article 3(2) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(3) of Convention No. 129, any further duties which may be entrusted to labour inspectors shall not be such as to interfere with the effective discharge of their primary duties. Referring to its General Survey of 2006, Labour inspection, paragraph 72, the Committee recalls the importance of not overburdening inspectorates with tasks which by their nature may be understood as incompatible with their primary function of enforcing legal provisions. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on the measures it is taking to ensure that additional duties assigned to labour inspectors are not such as to interfere with the effective discharge of their primary duties. In this respect, it requests further information on the implementation of the Project on Eliminating Conflict at Work, including the appointment of mediators and the functioning and the staffing of the project unit, indicating if it is staffed by inspectors.

3. Supervision of the Labour Market Regulation Act by inspectors monitoring working conditions and employment relationships. The Committee previously noted that inspections of the implementation of the Labour Market Regulation Act (LMRA) are carried out by inspectors monitoring working conditions and employment relationships under the employment inspection services (EIS) within the labour inspectorate (section 150). Noting the heavy workload of the labour inspectorate, it requested the Government to indicate whether the inspectors who supervise the LMRA are recruited within the current budget of the labour inspectorate, or with a separate line of budget.

The Committee notes the Government’s information that the recruitment of all new inspectors who are employed by the labour inspectorate falls under the budget line "wages" of the applicable budget for the relevant year, adjusted with regard to the personnel plan and new recruitments concluded. There are no separate budget lines for different inspection areas, namely working conditions and employment relationships, health and safety at work and social affairs. The Committee also notes that, according to the 2019 Annual Report, the labour inspectorate detected 180 violations of the LMRA in 2018 and 105 such violations in 2019. The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that the control duties by the labour inspectorate under the LMRA do not prejudice the exercise of its primary duty to secure the enforcement of the legal provisions relating to conditions of work and the protection of workers. It also requests the Government to indicate in detail the proportion of time devoted by the inspectors to supervising implementation of the LMRA, including monitoring working conditions and employment relationships with respect to employment services, temporary employment agencies, job certification processes and unemployment insurance, compared to the time devoted to the exercise of the primary functions of labour inspectors as defined in Article 3(1) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(1) of Convention No. 129.

Articles 4 and 5(b) of Convention No. 81 and Articles 7 and 12 of Convention No. 129. Supervision by a central labour inspection authority and effective cooperation between the labour inspectorate and other government services. The Committee requested the Government to provide information on the role that the Inspection Council established in accordance with section 11 of the Inspection Act (IA) plays in coordinating with the labour inspectorate, including the impact of this coordination on the planning and carrying out of labour inspections as well as any joint inspections undertaken.

The Committee notes the Government’s information on the role of the Inspection Council in planning the joint performance of inspection tasks from different inspection services. The Government indicates that the Inspection Council drafts the Strategic Orientations and Priorities of Inspectorates and Inspection Services based upon the annual work plan that different inspection services and inspectorates draw up independently. During this process, the members of inspection services agree on any joint inspections and campaigns. At the end of every year, the Inspection Council also invites members to draw up reports on the implementation of the Strategic Orientations and Priorities of Inspectorates and Inspection Services for the year, on the basis of which the Council then draws up a joint report and presents it to the Government. The Committee takes note of this information.

Articles 5(a), 17 and 18 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 12, 22, 23 and 24 of Convention No. 129. Effective cooperation between the labour inspectorate and the justice system and enforcement of administrative penalties. The Committee previously noted that labour inspectors did not regularly receive feedback with regard to criminal complaints lodged with the State Prosecutor’s Office. It thus requested further information on the measures taken or envisaged to promote effective cooperation between the labour inspectorate and the justice system. It also requested the Government to indicate the impact of inspectors’ powers to impose fines against minor offences on the work of the labour inspectorate.

The Committee notes the Government’s indication that, according to section 11a(4) of the Minor Offence Act, state prosecutors should immediately inform the minor offence authority of their decisions referred to that affect minor offence proceedings, if criminal proceedings were initiated, and of the final court decision. However, in practice this provision is often not implemented. The Committee takes due note of the Government’s indication that, in order to effectively prosecute offenders and to promote the cooperation between the labour inspectorate and state prosecutors, a joint meeting of the representatives of the Office of the State Prosecutor General and the management of the labour inspectorate was held in January 2019. An agreement was reached on the provision of feedback about the criminal complaints filed and on establishing communication between inspectors and state prosecutors upon the filing of criminal complaints and during pretrial investigations. Upon the request of the labour inspectorate, the Office of the State Prosecutor General provided training for inspectors in 2019 in order to ensure the effective filing of criminal complaints. The Government also states that the fact that the labour inspectorate is also a minor offence authority affects its volume of work. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the impact of the agreement between the labour inspectorate and the Office of the State Prosecutor General, including the number and nature of feedbacks received upon the filing of criminal complaints and also during pretrial investigations. It once again requests the Government to provide information on the outcome of the cases referred to the justice system by the labour inspectorate, including specifically the number of convictions in relation to the infringements reported, the nature of sanctions applied and the amount of fines imposed.

Articles 6 and 11 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 15 and 20(a) of Convention No. 129. Costs for inspection procedures imposed on liable persons. The Committee previously noted that the IA obliges the person in breach of the laws or any other regulations to cover the cost of inspection procedures in establishing facts and evidence (section 31).

