|
| The complainant alleges that the enterprise CODELCO, pursuant to provisions of the Labour Code which are not in conformity with Conventions Nos 87 and 98, has excluded workers with temporary contracts for work or for services, and also those serving as superintendents or directors, from collective bargaining; discourages exercise of the right to organize, in that non-union workers, who enjoy the benefits stipulated in a collective instrument, are obliged to pay 75 per cent of the ordinary monthly union dues; and outlawed a work stoppage called in response to the policy implemented by the state enterprise to impose its transformation plans, because they are outside the collective bargaining process |
|