Display in: French - Spanish
Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body
Effect given to the recommendations of the committee and the Governing Body- 43. The Committee last examined this case at its October 2017 meeting
[see 383rd Report, paras 47–49]. On that occasion, the Committee regretted that, more
than four years after the dismissal of workers affiliated with the Koa Modas Union of
Workers, the salaries due to the reinstated workers had still not been paid, and urged
the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that those payments were made as
soon as possible.
- 44. In communications dated 1 February, 15 May and 27 December 2019, 27
November and 2 December 2020, 5 May 2021, 16 December 2022, and 27 April and 30 August
2023, the Government provided information in response to the above recommendation,
indicating that, as of 9 December 2019, the salaries and other labour benefits owed to
25 of the workers reinstated in accordance with the corresponding reinstatement orders
had not yet been paid. The Government also submits the observations of the Association
of the Garment and Textile Industry (VESTEX), which indicates that, as of 19 November
2020, the process relating to the claim for payment of wages not received during the
time the workers were away from their jobs was being processed in the labour courts. In
this regard, VESTEX further indicates that the company offered payment agreements
through conciliation. Furthermore, the Government reports that, on 2 February 2019,
criminal proceedings were initiated before the Criminal Court of Mixco against the chair
of the company’s board of directors for failure to pay a fine imposed in connection with
labour incidents, and that those proceedings are pending resolution.
- 45. The Committee notes with regret that more than 11 years after the
dismissal of the above-mentioned workers and more than 7 years after their
reinstatement, 25 of them have still not been paid their due salaries and benefits, and
that legal proceedings in this regard are still pending. In this regard, the Committee
recalls that justice delayed is justice denied [see Compilation of decisions of the
Committee on Freedom of Association, sixth edition, 2018, para. 170]. The Committee also
recalls that it has ruled on allegations concerning compliance with judicial orders of
reinstatement on several occasions in other cases concerning the Government of Guatemala
(see Case No. 3251, 400th Report, October 2022, paragraph 379; Case No. 2948, 382nd
Report, June 2017, paragraph 379; Case No. 3062, 376th Report, October 2015, paragraph
585; Case No. 3042, 376th Report, October 2015, paragraph 568) and that the road map
adopted by the Government in October 2013 as a result of the complaint regarding
Guatemala’s non-observance of Convention No. 87, made under article 26 of the ILO
Constitution, highlighted the importance and urgency of complying with and enforcing
labour court rulings with the aim of strengthening the rule of law in the country.
Recalling that in many cases, the Committee has requested the government to ensure that
the persons in question are reinstated in their jobs without loss of pay or compensation
[see Compilation, para. 1168], the Committee firmly expects that the pending appeals
concerning the payment of salaries and benefits owed to reinstated workers will be
resolved in accordance with these criteria.
- 46. Furthermore, the Committee recalls that in its last examination of
this case, it had received from the Government a report of the Committee for the
Settlement of Disputes before the ILO in the Area of Freedom of Association and
Collective Bargaining (now called the Sub-Committee on Conflict Resolution of the
National Tripartite Committee on Labour Relations and Freedom of Association (CNTRLLS)),
to which the case had been referred. In view of the above, the Committee encourages the
Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that, through the Sub-Committee on
Conflict Resolution of the CNTRLLS, the payment of the salaries and benefits owed to the
25 workers mentioned above is followed up, with a view to ensuring that it is made as
soon as possible.
- 47. In these circumstances, and in the absence of new information from
the complainant organization since 2013, the Committee considers that this case is
closed and does not call for further examination.