The Committee takes due note of the Government’s indication that funds allocated to the labour inspectorate from the public budget are approximately equivalent to its claims under non-tax revenues, including fines, court fees, costs of proceedings and administrative charges. The Committee observes that the large proportion of revenues from fines and fees may lead to uncertainty of the budgeting. It recalls that, by virtue of Article 11 of Convention No. 81 and Article 15 of Convention No. 129, it is essential for Member States to allocate the necessary material resources so that labour inspectors can carry out their duties effectively. The Committee therefore requests the Government to further provide information on the measures taken or envisaged to ensure that sufficient budgetary resources are allocated for the labour inspectorate. In this respect, it requests the Government to continue providing information on the budget of the labour inspectorate, including a specific identification as to the amount of revenues obtained for the Inspectorate through charging inspection costs as a proportion of the overall budget for the inspectorate.

Article 16 of Convention No. 81 and Article 21 of Convention No. 129. Adequacy and frequency of labour inspection visits. The Committee previously noted that the labour inspectorate conducts regular inspections, reactive inspections based on complaints and control visits to follow up on a previous decision. However, it noted the low proportion of regular inspections performed by the labour inspectorate reported in the 2017 Annual Report.

The Committee notes that, according to the statistical information provided by the Government and in the 2019 Annual Report, the number of inspections carried out was 14,541 in 2017, 12,928 in 2018 and 14,118 in 2019. Moreover, the number of regular inspections decreased from 810 in 2017 to 492 in 2018. The Committee also notes that, according to the supplementary information provided by the Government, from 1 January to 31 May 2020, 4,362 inspections were carried out, including 85 regular inspections, 2,573 inspections based on complaints, 1,173 inspections as part of targeted activities and 531 control visits. The Government further indicates that these inspections were mostly carried out in cases where, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the life and health of workers was at risk at the workplace. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken or envisaged to ensure a sufficient number of inspection visits, in particular regular inspections, and to provide information on the manner in which it determines the priorities for inspection. It also requests the Government to continue to provide information on the number of labour inspections carried out, disaggregating unannounced regular inspections from complaint-based reactive inspections.

Article 20 of Convention No. 81 and Article 26 of Convention No. 129. Annual inspection report. Following its previous comments, the Committee notes the annual labour inspection reports for the years 2015 to 2019 submitted to the Office, as well as their publication on the labour inspectorate’s website.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2020, published 109th ILC session (2021)

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of ratified Conventions on labour inspection, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 81 (labour inspection) and 129 (labour inspection in agriculture) together.

The Committee takes note of the Government’s report and the supplementary information provided in light of the decision adopted by the Governing Body at its 338th Session (June 2020).

Legislation. The Committee previously noted the legislative reforms regarding the Labour Inspection Act (LIA) of 2014 and requested the Government to indicate the extent to which labour inspectors are bound by the general principles established under the Inspections Act (IA) as well as how the overlapping or conflicting provisions under the IA and the LIA are applied in practice to the daily work of labour inspectors.

The Committee notes the Government’s reference in its report to section 3 of the LIA providing that unless otherwise provided by the LIA, the performance of inspection and inspectors shall be subject to the provisions of the IA governing inspection, the provisions governing the general administrative procedure and the provisions of specific regulations governing the supervision of individual inspection services that operate within the inspectorate. The Government states in this respect that inspectors carry out their work pursuant to the LIA, but that for issues not regulated in the LIA, they carry out inspections pursuant to the IA. In this respect, the Committee notes that qualifications of inspectors, the initiation of inspections, additional powers including seizure of documents, inspection records, and entities liable to inspection are covered by the LIA (sections 9–11 and 13–15), while inspection procedures and access to workplaces are regulated by the IA. The Committee takes note of the information provided by the Government.

Article 3(1)(a), (b) and (2) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(1)(a), (b) and (3) of Convention No. 129. Functions entrusted to labour inspectors. Additional duties entrusted to labour inspectors related to immigration. The Committee previously noted with concern that labour inspectors can impose fines on migrant workers for the performance of work that violates the Employment, Self-employment and Work of Aliens Act (ESWAA) (sections 51, 60, 61, 63, and 66), and are obliged to inform the police authority when its supervision activities lead to the suspicion of illegal residence of migrant workers (section 44(4)). It requested the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that the control duties by the labour inspectorate under the ESWAA do not prejudice the exercise of its primary duty to secure the enforcement of the legal provisions relating to conditions of work and the protection of workers. It also requested information on the manner in which the labour inspectorate ensure the enforcement of employers’ obligations with regard to the rights of migrant workers.

The Committee notes the Government’s indication that sanctions for violations of the ESWAA do not affect the protection of labour rights of migrant workers or their right to suitable working conditions. In accordance with section 19(1)-2 of the LIA, inspectors may prohibit the worker concerned from performing work until the correction of the irregularity, if during an inspection they find that the employer has enabled a foreigner or a person without citizenship to work contrary to regulations governing the employment of foreigners. According to the 2019 annual report on inspection activities (Annual Report), the inspectors found 49 infringements in 2019, compared to 29 in 2018. The Government also states that the labour inspectorate imposed sanctions on migrant workers due to such violations in a few cases in 2018 and 2019. The Government further indicates that a migrant worker whose employment contract is determined to be null and void in accordance with section 23 of the Employment Relationship Act (ERA) only enjoys the protection of labour rights if they prove the existence of an employment relationship in court.

The Committee recalls that, in accordance with Article 3(1) and (2) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(1) and (3) of Convention No. 129, the function of the system of labour inspection is to secure the enforcement of the legal provisions relating to conditions of work and the protection of workers while engaged in their work, and that any further duties which may be entrusted to labour inspectors shall not be such as to interfere with the effective discharge of their primary duties. It also recalls that neither Convention No. 81 nor Convention No. 129 contain any provision suggesting that any worker be excluded from the protection afforded by labour inspection on account of their irregular employment status (paragraph 77, General Survey of 2006, Labour inspection). Referring to paragraph 452 of its General Survey of 2017, Working together to promote a safe and healthy working environment, the Committee further indicates that workers in a vulnerable situation may not be willing to cooperate with the labour inspection services if they fear negative consequences as a result of inspection activities, such as the loss of their job or expulsion from the country. The Committee requests the Government to take measures to ensure that the duties entrusted to labour inspectors do not interfere with the fundamental objective of securing the protection of workers in accordance with the primary duties set out in Article 3(1) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(1) of Convention No. 129. It requests the Government to provide further specific information on the number of cases in which sanctions were imposed on migrant workers, the violations concerned and the sanctions imposed. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide information on the manner in which the labour inspection services ensure the enforcement of employers’ obligations with regard to the rights of migrant workers, in particular those in an irregular situation or without an employment contract, including specific information as to the payment of remunerations and any other benefits owed for the work they performed.

Articles 6 and 10 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 8 and 14 of Convention No. 129. Number of labour inspectors and their conditions of service. Stability and independence of labour inspectors. The Committee previously noted the continuous decline in the number of labour inspectors and their heavy workload, as well as issues related to external pressure facing inspectors from both complainants and employers, as documented in the Annual Report for 2017. It requested the Government to take measures to ensure that the number of labour inspectors is sufficient to secure the effective discharge of the duties of the inspectorate, and to provide information on measures taken to address the pressure facing labour inspectors.

The Committee notes the Government’s information that the number of approved posts at the labour inspectorate increased from 106 in 2017 to 121 in 2019, and that recruitment procedures are under way. According to the 2019 Annual Report, there are 120 employees at the labour inspectorate, including 91 inspectors (up from 81 in 2018) and the number of business entities increased from 215,354 in 2018 to 220,236 in 2019. The Annual Report further states that inspectors, in particular those in charge of monitoring working conditions and employment relationships and social affairs, still face difficulties to promptly process all requests. In 2019, the labour inspectorate received 7,215 complaints, of which about 80 per cent fall into the competence of inspectors monitoring working conditions and employment relationships. Information in the 2019 Annual Report also indicates that the number of these inspectors has increased in recent years in response to their heavy workload, but that there has been a decrease in the number of occupational safety and health (OSH) inspectors (from 41 in 2008 to 31 in 2019). In this regard, the Annual Report states that measures will be taken to reinforce OSH inspections.

The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that a risk assessment undertaken of the work of the inspectorate indicated that nearly all employees of the labour inspectorate, and particularly inspectors, are exposed to the risk of third-party violence, due to the nature of their work. In order to address this, the labour inspectorate has taken measures to prevent unauthorized access to its offices, drafted instructions outlining measures to reduce such violence, and organized various lectures and workshops on stress management, communication in difficult situations and other relevant topics. Concerning protection against aggression, certain inspections are carried out by two inspectors or together with other supervisory authorities, and inspectors may also request that police officers be present at the inspection. The Government also indicates that, in addition to the provisions on the independence of inspectors provided for by the IA and the LIA, certain inspections are carried out by inspectors from the head office instead of local units if it is assessed necessary to prevent the external influence from local stakeholders. The Committee also notes that, however, the 2019 Annual Report states that labour inspectors continue to be overwhelmed with the amount of assigned cases and face a significant level of external pressure from both complainants and employers in the form of insults, misconduct and aggressiveness concerning matters beyond their mandate. While taking note of the increase in the number of inspectors from 2017 to 2019, the Committee requests the Government to reinforce its efforts to ensure that the number of labour inspectors is sufficient to secure the effective discharge of the duties of the inspectorate, regarding both inspectors monitoring working conditions and employment relationships and OSH inspectors. It also requests the Government to continue to provide information on the measures taken in this respect. In addition, the Committee urges the Government to strengthen its efforts to address the issues raised in the 2019 Annual Report related to violence, harassment and other external pressure facing labour inspectors, including with a view to ensuring their independence from improper external influences.

Article 12(1)(b) of Convention No. 81 and Article 16(1)(b) of Convention No. 129. Access to workplaces liable to inspection. The Committee previously noted that pursuant to section 21 of the IA regarding business and other premises not belonging to the person liable, persons owning or possessing business premises, production premises or other premises or land can refuse inspectors’ free access under certain conditions. The Committee notes the Government’s explanation in response to its request that an inspection may only be denied in the exceptional cases provided for by section 21 of the IA. The Government also indicates that, if a person unjustifiably refuses to allow an inspection, they may be subject to the same measures as a witness who refuses to testify, and the inspection may be carried out against their will. With reference to its comments above on the LIA and the IA, the Committee notes that the LIA does not contain provisions relating to access to workplaces liable to inspection. The Committee recalls that, by virtue of Article 12(1)(b) of Convention No.81 and Article 16(1)(b) of Convention No.129, labour inspectors should be empowered to enter by day premises which they may have reasonable cause to believe to be liable to inspection in order to efficiently ensure workers’ protection, and that these Articles do not allow for any restrictions. With reference to its General Survey of 2006, Labour Inspection, paragraph 266, the Committee also recalls that restrictions placed in law or in practice on inspectors’ right of entry into workplaces can only stand in the way of achieving the objectives of labour inspection as set out in the Convention. The Committee once again urges the Government to take measures to bring the national legislation into conformity with Article 12 of Convention No. 81 and Article 16 of Convention No. 129 to ensure that that labour inspectors are empowered to enter by day premises which they may have reasonable cause to believe to be liable to inspection. In the meantime, it requests the Government to provide detailed information on the implementation of section 21 of the IA in practice, indicating the number of times that inspectors have been denied access to workplaces under this section, the reasons given for each denial under one or more of the exceptions provided for in section 21, and the outcome of any proceedings reviewing each denial.

The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2018, published 108th ILC session (2019)

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of ratified Conventions on labour inspection, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 81 (labour inspection) and 129 (labour inspection in agriculture) together.

Article 3(1)(a), (b) and (2) of Convention No. 81 and Article 6(1)(a), (b) and (3) of Convention No. 129. Functions entrusted to labour inspectors. 1. Labour inspection activities in the area of undeclared work. The Committee notes the Government’s indication, in reply to its previous comments, that most of the supervision of undeclared work has been transferred to the Financial Administration comprising the Customs Administration (CA) since the adoption of the Prevention of Undeclared Work and Employment Act (PUWEA) in 2014. The Government’s report states that pursuant to the PUWEA, the Labour Inspectorate (LI) only retains the power to supervise violations related to unlawful advertisements for work (section 6(1)); issue a decision prohibiting undeclared work; and inform the CA if there are grounds to suspect undeclared employment (section 19(1) and (5)). As a result, only 18 violations were detected with respect to undeclared work including illegal employment (employment of third-country nationals illegally residing in Slovenia) under the PUWEA. However, the Committee also takes due note that according to the Labour Inspectorate Act (LIA), as amended in 2017, labour inspectors can issue a decision prohibiting workers from carrying out undeclared work until the violation is eliminated (section 19(1)(4)) and order the liable person to conclude a written employment contract within three working days (section 19(2)). According to the annual labour inspection report for 2017 (2017 Annual Report), available on the LI’s website, the labour inspectorate detected 1,732 violations related to employment contracts, of which 176 concerned work based on a civil law contract despite the existence of elements of an employment relationship. Inspectors issued 55 prohibition decisions, and three orders to conclude a written employment contract. The 2017 Annual Report states that inspectors often find it difficult to assess evidence in this regard and the process can be complicated and time-consuming despite the proliferation of such forms of work. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the work of the labour inspectorate with respect to establishing employment relationships for those who engage in undeclared work, specifically with regard to the measures taken when work is based on a civil law contract despite the existence of elements of an employment relationship.

2. Labour inspection activities with regard to foreign workers and the protection of foreign workers in an irregular situation. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the new Employment, Self-employment and Work of Aliens Act (ESWAA) was adopted in 2015 to replace the Employment and Work of Foreigners Act. The LI is empowered to supervise the implementation of the ESWAA, and for this purpose, the LI has direct access to the electronic records of the Employment Service and concerning permits, European Union (EU) Blue Cards, and authorizations (section 44(2)). The Committee notes with concern that labour inspectors can impose fines on foreign workers for the performance of work that violates the ESWAA (sections 51, 60, 61, 63, and 66) and are obliged to inform the police authority when its supervision activities lead to the suspicion of illegal residence of foreigners (section 44(4)). According to the 2017 Annual Report, the LI detected such 45 violations in 2017. In its 2006 General Survey, Labour inspection, paragraph 77, the Committee indicated that the function of verifying the legality of employment should have as its corollary the reinstatement of the statutory rights of all the workers. The Committee also recalls that neither Convention No. 81 nor Convention No. 129 contain any provision suggesting that any worker be excluded from the protection afforded by labour inspection on account of their irregular employment status (paragraph 77). The Committee also observed in its 2017 General Survey on certain occupational safety and health instruments, paragraph 452, that workers in a vulnerable situation may not be willing to cooperate with the labour inspection services if they fear negative consequences as a result of inspection activities, such as the loss of their job or expulsion from the country. The Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that the control duties by the labour inspectorate under the ESWAA do not prejudice the exercise of its primary duty to secure the enforcement of the legal provisions relating to conditions of work and the protection of workers. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on the manner in which the labour inspection services ensure the enforcement of employers’ obligations with regard to the rights of foreign workers, including those in an irregular situation (such as the payment of wages and any other benefits owed for the work they performed).

3. Mediation and conciliation duties. As the Committee previously noted, labour inspectors may offer mediation for the settlement of a dispute between a worker and employer under the Employment Relationship Act (ERA) amended in 2016 (section 216). Noting the inspectors’ workload due to the understaffing of the LI, the Committee notes with interest the newly launched Project on Eliminating Conflict at Work described in the 2017 Annual Report, under which the LI is aiming to promote the use of mediation services provided by mediation institutions. The 2017 Annual Report states that this is part of their efforts to cope with the shortage of staff and the associated workload, by encouraging voluntary prevention and settlement of disputes by employers and workers themselves. This Project will continue until 2022. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the impact of this Project in reducing the proportion of time spent by labour inspectors on mediation. In this respect, it once again requests the Government to indicate the proportion of time devoted to the settlement of disputes pursuant to section 216 of the ERA, compared to the time devoted to the exercise of the primary functions of labour inspectors as defined in Article 3 of Convention No. 81 and Article 6 of Convention No. 129.

4. Creation of the Employment Inspection Service (EIS) under the labour inspectorate in the areas of employment policy measures, including the supervision of employment services, temporary employment agencies, job certification processes and unemployment insurance. The Committee previously requested information on the new inspection service under the Labour Market Regulation Act (LMRA). The Committee notes that inspections of the implementation of the LMRA are carried out by employment inspectors with special powers and responsibilities who are employed by the EIS within the LI (section 150). Noting the heavy workload of the labour inspectorate, the Committee requests the Government to indicate whether employment inspectors are recruited within the current budget of the LI, or newly recruited specialized inspectors with a separate line of budget.

Articles 4 and 5(b) of Convention No. 81 and Articles 7 and 12 of Convention No. 129. Supervision by a central labour inspection authority and effective cooperation between the labour inspectorate and other government services. Referring to its observation regarding legal uncertainty between the LIA and the Inspection Act (IA), the Committee notes the principle of mutual cooperation under section 11 of the IA, providing that the Inspection Council (IC) shall be established as a permanent interministerial working body for the purposes of ensuring mutual coordination of work and achieving greater efficiency in different inspection services. The Committee notes that pursuant to the IA, the IC shall, among others, coordinate the joint implementation of inspection duties of different inspection services and consider common issues relating to the operation of inspection services. The IA further provides that the work of the IC shall be addressed in the procedural rules adopted by the IC in agreement with the Government. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the role that the IC plays in coordinating with the labour inspectorate, including the impact of this coordination on the planning and carrying out of labour inspections as well as any joint inspections undertaken.

Articles 5(a), 17 and 18 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 12, 22, 23 and 24 of Convention No. 129. Effective cooperation between the LI and the justice system and enforcement of administrative penalties. The Committee notes with interest the Government’s indication that the LI, as a minor offence authority, is now empowered to impose minor fines (€1,500–€4,000), in accordance with the ERA. Labour inspectors may choose to take different measures, including administrative and prohibition decisions (written and oral), minor offence decisions with fines or reminders, payment orders, warnings, reporting suspected criminal offences. The Government however states that, with regard to criminal complaints lodged with the State Prosecutor’s Office, labour inspectors do not regularly receive feedback. The Committee requests the Government to provide further information on the measures taken or envisaged to promote effective cooperation between the labour inspection services and the justice system, including the provision of feedback to labour inspectors on the outcome of cases referred to the State Prosecutor’s Office. It once again requests the Government to provide information on the outcome of the cases referred to the justice system by the labour inspectorate (number of convictions in relation to the infringements reported, nature of sanctions applied and amount of fines imposed). The Committee also asks the Government to indicate the impact of inspectors’ powers to impose fines against minor offences on the work of the LI.

Articles 6 and 11 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 15 and 20(a) of Convention No. 129. Costs for inspection procedures imposed on liable persons. The Committee notes that the IA obliges the person in breach of the laws or any other regulations to cover the cost of inspection procedures in establishing facts and evidence (section 31). The 2017 Annual Report indicates that in 2017, the LI’s non-tax revenues through fines for minor offences, court fees, procedural costs, administrative fees and others accounted for €3,286,057 in claims. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the budget of the LI, including the proportion of revenues obtained through charging inspection costs.

Article 16 of Convention No. 81 and Article 21 of Convention No. 129. Adequacy and frequency of labour inspection visits. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the LI conducts regular inspections, reactive inspections based on complaints, and control visits to follow up on a previous decision. Referring to its observation, however, the Committee notes the low proportion of regular inspections performed by the LI reported in the 2017 Annual Report. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the number of labour inspections carried out, disaggregating unannounced regular inspections from complaint-based reactive inspections, as well as the coverage of workplaces under unannounced regular inspections disaggregated by sectors, size of establishments, and subjects of inspections.

Article 20 of Convention No. 81 and Article 26 of Convention No. 129. Annual inspection report. The Committee notes that the annual reports on the activities of the labour inspectorate, while available on the LI’s website, have not been communicated to the ILO since 2015. The Committee requests the Government to take measures to ensure that annual labour inspection reports are transmitted to the ILO, in accordance with Article 20 of Convention No. 81 and Article 26 of Convention No. 129.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2018, published 108th ILC session (2019)

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of ratified Conventions on labour inspection, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 81 (labour inspection) and 129 (labour inspection in agriculture) together.

Legislation. The Committee previously noted the overlapping provisions of the Labour Inspection Act (LIA) and the Inspection Act (IA) (which applies to all supervisory bodies, not only the labour inspectorate). It noted that section 3 of the IA provides that in the event of conflicting provisions, other laws take precedence over the IA. It noted, however, that legal uncertainty remained with respect to a number of important issues covered by Convention No. 81, and requested the Government to provide information on steps taken to provide greater certainty regarding the applicable provisions concerning labour inspection. In this respect, the Committee notes a series of amendments to labour legislation in recent years that reshape the mandate and functions of the labour inspectorate, including further amendments to the LIA in 2017, the 2016 amendments to the Employment Relationship Act (ERA), as well as the adoption of the Employment, Self-employment and Work of Aliens Act (ESWLA) and the Prevention of Undeclared Work and Employment Act (PUWEA). It notes with concern that, despite legislative reforms in recent years, legal uncertainty remains due to conflicting or overlapping provisions of the LIA and IA, with respect to, among others, preventative measures by inspectors, qualifications for inspectors, the requirement for liable employers to cover the costs of inspection, inspectors’ free access to workplaces without prior notice with certain exceptions, inspection procedures and their costs. The Committee further notes that the labour inspectorate (LI) is proposing various amendments to the new LIA, described in detail in the annual labour inspection report for 2017 (2017 Annual Report) available on the LI’s website, some of which were transmitted to the Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities at the end of 2017. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the extent to which labour inspectors are bound by the general principles established under the IA as well as how the overlapping or conflicting provisions under the IA and the LIA are applied in practice to the daily work of labour inspectors. In this respect, it requests the Government to clearly identify the provisions of the IA from which labour inspection is excluded, in light of the exception stated in section 3 of the IA, and to provide any judicial decisions or official guidance issued in that respect.

Articles 6, 10 and 16 of Convention No. 81 and Articles 8, 14, and 21 of Convention No. 129. Number of labour inspectors and their conditions of service. Stability and independence of labour inspectors. The Committee previously noted a decline in the number of labour inspectors (from 88 in 2011 to 81 in 2013). It notes with concern, that according to the 2017 Annual Report, the number has continued to drop to 77 in 2017 (41 labour inspectors for general labour conditions and employment relationships, 31 for occupational safety and health and five for social protection and security). The 2017 Annual Report states that this occurred despite an increase of 40,000 registered business entities since 2008 and additional duties being mandated to labour inspectors under the new LIA. In 2017, labour inspectors performed a total of 14,541 inspections (7,649 in the area of labour conditions and employment relationships; 6,659 on occupational safety and health and 233 on social protection), which resulted in the detection of a total of 29,513 violations. The Committee further notes with concern that the 2017 Annual Report states that labour inspectors are overwhelmed with the amount of assigned cases, and face a significant level of external pressure from both complainants and employers in the form of insults, misconduct, and aggressiveness concerning matters beyond their mandate. Noting the continuous decline in the number of labour inspectors and their heavy workload, as documented in the 2017 Annual Report, the Committee requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that the number of labour inspectors is sufficient to secure the effective discharge of the duties of the inspectorate. It requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken in this respect, as well as measures taken or envisaged to address the issues raised in the 2017 Annual Report related to the pressure facing labour inspectors, including with a view to ensuring their independence from improper external influences.

Article 12(1)(b) of Convention No. 81 and Article 16(1)(b) of Convention No. 129. Access to workplaces liable to inspection. The Committee previously noted that pursuant to section 21 of the IA, persons owning or possessing business premises, production premises or other premises or land can refuse inspectors’ free access under certain conditions. However, it also noted the Government’s indication that in practice, no cases had been recorded where the entry to workplaces had been refused by reason of section 21. The Committee urges the Government to take measures to bring the national legislation into conformity with Article 12 of Convention No. 81 and Article 16 of Convention No. 129 to ensure that that labour inspectors are empowered to enter by day premises which they may have reasonable cause to believe to be liable to inspection.

The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.

Replies received to the issues raised in a direct request which do not give rise to further comments (CEACR) - adopted 2014, published 104th ILC session (2015)

The Committee notes the information provided by the Government, which answers the points raised in its previous direct request and has no further matters to raise in this regard.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2012, published 102nd ILC session (2013)

With reference to its comments under the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), the Committee would be grateful if the Government would communicate the requested information in so far as labour inspection in agriculture is specifically concerned. The Committee also draws the Government’s attention to the following points.

Article 6(1)(b) of the Convention. Giving advice and information as preventative functions. The Committee notes with interest the information provided in the partial annual report of 2009 and the OSH Strategy for the period 2009–12, which are available on the governmental website of the Slovenian Ministry of Labour, Family and Social Affairs, according to which the labour inspectorate will be involved in preventative activities such as awareness-raising campaigns, exchange of good practice, the control of compulsory workers’ training by employers and the control of risk assessment obligations. The Committee would be grateful to the Government if it would keep the Office informed as to how this strategy is being implemented in the agricultural sector in particular.

Article 9(3). Adequate training of labour inspectors in agriculture. The Committee observes that, in accordance with section 12 of the Inspection Act, labour inspectors shall be trained on a regular basis in accordance with a training programme. Highlighting the importance for labour inspectors to have appropriate and continuous training, the Committee would be grateful to learn more about the existence and the implementation of such a training programme in practice. It also notes from the Government’s report that there are no labour inspection staff being specially qualified for labour inspection in agriculture.

The Committee requests the Government to indicate to what extent the inspection work in the agricultural sector is taken into account by such a training programme and how labour inspectors are prepared for performing inspections in the agricultural sector in particular.

Articles 26 and 27. Preparation of an annual inspection report and contents to be covered. The Committee takes note of the further statistical information provided in response to its previous direct request. However, it notes that statistics on the number of agricultural undertakings liable to inspection, as well as persons working therein, are yet to be provided.

With reference to its general observation of 2009 on the importance of statistics of industrial and commercial workplaces liable to inspection and of the number of workers covered, the Committee recalls that such data is essential for the assessment of the rate of coverage by labour inspection services and for the evaluation of the budgetary resources allocated to this public function. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would indicate the measures taken or envisaged in order to integrate within the annual report detailed information on the number of workplaces liable to inspection and workers employed therein.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2010, published 100th ILC session (2011)

The Committee takes note of the Government’s report which was received on 14 October 2009. In addition, further to its comments made under Convention No. 81, the Committee would like to raise the following question.

Articles 19 and 27(f) of the Convention. Statistics on occupational accidents and diseases. The Committee notes with interest the indication by the Government that no fatal accident at work took place in agriculture and forestry in 2008, nor by the end of May 2009. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would indicate whether and, in which manner, the work of the labour inspectors has contributed to such progress.

Articles 26 and 27. Submission and content of annual report. The Committee notes that an extensive and detailed annual labour inspection report for 2008 is available on the Internet in Slovenian and takes due note of the statistical information provided in the Government’s report on the number of inspections carried out and decisions issued by the labour inspection service in agriculture between 2005 and 2008. It also notes from the Government’s report, however, that there is no data on the number of labour inspectors performing inspections in the area of agriculture.

The Committee recalls that the annual report on labour inspection activities in agriculture should contain information on each of the subjects listed in Article 21, including data on the staff of the labour inspection service in agriculture (clause (b)) as well as the agricultural undertakings liable to inspection and the persons working therein (clause (c)). The Committee draws the Government’s attention to its 2009 general observation on the need to give effect to clause (c) for the labour inspection central authority to be in a position to evaluate the coverage and implementation of the Convention in practice.

The Committee would be grateful if the Government would regularly furnish in its reports on the application of this Convention, a summary of the data contained in the annual report with regard to the issues listed in clauses (b)–(g) of Article 27. Noting, moreover, that the Government’s report includes among the activities carried out by labour inspectors in agriculture the registration and “revocation” of aliens, the Committee would be grateful if more details would be provided by the Government on the specific functions carried out by the labour inspectors in this regard and their result.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2008, published 98th ILC session (2009)

With reference also to its observation and to its request under Convention No. 81 concerning labour inspection staff, the Committee draws the Government’s attention to the following point.

Articles 9 and 14 of the Convention. Labour inspection staff. The Committee observes that, in line with the policy to reduce the number of public service staff, the number of inspectors (83) has not increased during the last two years, despite the new responsibilities they face with regard to misdemeanours. According to the Government, the difficulty in recruiting qualified staff is due to the lack of interest in the job shown by young law graduates or persons with other specialist technical qualifications, who are already rare on the labour market. The Committee hopes that the Government will therefore take the necessary steps to improve the status of the post of labour inspector and make it more attractive, particularly by improving conditions of service (remuneration, career prospects, conditions of work, etc.), and also to provide for the training of specialists (lawyers, engineers, chemists, etc.) in sufficient numbers to allow the recruitment of duly qualified men and women inspectors. It requests the Government to keep the Office informed of measures taken or contemplated to this end and the results achieved.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2008, published 98th ILC session (2009)

The Committee notes the detailed information on the specific activities of the labour inspectorate in agriculture contained in the Government’s report and also in the annual inspection reports sent to the Office.

Article 6, paragraphs 1(a) and (b), of the Convention. Prevention and enforcement activities of the labour inspectorate. The Committee notes with interest the developments which have occurred in the working of the labour inspection system in agriculture and forestry. It notes in particular with satisfaction the implementation of a number of measures which have contributed towards improving the level of protection of workers in recent years. These measures include the expansion of information and advisory activities by inspectors, the adoption of instructions relating to the formulation of occupational safety policies, the definition of procedures for the assessment of occupational risks and also training activities organized by agricultural advisers from the Chamber of Agriculture and Forestry. Moreover, two specific campaigns have been undertaken: in 2005, on the use of agricultural machinery and equipment and the protection of young workers; and in 2006 on monitoring the application of legal provisions relating to occupational safety and health in agricultural undertakings. The Committee also welcomes the fact that agricultural subsidies are dependent on observance of a number of safety and health conditions. The Committee requests the Government to continue supplying information on the labour inspection activities specifically targeting occupational safety and health in agricultural and forestry undertakings and to indicate whether inspection campaigns have taken place or are planned to ensure the enforcement of the legal provisions relating to the general conditions of work of agricultural workers (wages, hours of work, holidays, etc.).

The Committee is also addressing a request directly to the Government with regard to another point.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2007, published 97th ILC session (2008)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee notes the Government’s report on the application of the Convention for the period between 31 May 2002 and 31 May 2005. It notes with interest that the annual report on the work and activities of the labour inspectorate contains distinct and detailed information on the subjects covered by Article 27 of the Convention, as well as relevant analyses and recommendations to improve the operation of inspection in agriculture.

1. Articles 14 and 6, paragraph (3) of the Convention. Inadequacy of labour inspection personnel and other duties entrusted to inspectors. With reference to its comment under Convention No. 81 concerning the inadequacy of the human, material and logistical resources of the single inspection system, the Committee emphasizes the need to ensure that the resources and means of action of the labour inspectorate are devoted principally to the duties determined in the relevant Conventions that have been ratified. As the same inspectors are competent in all sectors, it is therefore indispensable for the Government to envisage taking measures to relieve them of any other duties which may prejudice the discharge of their inspection duties, the nature and complexity of which require total availability. Furthermore, as mobility is an even greater requirement for the discharge of inspection functions in agriculture, in view of the distance and dispersion of the workplaces liable to inspection, it is necessary for specific transport facilities to be made available to inspectors. The Committee would be grateful if the Government, with a view to the implementation of the present Convention, would adopt the measures called for under Convention No. 81 and would provide relevant information in its next report.

2. Article 6, paragraph 1(b), and Paragraph 2(a) of Recommendation No. 133. Technical information and advice and training functions. The Committee notes from the annual activity report for 2004 that, following an inspection campaign carried out between July and September 2002 on safety and health in agricultural activities, the inspectors considered that the primary obstacle to the application of the relevant legal provisions, particularly in small farms, remains the low level of knowledge of farmers both with regard to the law and basic principles. This is due, firstly, to the scarcity of information and documentation to which they have access and, secondly, the inadequacy of the practical training provided to workers. In large farms, while the testing and controls of work equipment are carried out suitably by the employer, shortcomings have nevertheless been noted in the field of organization. Following the campaign, the inspectors therefore considered it necessary to provide farmers with educational and training services in the field of occupational safety and health, with specific measures being required in relation to owner-occupiers. Noting that efforts in relation to labour inspection in agriculture were planned for 2005, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would keep the ILO informed of the measures adopted to develop the provision to the employers and workers concerned of technical information and advice to ensure occupational safety and health, and if it would provide information on the progress achieved and, where appropriate, the difficulties encountered in the application of the Convention in this respect.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2006, published 96th ILC session (2007)

The Committee notes the Government’s report on the application of the Convention for the period between 31 May 2002 and 31 May 2005. It notes with interest that the annual report on the work and activities of the labour inspectorate contains distinct and detailed information on the subjects covered by Article 27 of the Convention, as well as relevant analyses and recommendations to improve the operation of inspection in agriculture.

1. Articles 14 and 6, paragraph (3) of the Convention. Inadequacy of labour inspection personnel and other duties entrusted to inspectors. With reference to its comment under Convention No. 81 concerning the inadequacy of the human, material and logistical resources of the single inspection system, the Committee emphasizes the need to ensure that the resources and means of action of the labour inspectorate are devoted principally to the duties determined in the relevant Conventions that have been ratified. As the same inspectors are competent in all sectors, it is therefore indispensable for the Government to envisage taking measures to relieve them of any other duties which may prejudice the discharge of their inspection duties, the nature and complexity of which require total availability. Furthermore, as mobility is an even greater requirement for the discharge of inspection functions in agriculture, in view of the distance and dispersion of the workplaces liable to inspection, it is necessary for specific transport facilities to be made available to inspectors. The Committee would be grateful if the Government, with a view to the implementation of the present Convention, would adopt the measures called for under Convention No. 81 and would provide relevant information in its next report.

2. Article 6, paragraph 1(b), and Paragraph 2(a) of Recommendation No. 133. Technical information and advice and training functions. The Committee notes from the annual activity report for 2004 that, following an inspection campaign carried out between July and September 2002 on safety and health in agricultural activities, the inspectors considered that the primary obstacle to the application of the relevant legal provisions, particularly in small farms, remains the low level of knowledge of farmers both with regard to the law and basic principles. This is due, firstly, to the scarcity of information and documentation to which they have access and, secondly, the inadequacy of the practical training provided to workers. In large farms, while the testing and controls of work equipment are carried out suitably by the employer, shortcomings have nevertheless been noted in the field of organization. Following the campaign, the inspectors therefore considered it necessary to provide farmers with educational and training services in the field of occupational safety and health, with specific measures being required in relation to owner-occupiers. Noting that efforts in relation to labour inspection in agriculture were planned for 2005, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would keep the ILO informed of the measures adopted to develop the provision to the employers and workers concerned of technical information and advice to ensure occupational safety and health, and if it would provide information on the progress achieved and, where appropriate, the difficulties encountered in the application of the Convention in this respect.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1994, published 81st ILC session (1994)

The Committee notes the information contained in the Government's report regarding the legislation ensuring the continued application of the Convention. It would be grateful if the Government would provide information on the practical application of the different Articles of the Convention in the form approved by the Governing Body. It also hopes that annual reports on the activities of the inspection services as required by Articles 26 and 27 of the Convention will be provided.